RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Michael Scheuer’s Nuclear Nut Meltdown [UPDATED]

If there was any doubt that Michael Scheuer, a retired CIA analyst who was given the task of getting Bin Laden (and failed miserably), is a complete nutjob then you have not seen his latest:


[UPDATE--I'm struck by the growing resemblance between Michael Scheuer and Bin Laden's number two guy. What do you think?]

IS MICHAEL SCHEUER ACTUALLY AYMAN AL-ZWAHIRI?

IS MICHAEL SCHEUER ACTUALLY AYMAN AL-ZWAHIRI?


___________

My disdain for this man is already on the record (see here).

But after watching this latest outburst I am convinced his behavior is becoming more erratic and bizarre with each passing day. What in particular does he believe that Obama is doing or not doing to give Al Qaeda a pass? I am all in favor of finding and killing Bin Laden. But to delude ourselves into believing that Bin Laden is more powerful that an evil superhero and the greatest threat we’ve ever faced is just flat out ignorant.

That anyone claiming to be a journalist or searching for truth would give this clown a platform is mystifying.

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post71 Comments »

Comment by John (from Liberal Rapture) | 2009-07-02 00:27:00

Wow. claiming an attack would save us takes my breath away both for it’s moral depravity and because it is probably wrong. I shudder at what Barry “don’t let any crisis go to waste” Obama would pull if we were attacked again. Of course, he’d have to think about it for a few days first.

Though, sending 1500 unarmed National Guard troops to the border seems farcical. Why are they bothering?

 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2009-07-02 00:43:20

At the risk of repeating my self and offending the spam god…

After watching the clip, any sane person would have only one conclusion.

He is off his freaking rocker! Anyway, Glen Beck thinks he is “honest and a man of integraty”…nuff said.

No wonder UBL is still out there.

Comment by socalannie | 2009-07-02 01:12:39

Who is UBL?

Comment by typical.white.person | 2009-07-02 02:09:02

Comment by socalannie | 2009-07-02 02:11:20

Oh. Thanks twp.

 
 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2009-07-02 02:20:02

Usama…remember in the primaries where fox news
would change Osama to Usama so as not to make a mnemonic association with Obama?

Saw it on the ticker all the time.
Osama = Obama…

It is Osama Bin Laden; sorry for the confusion.
But I was being mnemonically correct. :)

 
 
 

Comment by MrMike | 2009-07-02 00:48:28

Any time now UBL will fly over here using his telekinetic powers and warp the steel beams of the Empire State Building into a deadly barrage of missiles.

Or something like that.

Will the Man of Spiel be able to put down his smoke and stop UBL in time?

Tune in next weeks for the exciting conclusion.

And now a word from our sponsor, Bamboozletine.

 

Comment by socalannie | 2009-07-02 01:11:19

My disdain for this man is already on the record

Larry, you’re so funny! He sounds like a loon, to be sure.

What I’m wondering about is: what do you think of Leon running the cia? If you’ve already done a post on him, I must’ve missed it.

 

Comment by elise | 2009-07-02 05:24:14

It’s hard to tell which is the biggest nut in that clip, but Beck is just trying to stay relevant I suppose.

Mr Scheuer and Dick Cheney both seem to relish the idea of another terror attack to validate themselves and, one day, they will no doubt find their wishes have come true. The FBI recently released reports on the interviews with Saddam Hussein after his capture. Bitter irony. Saddam was concerned the IAEA would discover there were no weapons leaving Iraq vulnerable to Iran. Take a bow Cheney. Who would Iran fear most? Iraq with Saddam or Iraqi police when American troops have left the room?

I also disagree with the idea of an armed National Guard on the border with Mexico. Who would they shoot? Members of a drug cartel or innocent people looking for a better life and how will they know the difference? Or doesn’t it matter?

 

Comment by hokma | 2009-07-02 06:15:47

Anyone who addresses everyone he speaks to as “Mr.” and “sir” is not all there. I think he proved to be a bit off and not sure why these shows still invite him on.

