Cable TV News: Who Succeeds, Who Dumbs It Down
By SusanUnPC on April 14, 2009 at 8:15 PM in Fox News, MSNBC, Media, Media Bias, Media Handling of Story, Media, Television
RACHEL MADDOW, MSNBC: (Warning to Rachel: This will sting.)
Any liberal who has blamed the terrible quality of cable news discourse on its domination by conservatives should be reading Bob Somerby’s most recent series of articles on the vapidity of Rachel Maddow’s MSNBC show, which has become attracted a great deal of attention from liberal elites and media types. The inescapable conclusion of reading Somerby is that the problem with cable news is structural, not ideological. The only way for a pundit to assemble a large enough audience to succeed in prime time is to pander to their audience’s ideological sensibilities and to dumb down their content to the lowest common denominator.
The sad outcome of this process is that Maddow — a former Rhodes scholar — is distorting her own previous statements to make Republicans look bad and devoting long periods of airtime to a running joke about Republican “tea-bagging.” (Keith Olbermann’s show operates at a similar level.)
I’m sure liberals tell themselves that she’s still better than Hannity, O’Reilly, et al. but that’s a pretty low bar. Read all at Brendan Nyhan’s blog and Memorandum.com.
BRET BAIER, FOX NEWS: (Warning to Rachel, Keith and Baier’s new direct MSNBC competitor, the Numbskull Ignoramus Ed (shudder) Schultz: This will sting even more.)
Bret Baier has been covering the White House and national politics for a decade. Yet even he still experiences surreal moments with the most powerful people in Washington.
The anchor of “Special Report with Bret Baier” recently ran into Rahm Emanuel, chief of staff for President Barack Obama. Emanuel told Baier, a former WRAL reporter, he was doing a great job since replacing Brit Hume as anchor on the Fox News Channel program on Jan. 5.
Emanuel told Baier the White House senior staff watches his show every night.
“I said, ‘Oh come on …,’” Baier says. “And he said, ‘Now sometimes we have the volume down, but we watch it every night.’”
Baier found the story funny and gratifying.
“It told me the administration knows we’re there,” he says, “and it’s in their best interest to watch us.”
People are watching.
Baier’s 6 p.m. show attracted twice as many viewers as the CNN and MSNBC shows in the same time slot combined, an average of 2,045,000 viewers, according to Nielsen Media Research.
From Jan. 5 to April 6, “Special Report” viewership rose 39 percent over the same period in 2008. In March, it increased 44 percent compared with a year before.
“It has been quite a ride,” Baier says. “The information flow coming out of the nation’s capital, it’s like drinking from a fire hose.
“A lot of it affects everyone. It’s our job to sift through everything and make sure we’re not missing any big stories.” - Read all at the Raleigh News-Observer.
I watch Baier’s show every day too. I wouldn’t miss it. It’s chock full of news — important news! — and the panel during the last 15+ minutes offers insightful, witty opinions.
There’s no “junk” news, no wild conjecture, no playing with factoids, no piecemeal picking of quotes that leave out the full story, and no base, vulgar titillation. It’s solid news at a brisk pace, with some of the best reporters in television providing thoughtful news stories that always teach me something new.
There’s no tingling, pontificating, silly giggling, or cutesy voices (oh, for the love of god, Rachel, stop that — it’s not cute or funny). NBC, hire her a voice coach. Pronto.
And, rightfully, the ratings prove that people prefer substantive news shows to junk.
Ed Schultz’s predecessor, David Shuster on the now-defunct “1600 Pennsylvania Avenue,” did an alright job and I usually DVR’d the show because sometimes he had great guests like David Corn who actually took Obama to task for his extra-Constitutional power grab, beyond Bush, of a unitary presidency.
Yes, Shuster’s a sexist pig (due to his infamous remark about Chelsea Clinton), but we also have to remember that he did a superb job covering the trial of Scooter Libby and standing up for Valerie Plame Wilson. He grasped the highly complex trial issues, and offered up daily reports that made the arcane legal matters comprehensible to viewers. At least Shuster had a background as a reporter! Why, he was a bona fide newsman!
