<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Thread * &#8220;24&#8243; is Back!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/23/open-thread-24-is-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/23/open-thread-24-is-back/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:32:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Janeane Garofalo&#8217;s Convenient Ethic$ : NO QUARTER</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/23/open-thread-24-is-back/#comment-1191688</link>
		<dc:creator>Janeane Garofalo&#8217;s Convenient Ethic$ : NO QUARTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6909#comment-1191688</guid>
		<description>[...] year, I wrote an article about &#8220;24,&#8221; based on the extraordinary dissection of the series&#8217; ethical problems by New Yorker [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year, I wrote an article about &#8220;24,&#8221; based on the extraordinary dissection of the series&#8217; ethical problems by New Yorker [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/23/open-thread-24-is-back/#comment-1059896</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6909#comment-1059896</guid>
		<description>Say what you want about 24 and their creators 
(I probably agree w/it all) BUT...BUT I am just now watching the taped program and 

THEY PRESIDENT ELECT in it is a WOMAN and a SENATOR 
(Senator &quot;Taylor&quot;)

HA !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say what you want about 24 and their creators<br />
(I probably agree w/it all) BUT&#8230;BUT I am just now watching the taped program and </p>
<p>THEY PRESIDENT ELECT in it is a WOMAN and a SENATOR<br />
(Senator &#8220;Taylor&#8221;)</p>
<p>HA !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdona</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/23/open-thread-24-is-back/#comment-1059021</link>
		<dc:creator>jdona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6909#comment-1059021</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll watch absolutely anything that has Keifer Sutherland in it. That guy is a great actor and has a voice that is like velvet.  I loved the season with Jean Smart in it as First Lady, she and Gregory Itzen as the Prez were can&#039;t miss TV.  They added something to this show that had been lacking.  Pity they couldn&#039;t keep them going. Some may ridicule the show, but I am a fan, so have fun with it your way and I will be glued to the TV when it comes on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll watch absolutely anything that has Keifer Sutherland in it. That guy is a great actor and has a voice that is like velvet.  I loved the season with Jean Smart in it as First Lady, she and Gregory Itzen as the Prez were can&#8217;t miss TV.  They added something to this show that had been lacking.  Pity they couldn&#8217;t keep them going. Some may ridicule the show, but I am a fan, so have fun with it your way and I will be glued to the TV when it comes on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mimi</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/23/open-thread-24-is-back/#comment-1058842</link>
		<dc:creator>mimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6909#comment-1058842</guid>
		<description>Touchet,

Read my comments up thread.

Yes, 24 is &lt;em&gt;agit-prop&lt;/em&gt;. Always has been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Touchet,</p>
<p>Read my comments up thread.</p>
<p>Yes, 24 is <em>agit-prop</em>. Always has been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mimi</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/23/open-thread-24-is-back/#comment-1058838</link>
		<dc:creator>mimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6909#comment-1058838</guid>
		<description>If you know nothing, know this:

&lt;strong&gt;Hollywood is filled with hypocrites!&lt;/strong&gt;

And the do it with a straight face under the guise of &lt;em&gt;ars gratia artis.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you know nothing, know this:</p>
<p><strong>Hollywood is filled with hypocrites!</strong></p>
<p>And the do it with a straight face under the guise of <em>ars gratia artis.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mimi</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/23/open-thread-24-is-back/#comment-1058837</link>
		<dc:creator>mimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6909#comment-1058837</guid>
		<description>Making fun of it does not diminish the fact that 24 is nothing but  &lt;em&gt;agit-prop&lt;/em&gt; and therefore dangerous to the hoardes of people who watch the show and don&#039;t understand the serious implications of that.

Thank 24 for paving the way to an acceptance of a black POTUS. The first seasons revolved around a black president and those first seasons, which were the best, were hugely popular.

It&#039;s too bad that people underestimate the power of film as a tool of &lt;em&gt;mind control&lt;/em&gt;. No,  film can&#039;t &lt;em&gt;make&lt;/em&gt; someone do something, hypnosis can&#039;t either, btw, but it can influence the way one perceives the world to a fair extent.

