<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s at Stake in Pakistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/27/whats-at-stake-in-pakistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/27/whats-at-stake-in-pakistan/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:43:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: noname</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/27/whats-at-stake-in-pakistan/#comment-1198069</link>
		<dc:creator>noname</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=22869#comment-1198069</guid>
		<description>There existed country sides, villages and people, trees besides the mountains and their little stories in that part of the world. 

 There too existed Ghauri, Ghaznawi Abdali - who passed over the country before 1947.

 The reality is that, the latter set has been very much with Pakisthan. Did I err too much in talking a little of the former set as Pakisthan ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There existed country sides, villages and people, trees besides the mountains and their little stories in that part of the world. </p>
<p> There too existed Ghauri, Ghaznawi Abdali &#8211; who passed over the country before 1947.</p>
<p> The reality is that, the latter set has been very much with Pakisthan. Did I err too much in talking a little of the former set as Pakisthan ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nail  'Em Up</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/27/whats-at-stake-in-pakistan/#comment-1197555</link>
		<dc:creator>Nail  'Em Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=22869#comment-1197555</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a clip of Hillary Clinton explaining it all in a nutshell.  Brilliant:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dM1BG_NnHaA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a clip of Hillary Clinton explaining it all in a nutshell.  Brilliant:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dM1BG_NnHaA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dM1BG_NnHaA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nail  'Em Up</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/27/whats-at-stake-in-pakistan/#comment-1197542</link>
		<dc:creator>Nail  'Em Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=22869#comment-1197542</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with your last para. 

However, the fact that Sufi Mohammad&#039;s first name is &quot;Sufi&quot; is a hint of nothing other than his first name is Sufi.  His name has no relation to Sufism, the mystical branch of Islam.  Sufism&#039;s tradition of thinkers and intellects is in direct opposition to the backwards, primitive beliefs of Sufi Mohammad and his followers. As a matter of fact, religious fundamentalists have been bombing and capturing the tombs of Sufis.

Pakistan&#039;s future, religiously speaking, lies with Sufi Islam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with your last para. </p>
<p>However, the fact that Sufi Mohammad&#8217;s first name is &#8220;Sufi&#8221; is a hint of nothing other than his first name is Sufi.  His name has no relation to Sufism, the mystical branch of Islam.  Sufism&#8217;s tradition of thinkers and intellects is in direct opposition to the backwards, primitive beliefs of Sufi Mohammad and his followers. As a matter of fact, religious fundamentalists have been bombing and capturing the tombs of Sufis.</p>
<p>Pakistan&#8217;s future, religiously speaking, lies with Sufi Islam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCMediagirl</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/27/whats-at-stake-in-pakistan/#comment-1197407</link>
		<dc:creator>DCMediagirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=22869#comment-1197407</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Pakisthan had a culture before Islamic invasions, until about 1947 they had a fairly mixed population.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There was no country called &quot;Pakistan&quot; before 1947.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Pakisthan had a culture before Islamic invasions, until about 1947 they had a fairly mixed population.</p></blockquote>
<p>There was no country called &#8220;Pakistan&#8221; before 1947.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeakwoodKite</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/27/whats-at-stake-in-pakistan/#comment-1197218</link>
		<dc:creator>TeakwoodKite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=22869#comment-1197218</guid>
		<description>Thanks Nail&#039;Em Up for your response.

I can see why a person might see this a homogeneous problem between Pakistan and Afghanistan. If understand your meaning it is not, except for some common traits.

Gen. David H. Petraeus in recently testimony said that the Pakistan Army is ill suited to doing counter-insurgency work as they are configured for a conflict with India.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Petraeus &lt;a href=&quot;http://prairiepundit.blogspot.com/2009/04/petreaus-says-pakistan-needs-to-focus.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;requested congressional support for the Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund&lt;/a&gt;, a new, more-flexible spending stream that would permit more rapid and targeted U.S. training and provide more equipment to Pakistani forces that combat insurgents inside the country&#039;s lawless tribal regions.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t see how training the Pakistan military, which we have been doing for years, on counter-insurgency will have a long term benefits, when certain factions of the ISI and military are aligned with the &quot;Taliban&quot;.