But Schultz? I got worried when I saw that Schultz was regularly subbing for Shuster. Surely, I thought, MSNBC wouldn’t hire such an ignorant man who can’t get basic facts straight and who is a Johnny-come-lately to the liberal world, having been a Republican most of his life.
Schultz was vicious to Hillary Clinton during the primaries, and saddled up for Obama early on, who he deified so much that he can’t find any fault with the man.
Look at this new regular segment: “Psycho Talk.” When I think of the great anchors and reporters that NBC has had, I’m sickened. Here are a few of those distinguished people:
- David Brinkley
- Chet Huntley
- Bonnie Erbe
- John Chancellor
- Pauline Frederick
- Marvin Kalb
- Frank McGee
- Roger Mudd
- Ed Newman
- Betty Rollin
and on and on.
And this is what NBC News is putting on the air now? Is that swinging what Ed does to get himself revved?
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
So this is a crass search for the craziest crazy out there and to MOCK them, That’s easy enough to find in any large crowd on every side of the political spectrum (Code Pink, anyone?) . How informative. Tea Party insanity? No, this is just a cheap hatchet job with ZERO effort made by Ed’s producers to find the thousands of normal American citizens who are participating in the events of April 15th.
Chet Huntley and David Brinkley would be deeply ashamed that the once-great NBC News department they anchored would be reduced to this junk “news” pornography. Hell, they wouldn’t recognize this garbage as belonging on any “news” channel, let alone one owned by NBC.
Bret Baier has NOTHING to worry about, does he. His ratings will continue to soar, especially given his latest, um, competition.
























I gave up listening to Ed Schultz 18 months ago. He was evil to Hillary, and definitely drank the koolaid. It must be a prerequisite to getting a job on MSNBC. How low do you think the ratings have to go before they realize they are headed in the wrong direction? I sure as hell won’t be watching.
Ed Schultz should not be allowed to even comment on Wrestle Mania.
I haven’t watched msnbc’s drivel since Chris Matthew’s leg tingle.
RIP Journalism.
To start, I don’t think you become a “former” Rhodes Scholar. You either are or you aren’t. She is. She is manifestly, very bright. Her show is growing in popularity and is sometimes fun. There are times when her cute little smile, more a sneer, annoys me. The person who, on another blog over here, referred to her as” Madcow,” is a dunce and should be sent to a liberal blog where he will be destroyed by five little horses (so they don’t pull too quickly) being tied to *all* of his appendeges with a bucket of grain j.u.s.t. a foot away from their hungry little mouths. Beyond examining her providing of news, my take of her is that I HATE it that she likes girls for intimate friends. She is quite cute. Anyone disdaining her is afraid of really bright women. So, there!
Gug
wow.
she is not bright.
she is not cute.
she is vile and shallow.
and i like my women smart.
so there.
Thanks Dad.
Watching television news shows nowadays is like watching fiction about television news. They’re usually fake and almost scripted, so they seem like just made-up shows, like any drama or sit-com. (Remember Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman? That was a good show, especially when it then spun off Fernwood Tonight, with Martin Mull. That was hilarious!)
Watching national news now is just nothing like watching Huntley/Brinkly with my Dad back in the day. I can’t believe I am really watching news nowadays–it’s all so scewed, so I don’t watch–unless it’s a local station giving local news.
I always watch Bret Baier’s show. It really is “fair
and balanced”. Bret always seems amused at the news,
but comes up with some important points when the panel for the last 20 minutes discusses issues. I like that both liberal and conservatives have intelligent opinions without using name calling like
MSNBC. I’ve channeled surf onto MSNBC once in a while and can’t believe the Palin bashing, Bush mocking and calling real conservative and decent Americans “psychos”. That’s pathetic and who listens to it? Obviously, not too many.
