RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Obama Throws Afghanistan and America Under the Bus

I will beat this dead horse until we get a ton of glue. Barack Obama waffling on Afghanistan has now crossed a line that puts our nation at risk. His word means nothing. Here is what he said to a veterans group a little over a month ago about the nature of the threat in Afghanistan:

A war of necessity? A war worth fighting? He said it damn it, but he sure as hell did not mean a word of it.

But this was not the first time he promised to make the fight in Afghanistan a top priority. He even had the audacity to argue back in 2008 that “we lacked the resources” to do the job in Afghanistan because we were diverting resources to Iraq.

Barack Obama, you are not just a liar, you are a ham-handed buffoon of a liar.

Your commander on the ground has made it very clear that he needs 45,000 more soldiers to do the job that you have claimed repeatedly is a war of necessity and that you also have insisted will be the staging base for the next terrorist attack against the United States if we ignore Afghanistan.

You announced in March of this year you have a “new” strategy. You specifically spoke about the lack of resources and the inadequate number of troops that Bush had devoted to the Afghan effort.:

At the same time, we will shift the emphasis of our mission to training and increasing the size of Afghan security forces, so that they can eventually take the lead in securing their country. That’s how we will prepare Afghans to take responsibility for their security, and how we will ultimately be able to bring our own troops home.

For three years, our commanders have been clear about the resources they need for training. And those resources have been denied because of the war in Iraq. Now, that will change. The additional troops that we deployed have already increased our training capacity. And later this spring we will deploy approximately 4,000 U.S. troops to train Afghan security forces. For the first time, this will truly resource our effort to train and support the Afghan army and police. Every American unit in Afghanistan will be partnered with an Afghan unit, and we will seek additional trainers from our NATO allies to ensure that every Afghan unit has a coalition partner. We will accelerate our efforts to build an Afghan army of 134,000 and a police force of 82,000 so that we can meet these goals by 2011 — and increases in Afghan forces may very well be needed as our plans to turn over security responsibility to the Afghans go forward.

So forgive the Joint Chiefs, General Petraeus and General McChrystal for believing you were a man of your word. But you are a liar and a charlatan. When the commander who you personally selected to lead the war in Afghanistan tells you he needs more troops you let the request sit in your damn inbox and you hop a flight to New York City to yuck it up with Dave Letterman. Here’s what you said on Letterman:

Compare this with what he promised in March of this year:

Barack Obama, you are worse than an average political hack. You are an immature amateur who is putting the nation’s security at risk by your vacillation and hedging. Grow up man!

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post146 Comments »

Comment by Tammy | 2009-09-22 21:03:16

Larry:
I feel your anger. I’m sending packages to a Sergeant in Afghanistan right now, and he tells me that the troops are losing faith in their Commander in Chief.

Obama is undermining the very fiber of this country. When you demoralize our fighting men and women, you are the lowest of the low.

The death toll is rising for America’s finest.

Make a decision, you worthless “community organizer”:
Either pull them out,
or fight to win.

I know you don’t like it when I say that this man has a plan to destroy our country, but the evidence is plain for all to see.
I truly despise this man, and have never felt this way about any President in my entire life.

Comment by fif | 2009-09-22 21:46:26

He should have stayed on as a professor (though he was never actually a professor, but only a senior lecturer–another lie) where he could pontificate, and spend hours/days/weeks/years philosophizing and weighing all sides. He is not a leader–he does not have the courage or instinct for it.

 

Comment by b mathews | 2009-09-23 13:59:48

actually those are my thoughts exactly!! he seems to be doing everything he can to bring america to its knees. he has weakened our economy, weakened our defenses, insulted our allies, kissed up to our enemies and divided the country into races. it almost seems that he is inviting an attack on america so he can step in and declare martial law and perhaps himself as “president for life.” wait until he has his private militia (made up mostly of acorn workers and the black panthers) who will be just as powerful and well funded as the military. why is no one talking about this?!!!. bush looks like a simpleton buffoon compared to obama.

