<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NQ Must Read for First Responders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/nq-must-read-for-first-responders-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/nq-must-read-for-first-responders-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:05:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pestulant Beastie</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/nq-must-read-for-first-responders-2/#comment-1222163</link>
		<dc:creator>Pestulant Beastie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26776#comment-1222163</guid>
		<description>Obama administration seeks to quash suit by 9/11 families (June 26, 2009)

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Obama administration has intervened to quash a civil suit filed against Saudi Arabia by survivors and family members of victims of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. The suit seeks to hold the Saudi royal family liable, charging that it provided financial and other support to Al Qaeda and was thereby complicit in the hijack bombings that killed nearly 3,000 people in New York and Washington DC.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

http://tinyurl.com/n6dzmk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama administration seeks to quash suit by 9/11 families (June 26, 2009)</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The Obama administration has intervened to quash a civil suit filed against Saudi Arabia by survivors and family members of victims of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. The suit seeks to hold the Saudi royal family liable, charging that it provided financial and other support to Al Qaeda and was thereby complicit in the hijack bombings that killed nearly 3,000 people in New York and Washington DC.</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/n6dzmk" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/n6dzmk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barb</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/nq-must-read-for-first-responders-2/#comment-1221802</link>
		<dc:creator>barb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26776#comment-1221802</guid>
		<description>I for one want to see Obama held resposible for all the bloodshed going on in Iran. Get gets people all jacked up for hopeychangey in his Cairo speech and then choaks when the moderates in Iran actually believe the Koolaid. I consider what Obama did in Cairo worse than Kennedy&#039;s Bay of Pigs. You can&#039;t make people believe in change and then stand on the sidelines while they are slaughtered. Obama has blood on his hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one want to see Obama held resposible for all the bloodshed going on in Iran. Get gets people all jacked up for hopeychangey in his Cairo speech and then choaks when the moderates in Iran actually believe the Koolaid. I consider what Obama did in Cairo worse than Kennedy&#8217;s Bay of Pigs. You can&#8217;t make people believe in change and then stand on the sidelines while they are slaughtered. Obama has blood on his hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patience</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/nq-must-read-for-first-responders-2/#comment-1221789</link>
		<dc:creator>Patience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26776#comment-1221789</guid>
		<description>One would think he&#039;s a master of inscrutability, a paragon of poker faces, listening to this myth of his supposed unflappability and coolness repeated ad nauseam.  In addition to what you pointed out, his face betrays his glass jaw time and time again.  For instance, I&#039;ll never forget his petulant expression when Hillary won New Hampshire.  His voice is easy to read too -- he tends to sound whiney and exasperated when cornered.  The guy just cannot conceal when his ego is wounded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One would think he&#8217;s a master of inscrutability, a paragon of poker faces, listening to this myth of his supposed unflappability and coolness repeated ad nauseam.  In addition to what you pointed out, his face betrays his glass jaw time and time again.  For instance, I&#8217;ll never forget his petulant expression when Hillary won New Hampshire.  His voice is easy to read too &#8212; he tends to sound whiney and exasperated when cornered.  The guy just cannot conceal when his ego is wounded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patience</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/nq-must-read-for-first-responders-2/#comment-1221767</link>
		<dc:creator>Patience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26776#comment-1221767</guid>
		<description>This whole Saudi thing makes me sick.  I remember right after 9/11 the NYTimes, as one example, had SEVERAL pages of ads placed by Saudi Arabia on more than one occasion, obviously for image/damage-control purposes.  That alone had to cost a tidy chunk of change.