The actor, Denis Haysbert, who played the 24 president was extremely popular and charismatic in the role at a time in the series when it was new and fresh to the public.  Keifer Sutherland was also charismatic and powerful as Jack Bauer and he drew a lot of fans into the world of 24.

Of course now, the series has run its course and people are mocking it. And yes, now it&#039;s lost its power and influence, for the most part. 

But I think people would be surprised at the role, no matter how small, 24 played in shaping the ultimate result of this election.

So it makes me just a bit of uncomfortable seeing images of young African kids with gun and forced to fight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Making fun of it does not diminish the fact that 24 is nothing but  <em>agit-prop</em> and therefore dangerous to the hoardes of people who watch the show and don&#8217;t understand the serious implications of that.</p>
<p>Thank 24 for paving the way to an acceptance of a black POTUS. The first seasons revolved around a black president and those first seasons, which were the best, were hugely popular.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s too bad that people underestimate the power of film as a tool of <em>mind control</em>. No,  film can&#8217;t <em>make</em> someone do something, hypnosis can&#8217;t either, btw, but it can influence the way one perceives the world to a fair extent.</p>
<p>The actor, Denis Haysbert, who played the 24 president was extremely popular and charismatic in the role at a time in the series when it was new and fresh to the public.  Keifer Sutherland was also charismatic and powerful as Jack Bauer and he drew a lot of fans into the world of 24.</p>
<p>Of course now, the series has run its course and people are mocking it. And yes, now it&#8217;s lost its power and influence, for the most part. </p>
<p>But I think people would be surprised at the role, no matter how small, 24 played in shaping the ultimate result of this election.</p>
<p>So it makes me just a bit of uncomfortable seeing images of young African kids with gun and forced to fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mimi</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/23/open-thread-24-is-back/#comment-1058822</link>
		<dc:creator>mimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6909#comment-1058822</guid>
		<description>All I can say to Hillary is: &lt;em&gt;&quot;Good, girl!&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

I don&#039;t blame her for being punitive. What they did to her that was so damaging was to provide &lt;em&gt;cover &lt;/em&gt;for 0bama&#039;s total lack of credentials in the area of foreign policy.

The idea that these critics would say something like: &lt;em&gt;&quot;She never answered a 3am call,&quot;&lt;/em&gt; is patently absurd. 

She was the First Lady.

It would have been totally inappropriate for her to answer a 3am call. 

I never got the impression that Hillary was trying to imply that she was actively engaged in making foreign policy. I think the point was that as the wife of the POTUS she was his main adviser because of her intelligence and his respect for her point of view. Therefore, she was privy more on a personal level to what was going on in her husband&#039;s administration. 

I remember Clinton received a lot of bad press over the perceived notion that his was a co-presidency. And so a Clinton had to work at the appearance that Hillary was not helping him to make policy. This may be the reason she didn&#039;t sit in on any foreign policy meetings or that she didn&#039;t have security clearance.

But we&#039;ll never know what the two of them discussed privately, just like any other president and First Lady. How much did Nancy Reagan know, after she worked overtime at covering her husband&#039;s early stage of Alzheimer&#039;s?

Hillary is probably bitched at the way these people trashed her. I know I would be. They belittled her in ways that made her out to be a Liar, while 0bama got a pass on all fronts about his lies and the inflation of his resume.

And wasn&#039;t Susan Rice the person who talked Bill Clinton into not going after 0sama bin Laden?

Frankly, I don&#039;t want her anywhere near the State Dept or NSC after that colossal blunder. She should be kicked to the curb.

It&#039;s clear that these people have a personal grudge against Hillary. I don&#039;t blame her for wanting them out.

What&#039;s interesting is that 0bama seems to be agreeing with these terms. They can blame Hillary all they want but 0bama&#039;s agreeing so, so much for his loyalty to them. I&#039;m sure he feels they&#039;re indispensible because of the way they turned on the Clintons. If they did it to them, they will do it to him.

I like that Hillary is playing hardball. It means she will go down swinging. I also feel it&#039;s very telling that 0bama is going for her terms. I don&#039;t think this is just a case of him wanting her out of the Senate. Even though he is accomplishing this fact, if she fails as SoS, it will be his failure since he chose her and accepted her terms.

