reverend wright complicit in murder at the holocaust museum…?
By American Girl in Italy on June 10, 2009 at 6:01 PM in Current Affairs
“Reverend Wright will never restrain himself from incitement to murder and terrorism – not until his profits begin to decline, when his church’s growth stops.” Potential Keith Olbermann headline?
I’m just taking a guess at how the shooting at the Holocaust Museum will be covered by Olbermann tonight. Keith and his ilk were quick to blame Bill O’Reilly for the shooting of Tiller, so I assume they will also blame Wright for the murder of a security officer at the museum. Watch the video here, if you can stomach Olbermann.
So, why would Olbermann blame Wright? This interview with Reverend Wright appeared in the Daily Press today:
“Of course I voted for him; he’s my son. I’m proud of him,” Wright said. “I’ve got five biological kids. They all make mistakes and bad choices. I haven’t stopped loving any of them.
“He made mistakes. He made bad choices. I’ve got kids who listen to their friends. He listened to those around him. I did not disown him.”
Asked if he had spoken to the President, Wright said: “Them Jews aren’t going to let him talk to me. I told my baby daughter, that he’ll talk to me in five years when he’s a lame duck, or in eight years when he’s out of office. They will not let him … talk to somebody who calls a spade what it is.”
Wright also said Obama should have sent a U.S. delegation to the World Conference on Racism held recently in Geneva, Switzerland, but that the president did not do so for fear of offending Jews and Israel.
“Ethic cleansing is going on in Gaza. Ethnic cleansing of the Zionist is a sin and a crime against humanity, and they don’t want Barack talking like that because that’s anti-Israel,” Wright said.
This type of inflammatory language, coupled with Wright’s anti-Semitic behavior over the years such as his trip to Tripoli to visit Gaddafi, his support of Palestinian causes, his support of the Hamas terrorist manifesto, his awarding Farrakhan a lifetime achievement award, his stating Zionism has an element of white racism, is responsible for the assassination at the Holocaust museum.
Not to mention comments such as: “The Israelis have illegally occupied Palestinian territories for over 40 years now,” Wright has said. “Divestment has now hit the table again as a strategy to wake the business community and wake up Americans concerning the injustice and the racism under which the Palestinians have lived because of Zionism.”
“Israel’s a dirty word…” This coming from former Muslim Jeremiah Wright.
Law enforcement officials identified the suspect (from the Holocaust shooting) as James Wenneker von Brunn, 88, from the Eastern Shore of Maryland, NBC News reported. NBC said he may have had connections to hate groups or anti-government groups.
A racist, anti-Semitic Web site called http://www.holywesternempire.org and a book called “Kill the Best Gentile” were attributed to von Brunn.
Here are some quotes Olbermann made blaming O’Reilly for the death of Tiller:
“Without propaganda that rationalizes it, terrorism is impotent. Unfortunately, we have just this sort of propaganda without conscience. The responsibilities of the extreme far fight in the assassination of Dr. George Tiller.
And words can kill. Call a man a baby killer, a Nazi, like al-Qaeda, like Stalin, like Hitler, do it for four years. Then, the last part of the ingredient, act surprised when somebody shoots the man.”
Is it just a coincidence or an act of hate brought out by the inflammatory language against Jews spewed by Reverend Wright? Should we be surprised that when Jews are accused of ethnic cleansing, racism and injustice that someone stormed the museum and started shooting?
If I were to try to think like Olbermann, I would have to go with blaming Wright. And based on his previous *reporting* I can assume that Keith will release a diatribe tonight blaming Wright for the shooting and murder at the Holocaust Museum, right?
I won’t hold my breath.
(And for those of you who don’t get my attempt at sarcasm, I don’t think Wright is any more responsible for this shooting than O’Reilly is for Tiller’s.)
The Council on American-Islamic Relations also released a statement:
“We condemn this apparent bias-motivated attack and stand with the Jewish community and with Americans of all faiths in repudiating the kind of hatred and intolerance that can lead to such disturbing incidents.”
My thoughts are with the families involved, and am deeply sorry for the loss of a loved one.
(List Price: $27.95 - Your Price: $15.47)
By Sarah Palin (Release date: November 17. 2009)
very sad.prayers for the family
wow - so do Jews or Christians feel comfortable with BHO especially since he has listened and been mentored by this man for 20 YEARS?
