<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disturbing: Do you want Obama controlling your Internet access?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/04/disturbing-do-you-want-obama-controlling-your-internet-access/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/04/disturbing-do-you-want-obama-controlling-your-internet-access/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:09:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Solara 7</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/04/disturbing-do-you-want-obama-controlling-your-internet-access/#comment-1172393</link>
		<dc:creator>Solara 7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 22:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=20002#comment-1172393</guid>
		<description>ME are you sure you are at the right place????  No Quarter has always been concerned about ultra liberals and an Obama presidency.

I think you belong at MYDD or Kos or Huffipoo rather than here.  Please...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ME are you sure you are at the right place????  No Quarter has always been concerned about ultra liberals and an Obama presidency.</p>
<p>I think you belong at MYDD or Kos or Huffipoo rather than here.  Please&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksclematis</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/04/disturbing-do-you-want-obama-controlling-your-internet-access/#comment-1172348</link>
		<dc:creator>ksclematis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 21:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=20002#comment-1172348</guid>
		<description>Two thoughts: 
  Since the gross use of the Inernet for news has caused the failure and collapse, not to mention bankruptcy, of a number of large-city newspapers, and IF the &#039;givernment&#039; closes down the Internet, who will warn us to get duct tape and sheet plastic to surround our living space safe from nucUlar fallout????  (Egads, after 8 looooonng years, GW never did learn to pronounce that word!)

  Some federal lawmakers need to bump heads and get the current provision outlawed, which now gives the prez full authority to close down the entire country. Heaven forbid! But who knows what the Idiobots have on their pea brains....

  Oh, yes, how did BO use the Internet to collect his campaign funds, entice prospective voters to believe in Hope and Change???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two thoughts:<br />
  Since the gross use of the Inernet for news has caused the failure and collapse, not to mention bankruptcy, of a number of large-city newspapers, and IF the &#8216;givernment&#8217; closes down the Internet, who will warn us to get duct tape and sheet plastic to surround our living space safe from nucUlar fallout????  (Egads, after 8 looooonng years, GW never did learn to pronounce that word!)</p>
<p>  Some federal lawmakers need to bump heads and get the current provision outlawed, which now gives the prez full authority to close down the entire country. Heaven forbid! But who knows what the Idiobots have on their pea brains&#8230;.</p>
<p>  Oh, yes, how did BO use the Internet to collect his campaign funds, entice prospective voters to believe in Hope and Change???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksclematis</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/04/disturbing-do-you-want-obama-controlling-your-internet-access/#comment-1172335</link>
		<dc:creator>ksclematis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 21:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=20002#comment-1172335</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget &#039;toonist Pat Racimora...She has very timely and thought challenging articles on NQ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget &#8216;toonist Pat Racimora&#8230;She has very timely and thought challenging articles on NQ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donna darko</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/04/disturbing-do-you-want-obama-controlling-your-internet-access/#comment-1172119</link>
		<dc:creator>donna darko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 14:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=20002#comment-1172119</guid>
		<description>Exactly. PUMAs know from the way he ran his campaign he is a totalitarian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. PUMAs know from the way he ran his campaign he is a totalitarian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonic Ninja Kitty</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/04/disturbing-do-you-want-obama-controlling-your-internet-access/#comment-1172006</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonic Ninja Kitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 03:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=20002#comment-1172006</guid>
		<description>The one thing fascism and socialism/communism have in common:  they are both centralized forms of government.  Power and liberties are removed from the individual and placed with the state. 

Call it whatever you will, but the direction Obama is taking the government is towards more a authoritarian, totalitarian state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one thing fascism and socialism/communism have in common:  they are both centralized forms of government.  Power and liberties are removed from the individual and placed with the state. </p>
<p>Call it whatever you will, but the direction Obama is taking the government is towards more a authoritarian, totalitarian state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donna darko</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/04/disturbing-do-you-want-obama-controlling-your-internet-access/#comment-1171903</link>
		<dc:creator>donna darko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 00:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=20002#comment-1171903</guid>
		<description>The right thinks he&#039;s a communist and the left thinks he&#039;s a fascist. But like the definition of fascist economics says, Obama makes completely opposite statements about economic policies:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Fascists considered the economy to be of little importance, and did not have clear economic views. One significant fascist economic belief was that prosperity would naturally follow once the nation has achieved a cultural and spiritual re-awakening. Often, different members of a fascist party would make completely opposite statements about the economic policies they supported. Once in power, fascists usually adopted whatever economic program they believed to be most suitable for their political goals.

