<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: sanford saga &#8211; i&#8217;m more interested in who brought him down&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/sanford-saga-im-more-interested-in-who-brought-him-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/sanford-saga-im-more-interested-in-who-brought-him-down/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:38:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: texaslatina</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/sanford-saga-im-more-interested-in-who-brought-him-down/#comment-1222359</link>
		<dc:creator>texaslatina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26829#comment-1222359</guid>
		<description>dcmediagirl- just checkin in.  no comment?  where are you with your all knowin, pompous, totally off the mark self?   waitin for ya mama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dcmediagirl- just checkin in.  no comment?  where are you with your all knowin, pompous, totally off the mark self?   waitin for ya mama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Girl in Italy</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/sanford-saga-im-more-interested-in-who-brought-him-down/#comment-1222299</link>
		<dc:creator>American Girl in Italy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26829#comment-1222299</guid>
		<description>The three network morning shows on Thursday devoted a staggering 18 segments to the revelation that South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford was having an affair with a woman from Argentina, adding up to over 54 minutes of coverage. NBC&#039;s Today show spent the most time on the subject, highlighting the infidelity with six segments and 25 minutes of air time. 

Co-host Matt Lauer even talked to disgraced former Governor Jim McGreevey to get his thoughts on the matter. (However, while NBC made sure to label Sanford a Republican, the Today anchors failed to do so for the ex-New Jersey governor who resigned under a cloud of scandal.) 

ABC&#039;s Good Morning America touted the sex scandal for 17 minutes and 26 seconds, featuring seven stories on Sanford. (It should also be pointed out that GMA came within seven minutes of Today&#039;s total, despite the fact that the NBC program is four hours, double the time of ABC&#039;s show.) During one such segment, Sam Donaldson insisted that it&#039;s hard to forgive Republicans who get involved in sex scandals: &quot;They thump the Bible. They condemn everyone else, and when they- human- they don’t have much credit in the bank for forgiveness.&quot;

CBS&#039;s Early Show had the least amount of coverage, offering only five segments over 11 minutes and 44 seconds. As the MRC&#039;s Kyle Drennen noted in his June 25 posting, all three morning shows repeatedly identified Sanford as a Republican (100%). However, during the first week&#039;s coverage of former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer and his prostitute scandal, he was labeled a Democrat only 20 percent of the time. 


http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2009/06/26/morning-shows-devote-almost-hour-hyping-sanford-story</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The three network morning shows on Thursday devoted a staggering 18 segments to the revelation that South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford was having an affair with a woman from Argentina, adding up to over 54 minutes of coverage. NBC&#8217;s Today show spent the most time on the subject, highlighting the infidelity with six segments and 25 minutes of air time. </p>
<p>Co-host Matt Lauer even talked to disgraced former Governor Jim McGreevey to get his thoughts on the matter. (However, while NBC made sure to label Sanford a Republican, the Today anchors failed to do so for the ex-New Jersey governor who resigned under a cloud of scandal.) </p>
<p>ABC&#8217;s Good Morning America touted the sex scandal for 17 minutes and 26 seconds, featuring seven stories on Sanford. (It should also be pointed out that GMA came within seven minutes of Today&#8217;s total, despite the fact that the NBC program is four hours, double the time of ABC&#8217;s show.) During one such segment, Sam Donaldson insisted that it&#8217;s hard to forgive Republicans who get involved in sex scandals: &#8220;They thump the Bible. They condemn everyone else, and when they- human- they don’t have much credit in the bank for forgiveness.&#8221;</p>
<p>CBS&#8217;s Early Show had the least amount of coverage, offering only five segments over 11 minutes and 44 seconds. As the MRC&#8217;s Kyle Drennen noted in his June 25 posting, all three morning shows repeatedly identified Sanford as a Republican (100%). However, during the first week&#8217;s coverage of former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer and his prostitute scandal, he was labeled a Democrat only 20 percent of the time. </p>
<p><a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2009/06/26/morning-shows-devote-almost-hour-hyping-sanford-story" rel="nofollow">http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2009/06/26/morning-shows-devote-almost-hour-hyping-sanford-story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: texaslatina</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/sanford-saga-im-more-interested-in-who-brought-him-down/#comment-1222265</link>
		<dc:creator>texaslatina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26829#comment-1222265</guid>
		<description>dcmediagirl- you are one pathetic person.  i am willin to bet you have no life and no friends and bore everyone to death! and is that the only thing you know how to do is  criticize what everybody writes and then comment &quot;oh come on&quot;?  loser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dcmediagirl- you are one pathetic person.  i am willin to bet you have no life and no friends and bore everyone to death! and is that the only thing you know how to do is  criticize what everybody writes and then comment &#8220;oh come on&#8221;?  loser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tek</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/sanford-saga-im-more-interested-in-who-brought-him-down/#comment-1222243</link>
		<dc:creator>tek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26829#comment-1222243</guid>
		<description>ANimal Control:  she was married to John Heinz, Republican Rep.  So, the illegal bit--not even funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ANimal Control:  she was married to John Heinz, Republican Rep.  So, the illegal bit&#8211;not even funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tek</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/sanford-saga-im-more-interested-in-who-brought-him-down/#comment-1222240</link>
		<dc:creator>tek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26829#comment-1222240</guid>
		<description>Docelder:  so, Bush DIDN&#039;T disparage Kerry&#039;s service?  And what exactly did Bush do that constituted service?  All in one&#039;s perspective, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Docelder:  so, Bush DIDN&#8217;T disparage Kerry&#8217;s service?  And what exactly did Bush do that constituted service?  All in one&#8217;s perspective, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tek</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/sanford-saga-im-more-interested-in-who-brought-him-down/#comment-1222239</link>
		<dc:creator>tek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26829#comment-1222239</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t care who brought him down.  If he hadn&#039;t been messing around, this would not have happened to him.  