As a gay man….I will tell you that Rachael Maddow is one angry lesbian! I can’t stomach to listen to her……..Keith Olbermann is still overcoming a head injury so he can’t help himself for being a moron! LOL MSNBC is NoBama News Network along with CNN… Haven’t watched either since the primary season started and it was praise Allah NoBama and down with Hillary the Witch… The media has no business doing anything but reporting things as they actually happen…
Folks,
The main scream media is dying
I stopped watching CNN when they brought out that drunk Bernstein
I stopped Watching Overbite when I realized that he was a traitor to the United States
I never have liked Radical ManCow
I’ve given up the Seattle Slimes
I’ve stopped watching the class warfare on NBC.
Of course my wife keeps me updated on the latest sensationalized obot news…
Agreed, MSM is losing ground faster and faster (Go America!). I watch only FOX news and C-SPAN 1,2,3.
I would watch FOX Business News but I don’t get it as part of my standard package, I know, I know…demand it! And I think I will!
Someone shared a link here a couple weeks ago to Olbermann Watch with Lou Dobbs on the radio. The caller was basically saying that people should be listening to Keith as the voice of reason for both sides. Dobbs said that Olbermann has to adjust his medication so much he has no idea what he’s saying half the time. He had me laughing so hard I was crying. I never really watch Rachel very often. I never liked Keith( I would do the last channel thing when he would be talking because he was just too vile to listen to for a long period of time. I figured out what bothers me about O’Reilly also. He’s always pointing his finger with three fingers pointed right back at him. So, I’m always wondering just what those three fingers pointed back at him are saying.), but I used to really like Chris.
I gave up watching MSNBC and CNN in 2008 (before Lent I might add) during the dem. primaries. I became disgusted at their obvious bias against and personal remarks about Hillary Clinton, her family, and her supporters. I turned to Fox Cable News - a station I had hardly watched before. Although I don’t agree with their slant on some of the programs I watch, it’s better than the other two options. I have caught Brett Baier’s program and you are right, it’s full of news and excellent commentaries. Life has a way of surprising one. Who would have guessed two short years ago my husband and I would have even turned on Fox Cable News for anything?
I’m old enough to remember Huntley and Brinkley. It’s tragic what has happened to NBC news. Alas time passes and things change - not always for the better in the case of NBC news!
Chet Huntley?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ViBf2Riqqo
the left does not like you to challenge their heroes nor does the right (wrong). Over at Crooks and Liars I got in trouble for challenging Rachel Maddow had not had Charles Freeman on after the blogosphere was immersed. Olberman would not touch the Charles Freeman withdrawal. Hmmm
At the same site I got verbally whacked (think it is so telling) when I was challenging Jon Stewart for not taking Chris Matthews up on his invite on Hardball after Stewart ripped up Matthews yet goes kind of soft when it came to interviewing both Bill
Kristol and David Frum. Sorry but I know who I would be harder on.
The left does not like being challenged but either do those on the right.
—————————————
Hey this is bit ot but really worth it
Tonight on Hardball Frank Gaffney, David Corn and Chirs Matthews really went at on whether Spain has the right to go after our “alleged” war criminals
go to the spain clip
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036697/#30215925
They really went at it
Reply
Leen | Tuesday April 14, 2009 05:46 pm 20
In response to Leen @ 19 (show text)
David Corn to Gaffney “Frank we’re you against the Nuremberg Trials”
You go David
Matthews blew a fuse ya hoo
Chris Matthews ” my view, well my view is o.k. let me tell you my view of this Frank buddy I’ll tell you my view of this. We crossed that line in that West Point speech by President Bush George W. Bush up there in 2002 when he said we are going to go into other countries and kick ass because they do not have democracies in those countries that’s when he said we’re going to go kill
people internationally because we do not like their form of government that’s when we crossed the line Frank”
Really? I thought No Quarter liked Hannity and O’Reilly. Especially Hannity. NQ posts approvingly posts clips from his show all the time.
You still don’t “get it”. NQ people are independant and don’t belong in a herd. Each one of us can think for ourselves. We are not part of some kind of collective.
Really? I thought No Quarter liked Hannity and O’Reilly. Especially Hannity. NQ approvingly posts clips from his show here all the time.
