March is Women’s History Month
By Linda Anselmi on March 11, 2009 at 11:21 AM in Current Affairs, Hillary Clinton, Women, Women's Suffrage
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Supreme Court Justice, “I think about how much we owe to the women who went before us – legions of women, some known but many more unknown. I applaud the bravery and resilience of those who helped all of us – you and me – to be here today.”
The Other Tea Party that Launched a Revolution
The Women’s Rights Movement had its start on a sweltering summer day in upstate New York, when a young housewife and mother, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, was invited to tea with four women friends. Their conversation turned to the limitations that still remained on women under America’s new democracy. While the American Revolution, fought just 70 years earlier, was waged to win freedom from tyranny, women had gained little if any freedoms. And the friends agreed, that women should play a more active role in this new republic.
Within two days of their afternoon tea together on July 13, 1848, this small group of women had picked a date for their convention, found a suitable location, and placed a small announcement in the Seneca County Courier. They called it “A convention to discuss the social, civil, and religious condition and rights of woman.” The gathering would take place at the Wesleyan Chapel in Seneca Falls on July 19 and 20, 1848.
Today we are living the legacy of that afternoon conversation. ONE HUNDRED AND SIXTY years after a friendly tea party, we are looking at the massive changes these women set in motion when they daringly agreed to convene the world’s first Women’s Rights Convention.
A HISTORY OF WOMEN’S RIGHTS IN THE UNITED STATES 1769 – American colonial laws were based on the English common law, which said, “By marriage, the husband and wife are one person in the law. The very being and legal existence of the woman is suspended during the marriage, or at least is incorporated into that of her husband under whose wing and protection she performs everything.”
1839 – The first state (Mississippi) grants women the right to hold property in their own name, with their husbands’ permission.
1866 – The 14th Amendment is passed by Congress (ratified by the states in 1868). It is the first time “citizens” and “voters” are defined as “male” in the Constitution.
1869 – The first woman suffrage law in the U.S. is passed in the territory of Wyoming.
1875 – The U.S. Supreme Court declares, a state can prohibit a woman from voting. The court declares women as “persons,” but holds that they constitute a “special category of _nonvoting_ citizens.”
1890 – The first state (Wyoming) grants women the right to vote in all elections.
1918 – Margaret Sanger wins her suit in New York to allow doctors to advise their married patients about birth control for health purposes.
1920 – The Nineteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is ratified. It declares: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.”
1923 – National Woman’s Party proposes Constitutional amendment: “Men and women shall have equal rights throughout the United States and in every place subject to its jurisdiction. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.”
1963 – The Equal Pay Act is passed by Congress, promising equitable wages for the same work, regardless of the race, color, religion, national origin or sex of the worker.
1964 – Title VII of the Civil Rights Act passes including a prohibition against employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, or sex.
1971 – The U.S. Supreme Court outlaws the practice of private employers refusing to hire women with pre-school children.
1972 – Title IX (Public Law 92-318) of the Education Amendments prohibits sex discrimination in all aspects of education programs that receive federal support.
1972 – The Supreme Court rules that the right to privacy encompasses an unmarried person’s right to use contraceptives.
1973 – The U.S. Supreme Court bans sex-segregated “help wanted” advertising as a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended.
1973 – The U.S. Supreme Court declares that the Constitution protects women’s right to terminate an early pregnancy, thus making abortion legal in the U.S.
1978 – The Pregnancy Discrimination Act bans employment discrimination against pregnant women.
1984 – The state of Mississippi belatedly ratifies the 19th Amendment, granting women the vote.
1996 – United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996), affirms that the male-only admissions policy of the state-supported Virginia Military Institute violates the Fourteenth Amendment.
1997 – Elaborating on Title IX, the Supreme Court rules that college athletics programs must actively involve roughly equal numbers of men and women to qualify for federal support.
2009 – The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act expands workers’ rights to sue over pay discrimination.
For a more comprehensive History of Women’s Rights go to The National Women’s History Project website here.
Women Taking the Lead to Save Our Planet is this year’s National Women’s History Project theme. It is in recognition of the important work women are doing in the on-going “green movement. The 2009 Honorees include scientists, engineers, business leaders, writers, filmmakers, conservationists, teachers, community organizers, religious or workplace leaders or others whose lives show exceptional vision and leadership to save our planet.
Among the honorees is Hillary Rodham Clinton, who, while serving in the United States Senate, worked to secure federal legislation to protect the environment both on the Senate’s Environment and Public Works Committee and as the senior Democrat on the Fisheries, Wildlife and Water subcommittee. She co-sponsored the Petroleum Consumer Price Gouging Protection Act and Close the Enron Loophole Act to enable the President to declare an energy emergency and trigger federal gouging protections.
Pictured above is honoree Dr. Jean McLain, research microbial ecologist. For more information on Dr. McLain and the other honoree, please go here.

