RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Global Labor and Politics: Solis for Labor: SEIU Gets Pay Off, Blago Under Arrest

I am a lawyer, political scientist and law professor. I teach courses and conduct research on the global capital markets, business law, international human rights and labor law. My blog is Global Labor and Politics. You may read my other posts at NoQuarterUSA.net here.
::::::

SEIU Official (but not apparently that SEIU Official) Andy Stern is “thrilled” at the appointment of Cong. Hilda Solis of LA for Sec’y of Labor. Perhaps this appointment is the pay-off that the actual SEIU Official was discussing with Illinois Rod Blagojevich. If so, the good Governor from my home town must be royally peeved to be left out in the cold (or is that “on ice”?)

Given SEIU’s heavy financial backing of Solis over the years in southern California that’s no surprise. And given how quickly the SEIU website celebrated the moment, methinks they had advance notice from their friends in the Obama campaign.

That’s Solis above speaking at an event organized by SEIU as part of their phony effort to organize workers at WalMart. SEIU later tried cutting a back room deal with WalMart that angered the other unions involved.

Of course, it is no surprise that Solis is an advocate for labor’s top agenda item: the so-called Employee Free Choice Act, the attempt by desperate union officials to by pass democratic union elections as a short cut to unionization. 

If labor did not like the union election process, they should have listened to the ACLU when in the 1930s they pointed out that the Wagner Act would bog labor down in a bureaucratic nightmare.

Si, Se Puede?

But Solis’ real claim to fame probably lies in her interest in immigration issues and that’s likely why she and Andy Stern of SEIU are so cozy. SEIU has used a low wage immigrant organizing strategy over the last two decades. 

As detailed at some interesting posts at GangBox, a rank and file website run by a construction worker, SEIU was unable or unwilling to stop the shift in their industry from highly skilled service workers at apartment and office buildings when those buildings put in place modern HVAC equipment and displaced largely African American union members. This was part of the battle to defeat construction workers, too. 

Instead they began to orient towards much lower paid hispanic, largely immigrant janitors who were brought in to replace those displaced black workers through outsourcing and SEIU was willing to offer cut rate contracts to secure employer contracts for them.  

This sad defeat – where the wage rates were cut in half – was then rewritten as a great victory heralding the return of the heyday of the CIO by various academic apologists for Andy Stern and SEIU and Change To Win. 

In fact, the one real highlight of that latter day movement was Justice for Janitors which ran a social movement style campaign later made famous in a film starring Adrien Brody called Bread and Roses.  

The only problem? 

That rank and file energy led to an electoral takeover of SEIU Local 399 that upset the International so they put the local into trusteeship and then shoved LA’s janitors into a new statewide local with janitors 500 miles away in the Bay Area under International-friendly management.

The academic and left allies of Stern and Sweeney (who was heading up SEIU during the Local 399 trusteeship) were strangely silent about that top down move.

[Details on the Local 399 tragedy are below in another selection from GangBox.]

There are two problems with this low wage strategy: 

  • one, workers in low profit margin service industries rarely become high wage workers and no matter how many of them one organizes they do not have the leverage to put pressure on the wider society for progressive political change; and 
  • two, much of the upswing in organizable low wage workers has been driven by a one time jump up in illegal immigration from Mexico due to NAFTA type restructuring there, but that trend is set to reverse now with a slowdown in the U.S. economy and then the immigration flow tends to reverse.

Of course, the big picture is that Solis will be a lightweight in this Administration, stuck overseeing the DOL bureaucracy while the big guns like Summers, Volker and Geithner continue the crushing restructuring that is killing the once proud American worker and their labor movement.

GangBox:

……The defeat of the building trades would have been bad enough if it had only been a loss for construction workers.

However it had a ripple effect that went across the entire American working class.

The weakening of the construction unions severely hurt the building maintenance trades as well.

Companies that had dispensed with contractors that used union construction labor certainly didn’t want to have union labor cleaning their offices either.

So they went on the offensive against their janitors, firemen, oilers and stationary engineers.

Hardest hit was the Service Employees International Union (”Building” was dropped from the name in 1968 – because by that point the vast majority of their members were hospital workers or civil service employees).