Here is a great piece about our News and the U.K.’s
Need a chuckle about the news
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_amyJCLmMY8&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.harpers.org%2Fsubjects%2FNoComment&feature=player_embedded
Chet Huntley was in a different galaxy from the bottom feeders at MSNBC.
The thing is quality still matters .My husband & I rarely watch the “news” anymore because it generally appears coordinated through Obama’s pr wing.
Having said that we do see Greta and Hume’s replacement because their demeanor is the most civilized.
Ed Schultz is a fat pig. I can’t believe that this hack with zero political talent can be offered a job as an news host. I prefer Schuster over this joke, at least Schuster has a good understanding of politics, although he is biased.
MSNBC: Matthews, Olbermann, Maddow, Schultz
What a fkn joke! 4 Obama cheerleaders. Maddow is the best of the group! LOL
Yeah, but it is fun to watch him put a cloven hoof or two in his mouth as he often does.
oh yeah..ed shultz is a big, fat pig…yes he is…
what do you call Limbaugh?
I happen to like rush..i don’t agree with him on everything, because he is a stringent conservative and I am not. However I am impressed by his keep brain, his different perspectives, and his very adept analysis of the political vista…for example…. today…he put in perspective the timing of Obama’s speech..he thought that Obama spoke to take the edge off or counter the plethora of tea parties that will be taking place all over the nation tomorrow..and you know…I think that he was dead on…it must be unsettling to the administration that these tea parties are taking place, that they are so numerous, and that they point to a large grass roots organization…
that should read..keen brain
yeah, i had the wrong impression of rush until i actually listened to show. i don’t always agree with him, but he does make alot of sense.
A screaming fat pig.
MSNBC waste of air time..I used to watch all of them
all the time..as of 1 year ago..i don’t even know their number on my direct tv menu…
CBS; never watched still don’t..I used to charity-tune into Katie Couric..but since she was so needlessly mean to Sarah Palin.Katie also Kaput
ABC and boorish Charlie Gibson are totally Kaput
NBC..is just completely Kaput
CNN..Wolf, Cooper, Campbell are all Kaput
although I love to watch Lou Dobbs
FOX, that I have never watched in my life, is now my mainstay for the last year!
I have the same selections…as do most of us here at NQ, I believe. It is truly strange…
I began to wake up when they started the Hillary bash and rev’d up on Sarah. Just disgusting. It seems to me that both women have been marginalized now with general population. What a sad, sick bunch.
I’m still a Sarah admirer but I wonder whether she can recoup any standing at all…especially with the Republican men doing their best to ignore her. Shame on McCain for not backing her.
I used to be such a loyal democrat until I discovered the anti-American, socialist marxist’s that have hijacked the party.
I used to watch liberal blogs like…
Newshounds..We watch fox so that you don’t have to
Buzzflash.com which was the liberal version of Drudge
Bushflash.com A brutal anti bush site
Crooks and liars..An anti Republican gotcha blog
Media Matters. another gotcha site controlled by Soros
How times have changed
Now the constitution and liberty are the main issues along with a robust foreign policy
I’m now completely opposite what I used to believe.
Now I love FOX
Mark Levin
Drudge
Atlas Shrugged
American Thinker
lots of other conservative sites
But the site I enjoy the most is of course
No Quarter!!
Moss: Me too. I received daily updates from Buzz Flash and that other one (Soros owns) that I have purged from my mind.
I unsubscribed to the Dimocrat propaganda machine when I started feeling slimmed and unAmerican while listening to them or commenting on their blogs.
The primary coverage drove most Hillary supporters to Fox News. But I think we all know that if Hillary had won, Dick Morris and Hannity would be talking about Vince Foster and whether or not Hillary said Chelsea was in danger at the time of 9/11, but Fox became the only place for any kind of balance.
The 6:00 p.m. report on Fox, with Hume and now Brett Baier, is definitely the most substantive report on the air right now.
MSNBC is such a joke. With everything that is going on with their guy Obama, they insist on snarking about stories like Bristol Palin breaking up with her boyfriend.
Me Too! I watch Brett every evening.
I heard that Katie Couric is being presented with the some Walter Cronkite journalistic award on Wed. for, wait for it. . . her interview with Sarah Palin and the effect it had on the election.
