RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

While I’m At It, Let’s Talk Immigration

You know, it being GLBT Pride Month and all, as Obama the Backstabber declared the other day - copying Hillary Clinton, ONCE AGAIN, after she acknowledged the 40th Anniversary of Stonewall (”Cheney Two, Obama Nothing, Clinton - a Thousand,” and “In Recognition of LGBT Pride Month“), the posts keep writing themselves. We already have gaping wounds in our backs from DADT, DOMA, so let’s just add Immigration to it, while we’re at it (and H/T to fellow NQ writer, Linda, for the heads up on this).

Now, this isn’t a new issue - GLB couples having to engage in all kinds of machinations should they fall in love with someone from another country. But this story was mighty surprising given the position one of the men held, Gay Couples Forced To Flee U.S. Over Immigration Law: San Angelo mayor last month resigned his post and moved to Mexico to live legally with his partner. Right? Wowie zowie:

The mayor of this West Texas sheep ranching town offered a stunning explanation when he suddenly resigned last month: He was in love with a man who was an illegal immigrant and had gone to Mexico.

They had to move, he said, because there was no legal way for them to remain together in the United States. Same-sex couples can’t secure green cards for their partners like heterosexual spouses can (emphasis mine).

“It wasn’t a decision that any U.S. citizen should have to make,” former Mayor J.W. Lown said from Mexico. “I left a home. I left a ranch. I left a promising political career.”

His local prominence and his departure on the day he was supposed to be sworn in for a fourth term caused jaws to drop, but it also became a high-profile example of the thousands of Americans who face a similar choice — separate or move abroad .

About 36,000 Americans are in this situation, said U.S. Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., citing information from the advocacy group Immigration Equality.

He is absolutely right - it ISN’T a decision any U.S. citizen should have to make.

Now is when I interject that my sister married some guy from the other side of the world whom she met in a Star Trek chat-room. I am not kidding you (and yes, we were all so proud). Oh, he is now an American citizen - BECAUSE HE CAN BE.

And like everything else dealing with the GLBT community, it is not smooth sailing ahead:

Bills have been introduced in Congress to treat same-sex partners like heterosexual spouses for the purposes of immigration, but they are likely to face a strong fight, both from opponents of gay marriage and anti-immigration groups. The 1996 Defense of Marriage Act prevents immigration officials from recognizing same-sex marriages, even from states where they are now legal.

Proponents see the issue as a basic rights question, and Steve Ralls, a spokesman for Immigration Equality, said he thinks the best chance for the legislation is as part of a larger immigration bill.

But other immigration advocates want to keep the issues separate, fearful of bogging down an already tough fight. Kevin Appleby, migration policy director for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, said the push for same-sex partners in immigration is about getting recognition in federal law for gay marriage — which he opposes.

“It’s an unholy marriage of the immigration debate and the same-sex marriage debate,” he said. “It’s very combustible.”

Oh, well, when you put it like that, by all means, let’s just back burner the whole thing and continue to make the GLBT community pay a higher price than anyone else in this country to BE citizens of this country.

As for the mayor, well, evidently, his decision was a bit of a surprise:

Lown’s decision last month brought the issue to an unlikely place, a town of 90,000 where ranchers and roughnecks from the vast open lands come to do their banking and send their kids to the regional state college. The town’s only other recent brush with national fame came last year when it housed the hundreds of children taken from a polygamist sect’s ranch in nearby Eldorado.

Before his May 19 resignation, Lown was considered a political rising star. The 32-year-old Republican, first elected at age 26, won his fourth term with about 89 percent of the vote.

During his tenure, Lown transformed the $600-a-year, part-time job from a mostly ceremonial position to a hands-on office. He actively appeared at thousands of community functions and went to Washington to lobby for the West Texas town — spending his own money after a few residents complained about taxpayers footing the bill.

“That’s devotion and dedication,” Councilwoman Charlotte Farmer said. “He would have gone far in the political arena in the state of Texas and perhaps farther.”

Lown’s sexuality never really became an issue. Some people didn’t know he was gay. Lown’s godfather, Mario Castillo, said most who knew didn’t care.

“San Angelo has a live-and-let-live attitude. As long as you don’t go around waving your boxer shorts in Sunday school, people leave it alone,” said Castillo, a longtime resident who is now a Washington lobbyist.

ROTFLMAO - okay, that was funny. But, what is not funny is the attitude there in the town. It is downright REFRESHING. And AMERICAN.

Back to the mayor:

But Lown, who worked as a real estate agent, said his prominence meant his 2-month-old relationship would be scrutinized and his 20-year-old partner might be subject to deportation.

“My heart was torn, and I had to make a decision,” he said shortly after his resignation.

Lown has declined to identify his partner but said the man came across the Rio Grande as a teenager and attended high school and college in San Angelo. They went to Mexico — Lown won’t say exactly where — so that his partner can apply for legal residency in the United States, generally a lengthy process for Mexicans without a spouse, child or parent who is a U.S. citizen.

