Understanding Men, Part One
By Steve_in_KC on June 13, 2009 at 11:10 PM in Current Affairs
WARNING!
This post contains sarcasm! Reader discretion is advised.
Although it is improbable that any woman is capable of truly understanding men, just as we guys don’t have a clue what’s up with you chicks, this exposé will attempt to help the average woman get a peek inside the minds of men. Long-held secret recesses of the male psyche will be revealed at last to enquiring female minds. I cannot plumb all the depths of what makes a man a man, due to limited space, but like a fig leaf, I’ll try to cover the gist of it.
There are so many stereotypes of people, men included, it becomes akin to herding cats to even try to generalize them. But there are a few things about men that are pretty universal. I’ll try to keep it simple, if not concise.
And I don’t mean anything insulting about keeping it simple, just because it’s aimed at a mostly female audience. I’ve told you before, I’m a male feminist. I know women are fully capable of understanding complex subjects, and even some “long” words (like penis), or slang jargon (like “Old One-Eye”),or foreign words (like oui oui) so spare me the lectures. By “keeping it simple,” I mean that because men are so complex, I don’t think I can explain everything in laywoman’s terms. But I’ll try.
“Laywoman.” That word makes me snicker!
Lesson One : “Why do men stand up to pee?”
The obvious answer, “Because we can,” is not necessarily the real deal for most men. Given the choice to sit or stand in nearly every aspect of our daily functioning (work, watching TV, commuting), we almost universally choose to sit. Why would men continue the tradition of standing to urinate when they could just as easily drop trou and have a seat?
Oh sure, there’s the relative ease of unzipping the fly and fishing out the penis through the maze of the imbecilic fly designs on most briefs (and what about fly-less undies?), then leaning on one hand against the wall over the top of the toilet or urinal to steady yourself and get into aiming position. There’s even a dark spot on the wall to show us where to put our hand.
And of course there’s the added bonus of aiming the stream at bubble formations in the bowl. A guy can use his stream to “clean” the inside of the bowl like he’d use a garden hose to wash off the patio, or like a video game laser beam (I’m thinking Asteroids) to break up clusters of bubbles, or use the force of the water to create little bubble islands and then destroy them like a tsunami.
Just imagine the fun we have when someone leaves a soggy cigarette butt floating in the water! The first thing is to try to split the tobacco part off from the filter part. Then you focus on making the paper around the tobacco split or shatter, sending little remnants of tobacco and paper debris spinning in the currents created by the force of this major inundation! It’s like playing Battleship!
The worst part of standing to relieve oneself is the dreaded dribble. Especially as men get older, the old tsunami is more like a leaky kitchen faucet at times. Without the pressure to create thrust, the stream becomes more like a waterfall, often spilling right on the thighs. It’s bad enough having a wet spot on your Dockers, you’ve got to worry about, you know… the odor. Ick.
You then have two options: stay in the bathroom wiping and dabbing with paper towels to soak it up, then blowing on it till it dries; or you can wash your hands and splash some water around to make it look like the faucet overspray did it. You come out of the john with paper towels in hand, wiping at your sleeves and trousers while muttering about too much water pressure in there.
And let’s not even give more than a passing mention to how often men can manage to completely miss the porcelain. Using the garden hose metaphor again, it is sometimes as if a high-pressure hose has a jet spray nozzle attached, with nobody in control of it. I think you get the picture.
But really, why stand when you can sit? Personally, I do both. I find that I usually stand at work, and sit at home. This is in part because I know I’m going to have some stray drops if I stand, so at home I sit. It’s a hygiene decision. At work I usually stand to avoid contact with the community bowl. Again, hygiene. Besides, if I drop my pants at work, I risk them touching the floor, where there is still evidence that another man used the bowl from a standing position prior to my visit.
With all this logic supporting both methods, I can only conclude that my system is the best. But this doesn’t answer the more general question I first posed.
The main reason men stand to pee: they think they’re supposed to, because they were trained from childhood for it.
And besides, girls sit to pee. That’s pretty much it.
This concludes Lesson One.
Lesson Two: “Why do men think it’s OK to cheat on their mates, but not vice versa?”
Hey, that’s not true. That’s a loaded question, and I resent it!
The reality lies in the distinction between the two primary genres of adult males: Gentlemen and Barbarians.
