Remember This, Obama Biographers: “The Staged Iraq War Speech & More ‘Creative’ Embellishments”
By SusanUnPC on March 2, 2009 at 8:16 PM in Current Affairs
I WROTE THIS STORY LAST YEAR: I WONDER IF THIS STORY MADE ITS WAY INTO THE NEW BIOGRAPHIES BEING WRITTEN ABOUT BARACK OBAMA??? - SusanUnPC, March 2009
I am confident — as you surely are — that after the mainstream media sees the following, all of these stories will lead all the newscasts, as the Bosnia story has, repetitiously, for two days. RIGHT?
Jackie, a friend in Arizona, sent me an e-mail after hearing this March 25, 2008 NPR report from Don Gonyea. Gonyea reported on Obama’s now-famous 2002 anti-war speech. Jackie wrote:
Obama’s ad on anti-war speech is staged
The speech was given at an anti-war rally on Oct. 2, 2002…..Jessie Jackson was the main speaker. Obama’s speech went mainly unnoticed. He had not yet announced his run for the Senate, although now he claims he risked his political career. Of course we know that there was NO risk in running against Alan Keyes, all Obama had to do was breathe..Gonyea says…..”In an age of YouTube there is no video of the speech and only a snippet of audio. The Obama campaign has reenacted the speech in a campaign AD they are now running.”
If there is no video available it would seem the entire Obama anti-war speech on which he is basing his Ad campaign may be faked. In fact the entire speech could be distorted. LISTEN.
Is it a creation or a re-creation? You decide. But those aren’t Sen. Obama’s only “creative” embellishments:
I wonder if THIS GUY had anything to do with all that?
THE EMBELLISHMENTS:
“Senator Obama has called himself a constitutional professor, claimed credit for passing legislation that never left committee, and apparently inflated his role as a community organizer among other issues. When it comes to his record, just words won’t do. Senator Obama will have to use facts as well,” Clinton spokesman Phil Singer said.
Sen. Obama consistently and falsely claims that he was a law professor. The Sun-Times reported that, “Several direct-mail pieces issued for Obama’s primary [Senate] campaign said he was a law professor at the University of Chicago. He is not. He is a senior lecturer (now on leave) at the school. In academia, there is a vast difference between the two titles. Details matter.” In academia, there’s a significant difference: professors have tenure while lecturers do not. [Hotline Blog, 4/9/07; Chicago Sun-Times, 8/8/04]
Obama claimed credit for nuclear leak legislation that never passed. “Obama scolded Exelon and federal regulators for inaction and introduced a bill to require all plant owners to notify state and local authorities immediately of even small leaks. He has boasted of it on the campaign trail, telling a crowd in Iowa in December that it was ‘the only nuclear legislation that I’ve passed.’ ‘I just did that last year,’ he said, to murmurs of approval. A close look at the path his legislation took tells a very different story. While he initially fought to advance his bill, even holding up a presidential nomination to try to force a hearing on it, Mr. Obama eventually rewrote it to reflect changes sought by Senate Republicans, Exelon and nuclear regulators. The new bill removed language mandating prompt reporting and simply offered guidance to regulators, whom it charged with addressing the issue of unreported leaks. Those revisions propelled the bill through a crucial committee. But, contrary to Mr. Obama’s comments in Iowa, it ultimately died amid parliamentary wrangling in the full Senate.” [New York Times, 2/2/08]
Obama misspoke about his being conceived because of Selma. “Mr. Obama relayed a story of how his Kenyan father and his Kansan mother fell in love because of the tumult of Selma, but he was born in 1961, four years before the confrontation at Selma took place. When asked later, Mr. Obama clarified himself, saying: `I meant the whole civil rights movement.’” [New York Times, 3/5/07]
LA Times: Fellow organizers say Sen. Obama took too much credit for his community organizing efforts. “As the 24-year-old mentor to public housing residents, Obama says he initiated and led efforts that thrust Altgeld’s asbestos problem into the headlines, pushing city officials to call hearings and a reluctant housing authority to start a cleanup. But others tell the story much differently. They say Obama did not play the singular role in the asbestos episode that he portrays in the best-selling memoir ‘Dreams From My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance.’ Credit for pushing officials to deal with the cancer-causing substance, according to interviews and news accounts from that period, also goes to a well-known preexisting group at Altgeld Gardens and to a local newspaper called the Chicago Reporter. Obama does not mention either one in his book.” [Los Angeles Times, 2/19/07]
Chicago Tribune: Obama’s assertion that nobody had indications Rezko was engaging in wrongdoing ’strains credulity.’ “…Obama has been too self-exculpatory. His assertion in network TV interviews last week that nobody had indications Rezko was engaging in wrongdoing strains credulity: Tribune stories linked Rezko to questionable fundraising for Gov. Rod Blagojevich in 2004 — more than a year before the adjacent home and property purchases by the Obamas and the Rezkos.” [Chicago Tribune editorial, 1/27/08]