What I don&#039;t see happening is the co-ordination required between the Pakistan Army and the &quot;Mult-national&quot; and Afghan forces along with US foreign policy getting in sync.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Nail&#8217;Em Up for your response.</p>
<p>I can see why a person might see this a homogeneous problem between Pakistan and Afghanistan. If understand your meaning it is not, except for some common traits.</p>
<p>Gen. David H. Petraeus in recently testimony said that the Pakistan Army is ill suited to doing counter-insurgency work as they are configured for a conflict with India.</p>
<blockquote><p>Petraeus <a href="http://prairiepundit.blogspot.com/2009/04/petreaus-says-pakistan-needs-to-focus.html" rel="nofollow">requested congressional support for the Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund</a>, a new, more-flexible spending stream that would permit more rapid and targeted U.S. training and provide more equipment to Pakistani forces that combat insurgents inside the country&#8217;s lawless tribal regions.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t see how training the Pakistan military, which we have been doing for years, on counter-insurgency will have a long term benefits, when certain factions of the ISI and military are aligned with the &#8220;Taliban&#8221;.</p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t see happening is the co-ordination required between the Pakistan Army and the &#8220;Mult-national&#8221; and Afghan forces along with US foreign policy getting in sync.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noname</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/27/whats-at-stake-in-pakistan/#comment-1197187</link>
		<dc:creator>noname</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=22869#comment-1197187</guid>
		<description>This is an excellent article.


Here is another excellent article :

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/04/27/farrukh-rehan-denial-istan.aspx

 As the article says, there is a distinction between the Arabic version of taliban and Pakisthani culture. Pakisthan had a culture before Islamic invasions, until about 1947 they had a fairly mixed population. Thus it is not at all surprising to find a fine, and popular singer in Pakisthan, something that may as well become part of tumultuous history of Pakistan, if Taliban takes over Pakisthan until 2047.


  Unfortunately however, nothing worked in Pakisthan as much as some existential grievance vis-a-vis India or hindus.  It didn&#039;t have to be this way, but grievance and imagination of the absolute has been cheap and has almost been institutionalized.   Tremendous  investment has gone into this  to prop up this clouds, and each time it rises like a Ghost. It will do so in future too. Benzir Bhutto was not even so good in her first term, as she is in her death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent article.</p>
<p>Here is another excellent article :</p>
<p><a href="http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/04/27/farrukh-rehan-denial-istan.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/04/27/farrukh-rehan-denial-istan.aspx</a></p>
<p> As the article says, there is a distinction between the Arabic version of taliban and Pakisthani culture. Pakisthan had a culture before Islamic invasions, until about 1947 they had a fairly mixed population. Thus it is not at all surprising to find a fine, and popular singer in Pakisthan, something that may as well become part of tumultuous history of Pakistan, if Taliban takes over Pakisthan until 2047.</p>
<p>  Unfortunately however, nothing worked in Pakisthan as much as some existential grievance vis-a-vis India or hindus.  It didn&#8217;t have to be this way, but grievance and imagination of the absolute has been cheap and has almost been institutionalized.   Tremendous  investment has gone into this  to prop up this clouds, and each time it rises like a Ghost. It will do so in future too. Benzir Bhutto was not even so good in her first term, as she is in her death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: princess wears prada</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/27/whats-at-stake-in-pakistan/#comment-1197181</link>
		<dc:creator>princess wears prada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=22869#comment-1197181</guid>
		<description>Fascinating piece - well researched...thank you writing and for sharing...