Journalism truly is dead when they start handing out awards in the name of Walter Cronkite for affecting the outcome of an election!
What Couric did to Palin is deplorable..
[I am not a huge Palin fan, she's a great lady, but definitely not ready for prime time]
All that notwithstanding, this new “Gotcha” style of journalism is out of line, especially when it is so very “selectively” applied!
That Couric got a prize for it is downright disgusting!
Personally, I enjoyed Katie Couric’s on-air colonoscopy. It’s not everyday that you get to witness a journalistic brain scan and see how their thought processes really work.
Lou is the man.
the rest of CNN can burn for all i care, but Lou Dobbs has been telling it like it is for a long time. He even left his job there for a while after he bumped heads with then president Rick Kaplan over the way they covered columbine (long-term suspension of real news to bask endlessly in the “oh-my-god” atmosphere). he came back at the personal request of ted turner after kaplan had left.
i think the coolest thing about him is that he is a good economist, so when he takes a stand against NAFTA or illegal immigration he’s not just regurgitating stats - he actually knows what he’s talking about because he has done quite a bit of number-crunching himself.
its even funnier when people try to throw numbers or stats at him and he just throws ‘em right back. then they start stuttering “um.. er… uh..” ’cause that’s all they had, and now they got nothing left.
I have been watching Lou Dobbs since he came to CNN.
He is erudite, he is fair, he is real and he surely is not afraid to say what is on his mind. He reports what is pertinent and stays away from the sensationalism. He does so, with class and integrity! Definitely one of a kind!
I did the same thing. I really miss CNN at times. I used to live on CNN and would watch MSNBC a few hours a day. Usually in the morning with my coffee, then again for 2 to 3 hours after dinner. Now I have neither on my Direct TV line-up. I removed both. And I don’t care to look either back up to find them. I’m too busy enjoying the NASA Channel, the Smithsonian Channel, the History Channel in the evening and I now watch FOX news in the morning.
I stopped watching Olbermann even before the primaries, as his hatred of all things Bush was just so over the top, and his attacks on O’Reilly so infantile, that I figured I was being fed a lot of far left wing BS and wanted just the facts, not the facts altered through such a biased filter.
As far as Maddow goes, her snark and sarcasm are reminiscent of high school, and, as with Olbermann, the audience she’s pandering to thinks she’s a “newscaster”. What a waste of the fine mind I used to see years ago when I first saw her on Countdown.
this is really about the news watch it
Charlie Brooker on British and American TV News
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_amyJCLmMY8&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.harpers.org%2Fsubjects%2FNoComment&feature=player_embedded
I must agree with your assessment of Rachel Maddow. And I thought she was the bee’s knees before she got her own show. Her cutesy antics are baffling. And her latest triumph — mocking the “Tea Party” protests with the sexual slang “teabagging,” which has caught on throughout the MSNBC family — makes me feel embarrassed.
When she’s serious, though, she’s worth taking seriously.
and there are definitely issues she will not touch.
The Charles Freeman withdrawal for starters. She was a chicken shit or has an agenda or the producers would not let her touch it.
When I talked with Chris Matthews at the Scooter Libby trial I asked him about why he would not touch certain issues. His response “I do not control the programming”
I have read that both Olberman and Maddow have said that they do have quite a bit of control over what is on their programs. so why are certain topics off limits?
Oh, she’s a fierce partisan, no doubt. I tell myself it’s a corrective to Sean Hannity’s relentless right-wing hatchet work… but still, I find myself more than ever wanting straight shooters on cable news.
“Morning Joe” is the best thing happening on MSNBC.
As for Ed Schultz, I used to listen to him on radio (2 years ago). He’s a complete embarrassment. I can’t imagine anyone other than the MSNBC crowd taking a thing he says seriously.
Excellent post, Susan. Thank you!
Bret Baier acts like a grown-up. And he gives us grown-up news. And treats US like grown-ups! It’s a privilege to watch his show.
I was one of the founding members of Ed Schultz’s audience when he went on air in March of 2004.