Obama was forced to revise his assertion that lobbyists ‘won’t work in my White House.’ “White House hopeful Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) was forced to revise a critical stump line of his on Saturday — a flat declaration that lobbyists ‘won’t work in my White House’ after it turned out his own written plan says they could, with some restrictions… After being challenged on the accuracy of what he has been saying — in contrast to his written pledge — at a news conference Saturday in Waterloo, Obama immediately softened what had been his hard line in his next stump speech.” [Chicago Sun-Times, 12/16/07]
FactCheck.org: `Selective, embellished and out-of-context quotes from newspapers pump up Obama’s health plan.’ “Obama’s ad touting his health care plan quotes phrases from newspaper articles and an editorial, but makes them sound more laudatory and authoritative than they actually are. It attributes to The Washington Post a line saying Obama’s plan would save families about $2,500. But the Post was citing the estimate of the Obama campaign and didn’t analyze the purported savings independently. It claims that “experts” say Obama’s plan is “the best.” “Experts” turn out to be editorial writers at the Iowa City Press-Citizen - who, for all their talents, aren’t actual experts in the field. It quotes yet another newspaper saying Obama’s plan “guarantees coverage for all Americans,” neglecting to mention that, as the article makes clear, it’s only Clinton’s and Edwards’ plans that would require coverage for everyone, while Obama’s would allow individuals to buy in if they wanted to.” [FactCheck.org, 1/3/08]
Sen. Obama said ‘I passed a law that put Illinois on a path to universal coverage,’ but Obama health care legislation merely set up a task force. “As a state senator, I brought Republicans and Democrats together to pass legislation insuring 20,000 more children. And 65,000 more adults received health care…And I passed a law that put Illinois on a path to universal coverage.” The State Journal-Register reported in 2004 that “The [Illinois State] Senate squeaked out a controversial bill along party lines Wednesday to create a task force to study health-care reform in Illinois. [...] In its original form, the bill required the state to offer universal health care by 2007. That put a ‘cloud’ over the legislation, said Sen. Dale Righter, R-Mattoon. Under the latest version, the 29-member task force would hold at least five public hearings next year.” [Obama Health Care speech, 5/29/07; State Journal-Register, 5/20/04]
ABC News: ‘Obama…seemed to exaggerate the legislative progress he made’ on ethics reform. “ABC News’ Teddy Davis Reports: During Monday’s Democratic presidential debate, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., seemed to exaggerate the legislative progress he has made on disclosure of “bundlers,” those individuals who aggregate their influence with the candidate they support by collecting $2,300 checks from a wide network of wealthy friends and associates. When former Alaska Sen. Mike Gravel alleged that Obama had 134 bundlers, Obama responded by telling Gravel that the reason he knows how many bundlers he has raising money for him is “because I helped push through a law this past session to disclose that.” Earlier this year, Obama sponsored an amendment [sic] in the Senate requiring lobbyists to disclose the candidates for whom they bundle. Obama’s amendment would not, however, require candidates to release the names of their bundlers. What’s more, although Obama’s amendment was agreed to in the Senate by unanimous consent, the measure never became law as Obama seemed to suggest. Gravel and the rest of the public know how many bundlers Obama has not because of a ‘law’ that the Illinois Democrat has ‘pushed through’ but because Obama voluntarily discloses that information.” [ABC News, 7/23/07]
Obama drastically overstated Kansas tornado deaths during campaign appearance. “When Sen. Barack Obama exaggerated the death toll of the tornado in Greensburg, Kan, during his visit to Richmond yesterday, The Associated Press headline rapidly evolved from `Obama visits former Confederate capital for fundraiser’ to `Obama rips Bush on Iraq war at Richmond fundraiser’ to `Weary Obama criticizes Bush on Iraq, drastically overstates Kansas tornado death toll’ to `Obama drastically overstates Kansas tornado deaths during campaign appearance.’ Drudge made it a banner, ensuring no reporter would miss it.” [politico.com, 5/9/07]
Courtesy of AndreWalker’s MyDD diary, “Just Embellished Words: Obama’s Record of Exaggerations & Misstatements” and campaign press releases.
::::::::::::::::::::::
I REPEAT: I am confident — as you surely are — that after the mainstream media sees the following, all of these stories will lead all the newscasts, as the Bosnia story has, repetitiously, for two days. RIGHT?






















You have to look at the record…I can remember arguing points about Obama during the primary, only to have his supporters refer me to his website. Nothing but the facts there, right? I still do not understand how many people and how easily people were completely duped. I suppose that is part of the mystery of Obama…
DUPED is the perfect word for it.
Now, Howard Dean exploited his opposition to the war in 2003-2004, but he TRULY believed it, breathed it, lived it, spoke about it every day in complete consistence. He was sincere in his opposition.
Obama was not. He flitted about — in 2004, he became in favor of the Senate’s vote for authorization because, he explained, he wished to be supportive of Kerry/Edwards. NONSENSE. He was going along with the “party” line.