 

Comment by Retired | 2009-07-02 07:01:01

Larry,

I used to think that one couldn’t spend too much time in the library. Then along came Scheuer.

 

Comment by DCMediagirl | 2009-07-02 07:36:44

I have to say it Larry: Michael Sheuer brings out the best in you. While your writing is always excellent and often hilarious, this buffoonish man takes it to another level. Sort of like when Tom Shales used to write his reviews of Kathie Lee Gifford’s dreadful Christmas specials. He had so much contempt for her that she was his greatest muse. Keep it up!

 

Comment by Patience | 2009-07-02 09:44:57

The only time I’ve watched Glen Beck has been when videos of him are posted here. I have a little trouble with his highly-emotive style. But he’s only one of many drama queens on TV these days. I miss the likes of David Brinkley more and more as time goes on.

As well, I had trouble following the trajectory of this discussion, turning on a dime as it did from being about the Mexican border to Osama bin Laden. Maybe I just haven’t had enough coffee yet.

 

Comment by J | 2009-07-02 10:04:51

Larry,

Scheuer appears to have gone off the deep end, or was he always missing a few to begin with? I think its the fomer, that he never had it.

Scheuer is all about lining his personal pocket while he can before the world realizes what a buffoon he was/is.

 

Comment by Doc99 | 2009-07-02 10:16:45

The real question is – right now, who is the bigger threat – Osama or Obama?

Comment by Suzie Q | 2009-07-02 15:22:58

That’s the “real question” if you’re a total lunatic. Get a grip.

 

Comment by Docelder | 2009-07-02 15:37:04

That is not even close. Osama has been marginalized to producing a crappy video once in a blue moon. Pretty much any kid 10 years old with a cell phone and the Internet can do better than that. Obama on the other hand enjoys almost unlimited power right now. So, it isn’t even a question. Obama even if he means well will probably cost us more in money from honest mistakes than Osama could dream about at this point I would imagine.

 

Comment by NomNomNom | 2009-07-02 20:26:02

considering that Osama has been communing with Frigidaire for about 6 years, I’d have to go with door number 2.

 
 

Comment by Surfered | 2009-07-02 10:40:49

Going on the Glen Beck Show is the first clue of insanity. His viewers are the types who wear tin foil on their heads.

Comment by Ray SF | 2009-07-02 15:16:31

I resent that. Watch Glenn Beck for a week and then come back and tell me if what most of what he says doesn’t feel true to you somewhere in your gut. The man is the only person willing to speak out against Obama and all that he is doing. Please don’t dismiss this important voice for us.

Comment by A-Nony-Mouse | 2009-07-02 17:24:25

I’ve watched Glenn Beck. He’s worse than he seems in these clips. He’s an absolute lunatic. If you don’t see that… then you should consider looking in the mirror. Make that change.

Comment by Carlaforhillary | 2009-07-02 20:33:14

Glenn Beck is the first person to say he is a lunatic. With that being said, the things he reports on (ACORN being one example) are enough to drive anyone crazy.

 
 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2009-07-02 21:49:48

feel true to you somewhere in your gut

Never mind critical thinking…eh?

 
 
 

Comment by tek | 2009-07-02 10:41:58

Larry: thanks for a good laugh.

Seriously, people who equate Barack Obama with Osama bin Laden are not paying attention. Where were you when Bush looked the other way and let the terrorists strike us?

I don’t like Obama, but crazy talk does not further the agenda of reclaiming democracy in America.

 

Comment by MrMike | 2009-07-02 10:42:23

IS MICHAEL SCHEUER ACTUALLY AYMAN AL-ZWAHIRI?

Has anybody seen them in the same room together?

 

Comment by Dutch | 2009-07-02 11:54:48

I’m sorry, but when are we going to stop thinking that Obama has good intentions about this country? Advocating another 9/11 is not the most responsible thing to say, but I must admit with things going the way they are with Obama, that time will come again. I believe Obama is out to destroy this country from within. He is just a lying sack of shit with his own agenda and it doesn’t include the safety, security and prosperity of this country. You can mince words if you want to, but we are in shitload of trouble with Obama in command. We are in crisis overload in this country and everything has to be done NOW without any checks and balances – hell Congress doesn’t even READ what they vote on!!! The MSM won’t report on anything negative about Obama. Beck and Scheuer are not nuts, they are merely reflecting the insanity that is taking over this country.

