<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Black Box Voting&#8221; Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/05/13/black-box-voting-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/05/13/black-box-voting-part-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:08:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pm317</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/05/13/black-box-voting-part-2/#comment-1204592</link>
		<dc:creator>pm317</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=24374#comment-1204592</guid>
		<description>I agree. We need a non-partisan entity to work on behalf of the people. I thought that would be FEC but looks like they don&#039;t do much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. We need a non-partisan entity to work on behalf of the people. I thought that would be FEC but looks like they don&#8217;t do much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen Wynne</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/05/13/black-box-voting-part-2/#comment-1204501</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Wynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=24374#comment-1204501</guid>
		<description>pm317,

I appreciate your suggestion to give the FEC more teeth, but the problem is they don&#039;t enforce the laws that are already on the books, so I doubt they will improve with more laws!  What we are dealing with here is a totally broken system from top to bottom in our government, which has left the voting machine vendors, in collusion with the Congress, now in charge of our elections.  Keep in mind that it was our Congress who quickly put through the &quot;Help America Vote Act&quot; in 2002 in order to get these machines in place all over the country and the voting machine companies made billions.

Don&#039;t you see the conflict of interest involved here with Congress having all the say in the first place as to what voting system will be used in electing them into office?  There was never any real debate which involved citizens being able to ask questions and get answers about these voting systems security and transparecy.  There is none.  They are protected by &quot;propretary secret laws&quot;, which is an outrage in and of itself.  Business law trumps election law!!    

We should never give away our power (our votes counted in a public and transparent way) to any agency or election official or voting system and simply trust that those in charge will &quot;do the right thing.&quot;  Take a look around and see where our trust in our financial institutions and auto industry has put us. What&#039;s missing is &quot;checks and balances&quot; and citizens are the best checks and balance when it comes to our elections and that&#039;s exactly what has been taken away from us.  

Elections should not be outsourced, they belong to us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pm317,</p>
<p>I appreciate your suggestion to give the FEC more teeth, but the problem is they don&#8217;t enforce the laws that are already on the books, so I doubt they will improve with more laws!  What we are dealing with here is a totally broken system from top to bottom in our government, which has left the voting machine vendors, in collusion with the Congress, now in charge of our elections.  Keep in mind that it was our Congress who quickly put through the &#8220;Help America Vote Act&#8221; in 2002 in order to get these machines in place all over the country and the voting machine companies made billions.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you see the conflict of interest involved here with Congress having all the say in the first place as to what voting system will be used in electing them into office?  There was never any real debate which involved citizens being able to ask questions and get answers about these voting systems security and transparecy.  There is none.  They are protected by &#8220;propretary secret laws&#8221;, which is an outrage in and of itself.  Business law trumps election law!!    </p>
<p>We should never give away our power (our votes counted in a public and transparent way) to any agency or election official or voting system and simply trust that those in charge will &#8220;do the right thing.&#8221;  Take a look around and see where our trust in our financial institutions and auto industry has put us. What&#8217;s missing is &#8220;checks and balances&#8221; and citizens are the best checks and balance when it comes to our elections and that&#8217;s exactly what has been taken away from us.  </p>
<p>Elections should not be outsourced, they belong to us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pm317</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/05/13/black-box-voting-part-2/#comment-1204463</link>
		<dc:creator>pm317</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=24374#comment-1204463</guid>
		<description>Amy, I will stop after this. The Indian example is what I know to contrast what is going on here. I know their election commission is fiercely independent of political influence and has &quot;principles and convictions&quot; and abides by a certain &quot;honor code&quot; to conduct elections with integrity. Given that there were no problems last time and none anticipated this time with electronic voting machines or otherwise, I give them the benefit of the doubt that they have done their due diligence in acquiring and verifying the voting machines that count correctly as well.  