“I did not want to consciously violate the law,” Lown said. “We want to make a life together and do it in the right way and follow the law.”

Lown, whose mother was Mexican, holds dual citizenship that allows him to live legally in Mexico, he said.

And on that level, he is lucky that he CAN live in the country of citizenship for his partner. “Lucky,” in that regard, but a difficult word to use given what he has had to give up because of whom he loves:

San Angelo, meanwhile, will be without a mayor until the City Council decides whether to appoint someone or schedule a special election.

Lown said he hopes to eventually return here with his partner.

“I don’t know how long this is going to take. It could take months. It could take years, but I’m prepared to wait as long as it takes,” he said. “I hope I’ll have some shred of my good name left when this is resolved.”

I don’t know how long this will go on, either. It has gone on far too long as it is, but so has the fight for us to have equal rights AT ALL. And now we have a president who has reneged on every promise he made to the BLT community (and you already know how I feel about that - I expected nothing less from him than this big huge dagger sticking out of my back, but frankly, I am sick of so many of us reaping what others have sown. I’m just sayin’.).

So now Mr. Lown has had to up and move, give up his position (and potential positions) to live with the man he loves. This is happening all over the country, make no mistake. And will continue to happen until we are seen as full fledged citizens of this country. Once again, though, I am NOT holding my breath for that to change under Obama. Maybe when we get a President Clinton…Until then, GLB U.S. citizens will continue having to give up their homes, their professions, and their COUNTRY because of whom they love. And that is just wrong.

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post20 Comments »

Comment by foxyladi14 | 2009-06-15 17:34:27

thank you R.R.R.A. what a sad story.
i pray the day will come when we have equal rights for all.

Comment by Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy | 2009-06-15 18:20:38

Amen, foxylady!

 
 

Comment by OldCoastie | 2009-06-15 18:54:15

separate is never equal…

I can’t get over this latest filing by the DOJ on DOMA - I feel like I’m in shock at how bad this is…

 

Comment by Linda Anselmi | 2009-06-15 19:28:46

EQUAL RiGHTS FOR ALL - that sure seems basic enough. Who knew it would be so incredibly hard to achieve.

Great post Amy. Its amazing and heartbreaking how these policy play out in real life.

Comment by Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy | 2009-06-15 19:48:38

Thanks, Linda.

It is indeed - there are so many issues that come along with being LGB in this country. This is just yet another.

Someone mentioned the other day that Obama may tax health care benefits - welcome to my world. Already there, thanks, so no change here! And the other issues of which people have heard (hospital visitation, wills, property, etc., etc.).

 
 

Comment by politicalidentitycrisis | 2009-06-15 20:48:59

Sad to have a democrat finally in the White House, but you can’t get any democratic issues addressed by the usurper. Ugh. I just can’t believe that this democratic control was a dream come true a couple of years ago and now it is just a friggin’ nightmare! I want Hillary. Damn you Obama, you f*cker and the rest of you f*sckers who gave us this BS masquerading as Democrats!!!!

 

Comment by Craig Della Penna | 2009-06-15 20:55:13

Sad to see that homophobia lives on in the White House and sad to see that not much has changed in 40 years. I was in the Lion’s Den (the writers pub next door to the Stonewall Inn) when the riots started. As they say - it was a sight to see.
I never would have thought this would still be an issue today.

Comment by Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy | 2009-06-16 08:53:27

Craig - that’s incredible! What an experience that must have been for you. Did you happen to write anything abt it at the time? I’d love to see it, or read your recollections from that time…

 
 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2009-06-15 21:05:50

As a rule, I believe that if you came here illegally, you broke the law. If you don’t like the laws on the books (not that they will ever be enforced) work to change them. If you can not respect the laws of this country off the bat..then why should I excuse the actions of those that choose not to do so?

Amy, I must thank you for challenging my position with a very different twist on an issue that is in constant turmoil.

As his partner came here as a child, it presents another dilemma separate from their relationship.

Chances are that the child had no choice in being a lawbreaker and some measure of dispensation should be granted to the many children that are brought into this country illegally.

I am not in favor “anchor babies” ;of a person coming to this country for the sole purpose of having a child born here unless there are medical or humanitarian circumstances.

Do you not think the issue of civil union / marrage must be decided as the law of the land before this issue can be resolved?

 

Comment by lorac | 2009-06-15 21:13:00

I agree that things should be equal, whether someone is gay or straight. But when I got to the part in the article where the mayor said the relationship was only two months old - that was kind of weird to me. I don’t think someone should get a green card for a two-month old relationship, gay or straight. That’s where marriage could provide a good solid demarcation - although you can get married no matter how long you’ve been together, the marriage step itself is a kind of indication of commitment.

I sure hope this mayor doesn’t come to regret leaving his country, job, and ranch, for a two month relationship with someone 12 years his junior - it just strikes me as a bit premature and risky.

Comment by Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy | 2009-06-16 08:59:54

Iorac, I get your point, but ya know, sometimes the heart just rules the head in spite of all logic to the contrary. I would certainly HOPE that this is true love for this man, especially since he gave up so much. Hey, it happens!