Comment by Suzie Q | 2009-07-02 15:24:59

No sir. They are nuts. And so are you. That’s the problem with insane people, they don’t realize that they’re crazy.

 

Comment by tzada | 2009-07-02 18:34:05

Comment by tzada | 2009-07-02 18:35:47

Not with Suzi Q but with Dutch.

 
 
 

Comment by griswold | 2009-07-02 12:12:19

Well, I guess the comment above from Dutch is also reflective of the insanity that is taking over this country. I am not sure which sacred cows Dutch is worrying about, but if he/she truly believes our president is sincerely *out to destroy this country from within* then the time has come for Dutch to get away from the keyboard and get to either the southern border or to the mountains of Aghanistan. Larry we argued long and hard about the *true believers* while we sat in Langley. Your site seems to have uncovered a few more.

Comment by Larry Johnson | 2009-07-02 12:16:49

Gris,
(Happy Fourth by the way) Agree. I don’t think Obama is clever enough to cobble together a secret plan to destroy from within. I think he’s an ambitious kid who has bitten off more than he could chew and does not yet realize it.

Comment by Carlaforhillary | 2009-07-02 20:31:08

He may not realize it, but we all sure have/did.

 
 
 

Comment by J | 2009-07-02 12:45:00

Larry, Gris,

Sheuer is all about garnering himself a one-man comedy act.

Happy 4th one and all. Stoke up the grills for lip-smackin BBQ, Ribs, Chicken, Bratwursts, Burgers, Wiener dogs, Tater Salad, Pork-n-Beans, Tea, JD Black label, Beefeater, Johnnie Walker, so the world becomes blurry from the grill to the chair and back. Yee Haw!

Luv having my own locker calves and such. Makes for a hearty BBQ and full stomach on the 4th.

Again, Happy 4th one and all!

Comment by mark connette | 2009-07-02 12:59:29

Michael scheur is a very decent man. It is true he didnt get Bin Laden, but alot of the reason is the indecision of Bill Clinton and richard clarke. He obviously cares about America’s safety. He was trusted with very top secret material and tasked to do a very improbable task……I salute him and his effort. I see no need to denigrate his service to this country..

Comment by J | 2009-07-02 13:29:05

Scheuer lacked (and stil does) the foresight of an ‘Ops’ type persona. That Ops type ‘foresight’ is a ‘learned experience’ that can only be acquired by being smack-dab in the middle of the mud, the blood, and the beer so-to-speak. Scheuer was not the man for the job.

 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2009-07-02 14:38:10

Always about Bill Clinton…and now Richard Clarke?

Mark pull your socks up, your ignorance is showing.
This is not a guy full of words of insight and words of wisdom. He does NOT care about this country’s saftey if he states we must be attacked as a method of solidifing national support for the “WOGT”.

From all I have read he was not “trusted” by his peers and was banished to the “library”. And the “very top secret” material was borne of torturing people. I call it “top secret BULLSHIT”.

Comment by mark connette | 2009-07-02 15:08:04

sorry to inform you…..but richard clarke was asleep at the switch as was bill clinton. Thats not an attack…its the historical record

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2009-07-02 15:51:25

So in you view, the guy who is one loose screw short of having an ACME brain, who states this Country needs to be attacked somehow equates with Bill and Richard?

The Historical Record? Please. The record shows Mikey spent his time in the library with a candle stick.

I am sorry you informed me too. It confirms your ignorance by the mere fact that you deflect.

 

Comment by Ferd Berfle | 2009-07-02 17:43:16

Markie, the neoconclown is back and more banal than ever. Look, bushbot, your hero Shrub caught a break with the election of That One. He will only go down in history as the second-worst president.