I agree with Texas Playwright that it all boils down to oil, for which we have a huge appetite.  Granted, Saudi Arabia isn&#039;t our only supplier but they&#039;re a major player.  Look at your local papers and see who the big advertizers are -- auto dealerships as well as home sellers (often in suburban or even exurban locations which can&#039;t exist without auto-dependency).  Pay attention to how many car commercials you see on TV or hear on the radio.  These advertizers are major sources of revenue for the media, who aren&#039;t inclined to bite the hand that feeds them.  And that hand depends on oil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole Saudi thing makes me sick.  I remember right after 9/11 the NYTimes, as one example, had SEVERAL pages of ads placed by Saudi Arabia on more than one occasion, obviously for image/damage-control purposes.  That alone had to cost a tidy chunk of change.</p>
<p>I agree with Texas Playwright that it all boils down to oil, for which we have a huge appetite.  Granted, Saudi Arabia isn&#8217;t our only supplier but they&#8217;re a major player.  Look at your local papers and see who the big advertizers are &#8212; auto dealerships as well as home sellers (often in suburban or even exurban locations which can&#8217;t exist without auto-dependency).  Pay attention to how many car commercials you see on TV or hear on the radio.  These advertizers are major sources of revenue for the media, who aren&#8217;t inclined to bite the hand that feeds them.  And that hand depends on oil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scout</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/nq-must-read-for-first-responders-2/#comment-1221757</link>
		<dc:creator>Scout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26776#comment-1221757</guid>
		<description>&quot;Barack Obama, as everyone knows, is one of the most disciplined, controlled and unflappable political leaders in modern times.&quot;

This is just as big a myth as his mythological oratorical skills.  Any man who lashes out the way he does on a regular basis; who plays &quot;99 problems...&quot; during the primary, or &quot;Addicted to Love&quot; following President Clinton&#039;s convention speech; or who goes on a European rock tour while just a candidate; or who flips the bird on the sly; or who relies so heavily on sexism, racism, and ageism to get his way, has none of those qualities.  He is actually immature, vindictive, and easily knocked off kilter.

Oh, I take it back, he is controlled--we just don&#039;t know by whom, yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Barack Obama, as everyone knows, is one of the most disciplined, controlled and unflappable political leaders in modern times.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is just as big a myth as his mythological oratorical skills.  Any man who lashes out the way he does on a regular basis; who plays &#8220;99 problems&#8230;&#8221; during the primary, or &#8220;Addicted to Love&#8221; following President Clinton&#8217;s convention speech; or who goes on a European rock tour while just a candidate; or who flips the bird on the sly; or who relies so heavily on sexism, racism, and ageism to get his way, has none of those qualities.  He is actually immature, vindictive, and easily knocked off kilter.</p>
<p>Oh, I take it back, he is controlled&#8211;we just don&#8217;t know by whom, yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scout</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/nq-must-read-for-first-responders-2/#comment-1221753</link>
		<dc:creator>Scout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26776#comment-1221753</guid>
		<description>She wouldn&#039;t even go there when B0 and McCain and Mrs. McCain toured there together.

Still looking for evidence that she/he actually love this country.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She wouldn&#8217;t even go there when B0 and McCain and Mrs. McCain toured there together.</p>
<p>Still looking for evidence that she/he actually love this country&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scout</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/nq-must-read-for-first-responders-2/#comment-1221752</link>
		<dc:creator>Scout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26776#comment-1221752</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t it one of the Saudi princes who paid for B0&#039;s entire Harvard education?

I think the connections that the Bush family and B0 have to the Saudi&#039;s are very interesting. I just keep wondering who really runs our country these days.  It&#039;s not &quot;We the People,&quot; that&#039;s for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t it one of the Saudi princes who paid for B0&#8217;s entire Harvard education?</p>
<p>I think the connections that the Bush family and B0 have to the Saudi&#8217;s are very interesting. I just keep wondering who really runs our country these days.  It&#8217;s not &#8220;We the People,&#8221; that&#8217;s for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: candymarl</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/nq-must-read-for-first-responders-2/#comment-1221751</link>
		<dc:creator>candymarl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26776#comment-1221751</guid>
		<description>Good point trixta.  Obama was supposed to be different from all his predecessors. He was going to bring all this kind of thing to a halt through transparency, hope, and &quot;change&quot;.  

So Obama&#039;s not going to &quot;change&quot; our relationship with the Saudis no matter how they behave?