Teak, it IS a complicated issue since it is one of illegal immigration, too. But, that is not always the case. Often, people come over on student visas, or work visas, whatever, meet someone, and fall in love. When their visas expire, if they cannot get them renewed, back to their countries they go. The difference with heterosexual couples, though, is that they have the option to get married and keep their loved one in the country.

But you are right, it is complicated when the illegal immigrant aspect is thrown in (though extenuating circumstances were operative in this case as you pointed out). Whew…

 
 

Comment by ScottVA | 2009-06-15 22:25:29

I’m gay and while I will say I support equal representation for gays and their Int’l partners (who are here legally)…I DON’T support illegal immigration AT ALL!
I travel the World and if I were illegal in another country… I’d expect to get booted too!

 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2009-06-16 00:29:33

Spam monstor got my post, thanks Rev Amy for an thoughtful post.

 

Comment by SoCalDem | 2009-06-16 01:59:41

The Mayor of an American city has a Mother of Mexican citizenship, not dual but Mexican. How did he get to be mayor? I understand most of the folks on this blog are being defensive of this mayor because hes in love, ok fine he broke the law by harboring an illegal as long as he did for his own sexual pleasure. He seems to have no problem leaving his homeland, so whats the problem? He broke his word and his commitment to the people of that Texas town where he ran for mayor. That seems to be a man thing, a mans word is his bond unless he has a stiff johnson, then all bets are off.

 

Comment by TexasMirth | 2009-06-16 02:42:04

Now is when I interject that my sister married some guy from the other side of the world whom she met in a Star Trek chat-room. I am not kidding you (and yes, we were all so proud). Oh, he is now an American citizen - BECAUSE HE CAN BE.

Rev. Amy - Thanks for sharing your sister’s Star-Trek love story. I am smiling because of it. By the way, San Angelo is a wonderful community. I hope Mr. Lown and his partner can return there together.

 

Comment by Michael | 2009-06-16 06:16:34

Thanks good comments

The majority of the GLB bi-national ~36,000 couples that are caught in this immigration limbo have been in a relationship for years - enduring the separation from their countries and loves ones.

The immigration laws can be ammended to allow permanent partners of American Citizens to be sponsored to immigrate into the USA.
Immigration Officials will scrutinize each application very deligently (as it is done with ALL heterosexual couples)- Proof of a long-lasting relationship will have to be presented : such as finacial records, photos, testimony of friends and families, ect.
In addition, as with heterosexual couples, the American partner will have to pledge to support his partner financialy for the next 10 years !

This is a no brainer.
The Uniting American Families Act MUST be supported by ALL AMERICANS - it is in our nature, it is in our Constitution : we are fair, honest and dignified people.

 

Comment by Glennmcgahee | 2009-06-16 08:39:40

This is just another angle that shows the discriminitory nature of this country toward the last people to get their civil rights. All based on who you fall in love with. I still read many glbt blogs that insist Obama has some secret plan to grant us our rights. I’m beating my head against a brick wall. The legal brief filed to prevent the challenge to DOMA by the Attorney General was/should be enough to convince everybody that the Obama administration views us as untouchable. But this is the party that attempted to remove GLBT rights from the Democratic Platform last year stating that gay civil rights diminished the struggle for civil rights of African Americans. This disreagrded the civil rights of other minorities in this country as well. The party has sunk to a new low. I don’t even recognize it. BTW, it was Donna Brazille and Howard Dean that tried to remove the gays rights statement from the Democratic Platform. Never forget it.

 

Comment by Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy | 2009-06-16 09:08:09

Oops - I should read all of the comments first before I jump in - my bad!

Micheal hits the nail on the head. Well said!

And Glen, you are too right abt that whole secret agenda of Obama’s crapola. When Joe Solmonese of HRC came out with his letter to Obama regarding DOMA, I just had to shake my head in disgust. The HRC NEVER should have endorsed Obama over Clinton in the FIRST place, and now he is getting exactly what WE knew he would get - thrown under the bus. (http://www.hrcbackstory.org/2009/06/a-letter-to-the-president-from-joe-solmonese/) And he’s all upset by Obama doing this. He should have paid attention BEFORE, then maybe he and his entire organization wouldn’t have supported this man in the first place.

Again, WE are reaping what organizations like the HRC have sown.

 

Comment by bart | 2009-06-16 16:01:53

I’m still amazed anyone in the LGBT community could have thought BO would support them in any meaningful way. He spent 20 years at Rev Wright’s church.

 

Pingback by stephen colbert: stonewalling ~open thread : NO QUARTER | 2009-07-02 07:20:03

[...] “Would require stroke pf pen.” ouch Ani and Amy wrote a couple of great stories that touch on Stonewall, and what is (or not) going on in Washington right now wrt gay rights, in case you missed them: Cheney Two, Obama Nothing, Clinton - a Thousand, While I’m At It, Let’s Talk Immigration [...]

 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)