A third genre is Real Men, but we are a small minority. Some people call us “whipped,” but we don’t care. Real Men aren’t afraid to cry, nor even to watch chick flicks. We believe in equality of the sexes, so we wouldn’t hesitate to hide behind a skirt when confronted by trouble or a bar tab. Hey, fair is fair!
A Gentleman would never dream of cheating on his mate, any more than she would do unto him. But if he ever catches her, all bets are off! In fact, invoking the Bush Doctrine, if he even suspects or has heard unsubstantiated reports that she might be thinking of cheating on him, or maybe looked a little too long at that guy jogging down the street, even Gentlemen have been known to make pre-emptive strikes. Once that door is opened, he can declare himself “not bound” by all prior treaties and agreements, naturally.
As for Barbarians, and you know who they are, what do you expect from a Barbarian? Cuddling over chamomile tea while watching “Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood?” He’s a Barbarian, fer christ sakes. He could be receiving passionate fellatio and suddenly propose you invite your girlfriend to join you for a threesome someday. He might intend to stop for some take-home dinner after work, and end up shacked up for a couple of days with some bar floozy he’s never met before. He doesn’t care. It’s all snatch to him.
The reason Barbarians seem to have no self-control over their libidos is easily understood by psychology. Barbarians are all Id and no Superego. They lack a conscience; or more accurately, their conscience is there, but it’s pretty much a vestigial organ like the appendix. They have no problem with justifying their multi-partner activities, because they feel no need to justify it. Dey’re da man!
The reason Barbarians are totally intolerant of their mates cheating with other men is obvious to them. A real no-brainer. Because, she belongs to him! Any guy messing with his stuff is cruising for a bruising anyway, but when his stuff messes with other dudes, it’s “No More Mr. Nice Guy.” She’s damaged goods, tainted for life. She’s a whore, no longer worthy of him. She’s “The Enemy” now.
Barbarians have no concept of a double standard, obviously.
Back to the Gentlemen: A true Gentleman (or a Real Man) would never cheat on his mate, and it’s unlikely his mate would either, if they are a strong couple. But if she did cheat on her Gentleman, he’d be crushed by the betrayal of their bond of trust. Some would obsess about her body having been used as a receptacle for another man’s lust. Some may feel the sacred vault has been desecrated and is no longer a Holy Place.
Real Men would just have recurring crying jags and would never get over it. Pitiful whipped wimps.
By contrast, if a Gentleman slips and lets the Barbarian inside him out for a little air, and if he does fudge the rules a bit and have a little something on the side, all he has to do is use a condom and afterward wash his Willie in the sink. There! All good as new!
But of course the Gentleman will feel guilty about giving into his impulsive urge for some “strange,” so he’ll buy his mate some flowers, or maybe a new car. That should square things up nicely.
Conclusion to Lesson Two: What you don’t know won’t hurt you. Don’t ask, don’t tell. Hell, it works great for the Armed Forces! [snark]
In Lesson Three, I’ll tackle the ticklish subject of why so many men are homophobic. Stay tuned!









































Okay - way too much information Steve.
But I laughed anyways.
Yeah, way too much … but I agree with your final point. (I’m not sure the conceit you’ve elaborated — cheating husbands who don’t tell, etc. — works as an analogy for the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell situation, but, hey, it’s Saturday night and my critical faculties have been clouded a bit by the glass of wine I’ve just had.)
In any case, I always enjoy your contributions to this site.
Trixta, thank you for your kind comments!
I believe in my last comment, I may have gotten a little lost as to what my point was! I think in a way, although I disapprove, sometimes there is more damage done to good relationships by confessing to a “dalliance” than by keeping it to oneself, no matter which gender is dallying. If it’s a one-time thing, and the remorse is real, I think I actually do advise keeping it a secret rather than destroying the person you love. Very touchy subject, but I was trying to address it with humor. I guess a few people will understand, and others won’t.
Thanks for the clarification, Steve. It just goes to show that one should never mix boneheadedness with a glass of vino!
BTW, although I believe that honesty is the best policy, I, too, see that there are occasions where it might do more damage than good. But as you say, if the remorse is genuine…otherwise the very relationship the secret is supposed to protect becomes a lie in itself.