1963 – The Equal Pay Act is passed by Congress, promising equitable wages for the same work, regardless of the race, color, religion, national origin or sex of the worker.







































Thank you very much Linda!
I was really impressed to see the two dates from Wyoming. I had not seen these histories.
From progressive city women to rugged frontier women!
They did us proud!
Thank you Sassy.
And Every walk of life.
Yes, they did!
I too was surprised and impressed at Wyoming leading the way on giving women the vote. I’ll bet there is a good story behind that. I can’t image there wasn’t a good and compelling reason that the powers that be wanted and needed the women folk to vote.
Coming from India, I have already had a woman head of state in Indira Gandhi, and a very capable and powerful one at that. But she was picked (in a parliamentary system) initially for all the wrong reasons — she had the catchy last name, Gandhi, she was Nehru’s daughter, and the party bigwigs thought they could make a puppet out of her. Boy, were they wrong!
I had high hopes for this past election about electing a woman but was terribly disappointed. I am at times ashamed that this fairly advanced and wealthy country does not have it in its culture to affect that outcome. So there is still that little icky little thing called the glass ceiling. By and large America compared to other countries gives women the most freedom in making the most of their opportunities in everyday life. I am surprised to see however that it does not translate to higher echelons of power, be it corporate or political. When I graduated my first two women students about 5-6 years ago, my husband said that he hoped they would become CEOs one day. Let us hope it becomes easier for them. Hope and change of a monumental kind.
Hey pm317 -
Great to hear from you. I too had high hopes for this past election. And was extremely disappointed.
Your comment on Indira Gandhi was interesting that she was picked (needed) for the wrong reasons… it got me thinking.
I’m not sure much in life is changed until someone perceives a need for it.
Maybe that is now our challenge for the women’s movement (and advancement). Maybe we have to shown the world that -
WOMEN ARE NEEDED.
There in is the irony, the rub, isn’t it? — we’re a majority but we still have to demonstrate the need for our intellect which in no measure is inferior to a man’s intellect.
Sometimes, I feel in addition to deliberate planning for advancement, we need an icebreaker event — a woman thrust into the highest office for whatever reason but proves how women can also rise to the occasion to dispel any doubt anybody has. In Hillary we had all of it — with her prior proximity to the office she knew exactly what she was getting into; she had the ambition, the intellect and most of all courage. But a whole bunch of men and a few misguided women could derail that prospect by usurping a type parliamentary system in a non-parliamentary democracy to negate the people’s choice.
This article is what we need more of it brought me to tears. Women need to set aside their difference and start standing up united to finally get some equal rights. ERA now demand it! Every city in the United States Women Need To Start Local Womens Group to become aware what is going on in local and national politics. Rock on with more articles like this…
http://democracyinsuffrage.blogspot.com
If March is Women’s History Month, does that mean the other 11 months are Men’s History Months?
Apparently women made only 1/12 of all history.
It more than feels that way sometimes.
Thanks for this, Linda!
You know, it is really sad that the faces of women suffragettes are nowhere near as recognizable as men from comparable times in history.
Where would we be without them?
RRRA -
Love the changing faces of women’s history video in your “Women’s Reality and History” post.
well, technically one and a half, if you add in the Black women from black history month.
That is why I don’t like either… it makes it seems like we aren’t *part* of ALL the history.
I agree with you.
There is an African American columnist, Rochelle Riley, in the Detroit Free Press who is opposed to Black History Month because it relegates focus on Black history only to that month and feels their accomplishments should be fully integrated into everyone else’s accomplishments and given equal status.
By segregating the accomplishments of a certain group of people one could argue that it further reinforces their minority and second class status.
I can understand a bit of your logic, yet is love diminished by celebrating Valentines day?
Certainly there are some who put way too much importance on one day. While there are those who scorn such celebrations. For most, it is simply a day to remind each other what is important – caring for each other.
To tell you the truth, I wasn’t sure March was Women’s History Month until last week. On the whole, I don’t think most women have paid much attention to it. But its a shame. Especially after this last year or so and all the negating of women and their abilities and accomplishments.
Maybe it’s just me. And the mind set I am in at this point in my life. But I for one wouldn’t mind seeing a lot more celebration of Womanhood.
Great post Linda!! Thanks for putting all this together.
Remember when Obama tried to discredit Hillary by saying all she did was have tea parties? Well, look what can happen at tea parties!
yeah Obama’s community organiser was such a big thing but Hillary doing that same exact work, as the First Lady was reduced to just tea parties. If anything she should be praised even more, since we don’t pay first ladies anymore.
oops meant to say since we don’t pay first ladies at all.
oops meant to say since we don’t pay first ladies at all.
P.S. – Sorry, forgot to tell you great post!