 
 

Comment by Portia Elizabeth | 2009-09-22 21:11:30

Larry — I agree with every word of your post. I’m sickened and ashamed that our troops, our fine young men and women trained to defend and protect our country, are being neglected and undermined by a self-serving, lying, treacherous, worthless POS. I hope the troops know the American people still care about them and are grateful for their sacrifice.

 

Comment by graywolf | 2009-09-22 21:11:40

Everyone is SO surprised!!!!
WTF?
Were you all living under a rock?
Or better…….
Inside the beltway….where brain cells go to die;
that’s assuming that the sycophantic blow jobs who go there, in the first place, have brain cells.

Comment by Portia Elizabeth | 2009-09-22 21:15:10

graywolf — while we knew what he was capable of, we couldn’t believe in our hearts that anyone who occupied the Oval Office would sell out his own country. I prayed that God would guide him to do what was right. I’m having a really hard time understanding what God has in mind this time. (My apologies if my personal beliefs offend anyone.)

Comment by TeakWoodKite aka It's not just me. | 2009-09-23 00:26:16

Portia Elizabeth, many people wanted BO to succeed even though one completely disagreed with him and his ilk and where fully aware of the odds he would do so, inspite of himself.

It was not to be.

Never apologize for your personal beliefs, that is what this country is about.

Comment by Portia Elizabeth | 2009-09-23 03:28:22

 
 

Comment by In Christ | 2009-09-23 13:09:59

Who cares Portia if any of your comments about our Creator offend anyone,they can all go straight to hell.Never apologize for expressing Gods name.God Bless you.In Christ

 
 

Comment by ConfusedAmerican | 2009-09-23 00:07:23

Not Surprised — Just More Appalled Every day.

Just can’t believe this man and then there are his followers.

They laughing about ACORN because of some constitutional loophole… so Ha ha ACORN will get their federal money…It’s like they don’t Care as long as they think they doing Obama’s will

Sadly I’m waiting for them to be laughing about this.

I’m appalled at what I am seeing out there…

Obots is a good name for they have no brains and are just Obama Robots doing Obama’s bidding and talking.

 
 

Comment by angie | 2009-09-22 21:16:39

This is disgraceful, but I’m not surprised. I hope this wakes up the idiots who voted for this lying jackass (but I doubt it). And what in holy hell was the president of the United States of America doing on David effing Letterman while all this is going on in this country?!?!?!?! Doesn’t he have something more important to do?!?!?!?

Comment by MG-PUMA | 2009-09-22 22:43:21

….and what was he doing on Letterman, you ask?

Well, continuing the Soros marketing campaign that’s what!

Obama is nothing more than a marketing tool.

We tried hard to warn everyone and the 52 percent that voted for this tool are getting more than they bargained for.

All they had to do was look at what the O campaign did to HRC and draw an inference to the whole country.

MG-PUMA

 

Comment by DeeLee | 2009-09-23 16:57:13

He didn’t want to go home. would you want to listen to that silver-back of a wife on how everybody hates them?
He also had the famous 3 a.m. phone call from Gen. McCrystal that Hillary warned about, and he put him on hold. He’s still holding because dumbo doesn’t have any answers (other than telling McCrystal that he thinks his request is racially motivated)

 
 

Comment by Ferd Berfle | 2009-09-22 21:18:14

Excellent commentary, Larry, containing righteous anger at a pontificating, posturing, prevaricating poseur. That One is everything we all feared he’d be and a whole lot “less” or “more” depending on where one’s worries lie. His any-way-the-wind-blows-politically style of leadership puts this nation at risk and for nothing more than his over-inflated sense of self-importance and need for constant attention and adoration. He is dangerous. I am wonder out loud sometimes what it will take to get the American electorate off the Kool-Aide, off the couch, and onto the streets, civilly disobedient.

Comment by Donna Brazile | 2009-09-22 23:27:38

Ferd:

Where the frak is James Gugalooloo, Fran-arse, the wanna be black man, and Prime Obutt?

Comment by TeakWoodKite aka It's not just me. | 2009-09-23 00:35:37

‘festing in thier basements, I fear Donna.
Perhaps we should shine the OBOT spotlight over the night sky of Gothem City.

 

Comment by Diana L. C. | 2009-09-23 08:44:34

You forgot the mouse.

