75% of all employers did not support Obama..

Obama is BAD for business

Perception and confidence is everything

You’re blaming Obama for the drop in the stop market? the market wasn’t too good before he was elected. As far as his remedy for the situation, just giving tax cuts with the hopes that people will buy and companies will hire doesn’t take into account that as a nation we’re not manufacturing goods like we did in the past. if you get a tax cut and spend it at Walmart the money goes to Walmart and companies in China (or other foreign companies) and thus isn’t pumped back into the economy. in any event, give President-elect Obama a chance (I like the sound of that). he is going to be a great president.

As for creating manual labor jobs, where do you get that? In the third world?

Summers was there from the first, as Under Secretary of the Treasury, promoted on up to Deputy then Secretary.

Better to bring the Clinton 90s Treasury people back into their old jobs, or as near as possible — we know they were qualified and eventually familiar with the requirements, as they got good results cleaning up after Bush Sr.

BLair is an unknown quantity as far as Treasury jobs go — the only sure thing is that we’d be destabalizing a working FDIC just as it’s about to be stressed more than ever.

At least the FDIC works so far; don’t fix it.

The only thing that can get us out of this mess is the government. Both Republican and Democrats agree on this and frankly all countries around the planet also agree. Where they disagree is on the level of government support.

There is a role for government in the economy. It plays it everyday.

Trust everything to big business and you will be working at third world country wages, with no healthcare, and living on an environmental garbage heap.

Your standard of living is about to go down because of Bush’s recession.

Is that how you define results?

The people Obama has choice have phenomenal results. Geithner has helped solve one economic crisis after the other throughout his career.

The economy under Summers stewardship did pretty well during the Clinton years.

The election may be over to you because you don’t care about morality or legality or the “niceties” of constitutionality, but for some of us — like those of us who never supported shrub — it isn’t over as you so quaintly put it.

It isn’t over until this stain on the Democratic party is wiped clean.

Obama’s team is a very good and qualified team. Bi-partisan support.

Geithner is exactly the right man for the job. Non-partisan and an expert on financial crisis.

Summers is one of the smartest economic minds we have in this country. His economic track record during the Clinton years was very good.

The resumes that you give for each person says nothing about their track record and achievements. Just of a list of jobs and education.What do you want a corporate executive in there? There are plenty that are advisors. You need people that know there way around government and can get things done. They have to also be able to understand the complexities of policy and the complicated economic issues this country is dealing with.

Go find out what each of these people have actually done in their life and their achievements before you critize.

Larry stick with your national security experience and stay away from economics. You have nothing to add, except superficial cheap shots. The election is over, deal with it.

I’m not real upset that some Clinton folks will be in there but this is just another Obama “bait and switch” tactic. It appears that That One is running scared because of the mess he’s inherited and all of a sudden experience actually matters.

In his TV appearances, he also looks haggard and depressed. Looks like the guy needs an extended vacation already.

I guess they just should have announced that Hannity & Colmes was changing its name…