RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

February 2009 Market Review

monthly-market-review1Prior to going to the comments section of my son’s report card, human nature dictates that I first look at the grades. In that same vein, let’s see how the markets performed for the month of February:

22709-market-changes

Let’s review my specific projections from the January 2009 Recap:

For those who track the markets, there is a 75-80% correlation in the annual moves in equity markets with the performance in January. Without parsing words, this performance in January portends a very challenging year for our equity markets. All eyes and ears remain focused on Washington for a comprehensive financial rescue package (Bank Transition, insurance for other assets, aid to stem foreclosures, et al). Trade the range for now with a very wide band. Buy the S&P as it approaches 750 and sell it as it moves above 900. Otherwise….be patient!!

In the bond space, I did believe and continue to believe that despite the Fed and Treasury promoting the concept of quantitative easing (using the Fed’s balance sheet to buy Treasury, agency, and mortgage related assets), these rates will work their way higher simply due to the MASSIVE financing needs of our government and global governments.

The corporate bond space, led by high yield bonds, had very solid returns this month. As we mentioned, we thought these sectors had already priced in the economic turmoil to a much greater extent than the stock markets. High yield bonds were up almost 10% on the month. I would not add to that sector after that performance.

The dollar inched lower versus the Japanese yen. I believe the dollar will continue to weaken versus the yen, as well as the Canadian dollar. The U.S. dollar dramatically outperformed the Euro and the British pound. The economic situation in Europe is just as bad, if not worse, than in U.S. In fact, a number of European countries are being seriosuly challenged to raise funds. Sovereign credit risks (the risk that a government defaults) have risen considerably.

In the world of commodities, gold outperformed due to the global government credit risk, the threat of longer term inflation, and weakness in currencies. Oil remains very volatile but ended the month down 2.5%. Metals remain weak with anemic demand.

Add it all up and what is one to do? In my estimation, an investor is being paid to WAIT before making any major capital commitments. For those who are significantly underweighted stocks, a dollar cost averaging (add a fixed dollar amount on a regular basis versus one lump sum at one point in time) approach is always recommended. I am not going out on a limb to say that we will retest the lows (down another 7-9%) seen on November 20th.

Well, we have retested those November 20th lows and on the last two days of the month took them out by 2-3%. We are now down anywhere from 12-19% across the board for most stock indices on a year to date basis.

In a normal market environment, if stocks gave ground by 2-4%, one would expect government bonds to rally in a “flight to quality” move. The fact that equities are down 11% for the month and government rates have moved HIGHER is a clear indication that the overwhelming supply of government bonds to finance our deficit will continue to be a major issue going forward. The market absorbed well more than $150 billion in government supply (bills to 30 year bonds) this month. In the face of that, it is no surprise that rates moved higher. The question for investors is where does one go.

The enormous government supply along with the weakness in stocks did put a dent in the credit sensitive sectors of the bond market this month. The “crowding out” effect (government financing needs crowd out the availability of capital to flow to private enterprise) will continue to be a major problem.

In very volatile trading, the U.S. dollar did improve primarily versus the Japanese yen while only marginally versus the Euro (although it is significantly stronger vs the Euro on a year to date basis). As I mentioned to a reader, the yen seems to have weakned as many hedge funds have finished unwinding trades in which they had borrowed the yen. I missed this call and thus I was clearly wrong that the dollar would still weaken vs the yen.

Gold is up solidly on the year but actually had gotten higher than $1,000/oz during the month. I do not invest in gold simply due to a highly speculative contingent that plays in this commodity. I think many funds and managers have purchased this commodity as a safe haven move but are willing to sell those positions out for short term profits.

The BIG question is where do we go from here. Should I buy stocks here? Should I sell? Should I hold? Obviously, those are questions that can only be answered based on one’s personal situation. All I can offer is my assessment of the markets, the economy, Washington, Wall Street and hope it helps you navigate your own financial and economic landscape.

While the markets have retraced back to those November 20th lows and even moved lower by 2-3%, I still can not make a case for buying the market. Why? Very simply because overall market valuations do NOT clearly and distinctly display themselves as cheap. You may ask how is it that markets that are now down 50+% are not cheap. Remember that stock prices are a measure of forward earnings and the multiple paid for those earnings. A fair multiple is typically between 12-18% but in bear markets that multiple can get decidedly cheaper than 12. Let’s take a multiple of 15 times. At yesterday’s close of 735, that equates to an earnings projection on the S&P 500 of $49/share. That is overly optimistic and hopeful and thus the risk remains too high relative to the reward.

I always traded and invested based on the premise that “hope is a lousy hedge” meaning that one needs to fully review the risks prior to investing and not “close your eyes, buy in because it is down a lot, and HOPE it works.” I do think we are approaching a stage where the market may still move lower but then start more of a sideways price action. Why? Very simply because the volumes are declining on a lot of exchanges which indicate the selling pressure is abating. That said, I think investors are in NO rush to buy.

I actually have somewhat greater concerns about bonds than stocks. Why? I think a lot of investors have rushed into the bond market, that supply of bonds will increase not only in the government space but also the municipal space as towns, cities and states deal with their budgetary problems. Corporate bonds were very cheap relative to stocks coming into the year but have dramatically outperformed in the first two months. Given that a lot of investors in the corporate bond space are newer investors (looking for a place to park money), I think bonds across all sectors may start to weaken from here.

The U.S. dollar is benefitting from a flight to quality move given the major political and social issues elsewhere in the world. Additionally, as the U.S. government has shown it will not allow major banks to fail (although the banks’ shareholders can and will be diluted), a lot of money has flowed into the dollar. I think the Canadian dollar and Australian currency are fundamentally stronger than the U.S. dollar at this point.