In any case, you do have wicked sense of humor! Keep on making us laugh, cause we sure need it these days.
i.e. … my boneheadedness and vino….
TMI? Oh well, I guess that was part of the fun!
Thanks for laughing (appropriately, I hope!).
You Betcha Steve!
Enjoyed and agree (mostly) with your Manifesto also!
If we all marched to the same beat on NQ, it wouldn’t be any fun and it wouldn’t be real life. My own take on NQ is to empower, inform and engage readers in a respectful, adult exchange of information, opinions, and ideas. Political and other wise.
Now about lesson #2, Steve- that whole adultery thing. Hey, it could just be me, but you seemed to have thought way too much about the logic of it all. (JK!)
And It takes a REAL man to wear pink!
Funny post
Or a wife to make him
Oh, my.
Nothing else needs to be said.
OT
What is the latest on the Iran rioting over the elections?
Larry
What are your contacts saying?
WOMEN WITH INTELLIGENCE AND EXPERIENCE, MEN WHO SUPPORT THEM AND COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY ALWAYS
PUMAS,BUBBAS,EQUALISTS AND THOSE PEOPLE RULE
UNDERSTANDING LIBERAL MEN:
WOMEN OF THE WORLD, RISE UP!
YOU HAVE NOTHING TO LOOSE BUT YOUR BURGAS!
The male dominated “liberal” media would not attack Dick Cheney with the same amount of bile they’ve directed at a 14 year-old girl or an 18 year old beauty contestant. These are just the latest vile hateful attack against woman for the “crime” of expressing their opinion. Vicious attacks against women in the “liberal” male media have become a pattern with disturbing echos of the taliban.
It’s not just the opinions these “liberal” males hate—- It’s Women!
Liberal” males are ferocious misogynists. They share the radical Taliban opinion of women, differing only to the extent that liberals also support a women’s right to have an abortion.
You’d be better off in a real burqa than under the authority of a “liberal” American male.
Why does every TV news anchorette end up adopting the same political views of women that are written on the cave walls in Afghanistan.
From Margaret Carlson’s worship of David Letterman to Katie Couric on CBS and Norah O’Donnell on MSNBC, the whole harem of TV anchorettes weirdly have the exact same politics as their male “liberal” taliban masters. It’s the ideological burqa women are required to wear to work in the mainstream media or to run for public office. As with a conventional burqa, it enforces conformity and severely restricts a woman’s opinion, their issues and their vision.
Look at the ongoing attacks of Hillary Clinton, Geraldine Ferraro, Sara Palin, Carrie Prejean and now a 14 year old girl, and compare it to the “coverage” of Barack Obama by the “liberal” male media. The public stoning of women in this Taliban male dominated “liberal” media has included the regular use of the B-word, CUNexTuesday, PMS evaluations, and now statutory rape. Offenders are never banned from the networks but routinely asked back or continue with their own Letterman abusive talk show..
Can you imagine the justifiable firestorm that would erupt if the N-word was used against Barack, or a “Black” psychollogical evauation was suggested, or that he was unfit to hold office based on his race or gender? Or Shawn Hannity attacked his daughters? If you have a centilla of doubt–go ask Imus.
But outrage against these equally offensive hate terms and practices, being regularly hurled like stones at women, are found tellingly enough, only in the “conservative” (spelled FOX) media and the Christian community.
The only way to protect yourself is to do the liberal male’s bidding, as the anchorettes do, or face a public stoning, many thrown by “liberal” concubines mislabeled as feminist.
Now, another 14 year old woman/child has thrown off the liberal burga and refused her Taliban Media lashes .
ENOUGH!
It’s past time for all women to rise up and put an end to this disgraceful Teliban media behavior!
It is past time for a real Woman’s Rights Revolution for ALL Women.
It is past time for equal gender representation in the national media.
It is past time to demand an end to the gender hate speech being broadcast on the national airways everyday..
Women control this consumer economy that the media depends on. Demand change, squeeze them until you get what you, your sisters, your mothers and your daughters deserve.
No woman should ever have to be subjected to what a 14 year old girl, Carrie, Hillary, Sarah and Geraldine have bravely stood up to.
Women of the world, rise up!