Wow, don’t you think it’s a little too go*damn late to be feeling “uncomfortable”. It’s not as if BHO’s
relationship with Wright was a secret….Oh sh*t I forgot,the MSM didn’t vet the the lying fraud!!!
I’m certainly no fan of either Jeremiah Wright or Barack Hussein Obama. However, I feel it quite a stretch to blame the actions of an 89 year old white supremacist on the ill-chosen inflammatory verbiage of a preacher with a large chip on his shoulder.
you didn’t read the entire post, did you?
I didn’t even read the post at all, but after I heard about the shooting, my thought was that is related to Obama’s treatment of Israel, even if the guy is a “white racist.” He is crazy and 88 years old. Who knows how this killer twisted things around in his head. I’m not saying my theory is right, it was just a consideration of mine among many considerations of why this happened.
meant to say “it was related to”
What has Obama done that would in any way encourage any violence against Jewish people?
Obama is definitely stirring up the pot of anti-semitism with his antics and acitons of praise to muslim leaders. He is saying one thing with his right hand and sticking the knife in, so to speak to Israel with his left hand. To those who have eyes to see and ears to hear, it is obvious.
Amec. Girl– Thank you for this post! It needed to be said.
Check out this post on Free Republic of an ‘article’ of von Brunn’s back in early December:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2141655/posts
Sound familiar?
Its easy to figure out “why” when you look at it from a greedy money standpoint.
Many people refuse to even now except that they are no longer in control of our representatives. Even after a decade of voting irregularities and fraud cases, they think that going out to vote means something.
Obama was given the green light to manipulate the public for two reasons. One, they thought his installment would ease tensions between the muslim world and america. I think he is an epic failure in this case.
Second, and the biggest reason, is that after Iraq they want to go to africa for their oil and mineral resources. Obama is perfect for this. They will use his race and ties with africa to garner support for such an action. This will allow us to make deals with them for exlusive contracts over there. The Sudan region is ripe for the picking.
Yes, it does. It is very similar to the notebook that the shooter at the Holocaust Museum left about his reasons for doing the shooting.
He also echoes the Reverend White’s animus against Jews, with very similar wording.
This stuff is everywhere, on every side and facet of our society. It seems as if people need someone or some group to hate to validate their own alleged superiority. Oh, for the days when everyone is deemed equal, no matter what. Will they ever get here?
Link to story http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/06/11/museum.shooting.suspect.two/index.html
This a**hole and all his disreputable associations are NEVER held accountable. It’s only his opponents who are to be judged. Like the great George Orwell wrote “Some are more equal than others”.
I still cannot believe how many IDIOTS voted for this pos. How many so called “educated” morons actually believed the hopeychangey MTV generation soundbites. Stupid! Stupid! STUPID!
The articles are rolling in, with the left blaming the right for this. It was only a matter of time.
Yep, he will be just another bitter clinger before the story is finished spinning. Then this can morph into an indictment of guns and bibles. Never let a “good crisis” go to waste.
the guy was a hardcore nutjob… no one is to blame but himself. he is a hatefilled loon. normal people just don’t do that kind of thing.
Yes, I agree, but the truth seldom gets in the way of the story.
don’t we know it!
I bet the guy is terminally ill, and decided to go out with both barrels blazing, so to speak.
fortunately he is not a good shot and the casualties were minimal. it could have been much worse!
I’m sure Keef will blame O’Reilly, Rushbo or Hillary…maybe even Sarah.
Apparently he is a birther and a truther…
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/06/von_brunn_a_birther.php
http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-722-Conservative-Politics-Examiner~y2009m6d10-Holocaust-Museum-shooter-von-Brunn-a-911-truther-who-hated-neocons-Bush-McCain
and a holocaust denier.
http://www.arsenalofhypocrisy.com/blog/?p=463
and he is anti christian as well as anti-jew.
http://www.antichrist.net/vonbrunn.html
He’s just a mess.
Rev. Wright’s remarks confirm what most of us who participate here perceived from the get-go, since he infers the POTUS is a weak, opportunistic puppet.
It still boggles my mind that the majority of the voting public excused and/or dismissed Obama’s 20-year affiliation with this hate monger who he called his “spiritual mentor”.
but, but, but…he gave a speech about racism and it was the bestest speech evah!
snark!
I wonder what Obama’s legacy will be…
How about allowing the second holocaust to occur.
How’s that going to make Bush look when Obama allows millions of Jews to get nuked and a whole region to ignite in world war.
Some people kept us safe!
