Comments on: Motor Mouth Joe’s Telepathic Certitude

By: Who’s Running the White House? : NO QUARTER

Who’s Running the White House? : NO QUARTER — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:21:00 +0000

[...] why I had to write about V.P. Joe Biden’s astonishingly reckless remarks recently in “Motor Mouth Joe’s Telepathic Certitude” when he told CNN reporters that “I guarantee you we are safer today, our interests are [...]

By: tango

tango — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:47:39 +0000

Boy, Joe Biden is just daring someone to prove him wrong by carrying out some sort of man caused disaster. And when this man caused disaster occurs, then maybe America can bring back some of those specialized people from the overseas contingency operation to investigate and catch those who caused the man man diaster. And when we catch them, then we can take those people suspected of causing the man made disaster and bring them to an American prison for debriefing. And then we can ask them nicely to give us information about their fellow man caused disaster believers and about any future man caused disaster acts that might be in the works. Then these persons who used to be called suspected man caused diaster carry outers, become peoples who the president has the ability to detain. And these peoples who the President has the ability to detain are cared for with American taxpayer money, and given the same rights as American citizens, until such time they are convicted or released because there’s not enough evidence to prove they caused a man man disaster. And because their country of orgin no longer wants them or their safety might be at risk if they were to go back home or no third country wants to accept them, America then has to relocated them somewhere in America. American can’t leave them destitute so has to give them more taxpayer money so they have a good start. Then they are no longer called suspected man made disaster causers nor persons the President has the ability to detain but are now called welfare receipients. Oh but welfare receipients will probably be changed to “fairness receivers” since that’s a much nicer term and doesn’t have such a negative association.

Oh, I feel so much better now about what Joe said.

Now we know why the “terrorists”, “terrorism” and “enemy combantant” terms were used. It takes too long to use Obama speak.

By: lorac

lorac — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 02:44:01 +0000

Boys, too?

By: Bill

Bill — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:28:05 +0000

Rome was destroyed by it’s external enemies only after it had been gutted from within, by weak and corrupt political leaders. Once being bribed was valued more than doing what was right by those you governed, the political structure crumbled and with that the empire’s military security. Barney Frank and Chris Dodd with their taking money and favors would have fit right in at the end of the Roman empire. The biggest danger to the US is not it’s external enemies, but it’s corrupt politicians.

By: Ferd Berfle

Ferd Berfle — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:42:39 +0000

My comment got the old Maytag spin and dump. Can one of the administrators kindly retrieve it from the River Styx?

By: Ferd Berfle

Ferd Berfle — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:40:58 +0000

We’re only vulnerable because you idiots traded in one monumental idiot in Dubya for another monumental idiot, That One.

I am tired of demonstrating your lack of intellectual capacity and that of your polar opposites. Collectively, the extremists on the left and the right are the focus of stupidity in this world. I say again, the focus of stupidity in this world are boobs like you and boobs like Bushbots and their brethren. As far as I’m concerned, you can go yuck fourself.

I see cause and effect much more easily that you do, mainly because I’ve been trained in it and have been doing it for over 25 years. You are part of the problem, child and don’t even enter into any solution.

By: ziggy

ziggy — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:31:13 +0000

Come on Ferd–you’re a chemist, right? You damn well know any number of things I might be making an oblique reference to here. We’re vulnerable on a grand scale to anyone having an evil intention. There’s a perfectly obvious reason why the topic hasn’t been openly discussed, and in recognition of that I’ll say no more about it, but I know you know.

By: Ferd Berfle

Ferd Berfle — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:25:39 +0000

Regarding North Korea, I think the bigger problem is that there doesn’t appear to be anyone in charge in the North.

China won’t lift a finger to help the N Koreans, which are truly a pain in their large oriental arse. They’ve found capitalism and won’t give it up anytime soon.

Pakistan imploding would be a disaster.

Perhaps but India does possess a remedy for the Pakistanis should they go ballistic, so to speak.

In my mind, Iran is the biggest potential trouble-maker.

By: Ferd Berfle

Ferd Berfle — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:19:26 +0000

I worry more immediately about stuff like a predictably uninspected shipment of fruit or vegetables laced with slow-acting toxins or biological agents.

Well, dumbass, slow-acting toxins or biological are amenable to treatment (slow-acting being the key term, dumbass).

A nuclear weapon in the wrong hands is neither slow nor amenable to treatment. Once again you demonstrate your abject stupidity in the realm of science.

Kindly take a few courses, commit them to memory, and shut up in the interim, troll.

By: Ferd Berfle

Ferd Berfle — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:15:45 +0000

I’ve seem some monumentally-stupid trolls but you. Zippy, take the trophy. Irrespective of whether they have or can have the bomb, that we are even asking the question speaks volumes. You seem to be nonchalant about it, more than likely because you were dropped on your tiny head on more than one occasion as an infant, which was only about 6 years ago judging form the content of your posts. Does it still hurt, boob?

By: I'mFedUp

I'mFedUp — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:09:20 +0000

Zippy…sigh…You deserve a raise, really you do. I certainly think that your “concern” is a valid one. But you won’t be eating much clean cow if you’re dead.

By: ziggy

ziggy — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:06:30 +0000

You can worry about the currently non-existent Iranian or North Korean nuke all you want. They deserve some worry. I worry more immediately about stuff like a predictably uninspected shipment of fruit or vegetables laced with slow-acting toxins or biological agents. I don’t quite know how to respond if you really think that’s moronic of me.

By: RPL

RPL — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:06:02 +0000

Regarding North Korea, I think the bigger problem is that there doesn’t appear to be anyone in charge in the North. The potential for civil war in the north is very real. If anyone’s interested, there are a number of scenarios that were run regarding conflict in Korea. Basically, South Korea can probably handle the North Koreans, as long as China stays out, and the NK’s don’t lob a nuke or chemical warhead into Seoul.

Pakistan imploding would be a disaster. Since the USAF was strectched thin to move Obama and his entourage to Europe for his vacation (and with his missteps, he’s reminding me of Clark Griswold), and fly Pelosi all over the place, maybe they’d be willing to relinquish their flight perks and give the planes/capacity back to the air force?

By: foxyladi14

foxyladi14 — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:04:54 +0000

poor Joe..i really worry about him..

By: foxyladi14

foxyladi14 — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:58:51 +0000

give them an inch..they take a mile..