The Indian context was secondary to my main point which was that you needed honest brokers in an election commission (or any other body that administers elections) who by virtue of their responsibility would also make sure that the voting machines are what they should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy, I will stop after this. The Indian example is what I know to contrast what is going on here. I know their election commission is fiercely independent of political influence and has &#8220;principles and convictions&#8221; and abides by a certain &#8220;honor code&#8221; to conduct elections with integrity. Given that there were no problems last time and none anticipated this time with electronic voting machines or otherwise, I give them the benefit of the doubt that they have done their due diligence in acquiring and verifying the voting machines that count correctly as well.  </p>
<p>The Indian context was secondary to my main point which was that you needed honest brokers in an election commission (or any other body that administers elections) who by virtue of their responsibility would also make sure that the voting machines are what they should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/05/13/black-box-voting-part-2/#comment-1204458</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=24374#comment-1204458</guid>
		<description>NP, jbjd - I&#039;m glad you saw it now!  :-)

Wait until you see the next one coming down the pike on voting - if it isn&#039;t posted in time for tonight&#039;s chat, it will be for next week&#039;s chat.  (Hope you&#039;ll be able to join us again!)

Btw, &quot;Wahoo, Wah!&quot;  My partner graduated from UVA, too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NP, jbjd &#8211; I&#8217;m glad you saw it now!  <img src='http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Wait until you see the next one coming down the pike on voting &#8211; if it isn&#8217;t posted in time for tonight&#8217;s chat, it will be for next week&#8217;s chat.  (Hope you&#8217;ll be able to join us again!)</p>
<p>Btw, &#8220;Wahoo, Wah!&#8221;  My partner graduated from UVA, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbjd</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/05/13/black-box-voting-part-2/#comment-1204453</link>
		<dc:creator>jbjd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=24374#comment-1204453</guid>
		<description>I did not call anyone &quot;ignorant.&quot; I said the person was &quot;ignorant of the fact that...&quot;  This person says electronic voting worked in India but only credits this to &quot;principles and convictions,&quot; likening this to an &quot;honor code&quot; at UVA. &lt;blockquote&gt;It is like honor code (I am a UVA grad) — things can be corrupted but people don’t go there because of principles and convictions.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I wanted proof the votes in India counted, using machines.

Here is the web site of the Elections Commission of India, answering some questions about electronic voting.  (I still see no mention of a paper receipt.)
http://eci.nic.in/faq/evm.asp

Here is another article, comparing and contrasting Diebold specs with the machines used in India.
http://techaos.blogspot.com/2004/05/indian-evm-compared-with-diebold.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did not call anyone &#8220;ignorant.&#8221; I said the person was &#8220;ignorant of the fact that&#8230;&#8221;  This person says electronic voting worked in India but only credits this to &#8220;principles and convictions,&#8221; likening this to an &#8220;honor code&#8221; at UVA.<br />
<blockquote>It is like honor code (I am a UVA grad) — things can be corrupted but people don’t go there because of principles and convictions.</p></blockquote>
<p>I wanted proof the votes in India counted, using machines.</p>
<p>Here is the web site of the Elections Commission of India, answering some questions about electronic voting.  (I still see no mention of a paper receipt.)<br />
<a href="http://eci.nic.in/faq/evm.asp" rel="nofollow">http://eci.nic.in/faq/evm.asp</a></p>
<p>Here is another article, comparing and contrasting Diebold specs with the machines used in India.<br />
<a href="http://techaos.blogspot.com/2004/05/indian-evm-compared-with-diebold.html" rel="nofollow">http://techaos.blogspot.com/2004/05/indian-evm-compared-with-diebold.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pm317</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/05/13/black-box-voting-part-2/#comment-1204449</link>
		<dc:creator>pm317</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=24374#comment-1204449</guid>
		<description>honest election commission (a governing body that enforces rules and regulations about elections) means they would have done their due diligence about the equipment (and anything else) they will use to conduct elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>honest election commission (a governing body that enforces rules and regulations about elections) means they would have done their due diligence about the equipment (and anything else) they will use to conduct elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pm317</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/05/13/black-box-voting-part-2/#comment-1204446</link>
		<dc:creator>pm317</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=24374#comment-1204446</guid>
		<description>I was not sure people were interested in Indian elections so much. When I say what I said about Indian elections, I speak with facts as I know them. They successfully conducted their massive scale elections about 5 years ago using electronic voting and there were no complaints from anywhere. In fact the joke going around here in 2004 was that people here should use Indian voting machines. They are doing it again. Their election commission is fiercely independent and takes pride in bringing about this process with integrity.