SM — By the end of the year, the Iranians’ development of a nuclear weapon (warhead) will be a fait accompli.
0bama says we’ll have a fairly good sense by the end of the year whether the Iranians are moving in the right direction.
HEL-lo!!
“right direction” = merely nuclear energy.
Yeah, right!
Yep, I would imagine that for electricity production, nuclear is probably way more expensive for them than using natural gas or oil. You have to question the motive. I have the feeling it is not out of concern for carbon footprints.
Of course, we won’t be sure until we see that mushroom cloud.
I’m sorry, but since when was it the US’s responsibilty to defend Israel? Huh? Israel is a fully sovereign nation with its own military and has proved itself fully able to defend itself from invaders (and also proved itself fully capable of Dubya’s little favorite activity–pre-emptive strikes).
Israel has also proved itself to be highly arrogant especially in regards to the “Law of Return”–Jews with NO legal claim to Israeli territory need only make a formal request to enter the country while Arabs whose families fled or were expelled from Arab territories in the old British Mandate are denied any right to return and Arabs continue to be expelled from areas their families have lived in for generations if and when a Jew decides to move into the area; additionally, Israel has continued to build settlements in CONSTANT defiance of international laws and resolutions (the gov’t officially classifies these new settlements as “illegal” but it’s incredibly amazing that these “illegal settlers” still receive government-funded social services and programs). Hell, Israel’s been allowed to ignore far more UN resolutions (courtesy of US backing and support) than Saddam Hussein was allowed to ignore. With Saddam, his violations resulted in military actions against Iraq, not once but twice by US-led (and UN-sanctioned) military action.
Taking a play from the “America: Love It or Leave It” brigade, if you love Israel so much, why don’t you emigrate and help Israel in a more substantial way? Or are you more like the neocon chicken hawks were with the war in Iraq–preferring to let others fight the battles that you’re too afraid to fight?
Agreed.
Now brace yourself for the antisemitism and Nazi accusations.
uh, how ’bout you move to Saudi Arabia, Joooooze. yeah; ’nuff said.
Josefal… You sound like you had a good seat at Wright’s church… That AND mush for brains…
You’re an uneducated coward
http://www.democracyforums.com/showthread.php?t=4742
On October 3, 2001, I.A.P. News reported that according to Israel Radio (in Hebrew) Kol Yisrael an acrimonious argument erupted during the Israeli cabinet weekly session last week between Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and his foreign Minister Shimon Peres. Peres warned Sharon that refusing to heed incessant American requests for a cease-fire with the Palestinians would endanger Israeli interests and “turn the US against us. “Sharon reportedly yelled at Peres, saying “don’t worry about American pressure, we the Jewish people control America.”
http://www.mediamonitors.net/khodr49.html
“I want to tell you something very clear, don’t worry about American pressure on Israel, we, the Jewish people control America, and the Americans know it.”
Ariel Sharon to Shimon Peres, October 3rd, 2001, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio.
http://christianparty.net/sharon.htm
OCCUPIED JERUSALEM — An acrimonious argument erupted during the Israeli cabinet weekly session last week between Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and his foreign Minister Shimon Peres during which Sharon reportedly yelled at Peres, saying “don’t worry about American pressure, we control America.”
According the Israeli Hebrew radio Kol Yisrael Wednesday, Peres warned Sharon that refusing to heed incessant American requests for a cease-fire with the Palestinians would endanger Israeli interests and turn the US against us.
At this point, a furious Sharon reportedly turned toward Peres, saying “every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”
The radio said Peres and other cabinet ministers warned Sharon against saying what he said in public, because “it would cause us a public relations disaster.”
http://americandefenseleague.com/onaleash.htm
Sharon to Peres: “Don’t worry about American pressure; we control America”
http://www.wrmea.com/html/newsitem_s.htm
Sharon’s Infamous Comment - “We Control America”
http://www.rense.com/general45/sharonsinfamouscomment.htm
December is offline Reply With Quote
Obama has the lowest support among Israelis of any U.S. President since their inception.
Netanhayu and all Israelis will never allow Iran to complete development of nuclear weapons. You can count on that.
They have given Obama some time but not forever. Their recent unprecendented civil defense drill was serious and citizens there knew it was serious. They have been prepared for strikes against Iran and for retaliation.
What is no going to be said is that all the other “moderate” Arab states will welcome Israel’s strikes. No one want s nuclear Iran.