The fascists opposed both international socialism and liberal capitalism, arguing that their views represented a third way. They claimed to provide a realistic economic alternative that was neither laissez-faire capitalism nor communism. They favoured corporatism and class collaboration, believing that the existence of inequality and separate social classes was beneficial.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The right thinks he&#8217;s a communist and the left thinks he&#8217;s a fascist. But like the definition of fascist economics says, Obama makes completely opposite statements about economic policies:</p>
<blockquote><p>Fascists considered the economy to be of little importance, and did not have clear economic views. One significant fascist economic belief was that prosperity would naturally follow once the nation has achieved a cultural and spiritual re-awakening. Often, different members of a fascist party would make completely opposite statements about the economic policies they supported. Once in power, fascists usually adopted whatever economic program they believed to be most suitable for their political goals.</p>
<p>The fascists opposed both international socialism and liberal capitalism, arguing that their views represented a third way. They claimed to provide a realistic economic alternative that was neither laissez-faire capitalism nor communism. They favoured corporatism and class collaboration, believing that the existence of inequality and separate social classes was beneficial.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penguin</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/04/disturbing-do-you-want-obama-controlling-your-internet-access/#comment-1171894</link>
		<dc:creator>penguin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 00:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=20002#comment-1171894</guid>
		<description>How could Americans not see this coming!  With the exception of no quarter readers that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could Americans not see this coming!  With the exception of no quarter readers that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JozefAL</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/04/disturbing-do-you-want-obama-controlling-your-internet-access/#comment-1171753</link>
		<dc:creator>JozefAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 20:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=20002#comment-1171753</guid>
		<description>But, according to the hardcore conservatives who call themselves &quot;strict constructionists&quot;, the First Amendment does NOT apply to things like radio, television or the internet since they didn&#039;t exist during the time of the Founding Fathers.
Maybe we should also send copies of the Constitution to the 4 living jackasses at the Supreme Court who put Dubya into office in 2000.  There is NOTHING in the Constitution that even refers to the Supreme Court being involved in the election of the President.  Nothing that even remotely IMPLIES such action.

(Talk about an eerie coincidence:  I tried posting this a few minutes ago but my internet connection was briefly disrupted and, even though I never lost *full* connection, I couldn&#039;t get this to post nor could I make a connection with other websites.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, according to the hardcore conservatives who call themselves &#8220;strict constructionists&#8221;, the First Amendment does NOT apply to things like radio, television or the internet since they didn&#8217;t exist during the time of the Founding Fathers.<br />
Maybe we should also send copies of the Constitution to the 4 living jackasses at the Supreme Court who put Dubya into office in 2000.  There is NOTHING in the Constitution that even refers to the Supreme Court being involved in the election of the President.  Nothing that even remotely IMPLIES such action.</p>
<p>(Talk about an eerie coincidence:  I tried posting this a few minutes ago but my internet connection was briefly disrupted and, even though I never lost *full* connection, I couldn&#8217;t get this to post nor could I make a connection with other websites.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferd Berfle</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/04/disturbing-do-you-want-obama-controlling-your-internet-access/#comment-1171711</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferd Berfle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 19:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=20002#comment-1171711</guid>
		<description>That would be a good one, for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be a good one, for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oowawa</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/04/disturbing-do-you-want-obama-controlling-your-internet-access/#comment-1171708</link>
		<dc:creator>oowawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 19:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=20002#comment-1171708</guid>
		<description>Controlling the internet?  Hey--here&#039;s a cool idea for another round-robin tournament: Sites Most Likely to be Shut Down By Executive Order During an Emergency.  I give No Quarter a number one seed.  Off the top of my head, Confluence, Reverend Amy, Texas Darlin&#039;, Uppity Woman, Flopping Aces, Market Ticker, Obamamessiah, you&#039;re all IN.  I&#039;m afraid Huff-Po and DK are out of the running.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Controlling the internet?  Hey&#8211;here&#8217;s a cool idea for another round-robin tournament: Sites Most Likely to be Shut Down By Executive Order During an Emergency.  I give No Quarter a number one seed.  Off the top of my head, Confluence, Reverend Amy, Texas Darlin&#8217;, Uppity Woman, Flopping Aces, Market Ticker, Obamamessiah, you&#8217;re all IN.  I&#8217;m afraid Huff-Po and DK are out of the running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferd Berfle</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/04/disturbing-do-you-want-obama-controlling-your-internet-access/#comment-1171700</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferd Berfle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 19:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=20002#comment-1171700</guid>
		<description>Sorry, FL, that was meant for the troll &quot;Me&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, FL, that was meant for the troll &#8220;Me&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferd Berfle</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/04/disturbing-do-you-want-obama-controlling-your-internet-access/#comment-1171699</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferd Berfle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=20002#comment-1171699</guid>
		<description>Why do you continue to blather? This site and the regulars have been against That One since the beginning. In addition, we knew  that the Dick and George show should have been cancelled after the first episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you continue to blather? This site and the regulars have been against That One since the beginning. In addition, we knew  that the Dick and George show should have been cancelled after the first episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferd Berfle</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/04/disturbing-do-you-want-obama-controlling-your-internet-access/#comment-1171696</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferd Berfle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=20002#comment-1171696</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ve assumed that all internet and e-mail traffic has been monitored by the NSA for the past year, at least.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
And is more than likely &lt;em&gt;still&lt;/em&gt; being monitored. So much for hope and change. Monitoring: Bush bad; That One good.