He can&#039;t win no matter how this turns out. And if his domestic policy is fraught with difficulty, the last thing he&#039;ll need is for Hillary to fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I can say to Hillary is: <em>&#8220;Good, girl!&#8221;</em></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t blame her for being punitive. What they did to her that was so damaging was to provide <em>cover </em>for 0bama&#8217;s total lack of credentials in the area of foreign policy.</p>
<p>The idea that these critics would say something like: <em>&#8220;She never answered a 3am call,&#8221;</em> is patently absurd. </p>
<p>She was the First Lady.</p>
<p>It would have been totally inappropriate for her to answer a 3am call. </p>
<p>I never got the impression that Hillary was trying to imply that she was actively engaged in making foreign policy. I think the point was that as the wife of the POTUS she was his main adviser because of her intelligence and his respect for her point of view. Therefore, she was privy more on a personal level to what was going on in her husband&#8217;s administration. </p>
<p>I remember Clinton received a lot of bad press over the perceived notion that his was a co-presidency. And so a Clinton had to work at the appearance that Hillary was not helping him to make policy. This may be the reason she didn&#8217;t sit in on any foreign policy meetings or that she didn&#8217;t have security clearance.</p>
<p>But we&#8217;ll never know what the two of them discussed privately, just like any other president and First Lady. How much did Nancy Reagan know, after she worked overtime at covering her husband&#8217;s early stage of Alzheimer&#8217;s?</p>
<p>Hillary is probably bitched at the way these people trashed her. I know I would be. They belittled her in ways that made her out to be a Liar, while 0bama got a pass on all fronts about his lies and the inflation of his resume.</p>
<p>And wasn&#8217;t Susan Rice the person who talked Bill Clinton into not going after 0sama bin Laden?</p>
<p>Frankly, I don&#8217;t want her anywhere near the State Dept or NSC after that colossal blunder. She should be kicked to the curb.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s clear that these people have a personal grudge against Hillary. I don&#8217;t blame her for wanting them out.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s interesting is that 0bama seems to be agreeing with these terms. They can blame Hillary all they want but 0bama&#8217;s agreeing so, so much for his loyalty to them. I&#8217;m sure he feels they&#8217;re indispensible because of the way they turned on the Clintons. If they did it to them, they will do it to him.</p>
<p>I like that Hillary is playing hardball. It means she will go down swinging. I also feel it&#8217;s very telling that 0bama is going for her terms. I don&#8217;t think this is just a case of him wanting her out of the Senate. Even though he is accomplishing this fact, if she fails as SoS, it will be his failure since he chose her and accepted her terms.</p>
<p>He can&#8217;t win no matter how this turns out. And if his domestic policy is fraught with difficulty, the last thing he&#8217;ll need is for Hillary to fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FenelonSpoke</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/23/open-thread-24-is-back/#comment-1058778</link>
		<dc:creator>FenelonSpoke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6909#comment-1058778</guid>
		<description>Never saw 24. Never saw most &quot;hot shows&quot; on T.V. I usually watch an hour of TV a week or less and that is usually PBS. I also don&#039;t get cable. That makes me  a real weirdo. ;^)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never saw 24. Never saw most &#8220;hot shows&#8221; on T.V. I usually watch an hour of TV a week or less and that is usually PBS. I also don&#8217;t get cable. That makes me  a real weirdo. ;^)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Touchet</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/23/open-thread-24-is-back/#comment-1058490</link>
		<dc:creator>Touchet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6909#comment-1058490</guid>
		<description>You guys do realize that this show in &#039;africa&#039; is propaganda to get you ready for our forces to go into africa and do the same thing we did in the middle east.  They have already started talking about it on the news.  You know those &quot;pirates&quot; that are a &#039;threat to the american economy&quot;.  Its all part of the show for the mindless who voted for Obama.