I knew he was a former conservative and he was someone who could be able to reach out to the conservative voting blocs. Still, he championed the causes of the liberals/progressives, especially on the economic front. I was unaware of his contempt for Hillary (and Bill) until September 2007 when Hillary rolled out her healthcare plan. There was a sudden shift in Ed. He used to defend Democrats across the board. He was hacking away at her healthcare plan and everything else she had to offer.
Once the primaries started, he was on a full scale attack against her and her supporters (which constitute a sizable portion of his audience).
His ratings once hit 5 million and they are now down to just 3 million. That 2 million loss was mostly Hillary supporters. You know, the “bitter gun clinging” ones who Ed claims to speak for.
I still listen to Thom Hartmann though.
I still do not like right wing talk radio as they are still blinded by hatred of anything to the let of the hard right.
I was a founding member of Ed Schultz’s audience.
Once he turned on Hillary, I turned him off.
I was a founding member of Ed Schultz’s audience.
Once he turned on Hillary, I turned him off.
Ed was supporting all causes dear to the liberals/progressives.
He did a remarkable coverup on hiding his hatred of
Hillary (and Bill). Once Hillary brought out her
healthcare plan in september 2007, Ed let lose and
begain throwing the hatchets into her back (like the coward he is).
Remember that Ed/Kos/Huffington were former Republicans
during the 1990’s. Their bias against anything Clinton
never went away, or should I say, they did not repent
like David Brock did.
Also, Schultz’s audience peaked at 5 million.
It now stands at 3 million. That loss of 2 million
listeners was comprised of Hillary supporters, you know
the bitter, gun clinging types that Mr. Schultz claims to support.
I do not watch much cable “news”. MSNBC is never
on my TV. CNN is on occasionally.
I watch PBS and use the web to get news.
Ed was supporting all causes dear to the liberals/progressives.
He did a remarkable coverup on hiding his hatred of
Hillary (and Bill). Once Hillary brought out her
healthcare plan in september 2007, Ed let lose and
begain throwing the hatchets into her back (like the coward he is).
Remember that Ed/Kos/Huffington were former Republicans
during the 1990’s. Their bias against anything Clinton
never went away, or should I say, they did not repent
like David Brock did.
Also, Schultz’s audience peaked at 5 million.
It now stands at 3 million. That loss of 2 million
listeners was comprised of Hillary supporters, you know
the bitter, gun clinging types that Mr. Schultz claims to support.
I do not watch much cable “news”. MSNBC is never
on my TV. CNN is on occasionally.
I watch PBS and use the web to get news.
My husband and I turned off all the jerks and only watch FOX and sometimes Lou Dobbs. Never in our wildest dreams would we have thought we’d watch Bill O. every day. We used to laugh about it. Now we think he’s one of the fairest of them all! Love, love, love Bret B. Can you guess we were Hillary supporters? Used to be liberals until we looked at the ones around us and didn’t like what we saw. It was a sad day when we realized liberals are only liberal toward you if you agree with them. Changed our affiliation to Independent after being a Dem all our voting life. Free At Last…..!!!!!!!!!!!
Same here regarding Ed Schultz as well as all of Air America.
Tonight I even heard Anderson Cooper talking about tea-bagging and giggling like a girl. The talking points memo must have gone out to the Obama stations today.
Hey they all suck—- America we are being played as the fool—- They get richer and we get more desperate every day— What is so special about O’Reilly? (Mr. Current Affair) Hannity is a phony Patriot Remember What Fox did to the Clinton Administration ? CNN FOX MSNBC they all suck with the bottom line being power and money We empower the assholes by falling for their manipulation.
Why did my post disappear? Is this a public forum or the Huffington Post?
It’s not you, Bob. It’s the spam filter. When the posts disappear just send Susan a quick note. She’ll paste them right up. Happens to me all the time.
Why? Haven’t a clue.
Bob…the spin cycle eats posts some times. Especially if you use the word “idiot” for some reason LOL.