I&#039;ve posted on justsaynodeal.com (with a slightly edited title ;-)

Cheers to Larry, Susan &amp; the rest of the crew @ No Quarter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating piece &#8211; well researched&#8230;thank you writing and for sharing&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve posted on justsaynodeal.com (with a slightly edited title <img src='http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers to Larry, Susan &amp; the rest of the crew @ No Quarter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peggy Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/27/whats-at-stake-in-pakistan/#comment-1197176</link>
		<dc:creator>Peggy Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=22869#comment-1197176</guid>
		<description>Maybe we should shift this initiative to the PakAf plan.  And btw, what is the plan, the strategy?  Yes, what we want:

&quot;is to pressurize the Pakistani government to support the locals against the Taliban.&quot;

But have we seen any evidence that the Pakistani government is willing to do that?  

From the little I&#039;ve been able to draw out from the scanty reports is that the Pakistani government sent in the &quot;Frontier troops,&quot; poorly armed and not exactly thrilled to go into battle.  And I&#039;ve heard mixed reports that the Taliban retreated back to the Swat Valley, but that they still have several hundred men patrolling the Bruner area and are systematically and deliberately intimidating the locals. 

It all seems like a tepid response to say the least.  Added to that, I&#039;ve read that the Pakistani army itself has been infiltrated with Taliban sympathizers, that the Taliban in the Swat Valley, something in the 6-8000 range, is less a raucous bunch of discontents then an army of ex-Pakistani military types, retired officers and hardened fighting men from surrounding countries. These guys mean business, mean, mean business. I don&#039;t think the term &quot;moderate&quot; applies.

I&#039;m beginning to feel Pakistan is the major front in this on-going battle, complicated by the fact that Pakistan is a nuclear nation. But then, Hillary Clinton predicted that Pakistan would be the major threat.

It&#039;s a mess.  And what&#039;s the plan?  I haven&#039;t heard it yet.

For all our sake&#039;s, I hope there is one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe we should shift this initiative to the PakAf plan.  And btw, what is the plan, the strategy?  Yes, what we want:</p>
<p>&#8220;is to pressurize the Pakistani government to support the locals against the Taliban.&#8221;</p>
<p>But have we seen any evidence that the Pakistani government is willing to do that?  </p>
<p>From the little I&#8217;ve been able to draw out from the scanty reports is that the Pakistani government sent in the &#8220;Frontier troops,&#8221; poorly armed and not exactly thrilled to go into battle.  And I&#8217;ve heard mixed reports that the Taliban retreated back to the Swat Valley, but that they still have several hundred men patrolling the Bruner area and are systematically and deliberately intimidating the locals. </p>
<p>It all seems like a tepid response to say the least.  Added to that, I&#8217;ve read that the Pakistani army itself has been infiltrated with Taliban sympathizers, that the Taliban in the Swat Valley, something in the 6-8000 range, is less a raucous bunch of discontents then an army of ex-Pakistani military types, retired officers and hardened fighting men from surrounding countries. These guys mean business, mean, mean business. I don&#8217;t think the term &#8220;moderate&#8221; applies.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m beginning to feel Pakistan is the major front in this on-going battle, complicated by the fact that Pakistan is a nuclear nation. But then, Hillary Clinton predicted that Pakistan would be the major threat.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a mess.  And what&#8217;s the plan?  I haven&#8217;t heard it yet.</p>
<p>For all our sake&#8217;s, I hope there is one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noname</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/27/whats-at-stake-in-pakistan/#comment-1197165</link>
		<dc:creator>noname</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=22869#comment-1197165</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The bigger concern is that India will become bolder as Pakistan get weaker. This is a tinderbox, and has been for a long time. &lt;/i&gt;

