<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attacking Not Just Conservative Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FranSC</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/#comment-1220510</link>
		<dc:creator>FranSC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 07:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26382#comment-1220510</guid>
		<description>I agree, TexasMirth, that O'Reilly's interview with Hillary was a good one and very spirited. In fact he told her at the end it was the best interview he had ever had.  He said that a couple of times later as well.  

I had the feeling Bill was very surprised about that.  But, you know, Hillary can talk with anyone and it is always great - filled with little golden nuggets of one description or another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, TexasMirth, that O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s interview with Hillary was a good one and very spirited. In fact he told her at the end it was the best interview he had ever had.  He said that a couple of times later as well.  </p>
<p>I had the feeling Bill was very surprised about that.  But, you know, Hillary can talk with anyone and it is always great - filled with little golden nuggets of one description or another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferd Berfle</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/#comment-1220322</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferd Berfle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26382#comment-1220322</guid>
		<description>The root of the problem is that there no longer exists a sense of common courtesy and decency. Call me old-fashioned, but civility is no longer in vogue and is lost to an entire generation and perhaps beyond.  Shock and awe are the order of the day--if it offends, their motto is "do it".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The root of the problem is that there no longer exists a sense of common courtesy and decency. Call me old-fashioned, but civility is no longer in vogue and is lost to an entire generation and perhaps beyond.  Shock and awe are the order of the day&#8211;if it offends, their motto is &#8220;do it&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FranSC</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/#comment-1220315</link>
		<dc:creator>FranSC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26382#comment-1220315</guid>
		<description>RRRevAmy, I agree - both Andrea T. &amp; Megyn K. have become favorites of mine as well.  But they still don't quite get it about Hillary and the "imagined" women's groups out here that remain silent.  

Whatever groups that are left were and are just as silent about Hillary as they are about Palin.  Laura Ingraham is like them as well, railing constantly about where are the feminists?  Where is NOW like NOW is THE voice of liberal feminists.  

Since you helped found one of the NOW Chapters, I'm sure with your leadership NOW was much more effective in combining many women's issues and not the narrow view they have always had in most of their chapters. In the heat of the women's movement in NC, NOW simply was not that strong.  The Women's Political Caucus way outnumbered them and trumped their effectiveness because of that group's continuous lobbying and interaction with legislators, congress people, and most elected officials.   I do realize that was not the case every where.  Today, NOW should not be looked at as "THE VOICE" of women, although I'm afraid it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RRRevAmy, I agree - both Andrea T. &amp; Megyn K. have become favorites of mine as well.  But they still don&#8217;t quite get it about Hillary and the &#8220;imagined&#8221; women&#8217;s groups out here that remain silent.  </p>
<p>Whatever groups that are left were and are just as silent about Hillary as they are about Palin.  Laura Ingraham is like them as well, railing constantly about where are the feminists?  Where is NOW like NOW is THE voice of liberal feminists.  </p>
<p>Since you helped found one of the NOW Chapters, I&#8217;m sure with your leadership NOW was much more effective in combining many women&#8217;s issues and not the narrow view they have always had in most of their chapters. In the heat of the women&#8217;s movement in NC, NOW simply was not that strong.  The Women&#8217;s Political Caucus way outnumbered them and trumped their effectiveness because of that group&#8217;s continuous lobbying and interaction with legislators, congress people, and most elected officials.   I do realize that was not the case every where.  Today, NOW should not be looked at as &#8220;THE VOICE&#8221; of women, although I&#8217;m afraid it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NomNomNom</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/#comment-1220284</link>
		<dc:creator>NomNomNom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26382#comment-1220284</guid>
		<description>agree they both suck re- women, that's all I meant: it's hardly &lt;strong&gt;just&lt;/strong&gt; the left that sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agree they both suck re- women, that&#8217;s all I meant: it&#8217;s hardly <strong>just</strong> the left that sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ladydawnelle</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/#comment-1220266</link>
		<dc:creator>Ladydawnelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26382#comment-1220266</guid>
		<description>the BAS@#DS!

How do you like my usage?  hehee!