That historical record to which you refer is only an echo of the voices in that vast empty expanse your call your skull, which I’m surprised you haven’t rented out to the locusts your neoconpoop friends. Oh, wait… you did and that’s where you got that “historical record” claptrap.

 
 
 

Comment by CentralMass | 2009-07-02 16:59:24

mark connette, what are you smoking?

Comment by Ferd Berfle | 2009-07-02 17:45:05

mark connette, what are you smoking?

Dung

 
 
 
 

Comment by Dutch | 2009-07-02 13:03:33

To: griswold and Larry Johnson

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

My view still is that the greatest threat to this country is Obama. I hope he proves me wrong, but I don’t have high “hope”s he will. Contrary to your remark Larry that “I don’t think Obama is clever enough to cobble together a secret plan to destroy from within” is very naive. He is not a “kid” and he may not be doing it on his own, but yes, he can. I never underestimate any politicians. Get out of the “world” and look inside your own backyard. Why do we have so many “crisis” situations? Wallstreet, Healthcare, Global Warming, a meaningless Press and who knows what’s next? Check out the “Cloward-Priven Strategy”. Obama has ties to so many subversives in his background that it’s scary. I thought from the very beginning of watching Obama that he had another agenda. I come from a background of witnessing a real fascist takover and the signs are here – even if you are too chicken to look. Larry, you run the risk of becoming irrelevant if you turn a blind eye to dangers from within. That’s what’s needed in order for fascism to succeed.

Comment by Ferd Berfle | 2009-07-03 09:55:12

To the contrary–the greatest threat to this country are the mindless automatons occupying the right and left fringes in this country, which have brought us the likes of Georgie “Tinhorn” Bush and That One. Thanks a lot for bringing the lowest common denominator to the head of the table.

 
 

Comment by califlefty | 2009-07-02 13:38:51

What I don’t get is how people with views so far out of the mainstream like Scheuer get to hold and retain such high positions of trust in the intelligence community. On a slow news day Larry please, explain that to us.

 

Comment by texaslatina | 2009-07-02 13:47:35

lmao- larry this is too funny. hadn’t seen the resemblance till you pointed it out. omg! your are so right! too funny. i’m still laughin at some of your post. but, it’s true. lol.

 

Comment by xax | 2009-07-02 14:33:37

Scheuer is kinda out there for me, but I think the only reason Beck likes him is because Scheuer just says it. He has no filter, just like Beck. And for me, it’s refreshing for someone to just tell me what they think than to hide and obfuscate.

Still the larger point is accurate. The trust gap between the DC crowd and America is growing wider. And any major event is going to split that gap wide open. (I think it’ll be the economy.) He could have found a better way of saying it, though.

Comment by Suzie Q | 2009-07-02 15:27:44

What is “America” exactly? President Obama has 60%+ approval. So what are you talking about?

Comment by Ferd Berfle | 2009-07-02 17:07:45

What is “America” exactly? President Obama has 60%+ approval.

Another reference to an irrelevant set of data points presented to prove some nonexistent point yet again. Come back when you get a clue about statistics, useless. Better yet, don’t come back at all.

So what are you talking about?

Which part of trust gap are you utterly failing to comprehend? If you believe any of the hot gas coming out of DC, your current state of development must be arrested.

Comment by A-Nony-Mouse | 2009-07-02 17:27:13

“Trust Gap” is completely meaningless unless you give it some sort of definition.

As far as trusting the “hot gas coming out of DC” – well of course not 100%. Political games are always being played, but that’s been true forever.

But I certainly trust this administration about 100X more than the last and it’s clear most Americans are there with me on that. So to talk about some new “trust gap” now is just completely ridiculous. Many more Americans trust this administration right now than they did the last for the last 3 or so years (at least.)

Comment by Ferd Berfle | 2009-07-02 18:15:26

But I certainly trust this administration about 100X more than the last and it’s clear most Americans are there with me on that.

Only in your own world, drip. That you “trust” this administration at all, with it’s predilection for lip service, speaks volumes about your gullibility.