 

Comment by Ferd Berfle | 2009-09-23 17:06:34

They’re down on skid-row trying to make a few converts to the dark side by giving away Thunderbird to the potential converts, purchased using the money they made commenting here.

 
 

Comment by Katmoon | 2009-09-23 06:48:30

I am wonder out loud sometimes what it will take to get the American electorate off the Kool-Aide, off the couch, and onto the streets, civilly disobedient.

A draft.

 
 

Comment by HARP | 2009-09-22 21:19:05

Obama is a sly one. I`ll bet he is planning on sending his National Security Force over there. Ya`ll remember that. The force that is just as well funded and just as well trained as the military. I`m sure the bots are signing up in record numbers to save “THE ONE`S” reputation.

Comment by Tammy | 2009-09-22 21:33:02

LOL.
That’s so funny, HARP.
The only thing a Bot can kill or defend is a bong.

 

Comment by Peggy Sue | 2009-09-22 22:03:34

For myself, Harp, I would love to see every Obamatron in Afghanistan, putting their “hope and change” on the line.

What a wonderful world it would be!!!

Comment by TeakWoodKite aka It's not just me. | 2009-09-23 00:41:15

I wonder what the average Afghan person thinks about hope and change.

Comment by Ellen D | 2009-09-23 02:35:00

I’m glad you said “person”. I had an Afghan with 4 legs and a tail and he couldn’t have cared less.

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2009-09-23 18:15:38

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Peggy Sue | 2009-09-22 21:19:14

I don’t know what Obama’s strategy is for the country. I don’t think he knows and that really, really worries me. I worry about my family, my commnity and the country at large.

I think it’s clear the President is in over his head. I felt the same way about GW, and we had eight years, holding our breaths, hoping we could survive that. I’m not so sure we can take another 4 years of confusion, obfuscation and politically-dominated national and international decisions with a rank amatuer at the wheel.

Larry, you cannot beat this dead horse enough. We are so-o-o-o screwed!

Obamatrons? You brought this on our heads and you will be damned forever! And Republicans, those who decided McCain wasn’t Republican enough and held back your support and votes? You fall into the same category.

Unbelievable!

 
 

Comment by Bemused | 2009-09-22 21:22:03

I absolutely can’t believe any of you ever thought he wouldn’t go back on his word in everything. Everything. He always has. Sometimes managing double flips with a triple axel as he whips from one position to another. He’s been 100% unreliable in his feel-good pronouncements, but not in some others; like making you serve and changing the country.

Comment by Ferd Berfle | 2009-09-22 21:28:19

Ahem… you’re at NQ, where commenters, bloggers, and the owner have been blasting away at That One for a *long* time (and battling all manner of Obots and trolls). That being said, this is not a right-wing site. Evidence and facts beat innuendo and opinion. LJ calls them as he sees them and that is good enough for me.

Comment by Ani | 2009-09-23 01:07:55

Thanks, Ferd. So true. We have been screaming about this stuff for nearly two years and providing evidence that this man was not ready to lead.

Too many out there ignored every piece of evidence or warning. Now here we are.

No one at NQ is surprised. No one.

But I for one thought since he is the “front man” that the cooler heads who deal with military strategy would at least coach him on what to do. Guess not. It truly feels like everyone is jockeying for a place in the clown car — or clamoring to get out. Take your pick.

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2009-09-23 01:57:02

Ani, I vote for the Boo Birds that SusanUnPc had posted so long ago.

 
 

Comment by Bemused | 2009-09-23 09:36:26

I know that very well, Ferd. You must have forgotten me, but I used to post frequently, although not as much as you. That’s why I can’t believe that anyone who is a regular on here would be surprised that the Zero would go back on any and all “feel-good” (i.e. appeals to the wishful) promises, statements, and innuendo. He’d say you misunderstood me, let me be clear, blah blah. But one thing he will do is stick to his narcissism. I can only say, normal people like Portia Elizabeth have a really hard time accepting the pure evil that can come along occasionally and this is how people like Thee One and his associates can grow and prosper. You aren’t stupid, P.E. You are the way people ought to be and the people of the lie take advantage of you.