In pretty much every major city except for Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Detroit, New York, Boston and Chicago’s Loop, SEIU janitors directly employed by building owners were laid off and replaced by non union minimum wage workers employed by cleaning contractors.

The pay drop was drastic – in Los Angeles, janitor wages fell overnight from $ 13/hr to minimum wage – $ 3.35 – with no pension or health insurance.

And even the cities that survived the unionbusting the union only remained in the downtown office buildings – the suburbs were as agressively deunionized as any other area.

And the downtown workers in those few highly unionized cities may have stayed union but, like every other janitor in America, they now worked for cleaning contractors, rather than directly for the owners of the buildings.

Like the new breed of construction contractors, these firms were almost always double breasted.

Unlike the construction contractors, many cleaning firms were national and even international in scope.

The biggest, Copenhagen, Denmark-based ISS, operated on 3 continents – 100% union back home in Copenhagen but agressively anti union everywhere else in the world.

But most of the cleaning contractors that came to dominate property services were US based firms like American Building Maintenance (ABM) and OneSource. They were very much double breasted – like ISS they were union in some areas, and ferociously scab in others, deending on the strength of a given area’s labor movement.

There was also an ugly racial aspect – many of the SEIU janitors were African American – most of their replacements were undocumented Latino immigrants.

The SEIU did nothing to resist the attack.

And they had their reasons.

After all, they were adding tens of thousands of hospital workers and civil servants every year, often organized thanks to backroom patronage deals with Democratic Party controlled local governments (which often involved Democratic Party controlled public worker company unions being absorbed into the SEIU as a body).

Those arraingements had made the SEIU the fastest growing union in America – from 480,000 in 1975 to over 688,000 a decade later, at a time when most American unions were rapidly shrinking.

In light of all that easy growth in the public sector, why on earth would the SEIU chiefs want to go to war with these agressive multinational cleaning contractors on behalf of a few thousand Black janitors?

It would be another decade before the SEIU leadership even so much as lifted a finger for the janitors.


….XI. “!Si, Se Puede!”

Meanwhile, out in California, the building trades were presented with yet another opportunity to reunionize the industry – this time, in the state’s Southland.

In the spring of 1990, Los Angeles local 399 of the Service Employees International Union launched an organizing drive among janitors working for ISS in the Century City office building complex.

This campaign was part of the “Justice 4 Janitors” project that the international leadership of the SEIU had launched 5 years earlier, to try and reunionize the office building janitors who’d been deunionized back in the late 1970’s.

Officially, the SEIU leaders never talked about that deunionization – or the ethnic cleansing replace-Black-Americans-with-Latino-immigrants aspects of it.

SEIU propaganda presented the industry as if it had never ever been unionized at all, like this was a first time organizing drive, rather than bringing the SEIU back to a business that had been union for over 50 years at the time the unions had been broken just 11 years earlier.

There were some other disturbing aspects – like the union’s very patronizing view of the janitors as victims, or the focus on getting white collar professionals to pity the janitors rather than trying to build solidarity with their fellow building workers, or the utter recklessness with which janitors were marched into a confrontation with the Los Angeles Police Department during a rally in a basement parking lot at Century City.

25 workers got hurt in that latter episode – including a pregnant janitor who was kicked in the stomach by an LAPD officer and lost her baby – and many arrested janitors got deported back to Mexico or Central America.

But, the strike was the first major building worker walkout in California in 20 years.

And they succeeded in getting a union contract at Century City and a number of other major office buildings in downtown LA.

A near minimum wage union contract that was almost $ 8/hr less than 1979 union scale – but a union contract nonetheless!

And it had caught the imagination of workers all over Southern California – and not just the White professionals and clericals that the SEIU wanted to pity the janitors, but the blue collar Latinos who had come to be a majority of LA’s private sector workforce in the previous decade.

Justice 4 Janitors also gave the American labor movement the opportunity to take advantage of the heroism, street smarts and activism skills of the many Salvadoran and Guatemalan communist political refugees among the janitors.

