RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Walls

webdoctoraccesstoon_edited

Marcus Welby? He’s history. So says Ronald Glasser in a stinging Washington Post editorial. It’s not that a Dr. Welby won’t be coming to your house because he doesn’t care to do that sort of thing any more. Your doctor is no longer available because your doctor is probably no longer in control of what he and she does!

Here is a shocking fact.

Of the 15,000 students who will graduate from medical school this year — and the roughly 8,000 physicians and surgeons who will finish their specialty training — more than 93 percent will become employees of large clinics, managed-care companies or hospital systems.

Yikes. 93% of newly available doctors go directly to “The Man.” What does this mean to us, I shudder to ask?

These physicians … are no longer patient advocates. In many ways, they’ve abandoned the patient to the work rules of health plans and the professional demands of managed care. The Hippocratic Oath has been discarded, and the Golden Rule has become: He who has the gold sets the rules.

What this means is that the care you get — and how long you get it — is only the care your health plan will reimburse your doctor for. You can see your psychiatrist or psychologist for five visits; you can stay in the hospital for 48 hours following a hip replacement, or three days after a radical prostatectomy. Simple mastectomies go home the same day, and gall-bladder removals as soon as they wake up from the anesthesia. If the drug prescribed is not on your health plan’s list, then your doctor will have to prescribe an approved alternative that may not be as effective.

So why don’t doctors care about this? Dr. Glasser continues:

Everyone in medicine knows that these are no longer the physician’s patients. They belong to the insurance companies, the health plans, the hospitals. With that understanding comes personal indifference and professional exhaustion.

Dr. Glasser goes on to assert that even medical training is complicit in separating doctors and their patients. Small group practices are dismissed as unworkable, and “team playing” in large practices is taught in its place. He concludes:

Perhaps we can’t go back to the two- or four-physician group practice. But medical school faculties can quit carrying the water for the managed-care companies and the large hospital systems. Our current medical system is out of whack. And those of us who see the edge of the cliff approaching should begin to warn publicly that medicine cannot survive if its real value — its capacity both to comfort and to heal — is replaced only by the superficial value of price.

Now I realize how lucky I am. I have a primary care physician who is part of a husband and wife team practice. No walls! They do ask for quarterly checkups and do a lot of prevention counseling. I do have to pay extra for all of this because this level of individualized care is not covered by my insurance. What I didn’t realize until I read Dr. Glasser’s article is that, for most people, even paying extra for this level of care is not an option. However, even my doctors are getting older, and when they retire I do not expect to find a replacement.

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post50 Comments »

Comment by LisaB | 2009-06-03 16:00:08

Great article Pat! I like the toon as well. I live in a university town with a med school. And Duke Hospital is right around the corner. The area is lousy with clinics. But one day I sat in the waiting room of my kid’s pediatrician’s office and chatted with a young mother. They had to drive over 2 hours to reach that clinic. It was the only one that would take their insurance. And her insurance is the one military families get. (Her new baby had a problem.)

And when I need my doc, I have to first leave a message with his nurse who is supposed to call back within a day (not necessarily THAT day). Then if she feels it’s important, she’ll refer me to appointments. If not, I’m not sure what she’d do.

You simply cannot speak to the doc. I’ve only ever made 3 calls to my doc’s office. The nurse called me back once after two days and never returned another.

I also have friends at the local hospital who say its mission is changing to emphasize revenue. For ex, its clinics will advertise for easy-to-treat problems and turf out more complicated things that are costly. Since those clinics are still part of the hospital, it looks as if they still handle any problem a patient comes in with. But that’s not going to be the case.

Of course, it goes back to less funding from the state, insurance companies and lots of uninsured patients, among other things.

Comment by Tricia Spiegel | 2009-06-03 16:43:18

Agree, Lisa B. What is so crazy is my friends telling me that they have some sort of test (like an MRI or colonoscopy) and then they cannot find out the results–maybe from s nurse if they are lucky.

One friend said she had to go into the office after weeks of trying to find the results of a sonogram on her liver, and the person showed her the report saying “large cyst or tumor.”

She kept asking for the doctor to be more interpretive, but it never happened. She had to hire another doctor to try to figure it all out. Turns out it was nothing, but she went through many weeks of agony and extra work to put her mind at ease.

Remember when they would actually call you to discuss test results, even if to say everything was OK???

Comment by churl | 2009-06-03 22:39:28

I think I would have hired a lawyer to get the test results for me– if enough people behave badly when they get shit on, then the bad behavior will at least lessen.