The Ones that OWN the ONE have WON!
(but ONE is the loneliest number)

especially when it's flying over the cuckoo nest!

as the ONE FLEW (who knew?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the BAS@#DS!</p>
<p>How do you like my usage?  hehee!</p>
<p>The Ones that OWN the ONE have WON!<br />
(but ONE is the loneliest number)</p>
<p>especially when it&#8217;s flying over the cuckoo nest!</p>
<p>as the ONE FLEW (who knew?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYCgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/#comment-1220161</link>
		<dc:creator>NYCgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 04:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26382#comment-1220161</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;BTW, I wish I could remember the article, but just the other day I read a piece written by a woman about Hillary and she described what she was wearing! It wasn’t a negative piece by any measure but still, why must a woman’s appearance be part of the story?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

To try to offer a slightly different take on this:

There's a huge amount of interest all over the world in Hillary as SOS -- what she's doing, thinking -- and yes, what she's wearing. I really don't have a problem with this. I know that Hillary has been looking very good in her post as SOS and I am sure she puts a lot of thought and time into her appearance. So, if people notice her outfits or hairstyles that she has gone to some effort to make attractive, that can only be for the good, IMO.

If you read blogs devoted to Hillary, many of the comments will center on her pantsuits, her hair (which she changes frequently), her jewelry (much of which Bill buys for her, apparently). But does anyone doubt that these bloggers take Mme. Secretary seriously? She is not a "cupcake", by any means. But people do appreciate an attractive, strong woman, and they are respectful of her position while admiring her style.

I have a problem with people &lt;em&gt;attacking&lt;/em&gt; Hillary for her appearance -- as has happened so often in the past, and I have a problem with them not taking her seriously as a world leader. But if we like her new hairstyle, I think it's fine to say so. JMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>BTW, I wish I could remember the article, but just the other day I read a piece written by a woman about Hillary and she described what she was wearing! It wasn’t a negative piece by any measure but still, why must a woman’s appearance be part of the story?
</p></blockquote>
<p>To try to offer a slightly different take on this:</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a huge amount of interest all over the world in Hillary as SOS &#8212; what she&#8217;s doing, thinking &#8212; and yes, what she&#8217;s wearing. I really don&#8217;t have a problem with this. I know that Hillary has been looking very good in her post as SOS and I am sure she puts a lot of thought and time into her appearance. So, if people notice her outfits or hairstyles that she has gone to some effort to make attractive, that can only be for the good, IMO.</p>
<p>If you read blogs devoted to Hillary, many of the comments will center on her pantsuits, her hair (which she changes frequently), her jewelry (much of which Bill buys for her, apparently). But does anyone doubt that these bloggers take Mme. Secretary seriously? She is not a &#8220;cupcake&#8221;, by any means. But people do appreciate an attractive, strong woman, and they are respectful of her position while admiring her style.</p>
<p>I have a problem with people <em>attacking</em> Hillary for her appearance &#8212; as has happened so often in the past, and I have a problem with them not taking her seriously as a world leader. But if we like her new hairstyle, I think it&#8217;s fine to say so. JMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYCgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/#comment-1220157</link>
		<dc:creator>NYCgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 04:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26382#comment-1220157</guid>
		<description>That last line should read:

"And &lt;em&gt;classism&lt;/em&gt;, as a previous poster noted earlier in this thread."

I am not really against the "classics". :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That last line should read:</p>
<p>&#8220;And <em>classism</em>, as a previous poster noted earlier in this thread.&#8221;</p>
<p>I am not really against the &#8220;classics&#8221;. <img src='http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYCgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/#comment-1220156</link>
		<dc:creator>NYCgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 04:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26382#comment-1220156</guid>
		<description>As we discuss this very important issue of sexism against women of ALL political stripes, let's keep reminding ourselves that the "fun" has only just begun. Palin will undoubtedly run again in 2012 -- she's already got her PAC in place and has filed candidacy papers with the FEC, I have heard. And she will have a fight on her hands once again with the MSM PLUS the "good ol' boys" in her own party who want to shoot her down. They have already started the sniping.