If people are interested in more info, they have to do their own research. Not my job to educate them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was not sure people were interested in Indian elections so much. When I say what I said about Indian elections, I speak with facts as I know them. They successfully conducted their massive scale elections about 5 years ago using electronic voting and there were no complaints from anywhere. In fact the joke going around here in 2004 was that people here should use Indian voting machines. They are doing it again. Their election commission is fiercely independent and takes pride in bringing about this process with integrity.</p>
<p>If people are interested in more info, they have to do their own research. Not my job to educate them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/05/13/black-box-voting-part-2/#comment-1204441</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=24374#comment-1204441</guid>
		<description>I hear ya, jbjd.  But it was to the more personal part when you assumed pm317 has no knowledge of voting machines or how they work to which I was specifically referring, and calling pm317 &quot;ignorant.&quot;  My point abt pm317 &quot;being on our side&quot; was to ask you to not be so harsh in a subtle manner.  

I agree that cites are important to substantiate claims.

Like I said, I value your comments and your passion.  It is important, though, to have these discussions in a way that invites more conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear ya, jbjd.  But it was to the more personal part when you assumed pm317 has no knowledge of voting machines or how they work to which I was specifically referring, and calling pm317 &#8220;ignorant.&#8221;  My point abt pm317 &#8220;being on our side&#8221; was to ask you to not be so harsh in a subtle manner.  </p>
<p>I agree that cites are important to substantiate claims.</p>
<p>Like I said, I value your comments and your passion.  It is important, though, to have these discussions in a way that invites more conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pm317</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/05/13/black-box-voting-part-2/#comment-1204438</link>
		<dc:creator>pm317</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=24374#comment-1204438</guid>
		<description>Kathleen, thank you for working on this. This is a very important issue especially in a country that prides on its 200+ years of democracy. There has to be many reforms on many levels otherwise it is very easy to turn the whole country into Cook county Illinois, especially with electronic voting without paper trail. The way forward (at least one of them)is to reform FEC and give it more teeth and have its subsidiaries in each state to oversee and do quality control. The equipment has to be standardized and the contracts and the implementation for obtaining voting equipment has to be transparent and subject to verification at each step. Everything has to be done more scientifically and in a sterile fashion without corruption creeping into it at any level. For this to happen FEC has to have more teeth and also a more idealistic bent of mind to preserve and protect our democracy. This past election has been an eye opener for me and to see how archaic the whole process is and how prone to corruption it can be is another revelation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathleen, thank you for working on this. This is a very important issue especially in a country that prides on its 200+ years of democracy. There has to be many reforms on many levels otherwise it is very easy to turn the whole country into Cook county Illinois, especially with electronic voting without paper trail. The way forward (at least one of them)is to reform FEC and give it more teeth and have its subsidiaries in each state to oversee and do quality control. The equipment has to be standardized and the contracts and the implementation for obtaining voting equipment has to be transparent and subject to verification at each step. Everything has to be done more scientifically and in a sterile fashion without corruption creeping into it at any level. For this to happen FEC has to have more teeth and also a more idealistic bent of mind to preserve and protect our democracy. This past election has been an eye opener for me and to see how archaic the whole process is and how prone to corruption it can be is another revelation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbjd</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/05/13/black-box-voting-part-2/#comment-1204432</link>
		<dc:creator>jbjd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=24374#comment-1204432</guid>
		<description>R3A, without cites, without naming the machines used in India (so that the types of machines as well as their origins can be determined), nothing pm317 says can be verified.  On its own, the statement that honest elections officials equals validated electronic voting makes no sense to me, anyway.  Intentional wire tampering or unintended software or hardware glitches precludes an accurate count.  (But I have no idea of the voting environment because pm317 merely states an opinion without support.  That&#039;s not about &#039;sides&#039; but about meaningful exchange of information.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R3A, without cites, without naming the machines used in India (so that the types of machines as well as their origins can be determined), nothing pm317 says can be verified.  On its own, the statement that honest elections officials equals validated electronic voting makes no sense to me, anyway.  Intentional wire tampering or unintended software or hardware glitches precludes an accurate count.  (But I have no idea of the voting environment because pm317 merely states an opinion without support.  That&#8217;s not about &#8217;sides&#8217; but about meaningful exchange of information.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/05/13/black-box-voting-part-2/#comment-1204429</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=24374#comment-1204429</guid>
		<description>If I may jump in, jbjd - pm317 seemed to be referring to India specifically, not the US, and how is it India can have votes counted without the same kind of difficulties we have faced here.