Comment by Chicago Joe | 2009-06-04 10:39:21

I do have to pay extra for all of this because this level of individualized care is not covered by my insurance.

This is the future of medicine. The have-nots and the vast middle will have the three-walled system. The rich folks, such as the Obamas, will have the ability to contract with a boutique physician practice. There is no way in hell that the “haves” will have to get in line with the plebians. That is the great untold truth about single-payor or universal health care.

Comment by listing starboard | 2009-06-05 11:54:36

Exactly. The rich will be able to pay for prompt medical treatment from the more experienced clinicians, the free medical care will require horrendous waiting time from third world doctors and nurses.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Solara 9 | 2009-06-03 16:37:58

We pay more for health care than any other nation, but the quality of it is far from being at the top of the list. And it appears it will just be getting worse–more expensive and of lower quality than it is now.

We are pretty much on our own I think, so take good care of your bodies!

 

Comment by Rich | 2009-06-03 16:43:43

Wonderful Cartoon!

The problem is not just government-controlled health care and what they will or will not allow. It is what options patients will have to pay for extra if they can afford it.

The other problem is that it is so difficult to find a doctor who is willing to take on new primary care patients now. What will happen when everyone wants to have their own doctor as they should be able to do? In the process of making changes we need to develop different levels of care like nurse practitioners who can write prescriptions and who will be fully compensated for their services. I feel that most of the time when we go to a doctor, it does NOT require a full-fledged doctor to take care of the situation. We will need more clinics that also should be fully reimbursed for their services. In addition we will need to have a functioning watch dog group to make sure people are not forced to have medical procedures or exams just to make sure that the nurse practitioner, clinic, or doctor is not dragging people off of the streets just so that they can bill the government or single-payer program run by the government.

We need to make changes, and I am happy to hear that Obama is leading to at least create serious conversation about a very important subject.

Let us remember that they way things are, many of us who have insurance are covering the cost for people who do not have insurance. And, as it is now, people are dying from not receiving appropriate medical care or diagnoses and hopefully this will happen less once we create an American form of single-payer health coverage, which hopefully will allow those who can afford it to buy more insurance coverage or pay for extra services.

Rich

 

Comment by Docelder | 2009-06-03 16:45:28

Pat, good job. I am apprehensive even to start to comment. Because, I am in favor of a single payer system, and almost everybody here is not. But let me just say this… the system we have now is not sustainable, it is not the best, it is not the most efficient, it is not equitable and it is not free market. None of that. What it is is akin to a health care mafia. We can do better. Better because we deserve better, and better because for what we spend we should be getting more.

Comment by NoBamaNoWay | 2009-06-03 16:59:28

word, docelder; our health care system, like our government, is just another form of organized crime.

 

Comment by Don | 2009-06-03 17:31:22

“not free market”? So who really gives a damn about free market? Isn’t that sort of what Chrysler and GM used to be? Big difference between socialism and free market.

Comment by Docelder | 2009-06-03 17:49:05

So who really gives a damn about free market?

Somewhere a capitalistic society might have use for that again one day. I used to worry we were turning socialist, until I realized we were already there. Anyway, that was kind of my point. We don’t have a free market system with the third party payers, employer paid insurance and government programs we have now anyway. It would be better to just accept that and accept a socialistic single payer health system and be done with it. Yes, Marcus Welby is gone, but then again Marcus Welby wouldn’t be prescribing the latest patented drug, when the old generic one works just as fine. Dammit, I said I wasn’t getting into this one. ;)

Comment by Chicago Joe | 2009-06-04 10:41:06

Single payer will not bring us better care. As a member in this industry, you do not really want to know where we are going with this. It is not going to be good.

Comment by listing starboard | 2009-06-05 11:56:46

Tort reform would have made a tremendous difference in health care costs but since most politicians are also lawyers it will never happen.

