Comments on: 21: A Number Emanuel and Obama Will Remember on Fitzmas http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/12/17/21-a-number-emanuel-and-obama-will-remember-on-fitzmas/ Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:48:07 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Wisewoman http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/12/17/21-a-number-emanuel-and-obama-will-remember-on-fitzmas/#comment-1095040 Wisewoman Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:13:34 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=8797#comment-1095040 Your example of pregnant Mexicans running over the border to give birth so the babies are citizens of the US does not fit. They still could not be POTUS because they are not natural born citizens (both parents were not citizens at the time of the child's birth). Did you watch the video that explains this aspect? Your example of pregnant Mexicans running over the border to give birth so the babies are citizens of the US does not fit. They still could not be POTUS because they are not natural born citizens (both parents were not citizens at the time of the child’s birth). Did you watch the video that explains this aspect?

]]> By: Wisewoman http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/12/17/21-a-number-emanuel-and-obama-will-remember-on-fitzmas/#comment-1095026 Wisewoman Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:54:21 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=8797#comment-1095026 Soldier of C: I notice you never fail to take a shot at Hillary no matter the topic. Listen I know you are highly disappointed in her actions and behavior; so am I. As a black woman I admired her greatly and followed her and all the pitfalls of her campaign. She initially made one huge mistake and after that she doomed herself. That mistake was not listening to her husband who tried to advise her to fight the racism charges forcefully during the SC primary. He immediately tried (without her permission) by going on black talk radio programs like Tom Joyner. As we say in the black vernacular, he "clowned" on them for even suggesting he or she were racist. He understood the devastation of the charges, SHE DID NOT. She should have allowed him to continue his efforts but she insisted he cease saying that she called the shots in her campaign. That was a major mistake on her part not his. She followed up on that mistake by not pounding on his lack of achievements and accomplishments. Instead she allowed herself to be put on the defense about her own record, especially her foreign policy record. She kept backing off him as did Mccain. Her every move since suspending her campaign has been a detriment to her political future. The problem is that again she doesn't know it. Give Obama less than 2 years and she will be replaced with Susan Rice as SOS. Caroline Kennedy will have her senate seat and she will be "knocked" out of the party. She will be used as a patsy. Incidentally she has not endorsed Caroline but how does she dare oppose her especially since she is a woman? As I understand it, she has merely asked her supporters not to involve her in any action to oppose Caroline. These are the actions of one who was on top but now will be at the bottom; an object of pity. SHE BLEW IT AT A CRITICAL POINT, (NOT LISTENING TO HER HUSBAND) SOMETIMES YOU CAN'T RECOVER. THAT IS WHAT HAPPENED TO HER. SHE DID NOT KNOW HOW TO RUN AGAINST A "BLACK" GUY. Soldier of C: I notice you never fail to take a shot at Hillary no matter the topic. Listen I know you are highly disappointed in her actions and behavior; so am I. As a black woman I admired her greatly and followed her and all the pitfalls of her campaign. She initially made one huge mistake and after that she doomed herself. That mistake was not listening to her husband who tried to advise her to fight the racism charges forcefully during the SC primary. He immediately tried (without her permission) by going on black talk radio programs like Tom Joyner. As we say in the black vernacular, he “clowned” on them for even suggesting he or she were racist. He understood the devastation of the charges, SHE DID NOT. She should have allowed him to continue his efforts but she insisted he cease saying that she called the shots in her campaign. That was a major mistake on her part not his. She followed up on that mistake by not pounding on his lack of achievements and accomplishments. Instead she allowed herself to be put on the defense about her own record, especially her foreign policy record. She kept backing off him as did Mccain. Her every move since suspending her campaign has been a detriment to her political future. The problem is that again she doesn’t know it. Give Obama less than 2 years and she will be replaced with Susan Rice as SOS. Caroline Kennedy will have her senate seat and she will be “knocked” out of the party. She will be used as a patsy.

Incidentally she has not endorsed Caroline but how does she dare oppose her especially since she is a woman? As I understand it, she has merely asked her supporters not to involve her in any action to oppose Caroline. These are the actions of one who was on top but now will be at the bottom; an object of pity. SHE BLEW IT AT A CRITICAL POINT, (NOT LISTENING TO HER HUSBAND) SOMETIMES YOU CAN’T RECOVER. THAT IS WHAT HAPPENED TO HER. SHE DID NOT KNOW HOW TO RUN AGAINST A “BLACK” GUY.