I do not support Palin's politics -- I am not a conservative. But I will certainly back her up as a woman battling sexism and misogyny. And classicism, as a previous poster noted earlier in this thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we discuss this very important issue of sexism against women of ALL political stripes, let&#8217;s keep reminding ourselves that the &#8220;fun&#8221; has only just begun. Palin will undoubtedly run again in 2012 &#8212; she&#8217;s already got her PAC in place and has filed candidacy papers with the FEC, I have heard. And she will have a fight on her hands once again with the MSM PLUS the &#8220;good ol&#8217; boys&#8221; in her own party who want to shoot her down. They have already started the sniping.</p>
<p>I do not support Palin&#8217;s politics &#8212; I am not a conservative. But I will certainly back her up as a woman battling sexism and misogyny. And classicism, as a previous poster noted earlier in this thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ani</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/#comment-1220139</link>
		<dc:creator>Ani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26382#comment-1220139</guid>
		<description>Amy,

Excellent post. We are certainly deteriorating as a country by letting this kind of behavior go unpunished.  And it is very true that we do lose our moral authority, telling other countries to treat women better when we do this -- and so many women are still on the receiving end of violence.

Further, Letterman's behavior is typical of the type of man (and some women) who hate confrontation and don't ever want to be called on the carpet -- they cannot ever admit they are wrong so it's always about some schoolboy sheepish crap that they were "misunderstood".  He is 62.  Grow up, Dave.

He expected Hillary and Sarah and their families to take the endless filth that he dished out without comment and now he can't even take his own lumps like a grown-up.  Unbelievable. 

If any one of these neanderthals like him, Maher, Matthews, Olbermann, Leno and the like had ever been on the receiving end of this firestorm of disrespect, vitriol and crass put downs, they would alternately be crying foul at the top of their lungs, and curled up in a corner in the fetal position.

Letterman is a big baby -- with all that he has in his life, he cannot even find the humility to admit he was wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy,</p>
<p>Excellent post. We are certainly deteriorating as a country by letting this kind of behavior go unpunished.  And it is very true that we do lose our moral authority, telling other countries to treat women better when we do this &#8212; and so many women are still on the receiving end of violence.</p>
<p>Further, Letterman&#8217;s behavior is typical of the type of man (and some women) who hate confrontation and don&#8217;t ever want to be called on the carpet &#8212; they cannot ever admit they are wrong so it&#8217;s always about some schoolboy sheepish crap that they were &#8220;misunderstood&#8221;.  He is 62.  Grow up, Dave.</p>
<p>He expected Hillary and Sarah and their families to take the endless filth that he dished out without comment and now he can&#8217;t even take his own lumps like a grown-up.  Unbelievable. </p>
<p>If any one of these neanderthals like him, Maher, Matthews, Olbermann, Leno and the like had ever been on the receiving end of this firestorm of disrespect, vitriol and crass put downs, they would alternately be crying foul at the top of their lungs, and curled up in a corner in the fetal position.</p>
<p>Letterman is a big baby &#8212; with all that he has in his life, he cannot even find the humility to admit he was wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foxyladi14</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/#comment-1220033</link>
		<dc:creator>foxyladi14</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26382#comment-1220033</guid>
		<description>Mars i hope.the dominoes are falling</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mars i hope.the dominoes are falling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oowawa</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/#comment-1219972</link>
		<dc:creator>oowawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26382#comment-1219972</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What kind of sexuality is OK for you?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I can't believe I'm answering this, but here goes: Julia, I like kind sweet intimate love between consenting adults.  I hate cruelty, either physical or emotional. As to "the kind of sexuality we have done, brutal and violent," I can only say, I'm not part of that "we."  I don't demonize masturbation, and if a naked drawing or picture helps a lonely person to get it on with his or her own imagination, then fine. It's OK with me.  Violent images are another matter: that's not OK with me.  The Playboy bit on the "conservative women hate list" crossed that line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What kind of sexuality is OK for you?</p></blockquote>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe I&#8217;m answering this, but here goes: Julia, I like kind sweet intimate love between consenting adults.  I hate cruelty, either physical or emotional. As to &#8220;the kind of sexuality we have done, brutal and violent,&#8221; I can only say, I&#8217;m not part of that &#8220;we.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t demonize masturbation, and if a naked drawing or picture helps a lonely person to get it on with his or her own imagination, then fine. It&#8217;s OK with me.  Violent images are another matter: that&#8217;s not OK with me.  The Playboy bit on the &#8220;conservative women hate list&#8221; crossed that line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trixta</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/#comment-1219957</link>
		<dc:creator>trixta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26382#comment-1219957</guid>
		<description>Nom, but you have to admit that feminist causes &lt;strong&gt;used to be&lt;/strong&gt; one of the bedrocks of the Left.  The 2008 primaries revealed that in actuality, women have been cogs in a patriarchal game between the Left and the Right. It appears that elections have always been about masculinity and its construction.  I guess this time around the Dems wanted to shed their "Mommy Party" characterization (given to them by the Right all these years), and to do this they found the most misogynist and sexist candidate ever to run for POTUS. What was fascinating to watch was how Hillary handled the masculinity issue, at one point being the candidate most Americans trusted with foreign affairs and the war, while being a fierce mother figure (Pat Buchanan even characterized her as the Virgin Mary, at one point).  It was no accident that over 30 generals supported HRC whereas very few showed public support for Obama.       