   I didn&#039;t get  the bigger concern part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The bigger concern is that India will become bolder as Pakistan get weaker. This is a tinderbox, and has been for a long time. </i></p>
<p>   I didn&#8217;t get  the bigger concern part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nail  'Em Up</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/27/whats-at-stake-in-pakistan/#comment-1197148</link>
		<dc:creator>Nail  'Em Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=22869#comment-1197148</guid>
		<description>With regards to Clinton and Holbrooke, I agree with the statement that their hearts are in the right place but not their minds. 
As far as Obama is concerned, AfPak is neither a policy nor a strategy. This is not surprising considering how thin his foreign policy experience was when he took office. And he is being advised by at least dozens of people - who give conflicting reports. AfPak, therefore, is an amalgamation of the conventional wisdom of all the stakeholders&#039; pitches - with concerned parties and participants including Afghanistan and the US Army in Afghanistan; Pakistan and the Pakistan army; think tank fellows, South Asian experts, intelligence personnel, etc. Let&#039;s just hope that the main American players can put aside their squabbling, check their egos and the door.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regards to Clinton and Holbrooke, I agree with the statement that their hearts are in the right place but not their minds.<br />
As far as Obama is concerned, AfPak is neither a policy nor a strategy. This is not surprising considering how thin his foreign policy experience was when he took office. And he is being advised by at least dozens of people &#8211; who give conflicting reports. AfPak, therefore, is an amalgamation of the conventional wisdom of all the stakeholders&#8217; pitches &#8211; with concerned parties and participants including Afghanistan and the US Army in Afghanistan; Pakistan and the Pakistan army; think tank fellows, South Asian experts, intelligence personnel, etc. Let&#8217;s just hope that the main American players can put aside their squabbling, check their egos and the door.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnnyB</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/27/whats-at-stake-in-pakistan/#comment-1197130</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnnyB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=22869#comment-1197130</guid>
		<description>Thanks you two for your great outline of part of the Pakistan facts.  The bigger concern is that India will become bolder as Pakistan get weaker.  This is a tinderbox, and has been for a long time.

Our using Drones in Pakistan tribal areas forces the population right into the Taliban&#039;s hands.  They must be united against the foreigners that invade their lands, even if it is from Drones piloted from Nevada and missiles being fired without really knowing who is the target.  We&#039;ve sure made a mess of Iraq and Afghanistan, now on to Pakistan.  The Iranians and Russians are laughing their asses off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks you two for your great outline of part of the Pakistan facts.  The bigger concern is that India will become bolder as Pakistan get weaker.  This is a tinderbox, and has been for a long time.</p>
<p>Our using Drones in Pakistan tribal areas forces the population right into the Taliban&#8217;s hands.  They must be united against the foreigners that invade their lands, even if it is from Drones piloted from Nevada and missiles being fired without really knowing who is the target.  We&#8217;ve sure made a mess of Iraq and Afghanistan, now on to Pakistan.  The Iranians and Russians are laughing their asses off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CG</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/27/whats-at-stake-in-pakistan/#comment-1197120</link>
		<dc:creator>CG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=22869#comment-1197120</guid>
		<description>Thank you, very interesting the post, as well the comment above.  Is it your guess that the Taliban will prevail when they march back to Afghanistan.  Do you believe Hillary Clinton and Richard Holbrooke are effective, and in your opinion what influence guides Obama the most, in terms of the policies put forth regarding Af-Pak?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, very interesting the post, as well the comment above.  Is it your guess that the Taliban will prevail when they march back to Afghanistan.  Do you believe Hillary Clinton and Richard Holbrooke are effective, and in your opinion what influence guides Obama the most, in terms of the policies put forth regarding Af-Pak?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Librarian</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/27/whats-at-stake-in-pakistan/#comment-1197065</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Librarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=22869#comment-1197065</guid>
		<description>P
The history of Afghanistan/Pakistan/Nh india /West india is from invasions from  Mongol,Persian, Moghul &amp; British Colonialism.

Therefore to be found in Pakistan are influences of all these but some are not in fashion. (British colonialism).There are peoples who practice a hybrid of Shamanism /islam to British educated elite.

I would not be looking at Arab influence so much as The Moghul traditions. The guy named Sufi is a also a hint.it would help to read up on Sufis.

