Panetta Continues The CIA’s Culture Of Covering Up Abuses And Crimes
By Mel Goodman on June 22, 2009 at 5:45 AM in Current Affairs
(bumped up from yesterday - a must read)
CIA Director Leon Panetta is continuing the culture of cover-up that has plagued the Agency for the past three decades, ever since William Casey and Robert Gates collaborated in the 1980s to hide the crimes of Iran-contra and to politicize sensitive intelligence.
Panetta was expected to introduce an era of transparency and accountability to the CIA, but he has been a major disappointment, refusing to remove any of the senior officials responsible for policies that led to secret prisons, extraordinary renditions, and torture and abuse.
Currently, he is doing the bidding of the most reactionary elements of the CIA by supporting the heavy redaction of the Inspector General’s report of 2004, which is the most authoritative account on record of the Agency’s interrogation practices and the use of torture and abuse against detainees.
In addition to blocking the release of an authoritative version of the IG report, Panetta has established his own review group within the Agency on interrogation practices and has filled it with operational officials from the National Clandestine Service and lawyers from the Office of the General Counsel.
These were the lawyers who petitioned the Office of Legal Counsel for immunity in the conduct of so-called enhanced interrogation techniques. Panetta has also announced that former senator Warren Rudman (R-NH) would be the director’s special advisor on the Senate intelligence committee’s special inquiry of past practices in terrorist detention and interrogation. In 1991, Rudman worked actively to block CIA officials from testifying against the nomination of Gates as CIA director.
Panetta, moreover, has demonstrated no concern with the CIA’s destruction of nearly 100 interrogation videotapes, which was investigated by the FBI but has thus far led to no indictments and no information for the general public.
Clandestine officials have a great interest in making sure that the Senate intelligence committee does not receive the worst of the evidence from the investigation.
By placing Rudman as an intermediary between the review group and the Senate intelligence committee, Panetta has ensured himself that the most damaging information will never see the light of day. The chairman of the intelligence committee, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), has shown no interest in aggressive oversight of the intelligence community.
Finally, Panetta has not supported the nomination of a new Inspector General to replace John Helgerson, who authorized the 2004 report and had become a bête noire to three former CIA directors, George Tenet, Porter Goss, and Michael Hayden.
He should be supporting the nomination of a lawyer with outstanding credentials, such as the Justice Department’s Glenn Fine, who would aggressively puruse wrongdoing at the CIA. Panetta’s failure to name a new IG indicates that he supports the policy of using the lawyers of the Office of the General Counsel to monitor and restrain the office of the Inspector General. Again, Feinstein has made no effort to install a statutory IG at the CIA.
Those CIA directors, particularly William Colby and Stansfield Turner, who tried to deal forthrightly with the Agency’s sordid past have always earned the enmity of the National Clandestine Service, formerly the directorate of operations.
Colby assembled the “Family Jewels” or the “Skeletons,” which described the illegal activities of the CIA in Chile against the Allende government and in the United States during the Vietnam War. Colby’s “Family Jewels” and Seymour Hersh’s story on the CIA’s illegal domestic activities led to the Hughes-Ryan Amendment that required the president to report CIA covert actions to the congressional oversight committees.
But when Representative Michael Harrington (D-MA) leaked word of the Chilean operation, he was denied further access to the files of the oversight committee, which may explain why congressmen do not deal openly with CIA transgressions.
One congressman who has dealt openly with CIA transgressions, Peter Hoekstra (R-MI), has received no support from his congressional colleagues in pursuing the CIA cover-up of shoot down of a missionary plane in Peru that led to the deaths of a missionary and her seven-month-old daughter.
Again, a report from John Helgerson documented the CIA ‘s failure to follow presidential orders controlling the operation. The intelligence committees have similarly demonstrated no interest in pursuing CIA killings of innocent civilians in Yemen, Iraq, and Afghanistan.
Unfortunately, there is ample precedent for installing CIA directors who then become a captive of the clandestine culture and very resistant to any policy of openness or glasnost. Bill Casey and his deputy, Bob Gates, made sure that the White House would be firmly in control of the intelligence and informational bases of foreign policy. Both Casey and Gates dissembled often before the congressional intelligence committees.