 
 
 
 

Comment by boonies | 2009-06-03 18:21:37

Best…most efficient…free market…Try F-R-A-N-C-E , which the UN rates as #1 in health outcomes overall.
Canada -the land of Michael Moore’s wetdreams- is rated THIRTIETH… just ahead of US at 37th.
Yes we can do better. Not with a single payer system that shifts the power from an uncaring corporation to an unaccountable bureaucracy as in Ontario.
Serious students of this issue should Google( is that a verb?) the names of the following people.
Shona Holmes …Lindsey McCreith… and worst of all, Adolfo Flora.
The first two are on youtube telling their own sordid tales of Ontario’s bureaucracy, and Mr Flora is the man who was forced to go to the UK and SPEND 450K of his own money for a liver transplant they refused him in Toronto. Medical bankruptcy?….visualize Canada as well as the USA

Comment by Docelder | 2009-06-03 18:53:55

France has almost universal public health insurance, which is what I said “single payer”. France is #1, but they spend about half per capita on health care that we do. we don’t get nearly what we are buying. We just get more buildings with insurance companies names on them, they have more money to speculate on oil futures and peoples health is still just a vehicle to derive profit for corporations. I will say it again, it is a mafia. If we were a free people… really free… we wouldn’t stand for it.

 

Comment by Ellen D | 2009-06-03 21:33:11

Sorry I can’t give you my name but I had 2 perfect Caesareans in Ontario. My mother had great treatment for a heart condition and my father got priority care for a discovered Cancer.

Just walk around Toronto, stop people on the street, and ask them if they want to give up their OHIP for the American system. Good luck with that.

Comment by Docelder | 2009-06-03 21:46:05

and ask them if they want to give up their OHIP for the American system.

Of course not, we may get some medical tourists who can afford to doctor shop. That doesn’t make us better, it just means our resources are for sale. Meanwhile, our people shop for medicines in Mexico because they can’t afford medicine here.

 

Comment by HC123 | 2009-06-03 23:59:45

People in good health like Canadacare. Your results are fortunate. But to deny that Canada has issues with healthcare is to stick your head in the sand. Go ask for a new ACL with MRI evaluation. I did, then I went to the US.

Comment by Marge | 2009-06-04 11:36:37

I’m Canadian, in my 70s. In all my life, the life of my parents (with cancer in their later days), the lives of my grown children and grandchildren and all my friends and aquaintances - never has there been a complaint about Canadian health care. There are, of course, rare problems - and we hear about these. Our health care is excellent.

 
 
 

Comment by HC123 | 2009-06-03 23:53:12

France? Are you kidding me? Because the UN says so?

I cannot understand why people of good sense say such silly things. Move there, try it, get back to me. I have. No thanks.

If you want DMV style service, then France is certainly a place to go for healthcare. But never fear, we are rapidly adopting their plan, complete with provider strikes and government cost cutting measures.

Remember, your life isnt all that important to Big Brother. Just your tax dollars. You will be treated accordingly.

 
 
 

Comment by nobody special | 2009-06-03 16:49:21

Very good article. Having been a frequent customer of the health care system in my area due to serious illness; I can confirm that everything Dr. Glasser said is true and then some.

All these commercials about possibly taking decisions out of your and your doctors hands are nothing but a load of crap. Decisions regarding your health care have long been out of your or your doctors hands and squarely in the hands of your insurance company where profit rules the day…not your health. People who for one second think otherwise simply haven’t spent enough time traversing our medical system.

Comment by Jules | 2009-06-04 00:35:29

Keep in mind, doctors are businesspeople too. If left to their own devices with no supervision or anyone to answer to, what is to stop them from running test after unnecessary test to make a bigger profit for themselves? That is why managed care companies came into existence to try to keep an eye on this (though they are out for profit as well as all businesses have to be to exist). I understand that health insurers get a bad rap for ‘denying care’. I have a different perspective on that, which is that there is a legal contract with an insurance provider that says they will pay for certain things. The services that are covered are fully disclosed at the time a contract is initiated. It is not a contract that says they will pay for anything and everything under the sun that the patient may or may not need. Many people expect first dollar coverage for everything and consider it almost a God-given right. Many take insurance provided by their employers completely for granted as a right they have. I think it is reasonable to expect patients to pay for some of their own care. If it’s not in the contract, sorry but you have to pay for it yourself outside of the contract.

 
 

Comment by Diana L. C. | 2009-06-03 16:53:17

It’s sad. I remember my older brother walking me to the family doctor’s office in the small town I lived in while growing up. He had delivered my brother and sisters and me. He treated my mom and dad and us kids, and my mom babysat his nurse’s girl. I had to go to have my finger poked for my regular check for anemia when I was little. It was a much more personal feeling. This doctor knew our whole family, as well as the families of most people in town.

I’m not too unhappy with my care from Kaiser Permanente. I did get to pick my regular doctor, whom I see every time as long as I call in advance for the appointment. Kaiser does lots of prevention care cheaply. If I need medication I pick it up at the pharmacy on the way out of the building, which is two blocks from my house.