Both Hillary and Sarah confused the masculinity issue in the election, and therefore threatened the status quo: the former being a brainy and tough leader/mother who commands respect, and the latter being a frontier woman, leader/mother, and beauty queen to boot. 

In other words they both broke the mold, and thus put a certain type of masculinity on notice.  Misogyny and sexism are  the ways to put women back in their place (e.g. Michelle and Laura Bush).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nom, but you have to admit that feminist causes <strong>used to be</strong> one of the bedrocks of the Left.  The 2008 primaries revealed that in actuality, women have been cogs in a patriarchal game between the Left and the Right. It appears that elections have always been about masculinity and its construction.  I guess this time around the Dems wanted to shed their &#8220;Mommy Party&#8221; characterization (given to them by the Right all these years), and to do this they found the most misogynist and sexist candidate ever to run for POTUS. What was fascinating to watch was how Hillary handled the masculinity issue, at one point being the candidate most Americans trusted with foreign affairs and the war, while being a fierce mother figure (Pat Buchanan even characterized her as the Virgin Mary, at one point).  It was no accident that over 30 generals supported HRC whereas very few showed public support for Obama.       </p>
<p>Both Hillary and Sarah confused the masculinity issue in the election, and therefore threatened the status quo: the former being a brainy and tough leader/mother who commands respect, and the latter being a frontier woman, leader/mother, and beauty queen to boot. </p>
<p>In other words they both broke the mold, and thus put a certain type of masculinity on notice.  Misogyny and sexism are  the ways to put women back in their place (e.g. Michelle and Laura Bush).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ladydawnelle</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/#comment-1219948</link>
		<dc:creator>Ladydawnelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26382#comment-1219948</guid>
		<description>I think I heard O'Lielly say once he had to "put up with (in a joking manner) Kelly and Carlson and they're both Democrats!"

so I think she's leaning left to start with
as left as you can lean and still work for&lt;strike&gt; Faux&lt;/strike&gt; Fox

but then a LOT of people claim to be Dems or Reps and then when you watch them vote or act it screams something else  (aka Lieberdon't, Hagel, BenNelson or even the aristocat (blonde) in Louisiana

all puzzling to me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I heard O&#8217;Lielly say once he had to &#8220;put up with (in a joking manner) Kelly and Carlson and they&#8217;re both Democrats!&#8221;</p>
<p>so I think she&#8217;s leaning left to start with<br />
as left as you can lean and still work for<strike> Faux</strike> Fox</p>
<p>but then a LOT of people claim to be Dems or Reps and then when you watch them vote or act it screams something else  (aka Lieberdon&#8217;t, Hagel, BenNelson or even the aristocat (blonde) in Louisiana</p>
<p>all puzzling to me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scout</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/#comment-1219938</link>
		<dc:creator>Scout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26382#comment-1219938</guid>
		<description>This is one of your best posts, Rev Amy.