It&#039;s always the reporters, no? (John Edwards, Villaraigosa)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t care who brought him down.  If he hadn&#8217;t been messing around, this would not have happened to him.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s always the reporters, no? (John Edwards, Villaraigosa)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patience</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/sanford-saga-im-more-interested-in-who-brought-him-down/#comment-1222225</link>
		<dc:creator>Patience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26829#comment-1222225</guid>
		<description>Politico has a 2001 video snippet of the mistress.  Seems she used to be a television news reporter in Argentina.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politico has a 2001 video snippet of the mistress.  Seems she used to be a television news reporter in Argentina.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patience</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/sanford-saga-im-more-interested-in-who-brought-him-down/#comment-1222219</link>
		<dc:creator>Patience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26829#comment-1222219</guid>
		<description>I have to say the handling of the Edwards story convinced me without a doubt about media bias.  Compare their reluctance to cover it as opposed to the front-page-above-the-fold NYT article implying McCain had an affair with a lobbyist.  While there was never a shred of evidence of McCain&#039;s affair, the National Enquirer had the goods on Edwards AND STILL the media dragged their feet, giving the lamest excuses like &quot;it&#039;s the Enquirer&#039;s story&quot;.  Then there&#039;s the whole Bristol Palin saga, compared to Joe Biden&#039;s daughter being arrested and his son accused of fraud.  

I think &quot;handling&quot; is the key word here.  Yes, eventually &lt;em&gt;some&lt;/em&gt; media cover every scandal, but it&#039;s WHICH media, timing, content, placement, etc. that reveal their bias.  

BTW Bill Clinton&#039;s accusers like Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones and Kathleen Wiley CHOSE to go public and were very vocal, giving the media no choice but to cover them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say the handling of the Edwards story convinced me without a doubt about media bias.  Compare their reluctance to cover it as opposed to the front-page-above-the-fold NYT article implying McCain had an affair with a lobbyist.  While there was never a shred of evidence of McCain&#8217;s affair, the National Enquirer had the goods on Edwards AND STILL the media dragged their feet, giving the lamest excuses like &#8220;it&#8217;s the Enquirer&#8217;s story&#8221;.  Then there&#8217;s the whole Bristol Palin saga, compared to Joe Biden&#8217;s daughter being arrested and his son accused of fraud.  </p>
<p>I think &#8220;handling&#8221; is the key word here.  Yes, eventually <em>some</em> media cover every scandal, but it&#8217;s WHICH media, timing, content, placement, etc. that reveal their bias.  </p>
<p>BTW Bill Clinton&#8217;s accusers like Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones and Kathleen Wiley CHOSE to go public and were very vocal, giving the media no choice but to cover them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarainitaly</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/sanford-saga-im-more-interested-in-who-brought-him-down/#comment-1222218</link>
		<dc:creator>sarainitaly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26829#comment-1222218</guid>
		<description>Looks like it could have been her! 

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/06/26/politics/main5116933.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like it could have been her! </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/06/26/politics/main5116933.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/06/26/politics/main5116933.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCMediagirl</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/sanford-saga-im-more-interested-in-who-brought-him-down/#comment-1222209</link>
		<dc:creator>DCMediagirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26829#comment-1222209</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;NBC and other networks covered for Clinton as long as they could.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

They hammered him and his wife relentlessly throughout his presidency and allowed every kook and weirdo with a hairbrained accusation on the air (Clinton Death List, anyone?).