Incidentally, those aforementioned revolutionary Central Americans had tried to take their rightful place in local 399’s leadership after the strike. They, along with White, Black and Mexican American LA municipal worker activists in local 399, had run a slate of candidates in the local 399 executive board elections right after the strike.

That wasn’t part of the plan – janitors (and LA County clerical and service workers, for that matter) were supposed to be voiceless faceless victims, not active participants in the political life of their own union.

So, the SEIU international blocked the new local 399 officers from taking office, and the militant newly organized janitors were removed from local 399 and attached to local 1877, a local run by conservative Chicano officers and, more importantly, based 400 miles away from Los Angeles, up in San Jose (the better to keep LA janitors from participating in the political life of the local!)

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post18 Comments »

Comment by Diana L. C. | 2008-12-19 09:25:01

Hey, I just quit a post-retirement job I had to earn extra money to help my children and grandchildren. I was an admin assistant. Talk about another group of people who somehow need to unionize or work collectively.

They earn more than those non-union janitorial staff. We had a lady cleaning our office who was trying to raise six grandchildren, working two jobs. We did pity her, and we organized to give her food and needed items on a daily basis.

No one thought to go to bat about helping her get more pay. We worked for a union-busting employers councit.

(I didn’t fit, of course–part of the reason I quit.)

I stood at the bus pick up point in front of the Qwest building in Denver for two weeks as the janitors in the building picketed for being able to join with the janitors who worked at DIA (Denver’s airport). They were asking for the better health care coverage that would allow.

I would always give them the high five, but most everyone else standing there looked away, or pretended they didn’t know what was happening. (Look up Nacchio in regard to Qwest.)

The way we determine wages has always been a crime in this country–The disparity in wages for different jobs always seems to be this: if you work with money creating nothing tangible, you get lots of pay. If you work to help others or to actually see that you’ve done something tangible at the end of the shift, you get zip.

One question: Was the SEIU involved with the casino workers during the Nevada caucuses????

 

Comment by Leibniz 08 | 2008-12-19 09:40:30

Always good info from Mr. Diamond and helpful in painting the big picture

 
 

Comment by touchet | 2008-12-19 10:06:19

How did Obama put it. “Maybe they should take a couple of cues from the Chinese Auto Makers”. I believe it went something like that. This is what they want. Pretty soon you will be staying at your work place in communes, hours from where you live. Waking up doing exercises, chanting cheers of loyalty to the “Company” and making a dollar for every car you put together. Oh but don’t worry, the government will give you a house, and a 2000 calorie a day food allowance. Say good buy kids, to the iphones, game consoles, flat panel TV’s, and that sweet sixteen car, because in Obama Land, you got to live like the Chinese and “spread the wealth around”.

The only person who will be buying those luxury goods is your local politician and your friendly Congress and their Administration, who also happen to be chairman for .

I mean come on really, when are people going to realize that the government is no longer ran by the people. It has been effectively seized by corporations and their puppet politicians. FDR warned people of this impending corruption and its potential when he brought government regulation of the market. There is nothing that is going to stop it beside another “seizure” of congress by the people. And folks, that is our constitutional right. We have every right to go right into congress and boot the whole lot of them out.

 

Comment by bert | 2008-12-19 10:32:51

Excellent insight, S.D. into the NEW “union” mentality. From my days as a memebr of the retail clerks union through my days as a teacher’s union member and officer and then paid staff I sadly see unions sure are not what they used to be in far too many cases. It is no longer about the member – the worker – it is about the union and the perks for officers and staff. It is about looking good on paper, not being the best and achieving the best for members. Just another example of the downward spiral of America.

Comment by NoBamaNoWay | 2008-12-19 21:22:46

that’s what my experience with unions suggests, too. it’s a bummer, cuz workers get screwed with or without unions.

 
 

Comment by LD | 2008-12-19 11:20:04

Steve,

Thanks for your insightful analysis on these topics. Very enlightening.

 

Comment by Woman Voter | 2008-12-19 11:36:06

As I recall Solis is no friend to the business community and with the economy in the ‘recession’ toilet I would have thought that they would have brought someone in with business knowledge not someone that there to do the unions bidding.