You have nothing to loose but your burgas.
Participate in the actions PUMA PAC set up today against Letterman!
http://pumapac.org/2009/06/14/brand-nightmares/
(Takes only a few minutes!)
WE GOTTA DO IT NOW..can’t wait another day.
seize the POWER.it is ours..
Men do not pee standing up in all cultures. Arabs, as far as I know, squat to pee. Americans who do not want to splash the walls or spill pee on the floor of their home sit to pee. How do I know? Friends have told me that though they were taught to pee standing up, as they grew up, they found that the mess was unacceptable.
Imagine guys on a sailboat trying to pee — standing up during a storm?? Stupid.
Or the number one reason that mostly men fall overboard? Stand up to pee over the side of the boat, next to the rail (or life life line). Stupid.
But 0zero is Prez ’cause he has one of those p things and for no other reason. I find no humor in this AT ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
For your own good, Steve, don’t get cocky and take these ideas to a feminist blog. It’s smart to post here at this mixed gender site where my comments will more likely be attacked than yours; the reason being the system has to try and silence (control) me and not you.
I challenge you to put on your summer reading list some books/articles about feminism, women’s herstory, and the women’s movement (waves 1 and 2). Read about the horrendous violence against women. Read about the despair and depression that afflicts women. Read about the struggle as a minority group and the forces that maintain that status quo.
Gender inequality is no laughing matter. Sarcasm is also misplaced here as well.
I’m not hearing the voice of a feminist when I read your posts.
Arran, I respect your opinions and thank you for the advice. However, I disagree with you on several points.
This blog is a mixture of content, like most magazines. There are opposing views, voiced in clear but non-antagonistic ways by the writers here. Fortunately, we are not all clones.
We are not all militant feminists. Some are passive feminists. Some are male feminists. But I don’t agree in any way that the subject is too important to be beyond humor and sarcasm. If that were the case, or turns out to be the case, I would leave this blog, by my own choice.
I have heard No Quarter called a feminist blog, a gay blog, an anti-Obama blog, a pro-Hillary blog, and (most important to me) a political blog. I’ve never seen any indication that satire was unwelcome.
If feminists have no sense of humor, I’m outta here. If the LGBT folks have no sense of humor, goodbye. If straight married men who love their wives and daughters and are willing to fight for their rights and the rights of all women are not welcome here, adios amigas.
I took your comments as non-hostile and well-intentioned. I hope I have responded in kind.
As for myself, I see No Quarter as a political blog for centrists, a place where intelligent men and women can discuss and vent about the issues of the day. Our common feelings are often, but not always, in opposition to Obama, for many different reasons, not all of which are unanimously endorsed by the writers and editors of this blog.
Sure, there is strong support for issues that affect women, straight or lesbian. There are gay men who air their views. I am neither female nor gay. Should I not be a part of this blog because that contingent has a strong voice here?
If the feminists here want me gone, that’s fine by me, but I am not hearing that from the feminists on the writing staff. Shall we challenge their feminist credentials because they like my irreverent satire and my male point of view?
Actually, I’ll say it frankly and directly: the angry feminism, dwelling on any and all perceived inequities, insults, or outrages, gets a little boring, even tiresome at times. I don’t think NQ wants this blog to be entirely dominated by humorless, extreme feminist points of view.
This is a political blog first and foremost, as I understand it. It’s also intended for entertainment, education, and huge helpings of sarcasm. Or “snark” if you prefer.
Larry Johnson, owner of this blog, is a married man, as I am, and his sarcasm makes mine seem like kid stuff. SusanUnPC is the chief editor, and she is DEFINITELY NOT anti-male, and she has a wonderful sarcastic sense of humor herself.
As for my personal brand of male feminism, I don’t blindly follow anyone else’s point of view or definitions of feminism. I have no problem accepting the judgment of some women saying I’m not a feminist or don’t understand feminist issues. I don’t believe there is any one definition of feminism, except in the broadest sense of supporting primary issues that affect women, like equal pay for equal work, which I support whole-heartedly. I have stated that if women would step up to apply for management positions in the same ratio as men do, the balance of new hires for those positions would likely be equal to the ratio of applicants. That’s my conjecture, my opinion. You are free to disagree. I always invite discussion and the airing of different points of view.
