Good job narrowing down all the information….

A little behind the times aren’t you???

“NIST’s findings do not support the “pancake theory” of collapse, which is premised on a progressive failure of the floor systems in the WTC towers…Thus, the floors did not fail progressively to cause a pancaking phenomenon.”
NIST: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions (August 30, 2006)

Your friends, Ray McGovern and Mel Goodman, signed a petition calling for a re-investigation of 9/11, which stated in part, “We want truthful answers to questions such as:

1. Why were standard operating procedures for dealing with hijacked airliners not followed that day?

2. Why were the extensive missile batteries and air defenses reportedly deployed around the Pentagon not activated during the attack?

3. Why did the Secret Service allow Bush to complete his elementary school visit, apparently unconcerned about his safety or that of the schoolchildren?

4. Why hasn’t a single person been fired, penalized, or reprimanded for the gross incompetence we witnessed that day?

5. Why haven’t authorities in the U.S. and abroad published the results of multiple investigations into trading that strongly suggested foreknowledge of specific details of the 9/11 attacks, resulting in tens of millions of dollars of traceable gains?”

Other signers of that petition included:
Edward Peck – Former Deputy Coordinator, Covert Intelligence Programs, U.S. State Department. He also served as Deputy Director of the White House Task Force on Terrorism under President Ronald Reagan and was U.S. Ambassador and Chief of Mission in Iraq 1977 – 1980.

Morton Goulder – Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Warning under Presidents Nixon, Ford, and Carter.

Mr. Johnson, I am hopeful you would not characterize these individuals as “9/11 conspiracy nuts” for endorsing a re-investigation of 9/11 or asking these questions.

Your friend, Ray McGovern, has publicly stated about 9/11, “I think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a joke.” He also wrote in his endorsement of the book 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, “It has long been clear that the Bush-Cheney administration cynically exploited the attacks of 9/11 to promote its imperial designs. But the present volume confronts us with evidence for an even more disturbing conclusion: that the 9/11 attacks were themselves orchestrated by this administration precisely so they could be thus exploited. If this is true, it is not merely the case, as the Downing Street memos show, that the stated reason for attacking Iraq was a lie. It is also the case that the whole ‘war on terror’ was based on a prior deception. This book hence confronts the American people—indeed the people of the world as a whole—with an issue second to none in importance and urgency. I give this book, which in no way can be dismissed as the ravings of ‘paranoid conspiracy theorists,’ my highest possible recommendation.”

Mr. Johnson, have you heeded Mr. McGovern’s “highest possible recommendation” and read this book?

Your friend, Mel Goodman stated in his testimony in a Congressional Briefing (not a committee hearing), “This is an important examination of a 9/11 Commission that was an historic opportunity that was missed and a 9/11 Commission study that is terribly flawed. … I think the 9/11 Commission has taught me that we need to be extremely rigorous and extremely tenacious in pursuing that truth, because there is a corporate mentality in this country that is working against allowing the truth to surface, even in tragedies, such as the 9/11 tragedy. … I want to talk about the [9/11] Commission itself, about the flawed process of the Commission and finally about the conflict of interest within the Commission that is extremely important to understand the failure of the Commission. … The final report is ultimately a cover-up. I don’t know how else to describe it.”

Other respected, long-serving veterans of the counter-terrorism and intelligence community have independently and publicly stated their concerns about the official account of 9/11 and called for a new investigation.

Robert Baer, 21-year CIA veteran, has repeatedly called for a new investigation of 9/11. “There are enough discrepancies and unanswered questions in the 9/11 Commission Report that under a friendly administration, the 9/11 investigation should be re-opened.” And also “Until we get a complete, honest, transparent investigation–not one based on ‘confession’ extracted by torture–we will never know what happened on 9/11.” He was also asked in an interview if “there was an aspect of ‘inside job’ to 9/11 within the U.S. government?” To which Baer replied, “There is that possibility, the evidence points at it.”

William Christison, a 29-year CIA veteran, former National Intelligence Officer (NIO) and former Director of the CIA’s Office of Regional and Political Analysis has written, “We very seriously need an entirely new very high level and truly independent investigation of the events of 9/11. I think you almost have to look at the 9/11 Commission Report as a joke and not a serious piece of analysis at all.” And “[There’s] a strong body of evidence showing the official U.S. Government story of what happened on September 11, 2001, to be almost certainly a monstrous series of lies.” And “I have come to believe that significant parts of the [alternative] 9/11 theories are true, and that therefore significant parts of the “official story” put out by the U.S. government and the 9/11 Commission are false. I now think there is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us believe. … An airliner almost certainly did not hit The Pentagon. … The North and South Towers of the World Trade Center almost certainly did not collapse and fall to earth because hijacked aircraft hit them.”