Comment by Ferd Berfle | 2009-09-23 17:11:04

The trouble is that while we might “know” something, that is a far cry from evidence. Larry is building his case the way one should be built, not with emotions or anecdotes, but with facts. Besides, because That One apparently tests the political wind before opening his flapper, it difficult to pin him down directly.

 
 
 

Comment by Peggy Sue | 2009-09-22 21:35:12

Bemused, that’s exactly why few if any at NQ voted for Barack Obama. But for the sake of the country, we held out that maybe, just maybe we were wrong or at the very least, too harsh. Maybe, Barack Obama would be equal to the position.

But with every day, week and month it’s becoming abundantly clear: we were right from the start: this man, this blank slate never deserved to be elected dog catcher, let alone POTUS.

So no, not surprise. But genuine heartache for everyting we love, everything we hold dear.

Comment by Bemused | 2009-09-23 09:40:06

Exactly what I said above. I got so beaten down by the hope (that I knew was going to be forlorn) that I had to quit reading blogs and do something else for a while. At that time I had accumulated 450kb of a text file, “Troll Rants,” which is full of all the thoughts, pro and con, up to that date. Thatsa big text file–hope some day to turn it into an “I told you so” book.

Comment by Thinker | 2009-09-23 10:55:29

I think I remember you.

Your Troll Rants book sounds interesting.
I would read it!

Because as with Dubya, there are going to be people that will swear up & down that they didn’t vote for Obama.

 
 
 

Comment by Peggy Sue | 2009-09-22 21:36:28

Larry, had a spam gobble. Sending you an email now.

 

Comment by Tammy | 2009-09-22 21:37:24

Bemused.
Everyone here knew that he was a liar.
But I don’t think anyone really believed that he would be an utter traitor to his country.
Did you?
Really?
Wow, you must have a super powers.

Comment by Onofre's arm | 2009-09-22 23:18:39

It wouldn’t take super powers, just an informed perception to realize that Obama despised the proud principles that built this country, and that he would work for this country’s complete transformation into the nightmarish Utopia that he and his drugged up bull session buddies concocted in a Marxist dumpster.

I realize that by predicting Obama to be a potential America hating, Manchurian candidate, I was crawling out on a very thin limb, but I frequently wrote posts to that effect anyway. Now, sadly, it appears that my worst fears are coming true, but unlike Bemused, I won’t adopt an “I told you so” attitude, because my earlier cautions may have been difficult for the average American to accept due to the extreme nature of the possibilties that they represented.

That said,(and this is only for those types that thought Obama might turn out OK) I TOLD YOU SO! !

Come on, I earned the right.

Comment by Tammy | 2009-09-23 00:01:57

Onofre:
Why do you think that I campaigned for McCain?
Door to door.
Calling.
Brow beating. Screaming to anyone who would listen.

Those of us who fought, KNEW that something was wrong.
And I am disgusted with those who voted for this man BECAUSE he is black.
Those are the racists.
Martin Luther King would never have supported this buffoon.
“Content of character” Most powerful words that he ever said.

 

Comment by TeakWoodKite aka It's not just me. | 2009-09-23 00:47:12

Marxist dumpster.

Ha!! Onofre’s arm, good one.

 

Comment by Bemused | 2009-09-23 09:45:23

Exactly, again. Doesn’t take superpowers or even a couple of degrees in psychology and a history of doing attitude research–and I’m not going to hold off saying I told you so, when it becomes a teachable moment. Which it is getting to be. Before, Onofre, you are right. Out on a limb, no support.
Evil is banal. This is a finding from research into why Nazis could sell Germany on all they did. Nice, normal people, people like our own families. They were moved the same way Americans were to trust the 0.

 
 

Comment by Hillary or Bust | 2009-09-22 23:34:36

I totally did. No super powers required…just alarm bells ringing at how the media propped him up and then some.

The 2008 election turned me into an NWO conspiracy “nut” – watch Obama Deception, it’s all laid out in there.

Comment by ~~JustMe~~ | 2009-09-22 23:39:44

The 2008 election turned me into an NWO conspiracy “nut”

I agree I have never been the same!