In Obama, Israel now knows they do not have a supporter for the first time since Eisenhower. Even Carter was more or a supporter (while he was President).
A true statement. So why are you concerned? Israel possesses nuclear weapons and a military that, at least in training and expertise, rivals our own. I am not worried in the least. They can take care of themselves. Indeed, it may be better that they take the necessary measures to ensure that Iran does not fulfill their quest rather than the U.S. We already have enough on our overflowing plate.
Why am I concerned?
I have family there and Obama has placed them at ground zero of an Iranian attack.
Israel has been fighting the western world’s war against radical islam for too many years. Aside from the 9/11 attack, no other country has paid as heavy a price as the Israelis when it comes to radical islam.
“We already have enough on our overflowing plate”
That’s the attitude that brought Khomeini to power. This is everyone’s problem.
So your concern is not about Israel but your family. You should have said so in the beginning. Your post came across much differently and I made a much different assumption.
As an aside, your family over there would actually be better off if the Israelis performed the destruction of these sites. The U.S. is already in up to its eyeballs with two wars and does not need a third. Think about that for a minute before you respond.
Israel has been prepared to do it themselves. They just wants U.S. support (supplies, recon).
Right now they don’t have it from Obama and may have to go it alone.
You should also understand that Iran going nuclear is as serious a matter as Taliban in Pakistan - possibly worse.
Do you naive idiots really think Iran will stop at only Israel?? It is the responsibility of the WORLD to keep rougue, intolerant regimes from acquiring nuclear weapons. We are already in deep shit with N Korea… But most of you here posting were not even a thought when some of us were going thru air-raid drills and thinking how we might survive a nuc attack…
Well, I would suppose that Iran’s quest for the ultimate weapon was known during the Bush Administration and, in fact, the Iranians were named as part of the axis of evil by Bush and his ersatz master, Cheney. In lieu, though, of taking on those who actually were pursuing nuclear weapons, Bush and Cheney chose to go after one who didn’t. While I am not in any way enamored of the current Administration, I was also not enamored of the last. Pray tell, sir, what is the practical difference between the two? Neither are doing or have done anything about the real provocateurs. It is very easy to make these claims about the current administration while forgiving 8-years of incompetence of the previous. The history is there for those who actually take off the ideological blinders. Your indignation is only as poor as your analogy to historical precedence. The holocaust killed upwards of 6 million. Such a holocaust is not within the grasp of terrorists unless the previous Administration allowed such to be a possibility. That sort of planning takes a lot of time, effort, and planning.
“Bush and Cheney chose to go after one who didn’t.”
I’m not sure what you meant by this, but Bush/Cheney did confront Iran and North Korea very forcibly on their nuclear weapons development. You can see what kind of diplomatic force they used because since Obama changed to his kumbaya approach North Korea has broken all their commitments and Iran isn’t even listening to him. This is not ideological it is facual and extremely apparent. Obama is the first President that I can remember conducting an appeasement policy and it is backfiring rapidly.
A second holocaust would not reach the 6 million number but it could reach as much as 2 million if Iran achieves nuclear capability. Then there is the possibility of dirty bombs being delivered to Jewish populations around the world, particularly in the U.S. where have very porous borders.
Your facts are not in evidence. Neither Bush nor Cheney confronted Iran in any way. They did confront NK, but failed to follow up as they were too consumed with Afghanistan and Iraq. A two-front war is difficult in the best of times with a draft and taxes commensurate with the spending. Bush/Cheney, in their infinite stupidity, cut taxes, did not call for a draft, and did nothing for the soldiers except put them further in harm’s way.
As for Kumbaya, Bush and Cheney did that when they said roses would be thrown at the feet of our soldiers in Iraq. It is not lost on me that the same things you criticize the current administration for (and with good reason) are the same sorts of things you praise the last for. Your lack of consistency is appalling. The real force behind 9/11 is still out there and to praise the last Administration for their abject incompetence is laughable.
Dirty bombs are not nuclear weapons. The terrorists have that capability now. All they need is radioactive trash to create one. Your understanding of nuclear issues is somewhat lacking.
And where do you get the 2 million figure? Israel will more than likely not allow Iran to reach the point of weaponization. They certainly didn’t let Iraq in 1983, if you recall.
And your comment about our borders is superfluous. Our borders have been porous since the beginning of the country. I say we should seal the borders, but business types don’t want that. That blame you can place squarely on the neocons. Even Bush didn’t advocate it, which he should have.
Bottom line:
Israel does not need our help when push comes to shove.