Gates’ role in covering-up his knowledge of Iran-contra forced him to withdraw his nomination as CIA director in 1987, and his politicization of intelligence persuaded more than 30 Senators to vote against his nomination in 1991.
As CIA director, Gates (along with his immediate successors) wittingly took part in sending clandestine intelligence to the White House that had been manipulated by the Soviet Union and Russia and designed to deceive the United States.
Other CIA directors, including James Schlesinger, Goss, Hayden, and George Tenet, were political directors cut from the same cloth as Casey and Gates. Tenet made a special effort to cover-up the CIA’s mishandling of intelligence on the Soviet Union, which led to the failure to record the decline and fall of the USSR.
Panetta could learn a great deal from Bill Colby, who explained that the “Agency’s survival could only come from understanding, not hostility, built on knowledge, not faith.” Sadly, Panetta appears to be cut from different cloth.
Melvin A. Goodman, a regular contributor to the Public Record, is senior fellow at the Center for International Policy and adjunct professor of government at Johns Hopkins University. He spent more than 42 years in the US Army, the CIA, and the Department of Defense. His most recent book is “Failure of Intelligence: The Decline and Fall of the CIA.”
Originally published at PublicRecord.org blog.























Thanks for the very well put-together post….and most informative.
With all of these facts, why would fans of Obama be so accepting of Robt. Gates’ remaining in the administration?
And I don’t know if you keep up with Texas news, but some folks think that Gates is needed back at A&M.
Speaking of the CIA covering up — Do we have any indication at all of CIA involvement in the current protests in Iran? I have been reading theories both in favor and against that possibility. I do think that the protests seem to be staged, especially given all of the internet involvement (Twitter!!). But I don’t know - staged by who? And to what end? I have read that the CIA, the Mossad, the Russians, or any combination of the above are behind the protests. I certainly don’t believe for one minute that those mass protests are spontaneous and genuine, that’s for sure.
I found the answers to my own question here:
Are You Ready For War With A Demonized Iran?
http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts06162009.html
and here:
Are the Iranian Protests Another US Orchestrated Color Revolution?
http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts06192009.html
My question was: “Is the CIA involved in the current protests in Iran?” The answer is: YES.
I hope these links are wrong, but wouldn’t be surprised to learn otherwise. Regime change in Iran was high on the Bush/Cheney list of things to do.
Is Obama in control of intelligence agencies and does he have information that would clarify the situation? Why isn’t he “leading” instead of allowing others to control the message? If this is a CIA operation and not a genuine revolt, he should openly reject any interference in the elections of another country. On the other hand, if it is real and not staged, he should speak out more forcefully on possible human rights abuses.
He has been indecisive and tentative in his response and if there is fallout, he won’t be able to blame Bush for this one.
Is it possible that Obama did not KNOW that there was a covert CIA operation ready to roll in Iran as soon as their elections took place? He is acting as if he was completely caught off-guard by the alleged “stolen election” and the subsequent protests, which seemed staged to me from the get-go.
If he really was in the dark about the CIA stirring the pot over there, that would explain his silence and indecision. He can’t exactly stand there and say, “Wow! Look what’s going on!” On the other hand he can’t get up there and defend the bogus “people’s revolution” either, knowing it’s a sham, and not knowing where that would lead him. And on the third hand, as much as he might want to, he cannot publicly blame the CIA’s involvement on Bush/Cheney without giving away all of the above that I just mentioned.
In the memorable words of Sarget Schultz–I KNOW NOOOOTHING!
indeed he owns this one..
Russians? They have financed Irans Nuke plant…
Mossad? They need intel not riots in the street and crack downs on those samesources
The CIA? same thing.
Our Government is a big JOKE, a bunch of hypocrits… Regretfully, I don’t trust no one in this Administration, no Senator, Congressman, SCOTUS, Attorney General, no one. It looks like, they don’t work for the Country, they work for themselfs. We the peopele are just a pain of the neck, entity. Setting aside any politics and judgement, I have to be honest to recognize and admire the Iranian people courage, dtermination, sacrifyce for FREEDOM. It is the highest honor to stand-up for your Country,stand-up for what you believe in, no matter what.