And, I am sure pm317, as a computer scientist, does understand the inner workings of the electronic voting machine.

That is all to say, you know I value your opinion, jbjd, but the tone here might be ratcheted back just a bit.  pm317 is on our side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I may jump in, jbjd &#8211; pm317 seemed to be referring to India specifically, not the US, and how is it India can have votes counted without the same kind of difficulties we have faced here.</p>
<p>And, I am sure pm317, as a computer scientist, does understand the inner workings of the electronic voting machine.</p>
<p>That is all to say, you know I value your opinion, jbjd, but the tone here might be ratcheted back just a bit.  pm317 is on our side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pm317</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/05/13/black-box-voting-part-2/#comment-1204407</link>
		<dc:creator>pm317</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=24374#comment-1204407</guid>
		<description>I am a computer scientist and I know for a fact that electronic voting machines can be designed and built to count votes correctly (and with a paper trail for verification). Why a first world democracy with their fingertips on the latest technology can not pull off an election with integrity using electronic voting is the question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a computer scientist and I know for a fact that electronic voting machines can be designed and built to count votes correctly (and with a paper trail for verification). Why a first world democracy with their fingertips on the latest technology can not pull off an election with integrity using electronic voting is the question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbjd</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/05/13/black-box-voting-part-2/#comment-1204405</link>
		<dc:creator>jbjd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=24374#comment-1204405</guid>
		<description>OMG.  You posted this article way back in March!  I missed that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG.  You posted this article way back in March!  I missed that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbjd</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/05/13/black-box-voting-part-2/#comment-1204401</link>
		<dc:creator>jbjd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=24374#comment-1204401</guid>
		<description>Oh, now I get it.  You are opining as to the efficacy of using voting machines in national elections, notwithstanding you have no idea how voting machines work.  Therefore, you assume that, without the &#039;corrupting influence of elections officials,&#039; a mechanism exists to guarantee that every touch or punch is recorded as a vote, for the candidate for whom the vote was intended, and counted by the machine for that candidate.  You have no idea that some touch screen machines routinely display the wrong name in the window; or thank the voter for voting before the voter has completed voting; or record negative totals instead of actual number of votes cast on that machine. 

And you are ignorant of the fact that, these machines usually provide no paper verification to the voter as to how she voted, or how all voters voted, pointing to any discrepancy between votes cast and votes counted can be found.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, now I get it.  You are opining as to the efficacy of using voting machines in national elections, notwithstanding you have no idea how voting machines work.  Therefore, you assume that, without the &#8216;corrupting influence of elections officials,&#8217; a mechanism exists to guarantee that every touch or punch is recorded as a vote, for the candidate for whom the vote was intended, and counted by the machine for that candidate.  You have no idea that some touch screen machines routinely display the wrong name in the window; or thank the voter for voting before the voter has completed voting; or record negative totals instead of actual number of votes cast on that machine. </p>
<p>And you are ignorant of the fact that, these machines usually provide no paper verification to the voter as to how she voted, or how all voters voted, pointing to any discrepancy between votes cast and votes counted can be found.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen Wynne</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/05/13/black-box-voting-part-2/#comment-1204395</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Wynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=24374#comment-1204395</guid>
		<description>For the record, the reason I wanted to bring the election reform issue to the attention of NQ, via the help of my friend, Rev. Amy, was because I believed the PUMA members were a very astute group of people, who had created the PUMA movement due to their great awakening after witnessing how the caucuses were gamed by the DNC to favor obama and to ensure that Hillary did not get the nomination, despite the fact that she won the popular vote.  It was this clear eyed awareness that convinced me that the PUMA community would understand exactly what&#039;s at stake here and step up to the plate.  Thatkind of commitment would be key in our having any chance of taking back our elections.