Your knowledge of foreign affairs is apparently lacking.
“Neither Bush nor Cheney confronted Iran in any way.”
If you mean they did not confront them militarily, you are right. But if you mean they sat back and did nothing for eight years then you had to have been asleep.
In 2007 the IAEA confirmed that North Korea had shut down the Yongbyon nuclear facility after successful 6 party negotiations. In 2008 when there were disputes between the U.S. and North Korea, the U.S. took No. Korea off the list of state sponsored terrorism and the deactivation of Yonbyon proceeded.
Suddenly in April 2009 No. Korea anounced reactivation of Yonbyon and in may had conducted a successful test. It was the difference between the diplomacy with strength practiced during the Clinton and Bush years versus the Obama’s weak appeasement policies. You want to rewrite history, it’s a free country - but don’t pretend to be smart.
“The real force behind 9/11 is still out there and to praise the last Administration for their abject incompetence is laughable.”
Let’s see how smart you are. Who exactly is the “real force behind 9/11?”
“Dirty bombs are not nuclear weapons. The terrorists have that capability now. All they need is radioactive trash to create one. Your understanding of nuclear issues is somewhat lacking.”
You make a fool of yourself in your own statement. You said that “terrorists have that capability now” and then follow that with “they need radioactive trash to create one.” So they don’t have that capability, but Iran can provide it at some point.
as far as a dirty bomb, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about. Depending on how much radioactive material is contained and released you can see death from radioactive contamination quickly, particularly among those nearest the initial explosion.
Two million are about how many could be killed in Israel with initial nuclear strikes by Iran as well as coordinated smaller strikes in key U.S. cities. Do the math.
Concerning Iran, Bush did not do enough but had a strategy to isolate Iran and pressure them to concede nuclear weapons development. The U.S. invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq were something the Arab world did not expect from a paper tiger, which is how they viewed the U.S. Those invasions did result in further isolating Iran by having the U.S. on two of their major borders. Could Bush have done more to pressure Iran? Yes, but he was distracted by the failing war in Iraq.
Obama comes in with his kumbaya appeasement policy and like with North Korea iran looked at him as a joke and just went about its business developing nuclear weapons.
I agree that Israel does not need our help in the form of U.S. military forces. But they could use U.S. recon capabilities and they will need supplies. The latter could become a problem with the Obama administration.
No, I won’t watch the video, I cannot, simply cannot stomach Obersalzberg.
On Hardball: Journalist Links Rush Limbaugh to Holocaust Museum Shooting
Salon’s Joan Walsh, on Wednesday night’s “Hardball,” cited “conservatives” like Rush Limbaugh, Michelle Malkin and Bill O’Reilly for “whipping up” a climate that sparks the likes of alleged Holocaust Museum shooter James Von Brunn.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/geoffrey-dickens/2009/06/10/hardball-journalist-links-rush-limbaugh-holocaust-museum-shooting
You know, if we tried, I bet we could eventually link it to Kevin Bacon, too.
oh gawd i bet we could!
speaking of hate, David Letterman has a new sign up on his building:
http://s79.photobucket.com/albums/j125/sarahfdavis/?action=view¤t=letterman.jpg&newest=1
I suspect the meme will be that this senseless act of violence will justify Homeland Security’s warning about right-wing extremists being the “real” enemy. Napolitano took a lot of heat for that memo alerting police departments about returning vets, anti-abortion, anti-government types–McVeigh revisited.
Of course, extremists of any stripe can be dangerous, Oklahomo City being a case in point. But Reverand Wright’s statements? They’ll get buried, I’m sure, because it only reminds people of that whole, messy debacle with Obama sitting in the man’s church for 20 years.
We couldn’t have that, could we?? Control the medium and you control the message.
But a nice, snarky essay, AGI.
oh yes, that is happening as well. http://www.memeorandum.com/ has lots of stories covering this. people are pointing to the memo.
Right-wing extremists are more dangerous because they’re local. They blend in. Their craziness is fueled by the current enviroment. In my opinion, Napolitano’s threat assessment was dead on. I’m afraid that’s going to become clear with the passage of time. Dramatically clear at some point.
That’s what my gut feelings are telling me. I hope I’m wrong.
Why are we not talking about the first successful Islamic terrorist attack within the borders of the United States since Obama becoming president.
Pray tell, which Islamic group is responsible for what attack? I do believe your bacon has been frying a tad long unless you are equating a KKK member with Islamic extremists.