Political games are always being played, but that’s been true forever.

Irrelevant appeal to common practice and also a statement which makes That One and his supporters liars. This was supposed to be a transparent administration which changed politics. So much for your lies. You are one stupid troll, now aren’t you?

Many more Americans trust this administration right now than they did the last for the last 3 or so years (at least.)

That is an unknown fact, if there ever was one (and don’t use the polling argument, as statistics are not facts).

 
 
 

Comment by tzada | 2009-07-02 18:42:07

No, no he does not. According to Ramadan this week Obama was at a negative.

 
 
 

Comment by Ziggy | 2009-07-02 15:37:24

Al-Zwahiri’s photo displays clear evidence that he was dropped on his head as a child. I’m studying Scheuer’s hairline trying to decide if he might have been bonked on the head at exactly the same spot.

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2009-07-02 16:01:04

Ziggy the mark on his forehead is from praying to Allah and getting a permenant rugburn in the process.

 
 

Comment by Doc99 | 2009-07-02 15:49:37

Michael Scheuer Responds;

What I tried to say on FOX last night is what I said in my last two books. I believe that our governing elite has a single foreign policy vis. the Muslim World and that it has no contact points with reality. Americans are therefore very inadequately protected. I increasingly believe that our leaders’ perception of the threat and attempts to defeat it are verging on the feckless, and that most Americans — concerned with the economy, raising families, and quite insular in any event — do not recognize the poor job leaders in both parties are doing in defending their country, homes, and family. I am afraid that another, greater-than-9/11 attack will occur — because our leaders see the world that they want to be and not the one on offer — and that only then will Americans starkly see what I believe is unconscionable failure of the federal goverment to put their safety first. My bottom line is that there will be another attack because the Republicans and Democrats are abject incompetents and because our current economic state is too good a chance for bin Laden not to try to push forward al-Qaeda’s “bleed America to bankruptcy” strategey . Far from wishing for another attack, I trust that Churchill’s judgment that God looks out for drunks and the United States of America still holds good and and we remain safe. God better do the job, because no one in our elite is doing it.

Respectfully, Mike Scheuer

 

Comment by ces | 2009-07-02 16:00:11

So does this mean Fox News is akin to Al Jazeera?

Comment by Docelder | 2009-07-02 16:12:44

I am beginning to believe they are entertainers like the rest… because I find their shows more palatable then the rest doesn’t make them any more relevant. I like Beck by the way, in an entertainment kind of a way. I think the BBC World news is the best, if you don’t find the actual news too depressing to watch. So, I don’t watch the actual news so much, really more of the time Fox to be honest.

 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2009-07-02 16:13:21

 
 

Comment by Doc99 | 2009-07-02 16:05:53

Scheuer responds:

What I tried to say on FOX last night is what I said in my last two books. I believe that our governing elite has a single foreign policy vis. the Muslim World and that it has no contact points with reality. Americans are therefore very inadequately protected. I increasingly believe that our leaders’ perception of the threat and attempts to defeat it are verging on the feckless, and that most Americans — concerned with the economy, raising families, and quite insular in any event — do not recognize the poor job leaders in both parties are doing in defending their country, homes, and family. I am afraid that another, greater-than-9/11 attack will occur — because our leaders see the world that they want to be and not the one on offer — and that only then will Americans starkly see what I believe is unconscionable failure of the federal goverment to put their safety first. My bottom line is that there will be another attack because the Republicans and Democrats are abject incompetents and because our current economic state is too good a chance for bin Laden not to try to push forward al-Qaeda’s “bleed America to bankruptcy” strategey . Far from wishing for another attack, I trust that Churchill’s judgment that God looks out for drunks and the United States of America still holds good and and we remain safe. God better do the job, because no one in our elite is doing it.

Respectfully, Mike Scheuer

http://washingtonindependent.com/49412/mike-scheuer-explains-his-attack-comments

Comment by A-Nony-Mouse | 2009-07-02 17:30:40

Nice “cover.” I think he’s full of it. First of all it’s unlikely that Bind Laden is even alive at this point. Secondly, I think the hatred level against the United States has dropped considerably because of Obama’s new approach. I think he has made America significantly safer simply by not acting like a cowboy.