It was my hope that not only would we raise awareness about the dire need for election reform, but that I, along with my colleague Vickie Karp, in alliance with the election reform organization in which we are members, &quot;VoteRescue.org&quot;, would be given a great opportunity to show those who visit this fantastic site that the only way to prevent election fraud &quot;before&quot; it happens and becomes impossible to undo, is through a citizen uprising demanding a return to hand counted paper ballots, at the precinct on election night -- and to throw those blasted voting machines into Boston Harbor. 

After 7 years of pursuing this issue and uncovering layer after layer of corruption at every level within our elections process, I am more convinced now than ever, that the corruption of the elections process had evolved over time by design, to ultimately  give party leaders total control of our elections through these machines, corrupt election officials and a compliant Congress in cohoots with the voting machine lobby to make certain that they stay in power and ignore the will of the people.

As a result of these harsh realities, I believe we are at a cross roads in our nation&#039;s history which demands that we no longer be satisfied to take baby steps nor continue to agree to compromise with a totally corrupt system.  Instead, I believe it&#039;s  time to start a new government, because the old one ain&#039;t working any more and the only way we can do this is by taking back our elections.

There are still many within the election reform community who are still convinced that we cannot achieve hand counts and that we must continue to find ways to compromise with this corrupt government to achieve incremental reform.  I cannot and will not follow that strategy any longer because I believe it leads to a dead end.  

I hope you all will join us tonight and next week to learn for yourselves why an all out effort must be taken by the American people to bring back the kind transparency and citizen oversight in our elections that only hand counts can provide.

It&#039;s up to us. Our children are counting on us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, the reason I wanted to bring the election reform issue to the attention of NQ, via the help of my friend, Rev. Amy, was because I believed the PUMA members were a very astute group of people, who had created the PUMA movement due to their great awakening after witnessing how the caucuses were gamed by the DNC to favor obama and to ensure that Hillary did not get the nomination, despite the fact that she won the popular vote.  It was this clear eyed awareness that convinced me that the PUMA community would understand exactly what&#8217;s at stake here and step up to the plate.  Thatkind of commitment would be key in our having any chance of taking back our elections.</p>
<p>It was my hope that not only would we raise awareness about the dire need for election reform, but that I, along with my colleague Vickie Karp, in alliance with the election reform organization in which we are members, &#8220;VoteRescue.org&#8221;, would be given a great opportunity to show those who visit this fantastic site that the only way to prevent election fraud &#8220;before&#8221; it happens and becomes impossible to undo, is through a citizen uprising demanding a return to hand counted paper ballots, at the precinct on election night &#8212; and to throw those blasted voting machines into Boston Harbor. </p>
<p>After 7 years of pursuing this issue and uncovering layer after layer of corruption at every level within our elections process, I am more convinced now than ever, that the corruption of the elections process had evolved over time by design, to ultimately  give party leaders total control of our elections through these machines, corrupt election officials and a compliant Congress in cohoots with the voting machine lobby to make certain that they stay in power and ignore the will of the people.</p>
<p>As a result of these harsh realities, I believe we are at a cross roads in our nation&#8217;s history which demands that we no longer be satisfied to take baby steps nor continue to agree to compromise with a totally corrupt system.  Instead, I believe it&#8217;s  time to start a new government, because the old one ain&#8217;t working any more and the only way we can do this is by taking back our elections.</p>
<p>There are still many within the election reform community who are still convinced that we cannot achieve hand counts and that we must continue to find ways to compromise with this corrupt government to achieve incremental reform.  I cannot and will not follow that strategy any longer because I believe it leads to a dead end.  </p>
<p>I hope you all will join us tonight and next week to learn for yourselves why an all out effort must be taken by the American people to bring back the kind transparency and citizen oversight in our elections that only hand counts can provide.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s up to us. Our children are counting on us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