I think they mean the soldier that was shot by the islamic guy.
Sara - that would be solderS - plural. Two were shot. One died.
You’re welcome.
Seattle, and not a word reported as to if BO made mention or called the family of the fallen soldier.
I have been sailing in the horse latitutude of late, but I do not believe he has.
I would enjoy being corrected on this but odds are I won’t be as to my facts.
Anyone? Please?
“They blend in” ??? I thought hiding in plain sight was the meme of the day.
“Right-wing extremists are more dangerous because they’re local.”
There are not nearly as many “skin-head” right wing extremists as there are muslim radicals in this country - particularly those being groomed in prison to be terrorists like the one that killed the army private at the recruiting center.
That has been going on in Europe for a long time and it is an enormous problem for many countries there now. We can’t afford to have that happen in the U.S., but by bringing those Gitmo detainees into our prison system you bring in the worst of the worst and teachers of terrorism.
Maybe you should take a look at the website statistics page for the Stormfront forum and think about the implications of the numbers. For the past three months they’ve been getting over 30,000 unique visitors per day–up from around 20,000 this time last year.
http://www.big-boards.com/board/339/
That’s a worrisome trend, don’t you think?
The left is using this tragedy to silence the opposition. I didn’t hear Joan Walsh, Olbermann, or others talk about the young soldier shot by the Muslim extremist.
Shep Smith is an idiot linking the opposition to Obama and this senseless event. Didn’t Homeland Security send out a memo linking returning Vets and terrorism? It is BO, the media, and Congress that are fanning the flames of hatred.
they jumped ALL over the Tiller shooting and this one, but barely a peep about the soldier…
On that, did you happen to notice that the press conference held yesterday by the soldier that survived that shooting was only covered by CNN and MSNBC? Fox News couldn’t be bothered to cut from its compelling coverage of Newt Gingrich’s whining about Obama.
Yet, it was Fox News’s very own Bill O’Reilly who complained (as did a number of people on this site) about CNN and MSNBC’s lack of coverage about the shooting incident (even though CNN did cover the story–as O’Reilly had to admit once his lie was discovered).
EWard: So you think the “liberal media” is responsible for this shooting, but O’Reilly, Limbaugh et. al. should get a pass on the swill they disseminate from their microphones day in and day out?
And it is not Obama and Congress “fanning the flames of hatred.” The psychopath who shot up the museum has been associated with hate groups, GROUPS being the operative word, for decades.
Look, if you want to criticize Obama do so on the merits. Same goes for extreme left-wing crazies. But fair is fair. There’s a demented right wing element in this country that poses a direct threat to the safety and well-being of the public. To continually change the subject by saying “but but but the left but but but Ayers but but but Muslims but but but…” does nothing to advance the conversation. The same people who accuse others of reckless finger-pointing are masters of this art themselves.
Well, American Girl, I admire your nerve in writing this piece. You do an admirable job of rubbing Herr Olbermann’s nose in his own pile of illogical crap. This is going to be a hot one!
thanks! I am off to bed, have a great night chatting!
Good post. I’ve lost my temper and said things that I really didn’t mean. However, if someone overheard me and used that as an excuse to hurt some one else well… Let’s say they have problems to begin with.
Von Brunn was a WWII serviceman - sixty years ago. I can’t believe the stupidity of the media playing up the angle of Vets, terrorism and HLS.
All that’s missing from NBC, MSNBC, and others are brown shirts. Impeach Obama!
Josefal
After covering the soldier’s press conference, did CNN and MSNBC have analysts on linking the left’s hate to the shooting? Were Olbermann, Maddow, Anderson, Mitchell, and others blamed for this soldier’s death?
Is anyone else astounded that this hate-filled, violent criminal von Brunn is 88 years old?
I bet he is terminal, and decided to act upon his decades of hate. he is a psycho!
Popping a bag of popcorn and awaiting Olbermann’s reaction…will we have consistency or a classic demonstration of “do as I say, not as I do”?
The Holocaust museum shooting is terrible!
_______________
SCANDAL! SCANDAL! SCANDAL!
EMERGENCY! EMERGENCY! EMERGENCY!
George W. Bush continuously criminally stalked Margie Schoedinger to the point that she could not get away from it, and she committed suicide in desperation to escape: he murdered her.
