Comments on: Larry Johnson on CNN * 3 p.m. ET * Open Thread

By: Patrick Henry

Patrick Henry — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 04:41:29 +0000

LARRY…I sent you the transcript and TAPE to your email…!!

By: trixta

trixta — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 03:29:49 +0000

HRC hadn’t counted on the DNC and the elites of the Party doing her in. In any case, had it been a fair fight — that is, had the primary election run without handicapping HRC and had there been a genuine Roll Call vote — Hillary would have won. She won the popular vote and was only 4 delegates behind BO, after all. This is why the Party elites couldn’t let the Super Delegates decide the nomination.

By: Margaret

Margaret — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:05:38 +0000

If Bill and Hillary could defeat Obama, Hillary would be the President elect.

By: catherine

catherine — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:15:09 +0000

Being in the state department Hillary can keep tabs on the precious.

People relax. Bill and Hill are nobodies patsies and they have survived and defeated far more cunning and tenacious foes than Barky and his minions.

How do we know that the Clintons don’t have their moles in strategic places? Don’t be shocked. This is DC we’re talking about.

By: SJ

SJ — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:10:40 +0000

We are better for it because Hillary wanted to play along, I don’t think so. So what are we going to do when Obama mess up blame him and say its not Hillary’s fault, did anyone exclude Rice when Bush made his mess?

During the next four years we better not get attacked again because it will all be Hillary’s fault, it will be that she was not suited for this position, no one person will throw anything at Obama, it will be the power hungry Clinton force themselves into the administration because did could not bear to be out of the limelight.

Anyway you look at it, god alone know what was going through Hillary’s head, power corrupts but only time will tell if she made a smart move or not, at this moment I think she made and grave error.

By: Andy

Andy — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:57:16 +0000

NYC: well I was looking for some inside info. (eg. LJ trusts them?) since it was “especially” posted here.
(you know Wikipedia is biased by who writes the entry)

By: trixta

trixta — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:44:14 +0000

The Emperor is a crook.

By: Ferd Berfle

Ferd Berfle — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:32:55 +0000

Then we have to take back this country by persuasion and reason, one slack-jawed obamalobotobot at a time. We have no other choice.

By: NYC

NYC — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:32:25 +0000

Andy, Google them! Wikipedia has their bios.

By: sowsear

sowsear — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:27:16 +0000

I doubt that is true, but it would be something rather than having Hill lose her seat and then be asked to resign as SOS.

By: sowsear

sowsear — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:24:12 +0000

They may do fine but what about the nation? Even as SOS, Hill is powerless to stop PEBO, The Twirling Twit. No one who is anyone seems to have the guts to say The Emperor is a crook.

By: galsforhill

galsforhill — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:17:10 +0000

i just heard on fox that gov. patterson of n.y. is considering big dawg for hillary’s senate seat.
ye hah

By: Ferd Berfle

Ferd Berfle — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:46:52 +0000

You’re correct, trixta. We are better off with adults such as the Clinton keeping an eye on the adolescent That One.

By: trixta

trixta — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:41:58 +0000

Whatever. What do you suggest Hill and Bill do? As the vocal opposition they would be parriahs and thus powerless. I would rather HRC stay in the Senate, but she has chosen to be a player in the current clue-less administration — and I think the country is better for it. Bill and Hill are grown ups and will do just fine.

By: Andy

Andy — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:40:12 +0000

Who are these people? Will LJ be there too?

UPDATE: On Charlie Rose tonight, “A conversation about National Security with Steve Coll and Nicholas Burns” + “A discussion about the attacks in Mumbai with Anjali Pollack and Michael Pollack.”

Could you give some more background on who are these guests?

Thanks!