That said, however, I still hope to find a way to keep my usual practice of seeing the doctor no more than once or twice a year. I keep myself as healthy as I can. And my goal is to die quickly at home when it’s time. (I know I can’t guarantee that outcome, but it is my goal.) I don’t want to have any of what inheritance I’ve scraped together to go to the healthcare system instead of to my kids.

 

Comment by jiminycricket | 2009-06-03 16:56:40

….and now they want to TAX the benefits!

Comment by Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy | 2009-06-03 17:46:27

For those of us who cannot legally marry our partners, we already ARE taxed on the benefits.

GREAT post, Pat!

Comment by RKStone | 2009-06-03 22:30:20

Come to New England. We respect you and will welcome you with open arms.

 
 
 

Comment by Hg | 2009-06-03 17:06:23

It would help if we could stop paying subsidies for the rest of the world in the form of outlandish costs for pharmaceuticals here in America. Add to that the risks of prescription drugs made in China, especially generics. But back to the subject at hand–Where I once had checkups every six months by a family doctor, it is now once a year. The VA is even in worse condition. Where the VA doctor was seeing me (and everyone else) every six months also, it is now like approx. every 18 months, then you are alotted 15 minutes. Assembly line care. Maybe the way everything has turned out the last few years we are lucky to have this.

 

Comment by Doc99 | 2009-06-03 17:38:00

You left out the Trial Bar. The US will never get a handle on Healthcare costs (without rationing, of course) until the reason for defensive medicine is dealt with, once and for all.

Comment by boonies | 2009-06-03 18:25:06

I hear that the trial lawyers in the Senate are working on tort reform even now so dont despair.

 
 

Comment by Betsy Buzz Ross Latte | 2009-06-03 17:42:14

My grandmother had five kids at home by midwife. She never went to a gynecologist, internal doc, heart specialist, or any of the other specialists we have now. She ate fresh veggies, tons of meat, fresh fruit and drank green tea. Her strongest drink was ginger ale and some wine once.

She had cataract surgery at my parent’s insistence in her eighties. She recovered in a few days instead of the two-three weeks the doctors had told her.

She died just short of 91 years old.

When I asked my doctor to explain how my grandmother could live so healthy
and I couldn’t, he never answered me. From that day forward I decided I was in charge of my own health instead of the corporate medical world.

Now, I go to the doc once a year to renew three prescriptions.

 

Comment by foxyladi14 | 2009-06-03 18:07:25

good article Pat.thanks

 

Comment by Ferd Berfle | 2009-06-03 18:38:33

Perhaps if the Hippocratic Oath were actually adhered to n all cases, none of this would be an issue. I saw pre-med students in college actually cheating on Chemistry exams. Since I was a stupid freshman at the time, I did nothing. Shame on me, but moreso, shame on them. I still feel a great amount of guilt. That having been said, I’m confident that most physicians are both competent and caring and are diligent in their pursuit of treatment for their patients.

 

Comment by mamakay | 2009-06-03 18:39:40

I work at a 10 doctor clinic. I’ve been here for 21 years and have seen the changes. My docs are the best and are still willing to take the best care of their patients even though they know up front that they may not always be reimbersed.
A good sceario is the one my mother just went through. She was hospitalized for 11 days. Her bill was $27,000. Her insurance paid $92 and she paid $864. None of this made any sense to me. No wonder the health care system is in such a mess.

 

Comment by nobody special | 2009-06-03 20:17:05

mamakay did Medicare pick up the remainder of your mother’s $27,000 tab?

Comment by mamakay | 2009-06-04 08:51:33

No. I guess they just wrote it all off. Thats what makes no sense. Do they get a huge tax break? I just dont know.

 
 

Comment by JohnnyB | 2009-06-03 20:37:01

Thanks for the great cartoon, Pat:

I think we in the U.S. are spoiled brats. We are raised with the fear of dying of some disease that if the Dr. does not catch early, you will be dead soon. Now, pills are advertised on TV. The latest disease to be concerned with is PAT or something like that. Do you have poor circulation in your legs? Then this could lead to (take your choice of symptoms, we’ve got them all anyway) so as your Dr. to get you on these pills to save you.

I was paying $650 per month for my wife and I, almost $8,000 per year, then more out of pocket for each visit, and a small amount for any prescription.
We stopped paying after losing some clients during the downturn. We pay nothing monthly. Our meds are actually cheaper than the co-pay we used to pay.
Just hope we don’t need any major medical procedure, but since we have not ever had anything very bad go wrong, we are just not going to the Dr. unless we are feeling very bad (so far, we feell good). This has been going on for 6 months now. Saved $4,000 out of pocket.