The Axlerod talking points of late include labeling anyone they disagree with as “right wingnuts”, “rightwing loonies”, etc. Also, I guarantee you that the number of 12 million illegal immigrants has been sent out as the number to hammer home again and again, while the number is in all reality probably much, much larger than that. It’s just not a coincidence that all Dem talking heads on TV are using that 12 million number over and over again.
I think a lot of today’s cable prime time news show hosts could use a leeson from Professor Huntley right about now.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ViBf2Riqqo
Great post Susan.
I have often wonder how Rachel Maddow, the woman who would interrupt Al Gore’s rally to ask about drug aid to Africa, could be covering for or making light of this new adminstration on what she used to consider so outrageous, or to be mocking what she used to hold so dearly.
How is Rachel Maddow dealing with herself. Does she say “it’s tv, it’s just entertainment” ?
Schultz and the others already showed they are whores for whatever is the in thing at the time. Schultz was a repub and still is in many ways and keith was a Jock.
Of course you love Fox and hate Maddow. Rachel pokes fun at Fox, she is all about the snark. But you really have forgotten about you supposed heroes. Rachel follows the tradition of David Brinkley who was as snarky as they came in the old school journalism. Brinkley routinely skewered politicians and pointed out the absurdities of the American political system.
But Maddow is not always about the snark, she demolished Colin Powell in her interview Larry’s favorite “butt snorkeler” She repeatedly followed up Powell’s evasions on the Bush torture policy. Powell was visibly shaken by Maddow’s terrier like tenacity on the subject.
You have a right to dislike Maddow’s politics but you have no right to dismiss her work ethic. She does her homework and it shows. She ripped into the Obama administration’s brief supporting Black site prisons and depredations of Fourth Amendments. She is willing to call “bullpucky” when she see it no matter what the source.
Stylistically I can see why Maddow may not be some person’s tea. I can also see why K.O. also may set some people on edge. But please, Fox news? Fox is the propaganda arm of the Republican party. They get stuff hilariously wrong like the “fact” that they covered the “Million Man March” Fox News did not cover that event, they were not even on the air when the event happened.
If you want real news podcast the BBC or cough up the bucks to get the Beeb on cable. I won’t even bother mentioning NPR because far too many people have bought into the myth that NPR is somehow “left wing” It is kinda of sad when a plain vanilla organization like NPR gets accused of radical agenda that it never had and never will have in a million years. But that is what happens when you listen to a right-wing echo chamber like Fox.
You say that Fox is a right-wing echo chamber. Well, msnbc is a left-wing echo chamber. Pot meet kettle. Perception of bias depends on where you are on the political spectrum.
The Neilsen ratings in the 25-54 age group show Fox news beating msnbc by 3 to 1. Must mean there are a lot more conservatives out there than lefties–that, or a lot of viewers are moderates who perceive msnbc as more biased than Fox. Take your pick.
Who on earth with a brain could tolerate watching that MSNBC nonsense? Wow. It might as well be the TMZ for the loony left. Nothing but lies, cover ups and bias for the progressive nuts. No thanks. I will watch Fox and enjoy it. At least they tell the truth, the truth the hard left wants to censor. No wonder Fox is KILING those other pigs in the ratings.
Gumsnapper: You’ve perfectly encapsulated the Fox media line.
1. When accused of being a right-wing propaganda outlet, change the subject by accusing your competitors of being left-wing. Just because MSNBC leans left doesn’t mean Fox isn’t right wing.
2. When all else fails, boast about ratings. Again, Fox’s strong ratings don’t mean the network isn’t right-wing or that their news is more accurate than on other news sources. It could be that their success is driven by their dumbing down of the news, their obsession with tabloid fare, their shameless exploitation of their cleavage-y and leggy blonde on-air personalities and their Manichean worldview.
Just because a lot of people love to listen to Rush Limbaugh doesn’t make him an oracle. He’s still the same sexist, bigoted hypocrite he was when Bill Clinton was in office.
In my experience, Maddow is a typical bull lesbian. Pardon the bluntness, but I’ve known them all my life. They’re loud, they interrupt you before you finish a sentence, and if you listen to them long enough, they’ll spend all their time trying to convince you they’re the smartest person on the planet. If you happen to disagree with them, you’re an enemy for life.