Does the CIA really exist ?
I think it is just a front & the action has moved elsewhere.
Sort of like Al Queda -once was an entity now splintered off to more elusive smaller lines.
They both exist as decoys & for TV shows.
This is one of those misdirection questions correct?
Ray McGovern writes a very interesting article. In his view Panetta is not all he said he would be.
The only point I would make is that the buck stop on and AT Obama’s Resolute desk.
Two things can’t true in this case at the same time.
The first is that BO is control of the intelligence forces of this country and condones / ordered Panetta to do what he is doing / not doing and all that talk of transparency is indeed bullshit…or
BO is attempting to be transparent and is finding he is NOT in control of the intellegence asetts of this country.
Either senerio leads down a bad road, as I take Ray McGovern’s comment at face value.
Hi there. This article was actually written by Mel Goodman.
When first posted the author was “by Ray McGovern”.
If it was Ray or Mel the facts are the same.
Who is Ray McGovern? His name was on this post last night, and since I don’t drink, I can’t say I saw something that wasn’t there and blame it on moonshine.
No, it’s not you it was there yesterday. As for who is is?????????????????????
Animal control—-thanks! I’m in my mid-60’s and worry about my short term memory sometimes!
Nothing wrong with your memory but it appears your confidence level is a little low. You know what you know–go for it.
Thanks!
Wow, much info and sad to see every part of this administsration, from the Exec branch to the CIA, is all bull and their transparency only referred to them, how we could see through him when it mattered and could have made the difference our counry needed after 8 years of Bush.
Now we’re kneed deep in Bush 3.0 term, but much worse in many ways, only his idealism is far on the other side, strangling us while bleading us dry.
I can hope Panetta is trying to do some damage control, especially after seeing Obama willing and did release info that could hurt them and Pelosi making her charges and then will clean up ops, but as you point out by folks he’s bringing on board, that leaves doubt.
It appears to me that Washington D.C. has become like many small towns: Everyone knows everyone. Your neighbor may drink too much and cheats on his wife, but–hey–he’s a good guy and did a great job as the coach of your son’s little league team. Your other neighbor is a terrible elementary school teacher, but she works tirelessly for your church social committee, so don’t say anything about the terrible education those kids in her class are receiving. The newly hired teacher for your child’s school is the daughter of a city banker, so don’t bring up the fact that she got terrible grades in college, had to have intervention to get her degree, and was hired over way better qualified applicants from out of town.
I’m guessing there is too much “inbreeding” in the capital of our country. Can we just start over somewhere else with a new slate of players?
I’m not a scholar, or a journalist, or a politician, or a soldier, but I am an interested observer of the CIA culture. I have to conclude from everything that I have ever read about that organization that the CIA is a perversion and a monstrosity. Collecting and analyzing intelligence is one thing; covert operations are something entirely different. And I would dispute anyone who claims that deception is essential to protecting destructive military technologies or national defense priorities. As far as I can tell, anyone who ventures into the highest realms of CIA administration does so at the risk of losing his soul.
Think about how all this throws a kink into Obama’s plan to open a dialogue with Iran. Hillary said it was naive. But the most startling part to me is seeing all of the “change” signs being held up by the protesters in Iran. Now where could they have gotten those signs? Is this what we might have seen here when Donna Brazille threatened that there would be blood in the streets if Obama did not get the nomination? There will be no transfer of power in Iran unless we have decided to meddle once again in their mess of a gov’t over there. We’ve done it before and each time we fucked up by installing sonething far worse than existed in the first place. Sure the CIA is in place over there. They’ve always been there I bet. Why do you think these countries keep accusing us of interfering.Obama just keeps his mouth shut so he can adapt to whatever outcome and claim thats what he had planned all along. He’s so smart. Another speech in Cairo is called for. The wimin’s don’t want to wear their hajib over there. Thats very important to Obama, they must wear them, he told us how importatnt it was.
See the latest Cannonfire post for a summary of Obama’s probable CIA roots.
I wish someone from the CIA would come out and expose the things they have done and are doing! I really believe that they do more harm they good, and most of them have gone mad with power. If you search the most evil human experiments, it is usually the secret government agencies that are the masterminds and that scares the cahoonies out of me!