I had a relative that was a Dr. and very highly respected. He told me that 50%

 

Comment by JohnnyB | 2009-06-03 20:42:30

Sorry. Must have hit the send button.

I had a relative that was a Dr. and very highly respected. He told me that 50% of the diagnosis were wrong, so you are being treated for the wrong disease.

I still think that the state-of-the -rt medicine today is similar to the state-of-the-art medicine that treated President Washington. They bled him to death with leeches.

Today, this is what the good treatment is, and later it is found out to be really bad for you. Stay away from Dr’s unless the bone is showing through your skin.

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2009-06-04 00:07:40

They bled him to death with leeches.

A good financial anology.

100,000k for the birth of my grand-daughter. Ask me how anyone can afford that. I can’t

 
 

Comment by Blue Orchid | 2009-06-03 21:05:04

Having lived in 5 countries on 4 continents, I was most pleased with the Canadian single payer system. During the 5 years I lived there, I had been able to go see any doctors any time I liked with no restriction whatsoever, and I didn’t have to deal with any medical bill at all. In contrast, I find our health care system by far the most inefficient, inhumane and exorbitant among Western nations. At the root of the problem is the fact that our healthcare is aimed at maximizing profit for corporations and healthcare providers at the expense of the health and welfare of patients.

Comment by Ferd Berfle | 2009-06-03 21:40:15

I agree with your assessment. Our downfall was when hospitals became for-profit organizations and doctors forgot their oath. Bring on the business-types who find no problem with captive audiences and fraudulent practices.

 

Comment by Ellen D | 2009-06-03 21:46:02

It is basically immoral to have corporations making profits from human misery and misfortune.
I wish someone who is a lot more religious than I am would take this up as a cause.

Comment by Docelder | 2009-06-04 00:17:11

It is basically immoral to have corporations making profits from human misery and misfortune

Yes, and I am pro business, and am nobody socialist ordinarily. I draw the line here, knowing how our system is so corrupt. Nobody should want for clean air, food, clean water and basic health care. We would want no less for dogs in an animal shelter. We deserve at least as much for ourselves.

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2009-06-04 00:27:39

We are only as strong as our weakest link,

What get’s me Doc

Everything that obama has said about infrastructure,building high speed rail,planning for alternative fuels,building better fuel efficient cars to national health care have all been issues dear to me for years.
I have been wanting all this for 30 years..One reason for my support of Hillary.
So why do I sound like a John Galt

Simple!

No Money and the real risk of hyper inflation which will lead to a world very dark.

 
 
 
 

Comment by HC123 | 2009-06-03 23:56:20

I am constantly baffled as to why people will spend more on clothing, hair and nails than their own health.

I go to a doctor who does not accept insurance. I write a check for her time. I do not expect my insurance to cover every single thing I request.

If you dont want a doctor to work for someone else, pay them directly. Especially your primary care doc, who coordinates the rest of your care.

Exchanging “evil big business insurance companies” for “the government” does not improve care.

Comment by Docelder | 2009-06-04 00:12:35

Exchanging “evil big business insurance companies” for “the government” does not improve care.

It does make it equitable. It also removes the insurance profit from the system. Government also will have overhead, yes. But, there will be no need to advertise, pay agents, buy skyscrapers etc. Also, less money for insurers to speculate in stocks and futures. Health care needs to be a service, and not a business. That is all I want to say about it. I always beat this horse ot death. This time no. I am fully reconciled to our mediocrity for the time being. Maybe when Mexico passes us by we can wake up.

Comment by HC123 | 2009-06-04 09:27:21

It amazes me how people who rail against state-ism, and own that government is inefficient want to hand this aspect of life over completely. I am sure it will happen because the lower end mediocrity is the best humanity can do, but it truly baffles me.

I can make healthcare equitible immediately. Dont provide any to anyone.

It also solves the secondary goal you state, which is making sure nobody makes any money at it.

If these are the benchmarks, problem solved.

Chad has implemented this system of healthcare pretty well on both fronts. I think their life expectancy hovers around 40.