&lt;blockquote&gt;
The MSM wouldn’ touch Edwards. The liberal media conceals labeling a scandal whenever it is a Democrat, yet gleefully, repeatedly labels Repubs.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh, you mean like the Republicans exposed in the Flynt Report?  Were you aware of all those stories about sexual hijinks involving those members of Congress?  No?  And why is that?  Because although those stories were widely known, sometimes for year, the MSM didn&#039;t report them. All Republicans. All conservative. Not a word.  Hell, everyone in DC knew that Newt Gingrich was running around with another woman (who&#039;s now wife #3) for YEARS, yet it was never printed until a reporter from Vanity Fair alluded to it (and didn&#039;t mention the woman by name).  I knew about it because she used to work for a member of Congress who lived up the street from me.  

For every story you&#039;ve read about a sexual indiscretion on the part of a Republican there are at least 2 - 3 more that are widely known and discussed but have not been printed, including revelations about well-known conservatives who are gay and yet strongly oppose civil rights for gay people.    

So no, I don&#039;t see what I want to see.  I see what&#039;s there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>NBC and other networks covered for Clinton as long as they could.</p></blockquote>
<p>They hammered him and his wife relentlessly throughout his presidency and allowed every kook and weirdo with a hairbrained accusation on the air (Clinton Death List, anyone?).</p>
<blockquote><p>
The MSM wouldn’ touch Edwards. The liberal media conceals labeling a scandal whenever it is a Democrat, yet gleefully, repeatedly labels Repubs.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, you mean like the Republicans exposed in the Flynt Report?  Were you aware of all those stories about sexual hijinks involving those members of Congress?  No?  And why is that?  Because although those stories were widely known, sometimes for year, the MSM didn&#8217;t report them. All Republicans. All conservative. Not a word.  Hell, everyone in DC knew that Newt Gingrich was running around with another woman (who&#8217;s now wife #3) for YEARS, yet it was never printed until a reporter from Vanity Fair alluded to it (and didn&#8217;t mention the woman by name).  I knew about it because she used to work for a member of Congress who lived up the street from me.  </p>
<p>For every story you&#8217;ve read about a sexual indiscretion on the part of a Republican there are at least 2 &#8211; 3 more that are widely known and discussed but have not been printed, including revelations about well-known conservatives who are gay and yet strongly oppose civil rights for gay people.    </p>
<p>So no, I don&#8217;t see what I want to see.  I see what&#8217;s there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCMediagirl</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/sanford-saga-im-more-interested-in-who-brought-him-down/#comment-1222207</link>
		<dc:creator>DCMediagirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26829#comment-1222207</guid>
		<description>No I&#039;m not &quot;kiddin you&quot;.  I personally don&#039;t give a damn that you want to make a fool out of yourself on the Internet.  Go ahead and express your anger.  You don&#039;t need my permission for that.  But since we&#039;re all about free expression here and not telling one another what to write, let me express what I&#039;m feeling - you obviously know nothing about Afghanistan and how women live there. To compare a strong, independent female governor to a woman living in Afghanistan is incredibly ignorant and insensitive to women living in Afghanistan, not to mention patronizing in the extreme to Sarah Palin.  But hey, it&#039;s a free country (here, not Afghanistan), so knock yourself out commenting!

Oh, and you might want to brush up on your grammar.  Just trying to help.

One last thing: TYPING WORDS ALL IN CAPS doesn&#039;t advance your argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No I&#8217;m not &#8220;kiddin you&#8221;.  I personally don&#8217;t give a damn that you want to make a fool out of yourself on the Internet.  Go ahead and express your anger.  You don&#8217;t need my permission for that.  But since we&#8217;re all about free expression here and not telling one another what to write, let me express what I&#8217;m feeling &#8211; you obviously know nothing about Afghanistan and how women live there. To compare a strong, independent female governor to a woman living in Afghanistan is incredibly ignorant and insensitive to women living in Afghanistan, not to mention patronizing in the extreme to Sarah Palin.  But hey, it&#8217;s a free country (here, not Afghanistan), so knock yourself out commenting!</p>
<p>Oh, and you might want to brush up on your grammar.  Just trying to help.</p>
<p>One last thing: TYPING WORDS ALL IN CAPS doesn&#8217;t advance your argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patience</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/sanford-saga-im-more-interested-in-who-brought-him-down/#comment-1222197</link>
		<dc:creator>Patience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26829#comment-1222197</guid>
		<description>Oh, and another reason I suspect her is that the emails were leaked to the press around the time the governor and his wife began marriage counseling.  A girlfriend&#039;s hopes of a future with a married man could certainly be dashed by this fact.