Comment by Ferd Berfle | 2009-07-02 18:25:49

First of all it’s unlikely that Bind Laden is even alive at this point.

And just how would you know? You sophomoric blather aside, judging by the content of your comments, I’d say you haven’t the foggiest notion of whether he is alive or not.

Secondly, I think the hatred level against the United States has dropped considerably because of Obama’s new approach.

I suppose someone forgot to tell that to Kim Jong Il and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Oh, you are referring to the pandering and bowing before Saudi Kings and the like.

Don’t you ever get tired of being the constant water-carrier for That One? I know you need the $0.05 per comment, but at some point you have to figure it isn’t worth it.

 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2009-07-02 19:04:12

So he acts all wimpy, like Tuesday’s hamburger, and that makes us safer?

A-Nony-Mouse
I do not know if have seen BO’s AP interview? In responding to the question of Iran, I am not impressed. More to the point he was just verbally wacked by Diner Jacket and does not have the presence of mind to use the interview to “communicate” with the Iranian president.

HE HAS NO POLICY REGARDING IRAN. Me thinks Susan Rice has more input than the SOS.

 
 
 

Comment by Doc99 | 2009-07-02 16:07:38

 

Comment by Peggy Sue | 2009-07-02 17:32:18

Why is this man given so much airtime, heralded as an expert of anti-terrorism? I watched a clip where Glenn speaks to Scheuer’s credentials, makes a comment about how long Scheuer has worked in “the White House, spoken directly to Presidents” on critical matters. Scheuer corrects him but then adds that he’s dealt “with the highest, senior officials.” Which, of course, doesn’t leave presidential or next in line officials out. This is weasal positioning at best.

But I have to be honest. Until I read Larry J.’s former putdown of Scheuer, I assumed [bad thing to do] that the man’s credentials had been thoroughly vetted, that he was speaking with the CIA’s voice.

It’s just another example of how we’re being manipulated by all outlets, right, left, libertarian, whatever.

Personally, I found this interview reckless and completely irresponsible. An Osama attack is the only road to our salvation???

Please!! Using our critical thinking skills and our bullshit meters is the real avenue.

And Glenn Beck, who worries me but sometimes makes a valid point, should have called Scheuer out on that comment. There’s unfiltered, and there’s irrational.

Thank you, Larry, for bringing this to our attention.

We’re surrounded by maniacs! And fools.

 

Comment by Peggy Sue | 2009-07-02 17:34:29

Oops! Had another post lost in space. Can anyone retrieve it??

Thanxs!

 

Comment by foxyladi14 | 2009-07-02 17:51:44

i,m not worried about osama it,s obama that scares me to death.

Comment by tzada | 2009-07-02 18:49:01

Me too. Anyone who isn’t worried, concerned or pro active about it, is either in bed with the plan, a spineless wonder or has the Hitler syndrome.

Comment by Ferd Berfle | 2009-07-02 18:57:39

I have to agree. I can at least say with certainty where Osama’s loyalities are. There isn’t enough information on That One and his history to be able to say the same. That tabula rasa of his is one scary thing.

 
 
 

Comment by Carlaforhillary | 2009-07-02 20:36:55

I thought the interview was pretty good, especially the part about the unarmed National Guards, until the part about Obama blowing us up in order to get the attention of those “Harvard types.”

Can’t we just vote them out? I don’t think we need to another terrorist attack.

 

Comment by Frustrated European | 2009-07-03 11:25:46

Where was the “nuclear nut meltdown” exactly? Yes, he seems to be obsessed about Osama but that doesn’t change the fact that there are people who’d like to kill Americans just because of their faith or nationality. Nor does it change the fact that illegal immigration causes a lot of negatives.

It breaks my heart to see that the US is following so closely on Europe’s footsteps and rejoicing over the benefits of multiculturalism. Oh, and of course if any problems do occur the blame is always on the Americans. Are you there yet? Because that’s what we’ve been hearing for decades; we’re lazy, racist, genetically bad and we need to be perfected.