]]> By: lark http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/12/17/21-a-number-emanuel-and-obama-will-remember-on-fitzmas/#comment-1094966 lark Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:06:22 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=8797#comment-1094966 To me this is a game changer. Why aren't people outrage at this. Obama was explicitly asked questions on this during the primaries against Hillary and he answer fraudulently to the MSM and the public. That need to have consequences otherwise elections are worthless. Obama committed fraud on the voters just like ACORN did. No different. They were one and the same, two faces of the same coin. To me this is a game changer. Why aren’t people outrage at this. Obama was explicitly asked questions on this during the primaries against Hillary and he answer fraudulently to the MSM and the public. That need to have consequences otherwise elections are worthless. Obama committed fraud on the voters just like ACORN did. No different. They were one and the same, two faces of the same coin.

]]> By: Whitey Tape http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/12/17/21-a-number-emanuel-and-obama-will-remember-on-fitzmas/#comment-1094908 Whitey Tape Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:18:24 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=8797#comment-1094908 Good luck with that. Good luck with that.

]]> By: nancy sabet http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/12/17/21-a-number-emanuel-and-obama-will-remember-on-fitzmas/#comment-1094741 nancy sabet Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:38:27 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=8797#comment-1094741 another question: have you taken your sleeping pils? another question: have you taken your sleeping pils?

]]> By: Sassy http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/12/17/21-a-number-emanuel-and-obama-will-remember-on-fitzmas/#comment-1094721 Sassy Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:07:59 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=8797#comment-1094721 Always look for the qualifier in political speak! Each adjective is inserted to nullify any statement...each one is always amendable at a later date. That's the real beauty of the art of politics...bob and weave, never commit, never get pinned down! Always look for the qualifier in political speak!
Each adjective is inserted to nullify any statement…each one is always amendable at a later date.
That’s the real beauty of the art of politics…bob and weave, never commit, never get pinned down!

]]> By: The Holidays may cause a few tummy aches for Sen. Obama. « ZachJonesIsHome - Helping to Keep an Eye on the Larry Sinclair Allegations http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/12/17/21-a-number-emanuel-and-obama-will-remember-on-fitzmas/#comment-1094680 The Holidays may cause a few tummy aches for Sen. Obama. « ZachJonesIsHome - Helping to Keep an Eye on the Larry Sinclair Allegations Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:16:41 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=8797#comment-1094680 [...] Emanuel was recorded 21 times by Patrick Fitsgerald. This is from NOQuarters: According to Michael Sneed of the Chicago Sun-Times, Rahm Emanuel was not recorded in one, two, [...] [...] Emanuel was recorded 21 times by Patrick Fitsgerald. This is from NOQuarters: According to Michael Sneed of the Chicago Sun-Times, Rahm Emanuel was not recorded in one, two, [...]

]]> By: AdrianS http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/12/17/21-a-number-emanuel-and-obama-will-remember-on-fitzmas/#comment-1094658 AdrianS Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:32:17 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=8797#comment-1094658 This may remind you of Barack Hussein Obama: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7787654.stm. No license, no birth certificate? No job. This may remind you of Barack Hussein Obama:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7787654.stm.

No license, no birth certificate? No job.