“In her suit, Margie Schoedinger states that George W. Bush committed sexual crimes against her, organized harassment and moral pressure on her, her family members and close relatives and friends. As Schoedinger said, she was strongly recommended to keep her mouth shut. . . . Furthermore, she alleges that George Bush ordered to show pressure on her to the point, when she commits suicide” (blog of drizzten).
“One of those very least were George Bush’s personal complicity in the death (murder to be precise) of my friend Margie Schoedinger in September of 2003” (Leola McConnell (Nevada Progressive Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in 2010)).
Leola McConnell is correct: Bush applying pressure (continuously criminally stalking Margie Schoedinger) purposefully to force Margie Schoedinger to commit suicide does in fact constitute murder.
BEWARE: If the president of the United States hates one—for whatever reasons—he can continuously criminally stalk one to the point that one cannot get away from it, and one ultimately commits suicide in desperation to escape. He can murder people in this way.
Bush is getting away with his murder of Margie Schoedinger—with no sheriff, prosecutor, or court willing to uphold the rule of law.
Bush’s method of murdering Margie Schoedinger cannot exist in a vacuum: he must have murdered other people in the same way.
Bush should confess, come out with the names of all of the people whom he murdered in the disgusting way he murdered Margie Schoedinger, undergo execution, and accordingly find himself at the intersection where he would be free.
(There are thousands of copies of the information above on the Internet. It exists very extensively in all major search engines. Please feel free to go to any major search engine, type “George W. Bush continuously criminally stalked Margie Schoedinger to the point that she could not get away from it, and she committed suicide in desperation to escape: he murdered her,” hit “Enter,” and find innumerable results.)
_______________
Andrew Wang
(a.k.a. “THE DISSEMINATING MACHINE”)
B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
Messiah College, Grantham, PA
Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993
Jeremiah Wright
This was the pastor Barack Hussein Obama chose for himself and his family.
They belonged to that church and attended service ritually for 20 years (2 decades).
Obama admitted many times that he and Wright were close personal friends and his spiritual mentor.
Does anyone believe that Obama during those 20 years never heard or read any of Wright’s anti-Jewish and anti-American rhetoric as he claims? Does anyone believe that Obama does not share Wright’s views on those subjects?
It is too bad that Hillary Clinton did not find out about Wright until it as too late in the primaries. And it is too bad that McCain misguidingly decided not to make Wright an issue in his campaign.
And what good would it have done? Made a divisive election even more divisive? The current occupant of the WH is not qualified but that does not mean we should destroy whatever semblance of civility we have left in us. McCain is not the sort of man who would do such a thing. That is one reason why he should be president now. HRC is also not one to do such a thing and she would have been an even better president than McCain. Better that they did what they did and let the rest unfold in due time. 2012 looms. The time for recrimination is done. Best we get onto the work ahead of us, including the defeat of the current person occupying the WH.
Hillary Clinton did not find out about Wright until it as too late.
She did know, but made a choice not to use it beyond saying that she would not have attended that church. Besides, I figure from her vantage point, spoke for itself.
Apparently she has certain level of ethical behavior that BO does not possess and never will.
Wow, you’re a scary nutcase, this is probably the most absurd equivocation I have ever read. You should probably be locked up to save the rest of us you psycho
and i can tell you didn’t read the entire post.
Well, I am not linking it in, but at Taylor Marsh they are saying this:
Bitter clingers come in all flavors evidently.
I ask the same question and nobody ever will convinse me, that 0bama wasn’t aware of Wright hate for Jews. Also his friendship with that alestinian professor, I forget his name. Axelord, Iranian born. In other words, all 0bama friends, close associates are Jewish haters.To be friends or be part of the same circle of people, it has to be a chemistry, affiliation of close ideas. I just speak from my own point of view.
Lisabona: Oh for God’s sake, David Axelrod is Jewish. So is his Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, whom I would charachterize as a “close associate”. Of course, it’s your right to post nonsense to make your point if you want.
And before everybody pounces, I don’t condone a single thing Jeremiah Wright says or has said.
I meant to write Obama’s Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel.
I don’t know.But I read on the internet he is Iranian born. Maybe they were reffering to Rezko. I believed too before I read ,he was Jewish.No matter if he is Jewish or Irtanian, he is an A…hole
I don’t know.But I read on the internet he is Iranian born. Maybe they were reffering to Rezko. I believed too before I read ,he was Jewish.No matter if he is Jewish or Iranian, he is an A…hole
OT (sorta): Valerie Jarrett really bugs me. Born in Iran, and Jarrett is her married name. Sticks to the Obamas like spit.