I’m 57 years old, a lifetime old-school liberal. I have been a supporter of women’s rights longer than many of the readers here have been walking upright. I am not about to give up my own sense of pride in being what I am, an intelligent heterosexual man, nor will I shy away from expressing my male points of view.
If this blog is no longer a political blog, if it’s become a strictly feminist blog, I may as well delete the bookmark. I thrive on politics, not combating sexism.
And by the way, sexism cuts both ways. Women discriminate against men, too. Is that acceptable?
I guess maybe it’s acceptable in the same way that so many Obots thought is was acceptable to cheat the election system since the Republicans have been accused of cheating previously.
Myself, I don’t buy that excuse for a minute. And I won’t withdraw my opinion that sexism against men is unjustified, no matter what reason is offered. I read all the time about women’s issues here at NQ. I figure that “real women” want to hear what a “real man” has to say, to give women some insight into male attitudes and thinking, even if it does sound at times like justification for sexism against women. It’s satire.
So far, satire is not forbidden at NQ.
Steve, an admirable manifesto. This also expresses my feelings about No Quarter in general.
mine too.bravo Steve….
Bravo, Steve! I enjoy your articles. And yes, NQ is a place for politics and even for the humorous politics of sex!
I have to agree on the militant feminist outrage being boring. It is.
No humor in sex? Now that is a cosmic joke!!
Much of your post could have been written in the 1950s. You come across as a person who may have read some of the comments by women and men about the sexism and misogyny directed towards Hillary Clinton in the primary, but it didn’t quite register. What do those women have to complain about anyway? It’s called misogyny — the hatred of women. We are talking about “hatred.”
Women can also be sexist and even misogynist. Many of them haven’t evolved to understand how different life would be in a gender-equal, non-sexist culture, one that condemned women-hate, much like the media’s attitude toward AAs, Obama, and his wife and family. Everyone is not race tolerant, but the media certainly was in the primary, and has been since.
During this past week, there were 3 occurrences that many women/feminists were responding to: the Letterman Top Ten List, Contessa Brewer’s interview (posted here), and Margaret Carlson’s post at “The Daily Beast.” Many women agree with Palin and have opposed this abominable attack on her and her daughters, even though they don’t agree with her politics, like me.
My response has been specific: I am challenging your credentials to call yourself a “feminist” because I’ve read little in your writing to support that description. I understand you as someone who is making some observations, but still has the gall to ask why aren’t women applying in greater numbers for management positions. I think you can figure that riddle out.
Even though support for women candidates and women’s issues is well-comed and appreciated, there is more to feminism than supporting women in politics and in careers. There is a belief in gender equality elsewhere, there’s an attitude towards women’s rights, and there’s a determination to actively move the culture towards actual women’s liberation.
As for William L. Donlon (from his comments), he appears to have “gotten it.”
(BTW, I am not angry or humorless. It’s a shame that I have to make that statement. My argument is with your post. Whether or not I have the support of other blog writers or the administrators is immaterial.)
Don’t Leave Steve! You’re a riot!
Well, I, at least, was amused by your post, Steve. In fact, on this topic of standing vs. sitting, I spoke to this very point in pm317’s previous story, “Feminists On the Left, Bah! Humbug,” and she quite properly but gently pointed out that I was off-topic. And now this thread comes along, where I could be on-topic, and my rhetorical bladder has already been emptied. Pure synchronicity. Well, I wish you well on this thread, Steve. You’re a brave man, and I respect that.
Thanks for your support, oowawa! Looks like I may need all the support I can get!
steve, this is priceless. as a lifelong feminist from the 1960’s, I LOVE it when feminist men have the audacity to reveal their experiences with snark and humor. can’t wait for part II, pay no attention to the self righteous pseudo feminists. there will always be twinks who don’t get it, as well as those of us who do.
emma, I very much appreciate your comments and support.
I loved this article. I grinned and laughed all the way through it. Sometimes we need to lighten up and forget for a minute or two the depressing state of our country. Thanks, Steve.
That’s very nice to hear! Thanks!
[...] Part One (Lessons One and Two) can be read here. [...]
The rule of thumb is, Steve, if you cheat and then come home, we’re gonna know– and you’ve got to fall asleep sooner or later. you know what I mean? Wink wink.