This PROVES to me beyond any shadow of a doubt that our elections are a sham.  All completely set up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys do realize that this show in &#8216;africa&#8217; is propaganda to get you ready for our forces to go into africa and do the same thing we did in the middle east.  They have already started talking about it on the news.  You know those &#8220;pirates&#8221; that are a &#8216;threat to the american economy&#8221;.  Its all part of the show for the mindless who voted for Obama.</p>
<p>This PROVES to me beyond any shadow of a doubt that our elections are a sham.  All completely set up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JozefAL</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/23/open-thread-24-is-back/#comment-1058484</link>
		<dc:creator>JozefAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6909#comment-1058484</guid>
		<description>I got over 24 after last season.  I watched it, hoping that it would improve over the previous season, but no.  It just got worse. 
The series&#039; best moment:  Showing us that we could have an African-American President who actually could handle the office and acted responsibly, even in the face of intense opposition.  (Gods, I wished that President David Palmer had been the commander-in-chief instead of the one we were stuck with in reality.)
My biggest problem with the show:  In the span of six seasons, the program gave us 3 different Presidents (well, technically 4--the President in Season 1 wasn&#039;t really involved) but virtually every Season seemed to be set in the &quot;present&quot; day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got over 24 after last season.  I watched it, hoping that it would improve over the previous season, but no.  It just got worse.<br />
The series&#8217; best moment:  Showing us that we could have an African-American President who actually could handle the office and acted responsibly, even in the face of intense opposition.  (Gods, I wished that President David Palmer had been the commander-in-chief instead of the one we were stuck with in reality.)<br />
My biggest problem with the show:  In the span of six seasons, the program gave us 3 different Presidents (well, technically 4&#8211;the President in Season 1 wasn&#8217;t really involved) but virtually every Season seemed to be set in the &#8220;present&#8221; day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeakWoodKite</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/23/open-thread-24-is-back/#comment-1058481</link>
		<dc:creator>TeakWoodKite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6909#comment-1058481</guid>
		<description>Seattle I watched every season back to back last year and after a while I was getting a PTSD effect. The theme music pounding in my head...

I like the show but how many times can Los Angeles get blown up? 
:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seattle I watched every season back to back last year and after a while I was getting a PTSD effect. The theme music pounding in my head&#8230;</p>
<p>I like the show but how many times can Los Angeles get blown up?<br />
 <img src='http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeakWoodKite</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/23/open-thread-24-is-back/#comment-1058457</link>
		<dc:creator>TeakWoodKite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6909#comment-1058457</guid>
		<description>Very interesting Galt...

Can I get some Pizza to go and case of Moosehead for WildChild,KathyNeocon,tampagurl, OBAMA IS A FRAUD,AngryWhitePerson,Seattle Moss,Ferd Berfle and a few others?

They are around the corner at that bar of NewHampsters, called &quot;The Future Looks Bleak&quot; (for the good ol US of A) having a dwarf throwing contest and they look like they are getting hungry.

(No disrespect to dwarfs in general.)
Reminded me of the good ol days. Can I run a tab? I might be back for more.

I know the sign on the wall said &quot;In The One we DON&#039;t Trust all others pay cash&quot;....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting Galt&#8230;</p>
<p>Can I get some Pizza to go and case of Moosehead for WildChild,KathyNeocon,tampagurl, OBAMA IS A FRAUD,AngryWhitePerson,Seattle Moss,Ferd Berfle and a few others?</p>
<p>They are around the corner at that bar of NewHampsters, called &#8220;The Future Looks Bleak&#8221; (for the good ol US of A) having a dwarf throwing contest and they look like they are getting hungry.</p>
<p>(No disrespect to dwarfs in general.)<br />
Reminded me of the good ol days. Can I run a tab? I might be back for more.</p>
<p>I know the sign on the wall said &#8220;In The One we DON&#8217;t Trust all others pay cash&#8221;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galt's Pizza Parlor</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/23/open-thread-24-is-back/#comment-1058428</link>
		<dc:creator>Galt's Pizza Parlor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6909#comment-1058428</guid>
		<description>Citizen Wells has an &lt;a href=&quot;http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/11/23/obama-natural-born-citizen-leo-donofrio-explains-donofrio-lawsuit-us-supreme-court-appeal-obama-not-eligible-obamas-father-kenyan-donofrio-interprets-constitution/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;excellent post&lt;/a&gt; about the Donofrio case. Here is an excerpt:

&lt;blockquote&gt;There has been much confusion regarding Barack Obama’s eligibility and the aspect of Leo Donofrio’s lawsuit that sets it apart is his claim that Obama does not meet the constitutional definition of Natural Born Citizen. Here is an explanation from Leo Donofrio:

“Don’t be distracted by the birth certificate and Indonesia issues. They are irrelevant to Senator Obama’s ineligibility to be President. Since Barack Obama’s father was a Citizen of Kenya and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of Senator Obama’s birth, then Senator Obama was a British Citizen “at birth”, just like the Framers of the Constitution, and therefore, even if he were to produce an original birth certificate proving he were born on US soil, he still wouldn’t be eligible to be President.

The Framers of the Constitution, at the time of their birth, were also British Citizens and that’s why the Framers declared that, while they were Citizens of the United States, they themselves were not “natural born Citizens”.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citizen Wells has an <a href="http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/11/23/obama-natural-born-citizen-leo-donofrio-explains-donofrio-lawsuit-us-supreme-court-appeal-obama-not-eligible-obamas-father-kenyan-donofrio-interprets-constitution/" rel="nofollow">excellent post</a> about the Donofrio case. Here is an excerpt:</p>
<blockquote><p>There has been much confusion regarding Barack Obama’s eligibility and the aspect of Leo Donofrio’s lawsuit that sets it apart is his claim that Obama does not meet the constitutional definition of Natural Born Citizen. Here is an explanation from Leo Donofrio:</p>
<p>“Don’t be distracted by the birth certificate and Indonesia issues. They are irrelevant to Senator Obama’s ineligibility to be President. Since Barack Obama’s father was a Citizen of Kenya and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of Senator Obama’s birth, then Senator Obama was a British Citizen “at birth”, just like the Framers of the Constitution, and therefore, even if he were to produce an original birth certificate proving he were born on US soil, he still wouldn’t be eligible to be President.</p>
<p>The Framers of the Constitution, at the time of their birth, were also British Citizens and that’s why the Framers declared that, while they were Citizens of the United States, they themselves were not “natural born Citizens”.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galt's Pizza Parlor</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/23/open-thread-24-is-back/#comment-1058371</link>
		<dc:creator>Galt's Pizza Parlor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6909#comment-1058371</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You have to plug the car into something to get the electricity. The way I understand this is where does, or will that power come from?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I understand this [emphasis added]:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Hydrogen fuel cells or batteries charged at charging stations need to be the goal. These cars have zero CO2 emissions. &lt;strong&gt;The trick is producing the hydrogen or electricity cleanly.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You have to plug the car into something to get the electricity. The way I understand this is where does, or will that power come from?</p></blockquote>
<p>I understand this [emphasis added]:</p>
<blockquote><p>Hydrogen fuel cells or batteries charged at charging stations need to be the goal. These cars have zero CO2 emissions. <strong>The trick is producing the hydrogen or electricity cleanly.</strong></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy R</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/23/open-thread-24-is-back/#comment-1058363</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=6909#comment-1058363</guid>
		<description>The electric cars, the ones you are referring to, I think.

You have to plug the car into something to get the electricity.  The way I understand this is where does, or will that power come from?

1. Nuclear power plants,
2. Coal burning

Obama has said that he is going to bankrupt the coal burners because of the pollution they emit.  Which is kind of scary when you think about this.

Please don&#039;t think that I am downgrading what you are saying, I am not.  It seems to me that we have to start and go in some direction, now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The electric cars, the ones you are referring to, I think.</p>
<p>You have to plug the car into something to get the electricity.  The way I understand this is where does, or will that power come from?</p>
<p>1. Nuclear power plants,<br />
2. Coal burning</p>
<p>Obama has said that he is going to bankrupt the coal burners because of the pollution they emit.  Which is kind of scary when you think about this.</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t think that I am downgrading what you are saying, I am not.  It seems to me that we have to start and go in some direction, now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