In regard to Washington and its impact on the economy and markets, it strikes me that the Obama administration is hellbent on implementing as much of its social program and liberal agenda as quickly as possible. The markets are sending a very clear signal that his agenda is not pro-growth, investor friendly, or fiscally sound. He’s the President and the electorate sent the Republicans home, so we need to let our democratic process work. That said, the markets do not and will not stand idly by “HOPING” things work out.

I do firmly believe we will work our way through these economic challenges, but it will be a longer and harder road than most market analysts and political pundits would promote. Maintaining hope is a critically important part of our country and our moral fiber. I am ALWAYS hopeful, but I am not blindly hopeful. That would be called willful neglect.

Check out the piece, Buy and Hope Investing, written by John Mauldin, one of our Economic All-Stars (see left sidebar at Sense on Cents).

One thing I truly hope is that you find Sense on Cents helps you to navigate the economic landscape and that you will share the site with your friends.

LD

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post13 Comments »

Comment by maq | 2009-03-01 09:01:07

“”The enormous government supply along with the wea kness in stocks did put a dent in the credit sensitive sectors of the bond market this month. The “crowding out” effect (government financing needs crowd out the availability of capital to flow to private enterprise) will continue to be a major problem.”"

Words sure can sugar coat the ‘Obama reality’ : diluting the value of existing stock shares with his trillion(s) dollar deficit. Watering down the US dollar.

I keep reading about hyper inflation—is or are these indicaters of this situation.

I keep read

Comment by LD | 2009-03-01 16:29:18

No this crowding out effect will not cause hyperinflation. The hyperinflation would occur when and if the massive printing of money is so overwhelming and multiplies thus driving the value of the money down. That would happen when and if the economy starts to gain a little traction.

 
 

Comment by Linda C. | 2009-03-01 09:31:25

Interesting piece Larry. It is somewhat of an irony that money is flowing into the dollar because of the “government” policies of not letting the banks fail” versus in the same breathe the same such policies are being criticized for being “non-growth”. It would seem that the investors want things “both ways”, which is entirely impossible. I personally would rather see a government intervention that saves or re-creates the banking system instead of “savings banks”.

In my partner’s government pension fund I looked at the past 10 years return. If one had parked all of their money in common stock they would have lost almost 2 percent of their investment over the past ten years. Small cap investments only yielded a just above 1 percent return and international investing would have yielded a less than one percent return. The conservative fund or “G fund” bonds and treasuries gave about a 4 percent return over the past 10 years.

This somewhat breaks the myth that stocks will always outperform bonds. It also breaks the mythical thinking of privatizing social security as somehow giving people a better return on their dollar. It just really depends where one is at any given time within the business cycle.

The other unfortunate part is most people don’t keep up with their pension investments. Therefore those who initially set up in stocks lost money. Those in the G Fund made money, but not enough to keep up with inflation. (Real inflation, not the made up new fangled inflation numbers they have now) However, those execs who managed all of these funds regardless of where they are made lots of money I would venture to guess.

We have another 10 years until retirement. Just trying to look into the mess and figure out where to put the money. I do believe that in 10 years stocks will come back. The trick is to stay above water for at least the next 2 years.

Comment by LD | 2009-03-01 16:31:30

I totally agree with you that there will be a rebound in stocks but only after a period of at least a few years of sideways to perhaps even lower prices.

Patience is a virtue but hard to practice.

 
 

Comment by Sassy | 2009-03-01 09:57:36

LD, you must certainly be bleary-eyed from following all this data.
While I don’t understand a lot of the terminology, I have been reading a great deal as well.
The banks and financial institutions are lobbying heavily, and acknowledging they will not succeed. However, they are planning higher fees and interest rates for their benefit.
We are reviewing all our discretionary spending, with a goal of reducing it 25%.

Comment by LD | 2009-03-01 16:34:15

Sassy…ultimately you can only control what is in your control. Personal fiscal discipline is not only prudent now but also a good practice as a way of life.

I monitor the markets very closely and have for a long time so this chart is virtually automated.

 
 

Comment by basil | 2009-03-01 11:56:57

Larry,

You are a saint to be posting here for people like me who are economically challenged! :wink:

I just checked your site.

Excellent.

I will be a regular visitor.

Comment by LD | 2009-03-01 16:35:20

Thanks. Happy to help.

 
 

Comment by basil | 2009-03-01 11:58:10

Larry,

you are a saint for posting here for the economically challenged like me!

I just checked your excellent site and will be visiting often.

 

Comment by CG | 2009-03-01 12:44:50

LD, what are your thoughts regarding this point of view? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ik2uVt5zvNg Thanks

Comment by LD | 2009-03-01 16:45:03

He makes a few decent points but honestly he strikes me as overly simplistic and fearmongering.

The 12trillion number is not a fair number to use. A large percentage of those funds are used to backstop the short term sectors of the bond market. The government is not at risk on that money. Those funds merely facilitate the trading that is going on in those sectors.

Additionally to say that bondholders represent the wealthist 1% of people is just plain wrong. A LOT of the debt of these institutions is tied up in mutual funds and individual customers. Heck, my mother-in-law holds some of it as well.

I understand his frustration, but given that I viewed him as factually incorrect on those two points, I stopped watching.

 
 

Comment by CG | 2009-03-01 14:28:36

AIG to get up to $30 billion in additional TARP funds according to WSJ… Is this what we should be doing?

Comment by LD | 2009-03-01 16:48:12

The government owns 80% of this institution already. AIG has attempted to sell divisions to repay some govt loans with no success.

AIG in many regards is the center of our financial problems as it wrote the CDS contracts (insurance) that many banks and money managers used to hedge their holdings. If AIG went down, that would create a massive domino effect. That is the definition of systemic risk!!

 
 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)