Now that&#039;s &quot;change&quot; you can believe in - NOT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point trixta.  Obama was supposed to be different from all his predecessors. He was going to bring all this kind of thing to a halt through transparency, hope, and &#8220;change&#8221;.  </p>
<p>So Obama&#8217;s not going to &#8220;change&#8221; our relationship with the Saudis no matter how they behave?</p>
<p>Now that&#8217;s &#8220;change&#8221; you can believe in &#8211; NOT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: politicalidentitycrisis</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/nq-must-read-for-first-responders-2/#comment-1221743</link>
		<dc:creator>politicalidentitycrisis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26776#comment-1221743</guid>
		<description>It would be about frickin&#039; time they ask real questions, but I&#039;m sure once someone does, Rahmboy send them a dead fish or something so they don&#039;t do it again too soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be about frickin&#8217; time they ask real questions, but I&#8217;m sure once someone does, Rahmboy send them a dead fish or something so they don&#8217;t do it again too soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Playwright</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/nq-must-read-for-first-responders-2/#comment-1221742</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Playwright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26776#comment-1221742</guid>
		<description>Yep, the USA/Saudi connection is all about oil, I bet.  I think America should buckle down, live within our means, make Congress rescind that Chicago style dirty politics pay to play scheme called the stiumulus bill, get back to basics and walk ourselves through this time with common sense, thrift and the Bill of Rights.

Tough times, tough people.  We can do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, the USA/Saudi connection is all about oil, I bet.  I think America should buckle down, live within our means, make Congress rescind that Chicago style dirty politics pay to play scheme called the stiumulus bill, get back to basics and walk ourselves through this time with common sense, thrift and the Bill of Rights.</p>
<p>Tough times, tough people.  We can do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stodgie</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/nq-must-read-for-first-responders-2/#comment-1221725</link>
		<dc:creator>stodgie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26776#comment-1221725</guid>
		<description>dcmediagirl makes some interesting points about the saudi influence.

i for one want to see the media held accountable for their lack of integrity. and it follows the politicans as well. it does my heart good to see obama&#039;s numbers continue to fall no matter how the suckup media tries to play it. 

and abc? uggg! i didn&#039;t watch the anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dcmediagirl makes some interesting points about the saudi influence.</p>
<p>i for one want to see the media held accountable for their lack of integrity. and it follows the politicans as well. it does my heart good to see obama&#8217;s numbers continue to fall no matter how the suckup media tries to play it. </p>
<p>and abc? uggg! i didn&#8217;t watch the anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tess</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/nq-must-read-for-first-responders-2/#comment-1221724</link>
		<dc:creator>Tess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26776#comment-1221724</guid>
		<description>Obama and a plant: maybe they&#039;ll fall back on the Fainting Lady trick from the campaign?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama and a plant: maybe they&#8217;ll fall back on the Fainting Lady trick from the campaign?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tess</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/nq-must-read-for-first-responders-2/#comment-1221721</link>
		<dc:creator>Tess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26776#comment-1221721</guid>
		<description>What a lovely, funny thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a lovely, funny thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana L. C.</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/nq-must-read-for-first-responders-2/#comment-1221719</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana L. C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26776#comment-1221719</guid>
		<description>But, I finally got to read a critical editorial about O in my morning paper in regard to his use of plantd questions at the presser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, I finally got to read a critical editorial about O in my morning paper in regard to his use of plantd questions at the presser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCMediagirl</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/nq-must-read-for-first-responders-2/#comment-1221717</link>
		<dc:creator>DCMediagirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26776#comment-1221717</guid>
		<description>1. This information about the Saudis is hardly new.  It is common knowledge that the Saudis use their petrodollars to spread Wahhabism around the world, either via madrassahs and other means.  I wonder whether the same people who are so quick to jump on Israel and the evils of &lt;strike&gt;the evil Jewish lobby&lt;/strike&gt; AIPAC are aware of or interested in the vast reach of the Saudi lobby.  The House of Saud&#039;s Washington Ambassador Prince Bandar (a.k.a. &quot;Bandar Bush&quot;) did a bang up job of whitewashing the 9/11 report to downplay the Saudi role in the attack.  

More on the Saudi lobby:
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/04/jrm-pubnote-20070417

The Saudi post-9/11 PR blitz:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;The Saudis were the first to get this new era of PR,&quot; says Kevin McCauley, editor of O&#039;Dwyer&#039;s Public Relations,the leading trade publication covering the PR industry. Shortly after 9/11, Saudi Arabia entered into a $14 million-a-year contract with Qorvis, a Washington PR firm. Qorvis launched a TV campaign with ads on political talkshows featuring a procession of Saudi royals appearing alongside U.S. presidents, to highlight Riyadh as a closeally. Other TV spots, which ran in 14 American cities, touted the &quot;shared values&quot; of the United States and SaudiArabia. The firm also shuttled Saudi officials on whirlwind tours of major media outlets, and broadcast ads promoting the 9/11 Commission finding that there was &quot;no evidence that the Saudi government as an institutionor senior Saudi officials individually funded [Al Qaeda]&quot;--while omitting the report&#039;s conclusion that &quot;Saudi Arabia has been a problematic ally in combating Islamic extremism.&quot; The PR blitz helped reduce the number of anti-Saudi articles and speeches, says McCauley, which allowed the Bush administration to keep ties to the kingdom close. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
2. The Nico Pitney story is beyond ridiculous and those of you who are getting your knickers in a twist need to have a glass of water or something.  Here is Nico&#039;s question:

