YES! LET THE RIGHT-TO-LIFERS PICK UP THE TAB AND START LOVING THE OCTOPLETS WITH SOME MONETARY EFFICIENCY….

The 3 kids w/ special needs and the 8 babies no doubt require extra care. Specialists are big bucks. She doesn’t have the means to provide that kind of care; therefore, she is dependent on the state to provide that.

There are two huge obstacles in the way of the babies having a positive developmental outcome:

1. The mother is clearly dependent on the state for care. The state, just like ins., is slow to provide that level of care.

2. The mother is also clearly out-to-lunch as far as not recognizing the harm that she has caused/will cause her 6 kids at home and the 8 preemies. She will most likely gloss over any issues or not recognize them as such because she is wearing alternate universe googles.

As has been universally suggested, it would most likely be for the best for the state to intervene on these babies’ behalf.

Expanded story says she has three of the six children have special needs. At least one is autistic.

Expanded story says she has three of the six children with special needs. At least one is autistic.

The numbers just don’t add up. Was she involved in some illegal activity to come up with enough for invitro at a Rodeo Drive clinic? Something is very, very wrong with the money picture.

I agree. If you have enough to support a large family well, then it’s your life. But I didn’t have enough for more than two so that’s what I stuck with.

The woman is a sicko. I briefly saw an early picture of her with one of the six babies. No big lips and Angelina nose then. Ick.

The problem is that most women on welfare simply can’t count and have a poor sense of basic economics. Four hundred plus dollars a month for those many mouths to feed is nothing, true. But it’s found money in the sense that it’s not earned income from doing a job that someone has employed you to do.

Although raising children is a job, no one asks single mothers to do this job. They have children for their own personal reasons and expect the government to be their paternal benefactor.

The natural inclination to procreate or answer the calling of maternal nature now has to be addressed in the education of children. Basic economics should be taught in elementary school. People who understand these basic principles are less likely to be capricious when it comes to having more children than one can take care of.

This woman lives in a bubble that her parents have enabled. Not only does she not believe she isn’t getting welfare, she also doesn’t realize that her parents are providing the childcare as well along with paying the bills of shelter, utilities, etc.

I point this out because it’s this kind of social dysfunction that plagues poor people on welfare and perpetuates their behavior. Our condemnation really doesn’t penetrate this bubble, it hardens it. That’s why the key is to educate kids at the earliest most feasible age.

In the case of Suleman, I find her mental state frightening and wish an evaluation would be imposed on her. Social Services should be called into action for the sake of these kids.