“Honest Michelle, I was looking at her sandels and thinking I would get you a pair!”

http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/slideshow/photo//090709/ids_photos_wl/r3356552547.jpg/

FACEBOOK has an Obama approval poll. Approximately 60% – yes 60% of the responders say they STRONGLY DISAPPROVE of Obama. About 18% strongly approve. 10% approve, 3% are neutral, and almost 9% simply “disapprove.”

This is on FACEBOOK. The college social network. Filled with Obots. I have to say, those numbers blew me away. Seems like an unspoken backlash is growing! (Maybe there’s hope!)

Now we are facing furloughs and layoffs, and no one understands why. It is becvause if you want good schools,good roads and to lock up every jaywalker have to pay for it.

I haven’t had a decent raise in 9 years (since Ownes we first elected Governor). Ritter is not much better. But he has found ways to get around TABOR and that is good.

California needs to suffer a little and change their idiotic laws. They have a ton of money in that state and they need to start paying their bills.Thisa whole mess is just stupid. What a bunch of selfish bastards they have running that state.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMz2wpYbhHQ&feature=player_embedded

Listen to where he says he met Michelle, now anyone with a single working brain cell remembers where they met someone they eventually married!

Making opposition to any politician’s policies or actions a case for treason amounts to an extension of the Louis XIV principle, L’etat, c’est moi, or “I am the state.” It’s also the same idea behind the fuehrerprinzip that allowed Adolf Hitler untrammeled power in the Nazi regime, and any number of other tyrants, great and petty. It is an essential construct of fascism, tyranny, and elitism.

http://hotair.com/

Dissent is Treason!

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24673.html

The Associated Press has finally discovered math, and realizes that Barack Obama’s numbers don’t add up.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090708/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obama_tax_promise

The EPA says Cap and Trade won’t work, is vulnerable to fraud, and will only cost Americans more for energy while lining the pockets of the Industry.

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/08/epa-admits-cap-and-trade-won’t-work/

EPA Administrator Jackson confirmed an EPA analysis showing that unilateral U.S. action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions would have no effect on climate. Moreover, when presented with an EPA chart depicting that outcome, Energy Secretary Steven Chu said he disagreed with EPA’s analysis.

“I believe the central parts of the [EPA] chart are that U.S. action alone will not impact world CO2 levels,” Administrator Jackson said.

Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) presented the chart to both Jackson and Secretary Chu, which shows that meaningful emissions reductions cannot occur without aggressive action by China, India, and other developing countries. “I am encouraged that Administrator Jackson agrees that unilateral action by the U.S. will be all cost for no climate gain,” Sen. Inhofe said. “With China and India recently issuing statements of defiant opposition to mandatory emissions controls, acting alone through the job-killing Waxman-Markey bill would impose severe economic burdens on American consumers, businesses, and families, all without any impact on climate.”

Getting China and India on board with a carbon reduction plan is highly unlikely. Even then, a multilateral approach does not guarantee a successful system or the ultimate goal of global temperature reduction. Take a look at Europe:

Cap-and-trade regimes have advantages, notably the ability to set a limit on emissions and to integrate with other countries. But they are complex and vulnerable to lobbying and special pleading, and they do not guarantee success.

The experience of the European Union is Exhibit A. Emissions targets were set too high. Too many pollution allowances were given away to industry. The value of a carbon credit plummeted. Companies made windfall profits by charging customers more for energy while selling allowances they didn’t need. And the Europeans have not had much success reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Disputes on the next round of reductions led to the creation of a two-tiered system to appease Eastern European countries fearful of the cost to their industries.”

Prop 13 was the people telling Sacramento that stealing widow’s homes through tax hikes is a bad thing. Now get in there and work it out.

The voters were right then as they are now.

The legislature doesn’t need more money they need how to figure out how to do it with less money. And I agree, doing without all these feel good ballot measures that can’t be paid for.

In the past few elections, I have started voting no on almost everything on the ballots. Even for the schools, things have gotten so far out of hand.