&lt;blockquote&gt;“Under which conditions would you accept the election of Ahmadinejad, and if you do accept it without any significant changes in the conditions there, isn’t that a betrayal of the demonstrators there?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Obama answered:

&lt;blockquote&gt;“We didn’t have international observers on the ground, we can’t say definitely what happened at polling places. What we know is that a sizable percentage of the Iranian people themselves ... consider this election illegitimate. It’s not an isolated instance, a little grumbling here or there. There are significant questions about the legitimacy of the election.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The rule of question planting is that you make the query an obvious softball (see Gannon, Jeff) that the President or whomever can hit out of the park. The last thing those who choose the ringer want is for their boss to dodge a question, which is what Obama did.

Dana Milbank is dead wrong and should direct his umbrage at his colleagues in the DC press corps, which of course will never happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. This information about the Saudis is hardly new.  It is common knowledge that the Saudis use their petrodollars to spread Wahhabism around the world, either via madrassahs and other means.  I wonder whether the same people who are so quick to jump on Israel and the evils of <strike>the evil Jewish lobby</strike> AIPAC are aware of or interested in the vast reach of the Saudi lobby.  The House of Saud&#8217;s Washington Ambassador Prince Bandar (a.k.a. &#8220;Bandar Bush&#8221;) did a bang up job of whitewashing the 9/11 report to downplay the Saudi role in the attack.  </p>
<p>More on the Saudi lobby:<br />
<a href="http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/04/jrm-pubnote-20070417" rel="nofollow">http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/04/jrm-pubnote-20070417</a></p>
<p>The Saudi post-9/11 PR blitz:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The Saudis were the first to get this new era of PR,&#8221; says Kevin McCauley, editor of O&#8217;Dwyer&#8217;s Public Relations,the leading trade publication covering the PR industry. Shortly after 9/11, Saudi Arabia entered into a $14 million-a-year contract with Qorvis, a Washington PR firm. Qorvis launched a TV campaign with ads on political talkshows featuring a procession of Saudi royals appearing alongside U.S. presidents, to highlight Riyadh as a closeally. Other TV spots, which ran in 14 American cities, touted the &#8220;shared values&#8221; of the United States and SaudiArabia. The firm also shuttled Saudi officials on whirlwind tours of major media outlets, and broadcast ads promoting the 9/11 Commission finding that there was &#8220;no evidence that the Saudi government as an institutionor senior Saudi officials individually funded [Al Qaeda]&#8220;&#8211;while omitting the report&#8217;s conclusion that &#8220;Saudi Arabia has been a problematic ally in combating Islamic extremism.&#8221; The PR blitz helped reduce the number of anti-Saudi articles and speeches, says McCauley, which allowed the Bush administration to keep ties to the kingdom close. </p></blockquote>
<p>2. The Nico Pitney story is beyond ridiculous and those of you who are getting your knickers in a twist need to have a glass of water or something.  Here is Nico&#8217;s question:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Under which conditions would you accept the election of Ahmadinejad, and if you do accept it without any significant changes in the conditions there, isn’t that a betrayal of the demonstrators there?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Obama answered:</p>
<blockquote><p>“We didn’t have international observers on the ground, we can’t say definitely what happened at polling places. What we know is that a sizable percentage of the Iranian people themselves &#8230; consider this election illegitimate. It’s not an isolated instance, a little grumbling here or there. There are significant questions about the legitimacy of the election.”</p></blockquote>
<p>The rule of question planting is that you make the query an obvious softball (see Gannon, Jeff) that the President or whomever can hit out of the park. The last thing those who choose the ringer want is for their boss to dodge a question, which is what Obama did.</p>
<p>Dana Milbank is dead wrong and should direct his umbrage at his colleagues in the DC press corps, which of course will never happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