The one who was Obama’s first pick to fill his empty Illinois senate seat. When Blagovich (sp?) refused to seat her, all hell broke loose.
[...] http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/10/reverend-wright-complicit-in-murder-at-holocaust-museum/... And Fox News said it was wrong to worry about right wing extremism. [...]
a righteous diary american girl. you have spunk!
First of all, Rev. Jeremiah Wright really has nothing to do with the shooting at the Holocaust Museum. The shooter was a white supremacist, who would have shot Wright, as well, most likely, because he’s black.
So, whatever Olbermann says or does is just more hate-mongering, if he’s blaming Jeremiah Wright for it.
Second of all, I don’t see anyone here empathizing with the plight of the Palestinians, who’ve been suffering and dying for decades under a military occupation by Israel, starving, watching their children dying of malnutrition because of the Israeli blockade, being collectively imprisoned in their homes for months on end, having their homes and farms stolen, and basically living like blacks did in South Africa during apartheid.
That is fact. Thousands recently died in Gaza from an Israeli attack which was nothing less than a war crime. That is fact. Palestinians killed by Israel outnumbers Israelis killed by Palestinians by a ratio of something like 5-to-1. The Israeli government is engaging in state-sponsored terrorism. That is fact.
Jeremiah Wright is not the problem. Israeli policies and American support for them IS the problem.
And, dismissing people who question the 9/11 investigation, by calling them “truthers,” is sheer ignorance, considering that even the 9/11 Commission Now Questions it’s own results!
Wow. The 9/11 Commission are now “Truthers” too!
People who don’t know anything, yet make sweeping generalizations about a subject, parroting others who have propagandized them, don’t contribute anything to the discussion. “Truthers” happen to include a host of military leaders. And, some of those same military leaders question Israeli policy.
So let’s cut short the demogoguery, and be seekers of the truth…”truthers” if you will. There’s no reason to mock a search for the truth…
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2009/05/psychologists-weigh-in-on-911.html
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2009/05/columbia-space-shuttle-investigation.html
http://911summary.com/intel.php
http://911summary.com/military.php
Before you go off on rants, you might want to read the entire post…
(And for those of you who don’t get my attempt at sarcasm, I don’t think Wright is any more responsible for this shooting than O’Reilly is for Tiller’s.)
No, I didn’t read it completely, AIG, and so I owe you an apology. Actually, I wasn’t really talking to anyone in particular in my comment, just to the overall tone of media and left-wing, right-wing blame games. But, your sarcasm is more clear to me now, so thanks for pointing that out for me. I didn’t mean for my comment to sound like a rant at you in particular, just a rant at how we demonize in our political agendas, and trying to be my usual contrarian self and point out the opposite view.
I always appreciate your blog posts, so please know that.
Oops, shoulda been AGI, not AIG…
thanks. sorry if i was snappish back. I had a very nasty comment left on my blog about this, someone who didn’t read it, and accused me of lying, while lying about what i said. (someone who posts here) so i was getting pissed… haha
i am too sensitive sometimes… :O)
And, I am too hot-headed much of the time, get so focused on my own arguments, I forget to be more careful to think before leaping. You were right to call me on it. No worries.
and whether they are valid or not, people who have quetioned the events of 9/11 have been nicknamed truthers. just like people who question obama’s birth certificate have been nicknamed birthers.
why so hostile? it’s what they have been called for years. the name isn’t idiot truthers, or insane truthers. it’s truthers.
“So let’s cut short the demogoguery, and be seekers of the truth…”truthers” if you will. There’s no reason to mock a search for the truth…”
You just called em truthers… and i don’t believe i was mocking them. my point in mentioning it was that he was anti-governement and anti-Bush, he is not just anti-left.
Oh dear, I’m sorry, AGI, I didn’t mean to make you feel defensive. I was addressing the tone of the comments, more than your own blog post, but as I said above, I didn’t address your intentional sarcasm, and so I’m sorry for not more thoroughly reading before I commented so I wouldn’t have hit a nerve with you, and might have stated my thoughts better. Though I still would have said it, I would have better acknowledged your sarcasm…
:OD
it’s all good.
[...] a son to him? Oh, I am pretty sure he did, as American Girl in Italy reported recently in “Reverend Wright Complicit In Murder At Holocaust Museum?“: “Of course I voted for him; he’s my son. I’m proud of him,” Wright said. “I’ve [...]