http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/27/navarrette.obama.economics/index.html

He is the American Idol pick, and now we all have to suffer because you and others were totally duped.

I thought it was bad enough enduring American Idol…

Now we have

Survivor..White House Edition!

(seriously though, do a side by side of Axelrod & Hitler - it’s frightening!)

I’ve talked to my friends and not one of them can name anything Obama has done for black folks. He’s all show and no go. Rezko anyone?

As for any Jewish person handling Obama I’ll leave that alone. Don’t want called an anti-Semite ya know. Funny thing is Palestinians are Semites as well. But let’s not talk about that.

i.e. Smooth black men, managed by Jewish guy, for the entertainment of the white masses.

Is it wrong to say that? Or just totally f’n accurate?

We are so screwed.

Sorry to be blunt but of all of the reasons to vote for Obama this was the most stupid.

I’m male. I can honestly say that gender had virtually nothing to do with my own choice; race was also irrelevant; I would have been equally pleased to see either barrier broken, but that was an incidental matter. My own decision had to do with the belief that a change of course was desperately needed, and that either Clinton or Obama represented such a change. I’m still of the same opinion. Some will assume that’s because I’m still under an illusion. I would argue that it’s because I didn’t have too many llusions to begin with.

Like Wow!

I was really looking forward to 2008 being the year of the woman…Oh well!

The leftwing forces that are now in control are where they are because they’ve learned how to control and manipulate the semantics of the debate. For instance, there is no “war” in Iraq or Afganistan; there are no battle lines, no enemy strongholds, no uniformed troops, and no singular entity that we can compell to surrender unconditionally. The “war” has been over for some time now. The enemy was routed. It would be more accurate to call it an occupation or peace-keeping mission at this point. By continuing to call them wars is simply falling prey to the semantic trap that the left has used to foment dissent and create an atmosphere more favorable to their candidate.

More on topic, one of the most irritating semantic distortions that has become entrenched in the political realm is that of “campaign promises”. It has been assumed that when a candidate makes a verbal commitment to an issue, he is making a promise that he will try to keep. If or when he goes back on his word we say that he broke his promise. Fair enough, that’s the way it has been for most politicians. 0bama is a new animal. I truly believe that most of his grand proclamations and guarentees were lies when he told them. They were campaign “lies” not “promises”. He never intended on following through or accomplishing many of the things that he championed during the campaign, and he knew that at the time he spoke them. It is pointless to grant any credibility to anything that leaves his mouth, and therefor pointless to listen at all to him. He will say whatever he feels is necessary to get the support he needs to accomplish his goals, it doesn’t matter at all if what he says and what he wants are complete opposites. Bottom line, ignore EVERYTHING the bastard says, it could be true if it suits him, and a lie if that suits him. Judge him solely on his actions. I wonder how different his image would be if everyone actually could ignore or disregard everything he has ever said, and assess him only on his actions. Ignore the words, focus on the deeds.