The timing of all this seems to fit better with the goals of a scorned woman than a political rival, who would benefit more if the scandal were revealed closer to 2012.

I rule out the wife because as a wife myself, the world being able to read such romantic correspondences between husband and mistress would possibly be the most humiliating and degrading aspect of the whole ordeal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and another reason I suspect her is that the emails were leaked to the press around the time the governor and his wife began marriage counseling.  A girlfriend&#8217;s hopes of a future with a married man could certainly be dashed by this fact.</p>
<p>The timing of all this seems to fit better with the goals of a scorned woman than a political rival, who would benefit more if the scandal were revealed closer to 2012.</p>
<p>I rule out the wife because as a wife myself, the world being able to read such romantic correspondences between husband and mistress would possibly be the most humiliating and degrading aspect of the whole ordeal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashy1</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/sanford-saga-im-more-interested-in-who-brought-him-down/#comment-1222193</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashy1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26829#comment-1222193</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t condone the Sanford&#039;s behavior, but don&#039;t fall for these WDT&#039;s (Weenie Distraction Tactics) employed by both political parties with the help of the media.  There is so much other more important news that deserves attention.  In the grand scheme of things, is it really that important when, where, why, with whom, or what he did with his weenie?  It seems that politicians get in far more trouble this way than with how they vote on issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t condone the Sanford&#8217;s behavior, but don&#8217;t fall for these WDT&#8217;s (Weenie Distraction Tactics) employed by both political parties with the help of the media.  There is so much other more important news that deserves attention.  In the grand scheme of things, is it really that important when, where, why, with whom, or what he did with his weenie?  It seems that politicians get in far more trouble this way than with how they vote on issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Girl in Italy</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/sanford-saga-im-more-interested-in-who-brought-him-down/#comment-1222156</link>
		<dc:creator>American Girl in Italy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26829#comment-1222156</guid>
		<description>If you don&#039;t see any difference in how the media covers Dem scandals vs Repub scandals, then there is no reason to continue discussing the issue with you. You see what you want to see. I was a Dem my whole adult life, until this year. I see the bias.

NBC and other networks covered for Clinton as long as they could. The MSM wouldn&#039; touch Edwards. The liberal media conceals labeling a scandal whenever it is a Democrat, yet gleefully, repeatedly labels Repubs. 

At the end of the day, they WILL report on a scandal, because they get off on the firestorm, and they have to, but the way they handle the stories varies greatly.

I imagine conservatives WERE befuddled that Clinton escaped virtually unscathed. They knew about the charges of rape and affairs that surrounded him for years, and then Monica broke, and he still got away with it. Meanwhile, a Conservative caught in a scandal...? 

&quot;But God forbid that they faced the fact that people didn’t want Bill Clinton thrown out of the White House…&quot;

I&#039;m sure they were shocked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t see any difference in how the media covers Dem scandals vs Repub scandals, then there is no reason to continue discussing the issue with you. You see what you want to see. I was a Dem my whole adult life, until this year. I see the bias.</p>
<p>NBC and other networks covered for Clinton as long as they could. The MSM wouldn&#8217; touch Edwards. The liberal media conceals labeling a scandal whenever it is a Democrat, yet gleefully, repeatedly labels Repubs. </p>
<p>At the end of the day, they WILL report on a scandal, because they get off on the firestorm, and they have to, but the way they handle the stories varies greatly.</p>
<p>I imagine conservatives WERE befuddled that Clinton escaped virtually unscathed. They knew about the charges of rape and affairs that surrounded him for years, and then Monica broke, and he still got away with it. Meanwhile, a Conservative caught in a scandal&#8230;? </p>
<p>&#8220;But God forbid that they faced the fact that people didn’t want Bill Clinton thrown out of the White House…&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure they were shocked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HillaryWorksForObama</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/06/25/sanford-saga-im-more-interested-in-who-brought-him-down/#comment-1222150</link>
		<dc:creator>HillaryWorksForObama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26829#comment-1222150</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Dealing with two foreign nations on a fairly regular basis because they surround you on three sides.&lt;/blockquote&gt;    I Love your sarcasm!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Dealing with two foreign nations on a fairly regular basis because they surround you on three sides.</p></blockquote>
<p>    I Love your sarcasm!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