]]> By: educatedwhitewoman http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/12/17/21-a-number-emanuel-and-obama-will-remember-on-fitzmas/#comment-1094656 educatedwhitewoman Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:29:40 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=8797#comment-1094656 Does Fitzgerald know about this???? Did Obama get the ENTIRE $600,000 lot (not part of it as alleged) from the Rezkos for $125,000? From Jo Chgo over at TD blog: I put the assessor’s parcel number into our friend Google, and this old blog post (APril 2008) from the Chicago Sun-Times pulled up. Hiding all in plain sight. What does it mean? By Anna on April 26, 2008 4:42 PM Dear Natasha and Chicago Sun Times Reporters,- This link has some very curious information, some of which, I include below. If true this raises some questions for Sen. Obama (and some eyebrows) - Is this property linked to the bail of Tony Rezko?http://www.democrats.org/page/community/blog/mikestein “Examine the Cook County land records: “The deed for the house that the Obama’s purchased for $300k less than the asking price is from Frederic Wondisford and his wife, Sally Radovic, to the Obama’s Northern Trust Company Land Trust #10209 (established as such for “confidentiality”) is dated 15 June 2005 and is recorded 21 June 2005 as Document #0517233010. Declared value is $1,650,000.00.The deed for the vacant lot is from Wondisford/Radovic to Rita M. Rezko. This deed is dated 15 June 2005 and recorded a day earlier, on 20 June 2005 as Document #0517133004. Declared value is $625,000.00. Examination of the Cook County records very clearly indicates that Rita M. Rezko conveyed the entire lot to Obama’s Northern Trust Company Land Trust #10209 on 11 January 2006 and recorded 16 February 2006 as Document #0604733162. Declared value is $104,500.00.VERY IMPORTANTLY, thorough and careful examination of all Cook County land records fails to locate a deed back to Rita M. Rezko from the Obama’s Northern Trust Company Land Trust #10209.There is a “wild’ deed indicated from Rita M. Rezko to “5050 S. Greenwood LLC”. This is an Illinois limited liability corporation with the same address as Rezmar Corporation that is registered to the indicted Tony Rezko. (This deed is considered “wild” because it is not supported by any ownership deed from the Obama’s Land Trust.) Furthermore, Tony Rezko’s registered corporation, 5050 S. Greenwood LLC, then pledges the entire vacant lot in favor of a mortgage THAT IS STILL OPEN with Fifth Third Bank for the amount of $375,000.00. This is Document #0703357023 recorded 2 February 2007. THUS, THE ENTIRE VACANT LOT IS TITLED TO SEN. BARACK AND MICHELLE OBAMA (IN THEIR LAND TRUST FOR CONFIDENTIALITY) AND ALLOWED BY SENATOR BARACK AND MICHELLE OBAMA TO BE PLEDGED BY A TONY REZKO CORPORATION TO SECURE A LOAN. This is contrary to what has been stated by Senator Obama; contrary to what has been stated by Senator Obama’s campaign staff: and contrary to what has been reported. It must be noted that a seemingly intelligent Harvard educated attorney does not make such unknowing errors as stated above. The above is obvious intent not “oversight”. The home property description is 20-11-115-034-0000 The (entire) lot description is 20-11-115-035-0000 Originally, the entire piece of property was one description…so that the Obama’s could afford purchase, they pressed for the split. To do this, the county had to assign two property descriptions for each conveyance…and so that they could close on the same day as insisted by seller.Thus, to answer your question, which can very easily be determined…to sell only a portion of the lot, there would have to be assigned two (new) property descriptions for the lot…but that was never done and, obviously, not desired or requested.Proof positive that Obama and Rezko are partners. Everything that he said was false…Note, too, that Obama’s campaign stated that Rita Rezko sold the lot to Michael Sreenam, one of her husband’s attorneys…as the fable goes, for a profit…to make the whole scenario plausible…” full post available at above noted link. By midwestvaluz on April 27, 2008 11:21 AM One hopes there will be follow-up on Anna’s posting. By jp,michigan on April 27, 2008 11:52 AM People need to know this information . Why was it not reported to the news agenies? By Anna on April 27, 2008 3:44 PM There is another curious posting that looks at the very odd way this property seems to have been “divided” and questions concerning Michelle Obama’s seat on the board of the Commission of Chicago Landmarks. Please follow the link to the report. http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/2/4/20117/25087 How To Buy A Mansion You Can’t Afford by truthteller2007, Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 08:11:07 PM EST JP, Michigan - I don’t know if either of these individuals who researched and reported the information attempted to contact the media. Frankly, the only news people that seem to have the guts to dig into this story are the Sun Times Reporters and that’s why I submitted the link and info as soon as I found it, hoping they would allow the posting. Sun Times Reporters - please let us know if this information is valid or not. Thanks again for your outstanding reporting. And Bravo on the well deserved award you received! By Bessie on April 27, 2008 5:25 PM What is with this Alsammarae guy, he escapes from Iraq, his $160 million dollar Chamchamal deal falls through, he’s wanted by Interpol, he’s seen in a 60 Minute report “Sate of Corruption” with George Bush. Rezko, Mahru,Frawley and AlSammarae were all partners to build a Electricity plant for Iraq which turned out to be a scam. In the Human Events report “The Fugitive” he said that he went to school with Rezko at ITT back in 1970. Dosn’t the F.B.I. have some sort of relationship with Interpol, some kind of obligation to deliver him back? He has already been found guilty in Iraq. Does Fitzgerald know about this???? Did Obama get the ENTIRE $600,000 lot (not part of it as alleged) from the Rezkos for $125,000? From Jo Chgo over at TD blog:

I put the assessor’s parcel number into our friend Google, and this old blog post (APril 2008) from the Chicago Sun-Times pulled up. Hiding all in plain sight. What does it mean?

By Anna on April 26, 2008 4:42 PM
Dear Natasha and Chicago Sun Times Reporters,-
This link has some very curious information, some of which, I include below. If true this raises some questions for Sen. Obama (and some eyebrows) – Is this property linked to the bail of Tony Rezko?http://www.democrats.org/page/community/blog/mikestein
“Examine the Cook County land records:
“The deed for the house that the Obama’s purchased for $300k less than the asking price is from Frederic Wondisford and his wife, Sally Radovic, to the Obama’s Northern Trust Company Land Trust #10209 (established as such for “confidentiality”) is dated 15 June 2005 and is recorded 21 June 2005 as Document #0517233010. Declared value is $1,650,000.00.The deed for the vacant lot is from Wondisford/Radovic to Rita M. Rezko. This deed is dated 15 June 2005 and recorded a day earlier, on 20 June 2005 as Document #0517133004. Declared value is $625,000.00. Examination of the Cook County records very clearly indicates that Rita M. Rezko conveyed the entire lot to Obama’s Northern Trust Company Land Trust #10209 on 11 January 2006 and recorded 16 February 2006 as Document #0604733162. Declared value is $104,500.00.VERY IMPORTANTLY, thorough and careful examination of all Cook County land records fails to locate a deed back to Rita M. Rezko from the Obama’s Northern Trust Company Land Trust #10209.There is a “wild’ deed indicated from Rita M. Rezko to “5050 S. Greenwood LLC”. This is an Illinois limited liability corporation with the same address as Rezmar Corporation that is registered to the indicted Tony Rezko. (This deed is considered “wild” because it is not supported by any ownership deed from the Obama’s Land Trust.) Furthermore, Tony Rezko’s registered corporation, 5050 S. Greenwood LLC, then pledges the entire vacant lot in favor of a mortgage THAT IS STILL OPEN with Fifth Third Bank for the amount of $375,000.00. This is Document #0703357023 recorded 2 February 2007. THUS, THE ENTIRE VACANT LOT IS TITLED TO SEN. BARACK AND MICHELLE OBAMA (IN THEIR LAND TRUST FOR CONFIDENTIALITY) AND ALLOWED BY SENATOR BARACK AND MICHELLE OBAMA TO BE PLEDGED BY A TONY REZKO CORPORATION TO SECURE A LOAN.
This is contrary to what has been stated by Senator Obama; contrary to what has been stated by Senator Obama’s campaign staff: and contrary to what has been reported. It must be noted that a seemingly intelligent Harvard educated attorney does not make such unknowing errors as stated above. The above is obvious intent not “oversight”.
The home property description is 20-11-115-034-0000
The (entire) lot description is 20-11-115-035-0000
Originally, the entire piece of property was one description…so that the Obama’s could afford purchase, they pressed for the split. To do this, the county had to assign two property descriptions for each conveyance…and so that they could close on the same day as insisted by seller.Thus, to answer your question, which can very easily be determined…to sell only a portion of the lot, there would have to be assigned two (new) property descriptions for the lot…but that was never done and, obviously, not desired or requested.Proof positive that Obama and Rezko are partners. Everything that he said was false…Note, too, that Obama’s campaign stated that Rita Rezko sold the lot to Michael Sreenam, one of her husband’s attorneys…as the fable goes, for a profit…to make the whole scenario plausible…”
full post available at above noted link.