The problems in Europe are a bit different than what you’re facing since here it has a lot to do with religion and muslims have become a majority by 2050. The problems are present already and it’s absurd that the people in charge still refuse to see them. We’re becoming the next Balkan and anyone who dares to say a word is jailed. So I don’t have much hope that American politicians would do things differently. The oppressive politics have worked like magic, so far.

A big terrorist attack is exactly what is needed to wake some people up. It would have no impact in Europe since we’re all brainwashed that terrorists are only a group of few people and suggesting they have anything to do with muslims will again land you in jail. Americans still have hope since political correctness isn’t as bad in the States as it is in here.

All my friends who’ve migrated to the US have nothing but good things to say and Americans in my eyes are people who are proud of their country and will go for that extra mile to defend it. But now you’re lead by a weak president who seems to detest his own country and flies all over the world to appease the muslims suggesting that Islam is the best religion in the world. Downgrading oneself is an European custom, we’re professionals in that field and I hope you stop trying to match us!

Please, respect yourself. Be proud of yourself. Defend yourself.

Comment by Docelder | 2009-07-03 11:33:18

you’re lead by a weak president who seems to detest his own country

And that was pretty much the platform he ran on for two years. That and not being “Bush”. But, the detesting his country part was the only thing he was honest about… because he is the mirror image of Bush. completely reversed, but strangely identical.

 
 

Comment by J | 2009-07-04 13:31:23

Larry,

Scheuer is symptomatic of a larger problem — wacko prominent NEOCONS have been wishing for attacks in order to bring back their NEOCON AGENDA.

prominent Neocons who have uttered what Scheuer aspires:

Newt Gingrich

“This is … one of the great tragedies of the Bush administration,” Gingrich continued. “The more successful they’ve been at intercepting and stopping bad guys, the less proof there is that we’re in danger. And therefore, the better they’ve done at making sure there isn’t an attack, the easier it is to say, ‘Well, there never was going to be an attack anyway.’ And it’s almost like they should every once in a while have allowed an attack to get through just to remind us”. (April, 2008)

Donald Rumsfeld

“That’s what I was just going to say. This President’s pretty much a victim of success. We haven’t had an attack in five years. The perception of the threat is so low in this society that it’s not surprising that the behavior pattern reflects a low threat assessment. The same thing’s in Europe, there’s a low threat perception. The correction for that, I suppose, is an attack. And when that happens, then everyone gets energized for another [inaudible] and it’s a shame we don’t have the maturity to recognize the seriousness of the threats…the lethality, the carnage, that can be imposed on our society is so real and so present and so serious that you’d think we’d be able to understand it, but as a society, the longer you get away from 9/11, the less…the less…” (December, 2006)

Stu Bykofsky
(Columnist, Philadelphia Daily News)

“One month from The Anniversary, I’m thinking another 9/11 would help America,” laments Stu Bykofsky in his Philadelphia Daily News column.

“Remember the community of outrage and national resolve? America had not been so united since the first Day of Infamy – 12/7/41. We knew who the enemy was then. America’s fabric is pulling apart like a cheap sweater. What would sew us back together? Another 9/11 attack.” (August, 2007)

Lt. Col. Doug Delaney
(chair of the war studies program at the Royal Military College in Kingston, Ontario)

“The key to bolstering Western resolve is another terrorist attack like 9/11 or the London transit bombings of two years ago.” (July, 2007)

Rick Santorum
(former PA Senator)

“Between now and November, a lot of things are going to happen, and I believe that by this time next year, the American public’s going to have a very different view of this war, and it will be because, I think, of some unfortunate events, that like we’re seeing unfold in the UK. But I think the American public’s going to have a very different view.” (July, 2007)

Dennis Milligan
(chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party)

“At the end of the day, I believe fully the president is doing the right thing, and I think all we need is some attacks on American soil like we had on [Sept. 11, 2001],” (June, 2007)

 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)