Maddow parroted the obama party line through and through and for that I can never respect her. She along with everyone else on that network nightly portrayed Hillary as “Worse than Hitler!” That showed a naivete and a lack of integrity, not to mention a level of immaturity typical of every other talking head on my TV. As a result, I’ve given up on cable news and have blocked all those channels on my Dish. I get everything I need to know online, starting right here at NQ.
You’re spot on. I get my news from foreign sources and NQ, as well. If I am going to listen to opinion, I want to be sure it is reasoned. Here at NQ it is. The local news is the only on-air news I listen to and then only up to the point where they start the claptrap about That One or interviewing some local obamabot. My remote gets a good workout, as a consequence. I truly hope all the news networks go down as they are nothing more than useless backfill anyway, possessing only a passing knowledge of journalism, tinted yellow.
There is something both embaressing and disconcerting about a suppossedly smart, self-assurred lesbian using the urban slang word for “scrotum” over and over and over again while giggling like a sophmore. Of all the lesbians I know- family, friends, co-workers- scrotums are usually not a topic of discussion or jokes. They are just not into them, humor or otherwise. LOL
Rachel is just plain vulgar, in every sense of the word.
It’s really great to see someone like ManCow, who would of course scream “victim” if anyone railed on her because she’s gay, attacking other women like Palin, Hillary etc. She’s a mess and I can’t watch more than 60 seconds of that pig without a bucket by my side.
[...] show, as we noted earlier today, is cleaning up in its 6 p.m. ET slot — and proving that a substantive, heavy-on-the-news show can WIN a time [...]
Another terrific news program that Susan, here, suggested–PBS’ World Focus.
I disagree with the Lou Dobbs and Fox lovefest in this comment section. Dobbs engages in the crudest and most racist fearmongering imaginable night after night. And if ratings were a measure of seriousness in the news business then the falafel and loofah lovin’ Bill O’Reilly would be cable’s Walter Cronkite. Fox is a disgrace and CNN and MSNBC are clown shows. And let’s not forget that Fox still prefers their female on-air personalities young, blonde and dressed like $2 hookers. Watching that channel is a degrading experience all around.
So don’t watch and ergo you won’t degrade yourself!
Such self-righteousness is a tad over the top…
$2.00 hookers? please!
You take a lot of license…
Couric on Palin
DCmediagirl on Fox female anchors…
Brazile on Clinton..and so on…
We don’t need misogynistic males to debase us
we are our own worse enemies!
Chris from Chicago: Maybe you don’t remember that Fox served as the enthusiastic mouthpiece for
Inspector Javert’sKen Starr’s investigation. Fox brutalized the Clintons from the day the network launched. And having worked at Fox I know the criteria they use for hiring female on-air talent and contributors and how they’re encouraged to unbutton their blouses and show lots of leg on air. But I guess pointing that out makes me a misogynist. I’ve officially gone through the looking glass.Don’t worry, I won’t be watching. I’ve seen enough of what they call “news”.
You Hussein butt licking Marxist Libbies are as FUNNY AS MOST OF YOU LOOK. Shitzter claimed Karl Rove was going to be “INDICTED ANY MOMENT” and that was how long ago Hussein ass licker’s? STILL WAITHING HUSSEIN ASS LICKER’S! You MARXIST HUSSEIN ASS LICKER’S claim to be the SMART ONE’S(LMFAO) YET YOU BOW TO A COMMUNITY ORGANIZER AND A RAHM BALLERINA EMAN(?)NUEL, LMFAO!!!!!
LIBS SUCK: Your excellent grammar and impressive use of the English language have won me over.
[...] I wonder if Susan Roesgen graduated from the Rachel Maddow School of Journalism. [...]
Never forget what Fox News did to Bill Clinton
[...] in the entire series. Usefull Posts Green living for poor people « THREE BASICS…Cable TV News: Who Succeeds, Who Dumbs It Down : NO QUARTER…Shawn Bolz Riders of Justice Usurping Jesus Christ « End Times Prophetic, Prophecy, Visions, [...]