By midwestvaluz on April 27, 2008 11:21 AM
One hopes there will be follow-up on Anna’s posting.

By jp,michigan on April 27, 2008 11:52 AM
People need to know this information . Why was it not reported to the news agenies?

By Anna on April 27, 2008 3:44 PM
There is another curious posting that looks at the very odd way this property seems to have been “divided” and questions concerning Michelle Obama’s seat on the board of the Commission of Chicago Landmarks. Please follow the link to the report.
http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/2/4/20117/25087
How To Buy A Mansion You Can’t Afford
by truthteller2007, Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 08:11:07 PM EST
JP, Michigan – I don’t know if either of these individuals who researched and reported the information attempted to contact the media. Frankly, the only news people that seem to have the guts to dig into this story are the Sun Times Reporters and that’s why I submitted the link and info as soon as I found it, hoping they would allow the posting.
Sun Times Reporters – please let us know if this information is valid or not. Thanks again for your outstanding reporting. And Bravo on the well deserved award you received!

By Bessie on April 27, 2008 5:25 PM
What is with this Alsammarae guy, he escapes from Iraq, his $160 million dollar Chamchamal deal falls through, he’s wanted by Interpol, he’s seen in a 60 Minute report “Sate of Corruption” with George Bush. Rezko, Mahru,Frawley and AlSammarae were all partners to build a Electricity plant for Iraq which turned out to be a scam. In the Human Events report “The Fugitive” he said that he went to school with Rezko at ITT back in 1970. Dosn’t the F.B.I. have some sort of relationship with Interpol, some kind of obligation to deliver him back? He has already been found guilty in Iraq.

]]> By: hadit http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/12/17/21-a-number-emanuel-and-obama-will-remember-on-fitzmas/#comment-1094647 hadit Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:00:49 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=8797#comment-1094647 don't you mean exposing the fact that the man is an ass don’t you mean exposing the fact that the man is an ass

]]> By: Mawm http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/12/17/21-a-number-emanuel-and-obama-will-remember-on-fitzmas/#comment-1094619 Mawm Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:12:26 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=8797#comment-1094619 Right, and Cheney was completely exonerated after the Valerie Plame investigation. Right, and Cheney was completely exonerated after the Valerie Plame investigation.

]]> By: lark http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/12/17/21-a-number-emanuel-and-obama-will-remember-on-fitzmas/#comment-1094549 lark Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:47:49 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=8797#comment-1094549 21. You win. 21. You win.

]]> By: cc http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/12/17/21-a-number-emanuel-and-obama-will-remember-on-fitzmas/#comment-1094543 cc Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:18:20 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=8797#comment-1094543 his own grandmother... his own grandmother…

]]> By: Gerard McNedich http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/12/17/21-a-number-emanuel-and-obama-will-remember-on-fitzmas/#comment-1094529 Gerard McNedich Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:16:31 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=8797#comment-1094529 yeah that sounds about right to me! so sad... i still have that frampton live album somewhere.... a. hillary b. mccain america first! yeah that sounds about right to me!

so sad…

i still have that frampton live album somewhere….

a. hillary
b. mccain

america first!

]]> By: Elizabeth http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/12/17/21-a-number-emanuel-and-obama-will-remember-on-fitzmas/#comment-1094526 Elizabeth Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:00:16 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=8797#comment-1094526 Is that just your opinon ? It was my understanding under the law at the time of birth Obama's mother would not have been old enough to confer citizenship. "If a child is born abroad and one parent was a U.S. Citizen, which would have been his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama’s mother would have had to live ten (10) years in the United States, five (5) of which were after the age of fourteen (14). At the time of Obama’s birth, his mother was only eighteen (18) and therefore did not meet the residency requirements under the law to give her son (Obama) U.S. Citizenship” Is that just your opinon ? It was my understanding under the law at the time of birth Obama’s mother would not have been old enough to confer citizenship.

“If a child is born abroad and one parent was a U.S. Citizen, which would have been his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama’s mother would have had to live ten (10) years in the United States, five (5) of which were after the age of fourteen (14). At the time of Obama’s birth, his mother was only eighteen (18) and therefore did not meet the residency requirements under the law to give her son (Obama) U.S. Citizenship”

]]>