This new Taliban may be funded by Saudis but the aim is Moghul. These guys are not old boring farts like OSL &amp; Khaled but charismatic   virile  disciplined men with long wavy hair &amp; rather attractive.

yeah Yeah = beat me up on this but it is a visually more attractive foe &amp; they know Pakistan better than ll western experts &amp; those fat puncy puffy pakistani men from Islamabad offices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P<br />
The history of Afghanistan/Pakistan/Nh india /West india is from invasions from  Mongol,Persian, Moghul &amp; British Colonialism.</p>
<p>Therefore to be found in Pakistan are influences of all these but some are not in fashion. (British colonialism).There are peoples who practice a hybrid of Shamanism /islam to British educated elite.</p>
<p>I would not be looking at Arab influence so much as The Moghul traditions. The guy named Sufi is a also a hint.it would help to read up on Sufis.</p>
<p>This new Taliban may be funded by Saudis but the aim is Moghul. These guys are not old boring farts like OSL &amp; Khaled but charismatic   virile  disciplined men with long wavy hair &amp; rather attractive.</p>
<p>yeah Yeah = beat me up on this but it is a visually more attractive foe &amp; they know Pakistan better than ll western experts &amp; those fat puncy puffy pakistani men from Islamabad offices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nail  'Em Up</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/27/whats-at-stake-in-pakistan/#comment-1197056</link>
		<dc:creator>Nail  'Em Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=22869#comment-1197056</guid>
		<description>TeakWoodKite:  Legacy of Russia&#039;s invasion of Afghanistan - yes mostly true. The mujahideen were funded and backed by the US and Pakistan during the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. But the Taliban is a different phenomenon based on their concept of sharia law. 
I don&#039;t want to get into the history of the Taliban right now. But in 2001 when the Taliban were kicked out of Afghanistan they moved into Pakistan to regroup and remarshall their forces. This unfortunately suited them because of the absence of the US and Pak army on ground ready to make their move. Since resettling in Pakistan they have spread - and set up a local version known as TTP (Tehreek e Taliban Pakistan)  - literal translation Taliban Movement of Pakistan. The TTP is influenced and takes marching orders from the Afghan Taliban.
So you see, they actually started as a movement and then started controlling most of the areas of NWFP. 
Although they found it easy to operate in Pakistani territory - i think that they will march back to Afghanistan too to fight US forces in the next couple of months. Reason: the US will send more troops and presidential polls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TeakWoodKite:  Legacy of Russia&#8217;s invasion of Afghanistan &#8211; yes mostly true. The mujahideen were funded and backed by the US and Pakistan during the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. But the Taliban is a different phenomenon based on their concept of sharia law.<br />
I don&#8217;t want to get into the history of the Taliban right now. But in 2001 when the Taliban were kicked out of Afghanistan they moved into Pakistan to regroup and remarshall their forces. This unfortunately suited them because of the absence of the US and Pak army on ground ready to make their move. Since resettling in Pakistan they have spread &#8211; and set up a local version known as TTP (Tehreek e Taliban Pakistan)  &#8211; literal translation Taliban Movement of Pakistan. The TTP is influenced and takes marching orders from the Afghan Taliban.<br />
So you see, they actually started as a movement and then started controlling most of the areas of NWFP.<br />
Although they found it easy to operate in Pakistani territory &#8211; i think that they will march back to Afghanistan too to fight US forces in the next couple of months. Reason: the US will send more troops and presidential polls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oowawa</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/04/27/whats-at-stake-in-pakistan/#comment-1197041</link>
		<dc:creator>oowawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=22869#comment-1197041</guid>
		<description>Well, I can see this situation is even more complicated than I thought it was.  I think I&#039;ll stop pretending to be slightly knowledgeable about this mess.  Thanks for the post, dcmediagirl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I can see this situation is even more complicated than I thought it was.  I think I&#8217;ll stop pretending to be slightly knowledgeable about this mess.  Thanks for the post, dcmediagirl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