Space precludes listing more examples, but I refer you to the article, 41 U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11 at http://patriotsquestion911.com/#Articles

Mr. Johnson, would you refer to Mr. Baer and Mr. Christison as “9/11 conspiracy nuts” for stating that the evidence points to an inside job or that the government’s story is a monstrous series of lies?

The central theme of the 9/11 Truth movement is that the official account of 9/11 is full of significant errors, omissions, and distortions and that a thorough, independent re-investigation is necessary for our national security. A re-investigation is necessary to answer all the unanswered questions, to correct all the errors and distortions in the official account, so that we exactly understand the events leading up to and on the day of 9/11, so that they are not repeated.

A new investigation is also necessary to end the speculation about explanations other than the official conspiracy theory (bin Laden and 19 hijackers) that could explain those events, including your own speculation that it was incompetence.

Please continue to explore this subject with your friends and former colleagues in the intelligence services, particularly those mentioned in the article above. I am hopeful you will then endorse a re-investigation of 9/11.

Let it be clear that the nutcases are the ones who believe the government. Don’t believe anyone. Just go work in construction on highrises and see for yourself. People that don’t even know what’s a bearing wall have zero credibility.

You can’t have the pilot of the plane that hits the North Tower hitting the 50th floor when you have place the explosives around the 70th.

HAHAHAHAHA!!!

Larry, what are you smoking? The buildings fell well AFTER the planes hit.

BTW, alternative news are the ones who debunk 99.999% of everything that gets put out there. If it gets through them, it means there is missing info. So anyone else that comes along is just fooling themselves if they have info that everyone else has missed. All I’m seeing here is name calling and a complete lack of understanding of the available facts.

And you don’t know for a fact that the planes were hijacked by bin Laden operatives. Bush announced right afterwards that they were caught by surprise, and yet announced that it was bin Laden. Well, which one is it? How could they know who did it if they got caught by surprise? Don’t take my word for it. Look up the definition of surprise. It means lack of knowledge when something happens.

Peer-reviewed research documented by Dr. Niels Herritt and Dr. Jones and 7 others, show residues of nano-thermite in great quantity in the dust of the WTC buildings, along with very small particles of unreacted nano-thermite throughout Manhattan dust samples. Nano-thermite is not something you whip up in an Afghani cave. It is a high-tech military grade incendiary – a form of thermite that is explosive. You can assert all the geo-political propaganda you want and it won’t get you around these facts. Calling those of us who are tired of the endless stream of lies that constitute the news media “conspiracy nuts” does not address the fact that the official story is contradicted by solid information, scientifically verified. Calling names doesn’t affect that reality one iota.

See that here: WeAreChangeLA debriefs CIA Case Officer Robert Baer about apparent Mossad and White House 9/11 foreknowledge

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2z5BnihtWfs&feature=channel_page

p.s. The National Reconaissance Office’s drill, apparently run by the CIA, of a plane running into their building got started as the attacks got started and all “non-essential” personnel were then told to go home.

p.p.s. Mr Johnson, why don’t you come join those of us patriots living together in this thing called reality. Our country and Liberty cannot take the deceptive back-stabbing anymore.

Is that possible?

If it is, how did Mossad know it was something to celebrate about while Bush, Myers, Hayden etc. went about their business?

I’m a proud Jewish man, so no ‘anti-semitic’ or ’self-hating Jew slander’ will work in helping you try to dismiss dealing with the facts. In fact, the worst, most violently destructive anti-semitic conspiracy theory to human lives over the last 8 years is the one Mr. Johnson continues to push, that 19 Arab men with boxcutters stood down the FBI, NORAD and the laws of physics.

Get a plausible deniability alibi quick Mr Johnson, since your massively limited ‘incompetence’ hang-out is getting more limited by the moment.

The gig is up Mr. Johnson. The only question is who is going to go down with those who decided to put the advanced nano-thermite materials in the buildings ( look up the discovery of this material in the peer-reviewed paper at the Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal and go see how the VP reacted to receiving this information at our wearechangela you tube site) and coordinate the multiple overlapping mimetic wargames and terror drills that served as cover for the operational conduct of the attacks.

The American people of moral and intellectual integrity are demanding you come clean soon Mr. Arnold. How about today?