I left a comment earlier regarding "hate sex" that hasn't posted yet.  Lost in the spam filter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of your best posts, Rev Amy.</p>
<p>I left a comment earlier regarding &#8220;hate sex&#8221; that hasn&#8217;t posted yet.  Lost in the spam filter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/#comment-1219937</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26382#comment-1219937</guid>
		<description>Just another thought is that Obama was the candidate for the elites. He was Ivy league, male, elite profession, urban, acceptable region, and a minority so that supporters could make themselves feel good about their own political narcissism. Any criticism or inquiry of their candidate was immediately given a social stigma which is a common method of controlling groups especially women and girls who are socially conditioned to respond to it. Hence Letterman's choice of language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just another thought is that Obama was the candidate for the elites. He was Ivy league, male, elite profession, urban, acceptable region, and a minority so that supporters could make themselves feel good about their own political narcissism. Any criticism or inquiry of their candidate was immediately given a social stigma which is a common method of controlling groups especially women and girls who are socially conditioned to respond to it. Hence Letterman&#8217;s choice of language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/#comment-1219921</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26382#comment-1219921</guid>
		<description>I agree that Letterman is primarily about misogyny. He is also a crude ass. But many of the worst haters of Palin and Clinton would use crude misogynistic language, get called on it, then turn around and use a elitist, classist, regionalist, or religiously bigoted epithets as if that were acceptable also. Much of it is all mixed up, and anyone prone to misogyny is prone to all of the other forms of bigotry and abuse. It is a way to control people and the elites are experts at using these tactics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Letterman is primarily about misogyny. He is also a crude ass. But many of the worst haters of Palin and Clinton would use crude misogynistic language, get called on it, then turn around and use a elitist, classist, regionalist, or religiously bigoted epithets as if that were acceptable also. Much of it is all mixed up, and anyone prone to misogyny is prone to all of the other forms of bigotry and abuse. It is a way to control people and the elites are experts at using these tactics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/#comment-1219918</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26382#comment-1219918</guid>
		<description>I had never heard the term "Hate" sex either but I compared it to one more familiar to me and my "times"..."Grudge" sex ( using the word sex to be more polite and PC and to avoid being too vulgar)....I was able to get the total meaning...Playboy never really bothered me, it was one of the less trashy "rags" of that genre' however, they need to stay with photo's of female nude body and leave polotics to the polticians.  God knows that they hardly need any help screwing things up..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had never heard the term &#8220;Hate&#8221; sex either but I compared it to one more familiar to me and my &#8220;times&#8221;&#8230;&#8221;Grudge&#8221; sex ( using the word sex to be more polite and PC and to avoid being too vulgar)&#8230;.I was able to get the total meaning&#8230;Playboy never really bothered me, it was one of the less trashy &#8220;rags&#8221; of that genre&#8217; however, they need to stay with photo&#8217;s of female nude body and leave polotics to the polticians.  God knows that they hardly need any help screwing things up..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/#comment-1219915</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26382#comment-1219915</guid>
		<description>Mary, great rant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary, great rant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/#comment-1219914</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26382#comment-1219914</guid>
		<description>” Let’s not kid ourselves: Playboy succeeded because it was an easily available aid to masturbation. That’s OK with me"

That's OK with you?? well, you should think again. What kind of sexuality is OK for you? Playboy is a sexist sexuality. The problem isn't the sexuality (or masturbation obviously) but the kind of sexuality we have done, brutal and violent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>” Let’s not kid ourselves: Playboy succeeded because it was an easily available aid to masturbation. That’s OK with me&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s OK with you?? well, you should think again. What kind of sexuality is OK for you? Playboy is a sexist sexuality. The problem isn&#8217;t the sexuality (or masturbation obviously) but the kind of sexuality we have done, brutal and violent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scout</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/19/attacking-not-just-conservative-women/#comment-1219906</link>
		<dc:creator>Scout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26382#comment-1219906</guid>
		<description>"hate sex" really sums up the urges behind all the misogyny we've witnessed, and endured.

I remember a particularly startling quote from one of the blogger boys during the general (I don't remember his name, but I'll post if I find it).

He set it up by saying he had a really understanding girlfriend.  So understanding that she was willing to enable his fantasy of f***ing Palin on his Barack Obama sheets while his girlfriend read aloud from the Constitution.

I kid you not.  I'll never forget the cold feeling that went through my body when I read that.  I really started to appreciate how mistaken I was about the progress of America in eradicating sexism.

Clearly, we were fair game, and no-one bothered to hide it anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;hate sex&#8221; really sums up the urges behind all the misogyny we&#8217;ve witnessed, and endured.</p>
<p>I remember a particularly startling quote from one of the blogger boys during the general (I don&#8217;t remember his name, but I&#8217;ll post if I find it).</p>
<p>He set it up by saying he had a really understanding girlfriend.  So understanding that she was willing to enable his fantasy of f***ing Palin on his Barack Obama sheets while his girlfriend read aloud from the Constitution.</p>
<p>I kid you not.  I&#8217;ll never forget the cold feeling that went through my body when I read that.  I really started to appreciate how mistaken I was about the progress of America in eradicating sexism.</p>
<p>Clearly, we were fair game, and no-one bothered to hide it anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