Meg Whitman would have been a better choice, but then it was an appointment by Obama ‘Chicago’ politician, which says it all for me.

 

Comment by justsomeone | 2008-12-19 13:52:18

I’ve read this a couple of times & am confused as to what is being advocated. All the unionization in the world can’t trump the basic laws of supply & demand. When the number of workers wanting (willing) to be janitors vastly outnumbers the number of jobs in the field wages decline. It’s just that simple. Handing out union cards to the teaming hordes of illegal workers daily crossing our borders won’t remedy the problem. Unions make the most progress in good economic times & in tight labor markets, so the Left’s call for open borders is just music to the ears of corporate America. Turning this place into a debtor nation/3rd world country is not my idea of a solution.

Comment by Karma | 2008-12-19 16:36:51

Why is it so difficult to understand he is speaking out for all of the workers?

Those displaced from good paying jobs then. And those trying to feed families now…on much less.

It is a labor union, not concerned with the workers, working to lessen their strength by fragmenting their leaders. And now that thought process has a cabinet position.

How can that be good for the rest of us?

 
 

Comment by justsomeone | 2008-12-19 14:09:56

Repeal the Worker Replacement Act, crank up domestic manufacturing & close the borders if you want decent wages & benefits for blue collar workers. All the politically correct mumbo jumbo ain’t gonna get it. It would take generations to to get safety regs, fair wages & benefit standards enacted throughout the entire world.

 

Comment by justsomeone | 2008-12-19 14:44:44

there’s tv on in another room. I just heard Obama talking about his infrastructure projects & he actually said, “We’re going to need MORE workers, blah, blah…& part of Solis’ job will be to make sure we get them.” Hello Open Borders advocates

 

Comment by kat in your hat | 2008-12-19 15:27:46

Steve Diamond! I have missed you.

Good work, as always!

 

Comment by Karma | 2008-12-19 16:01:38

Thank you for covering Solis and this labor issue. I didn’t realize her ties to all of this, but was intending to research her background. Obama’s history with Magtag doesn’t give me faith about his commitment to unions.

During the CA debate one of Obama’s answers to this situation was of interest to me.

It seemed like he threw the AA community under the bus. While he was denying that all those good paying blue collar jobs were undercut by illegal immigration. He stated that ‘it was a case of scapegoating he didn’t believe in’.

After his applause line was finished. Obama immediately contradicts himself. Stating if conditions remain, the illegal immigrants would ‘continue to undermine U.S. wages.’

As a CA resident, I remember this whole thing unraveling on the nightly news with the huge state construction bids as well. The same formula was also used on housing construction workers.

Good jobs, that young men could get after high school, to pay their way through college. Or build a construction career and raise a family. Gone and replaced with shameful wages…in expensive CA no less.

Obviously, those well paying construction and janitorial jobs paid for mortgages and school supplies. The community losing those good jobs and eventually their homes brought chaos to their lives. In my opinion, it is one piece of the puzzle which helped to pave the way for the crack epidemic. The dispair of lost homes and lost jobs….

Catherine Austin Fitts has a map of the area and homes lost during this time. Stunning.

~~

“MOST OF THESE HUD/FHA SINGLE FAMILY LOANS DEFAULTED BETWEEN 1982 AND 1990.”

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/images/ethnic2.gif

~~

Transcript of the CA debate for Obama quotes upbove.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/31/dem.debate.transcript/

 

Comment by getfitnow | 2008-12-19 18:14:20

Thanks, Dr. Diamond

 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2008-12-19 19:07:56

Thanks for a informative read Steve Diamond.

 

Comment by athy | 2008-12-20 00:09:08

Good article Steve. Thank you.
Served as a great introduction for me into the world of labor unions. Excellent background, easy to understand. Good overview. Article provides enough of a background to help me continue to connect some dots…

 

Comment by justsomeone | 2008-12-20 02:21:12

Here’s a blog that ran an excellent post today on Solis & Salazar, complete with their voting records: Dustin Inman Society, click on blog. & Yes, it’s a site done by an activist who opposes illegal immigration

 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)