 
 

Comment by Jules | 2009-06-04 01:02:00

I agree with your first two comments, and 1/2 of the 4th. While I’m sure most doctors want to help people honestly and to the best of their ability, there are plenty who are simply out to get the most money possible. They do this by running unnecessary tests and/or if they take insurance (most do) they can miscode/misrepresent procedures to get maximum payment. At a former job, I was positioned to see this type of abuse first hand. So please don’t think that if the system was 100% doctor driven, and the “evil” insurance companies didn’t exist, that all would be right with the world.

One of the biggest and easiest things we can do to bring down costs is to get pharmaceutical advertising off of TV. They have to build their huge ad budgets into the cost of their drugs. And it also may increase unnecessary doctor visits (to request the drug). And some doctors will allow themselves to be pressured by their patients into prescribing what the patients ask for (after diagnosing themselves) so as not to anger the patient.

 
 

Comment by Don X | 2009-06-04 01:40:21

Great cartoon and important topic, Pat. Hospital charges are outrageous and most doctors give you about 7 minutes and turn the rest of your appointment over to a nurse to draw blood. However, if one is lucky enough to have good insurance, hospital costs may be reduced drastically. Medicare is well aware of hospital scams and make them discount their charges a lot.

My brother was in UCLA Santa Monica hospital for 5 days and the charge was over $49,202 for medical services and another $5,050 for other services. Medicare paid $5,050, the amount they allowed UCLA. His secondary Medicare supplement insurance paid $1,068. My brother was told he was not responsible for $48,134. Patient savings: $43,084.

I hate to think what the cost would have been without good insurance. I still haven’t seen the bill from the next hospital he was transferred to where they did a half-assed job of diagnosis before sending him to a nursing home. When I tried to get his medical records as next of kin, I was told that because of privacy laws, that is impossible without a power of attorney for health care or a conservatorship, which I do not have.

Not only did the hospitals make outrageous charges, but his doctor dumped him the moment he was admitted to a hospital, and it was like pulling teeth for the hospital to get information from the doctor needed to treat his multiple long standing conditions. His doctor doesn’t like to take Medicare patients. Had the doctor treated him properly, there is a good chance he would’t have ended up in the hosptial.

Comment by Tricia Spiegel | 2009-06-04 13:12:16

This is outrageous. It well-illustrates why the medical system needs a complete overhaul.

I just read an article saying that medical costs is by far the major reason people go bankrupt.

 
 

Comment by armymom | 2009-06-06 14:54:12

I work for a doctor’s office and I bill insurance companies and medicare/medicaid. Looking at the way medicare is handled is not the way to go. It may be for the patient, but it isn’t for overall healthcare. I can’t even begin to list how many times I’ve had to fight medicare just to get a little money for the doctor and to get coverage for the patient. Some of you say that with the write-offs, well good for them, the doctor charges way too much anyways. That isn’t so from what I’ve seen in my doctor’s office. In fact, my doctor has been in practice for over 35 years, and will retire as soon as they make it mandatory for a single payer system. He’s tired of being dictated to by the government and insurance companies.

And from going to seminars, I’ve heard that from a lot of doctors. Do any of you realize that doctors pay upward of $150,000 in malpractice insurance a year. If you’re just starting out, you not only have schooling to pay for, and the malpractice insurance, but you also have overhead, as in office, office furniture, office costs ie: telephone and the list goes on. If a doctor does not make a “living” or profit, then what is the motivator for having that much costs involved? Would you work at your job for nothing? Would you pay for all your student loans, insurance premiums if you didn’t know that you would have the money available to continue to practice.

In January of this year, we filed with medicare patients and we received the payments in April. How many of you would work for 4 months before you got a paycheck?

My doctor is old school, he makes sure his patients have his home phone number, he’s went to their house, even to the hospital when he wasn’t their “doctor on record” just to make sure they were doing okay. He’s involved in every step of his patients care, but he’s quite tired of one) being accused of making money hand over fist and being part of the “problem” as opposed to fixing the problem, and 2) frustrated with the system himself as he gets dictated to as to how much time he’s suppose to spend with a patient (he doesn’t follow that rule) and because of that, he could be dropped from several insurances. And I can’t even count how many times he has not charged a patient because he knew they were down on their luck, but didn’t have the money to get theirselves better.

At this rate, we’ll be lucky if we can even keep doctors in the states. There’s more I could say, but this is near and dear to me on both sides of the issue. I mean, I also am a “patient” at times as is my family, but I do work in the field and I have several suggestions for what to do, but the government isn’t going to listen to us because they want their hand in the cookie jar even more than it is. This isn’t about “fixing” health care.

 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)