Fortunately I have more than one computer and maintain only one on-line. That One/Whoever can&#039;t monitor what they can&#039;t make a connection to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’ve assumed that all internet and e-mail traffic has been monitored by the NSA for the past year, at least.
</p></blockquote>
<p>And is more than likely <em>still</em> being monitored. So much for hope and change. Monitoring: Bush bad; That One good.</p>
<p>Fortunately I have more than one computer and maintain only one on-line. That One/Whoever can&#8217;t monitor what they can&#8217;t make a connection to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cynic</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/04/disturbing-do-you-want-obama-controlling-your-internet-access/#comment-1171690</link>
		<dc:creator>cynic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=20002#comment-1171690</guid>
		<description>The reasons we should all be very concerned about internet monitoring and any capability to shut down or seize control of portions of the internet are obvious.  There&#039;s a fundamental dilemma, of course:  &lt;strong&gt;Vulnerability to clandestine monitoring and seizue of control are inherent in digital information and communication systems by their very nature.  Any sufficiently sophisticated and well-funded organization with internet access has the ability to exploit that fact.&lt;/strong&gt;  

We&#039;ve recently discovered that unknown parties in China--or at least operating through China--have utilized GhostNet to access computer systems world wide, and were able not only to download files but to turn on and off webcams and microphones undetected; we&#039;ve learned that Google, which we all know and love, has maintained full, identifiable  histories of every Google Search we have ever made; we&#039;ve come to understand that everything from the national power grid to a single New York City traffic signal is theoretically vulnerable to cyber-attack.  

Obviously the government needs the capability to counter the threat that&#039;s inherent in the system.  The dilemma is how it can be empowered to do that effectively without becoming an even greater threat itself.  Administrations we trust or distrust come and go.  New powers and capabilities remain, however, and become available to whoever is next to take the driver&#039;s seat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reasons we should all be very concerned about internet monitoring and any capability to shut down or seize control of portions of the internet are obvious.  There&#8217;s a fundamental dilemma, of course:  <strong>Vulnerability to clandestine monitoring and seizue of control are inherent in digital information and communication systems by their very nature.  Any sufficiently sophisticated and well-funded organization with internet access has the ability to exploit that fact.</strong>  </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve recently discovered that unknown parties in China&#8211;or at least operating through China&#8211;have utilized GhostNet to access computer systems world wide, and were able not only to download files but to turn on and off webcams and microphones undetected; we&#8217;ve learned that Google, which we all know and love, has maintained full, identifiable  histories of every Google Search we have ever made; we&#8217;ve come to understand that everything from the national power grid to a single New York City traffic signal is theoretically vulnerable to cyber-attack.  </p>
<p>Obviously the government needs the capability to counter the threat that&#8217;s inherent in the system.  The dilemma is how it can be empowered to do that effectively without becoming an even greater threat itself.  Administrations we trust or distrust come and go.  New powers and capabilities remain, however, and become available to whoever is next to take the driver&#8217;s seat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kat in your hat</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/04/disturbing-do-you-want-obama-controlling-your-internet-access/#comment-1171641</link>
		<dc:creator>kat in your hat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 17:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=20002#comment-1171641</guid>
		<description>What will Oblow be called if suddenly there is healthcare and programs funded?

What would it take before you change your mind about Oblow being a neocon/ fascist/ corporatist, etc?

And what will he be called when his actions appear to be both marxist and fascist simultaneously?

Or will he just be an authoritarian dictator...?  Or what?

The man has only been in office for a few months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What will Oblow be called if suddenly there is healthcare and programs funded?</p>
<p>What would it take before you change your mind about Oblow being a neocon/ fascist/ corporatist, etc?</p>
<p>And what will he be called when his actions appear to be both marxist and fascist simultaneously?</p>
<p>Or will he just be an authoritarian dictator&#8230;?  Or what?</p>
<p>The man has only been in office for a few months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