Then when it became advantageous in 2007, he turned against the war again, “finding” that 2002 speech that was so ill-remembered and never recorded that he had to re-record it in a studio.
And we have NO IDEA if that is even the speech he gave because there is no record of the original.
And the DUPED ONES drank it up. Believed it. Because they wanted to. Especially from a black candidate.
And it gave them a reason to oppose Hillary, the one candidate who was qualified and truthful, and who resisted the tempting chance to apologize for her vote, because she chose to stand by what she’d done because the intelligence reports had told her Saddam was a serious threat.
I could go on and on about it … people are so gullible. Some attractive guy tells them what they want to hear, and they can be beguiled into falling for the attractive guy every time. They never learn.
I can not see how anyone finds Barack Obama attractive, he’s far to skinny for his height and he has big ears. The thing to me that makes him so extremely ugly is his arrogance. Maybe I just prefer something with some meat on it and a little bit of honor, truthfullness.
Country before Party Always!!
We are 6 weeks into the administration of Obama and what I fail to see is leadership. It seems to me this is an actor playing the role rather than a leader. I true leader would have fought with this own party to pass a stimulus bill that would have addressed the unemployed and the states financial problems. What we got were pigs at the feeding trough. This is just a redux of the previous administration with a different letter following their name.
Every thing coming out of this administration instead of strong decisive leadership is weak kneed response to critical issues. I fear for this country when leadership’s main goal is to stay in power and reward and strengthen their base.
I have to laugh when people accuse the obama administration of being socialist or leftist and another group accusing them of being facist or rightist. They are not about a political idealogy but power both acquiring and retaining.
You made me think about the creation of “Good ‘Ol Shoe” from Wag the Dog.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-gHOhiRZCM
Thanks for posting a “Sentimental Journey”, SusanUnPc.
What I have found fascinating is the tango dance. While I would agree that “Duped” is a good description, it implies an unwitting victim.
Many people I talked to during this time, who were voting for him refused to embrace what they had read about BO’s immoral being.
Now, I do not know what word one would assign to a human that has bipolar comprehension skills, but if there is one let me know.
Great post, Susan. If the current implosion of the financial markets doesn’t give the phony bastards in the press pause…..I don’t know what this world is coming to. The surest way to resurrect America’s newspapers is to start telling the story of BHO. OR you can leave it to BLAGO who has a new book deal. He can’t write fast enough for me.
Unfortunately, Chicago Joe, I don’t think the news media has any remorse for it’s role in helping to elect Obama. I believe they see it like, ‘yes, the economy is bad, but no experience is better than what the experienced candidates would have brought to this.
I don’t see anything on the horizon that gives me one speck of hope that the gleeful media, the 18-40 year olds, or AA’s have seen one thing YET that gives them pause. They are completely unmoved by the unrelenting bad news day after day. The ’spell’ they are under seems to make them think he is so brilliant that he can by himself figure this out. Never mind he has had not one day of experience to give any credibility to such unrealistic thinking.
So Obama has been lying constantly for years. Who would have figured it … except for all of the people who have been reading this blog regularly who are not trolls?
My late father was a newspaper editor during my childhood, taught me to love the printed word, and showed me the meaning of “journalism” at its finest. Breakfast in my home was bacon, eggs, and newspapers. Dinner was pot roast, mashed potatoes, and more newspapers. I no longer have home delivery of any newspaper. My hometown paper is owned by the same company who owns the LA Times and the Chicago Tribune, and I stopped it during the primaries when I saw the totally biased, rah rah coverage of Barack Obama. I believe the Internet has much to do with the lagging newspaper sales, of course, but to someone like me to whom the smell of a newspaper coming off the presses was once sweet perfume, the lack of honest journalism, the rampant advocacy, the lack of any in-depth investigating, and the melding of op-ed pieces into the news are the primary reasons I no longer buy newspapers. With my background I would never have chosen the Internet over the newspaper, but I feel the quality and bias of our current print “journalists” give me no choice. Somewhere along the line we allowed “journalists” to become advocates, and the integrity and credibility of the once revered fourth estate are simply history.
Amen, Babs!
I think his cuts in military and defense spending and his withdrawal plans in Iraq will make most of his devoted followers happy enough to stay on the pony.
Only until the next terror attack.
I keep thinking how Al Quaida hate us because of our greed/wealth. One could think that they would like that we are going bankrupt. I can’t help but think that they would feel the opposite, listening to these huge numbers being thrown around like it’s nothing. Trillions here, trillions there, trillions everywhere in America. I don’t like the messages that are being sent to terrorists. They did not go away just because we elected a black man. I know the media would like to pretend that they did go away and love America now. I don’t believe that BS MSM story any more than I bought the BS BO MSM story.
OK, I’ll bite. What’s the Bosnia story and could you provide a link? I don’t see any reference to Bosnia in the past 2 days worth of MSM.