 

Comment by Thinker | 2009-09-23 10:59:25

Same here.

Didn’t need superpowers to see that something was wrong with this man.

None of his stories about his life matches up, so many lies, the media covering for him,etc.

Plus, his eyes are evil. Call it female intuition but there’s just something about his eyes that set off red flags for me.

Comment by Lyn | 2009-09-23 15:10:34

It is his dead flat shark eyes

Comment by Thinker | 2009-09-23 18:50:15

!!!

Wow. You see it too???

Shark Eyes is exactly how I’ve always described his eyes.

Thanks for confirming that I’m not the only one.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by fif | 2009-09-22 21:42:46

You obviously are not familiar with this site. I knew he was from the first Dem debate–inexperienced, arrogant and dishonest.

Comment by Martha Washington Collier | 2009-09-22 22:09:00

Many of us were freaking out from the minute his ties to Ayers and Wright were revealed and his drones continued to keep their crazed hopey changey zombie, glazed over look.

I couldn’t believe that the Huff&Puff crowd could possibly still be in their goo-goo state but they are. I truly believe that’s why he goes on TV daily…to keep them in their trance.

 
 

Comment by Animal Control | 2009-09-22 22:16:16

I can’t believe what you can’t believe–where have you been commenting

 

Comment by Portia Elizabeth | 2009-09-22 22:54:35

Bemused — if you meant me in that group, let me clear it up for you. I worked for and voted for Hillary. When she was driven from the playing field, I supported McCain. I was mad enough at the DNC to’ve voted for a yellow dog instead of the Dem choice.

Comment by Bemused | 2009-09-23 09:48:25

So did I, all of that, though I knew it was hopeless against the propaganda. I couldn’t reach my own son. He still thinks Thee One is going to be all right and it’s all the fault of Bush and the Hiltards. Your comment touched my heart because I know, I know, good people want to trust others.

 
 

Comment by ConfusedAmerican | 2009-09-23 00:36:34

I will admit I had a tiny bit of hope even though I didn’t vote for him….

I think I lost that with his inauguration fiasco.

 
 

Comment by fif | 2009-09-22 21:38:42

Again, why is anyone surprised? This is a man who voted present 130 times in the IL State Senate, and claimed to have “pulled the wrong lever” on several other controversial votes. When in his career has he EVER shown political courage? (And no, pretending to oppose a war he never actually opposed is not a valid example.) The frightening thing now, though, as Larry points out is that this is actually putting national security at risk. It makes me so angry–this is not a game, and instead of getting all excited by marketing hype, people should have elected a seasoned professional for the damn job!

Comment by Tammy | 2009-09-22 21:51:08

I am surprised.
I knew that he was a radical, but not to the degree that I know now. Everyone ignored ACORN, the SEIU, etc.
I knew that Soros had his back and I will BET is responsible for the run on banks last September(to assure Obama’s election).

But to openly be THIS incompetent and uncaring?
No. I am surprised at that.
I knew he was weak and inexperienced, but I had no idea that he had no SOUL.

 
 

Comment by fif | 2009-09-22 21:40:22

Didn’t I read that Hillary has been pushing for more troops–can anyone confirm that?

Comment by Onofre's arm | 2009-09-22 22:40:49

Last I heard she was recomending other opinions on the subject; she apparently knows other experts that claim a troop increase is not necessary. I don’t have much confidence in that direction. Right now, with our troops spread out simply maintaining a slowly deteriorating status quo, we have no ability to mount the type of cleansing offensive that would rock the Taliban back on it’s heals.

The most powerful effect of the surge in Iraq was a psychological one.When our opposing forces there realized that we were resolved in our efforts as demonstrated by the surge, it broke THEIR resolve. A strong show of force in Afghanistan would have similar effects, our enemies would get the idea that we’re not only serious, but that we have the capability to overwhelm them should we decide to do so. The problem is that such an American show of force while being in our best interest as a country, will not make us very popular in the world. Since every decision Obama makes is based upon how it effects his personal Worldwide rock star popularity, he has been put in a quandary. Should he choose between popularity, or the welfare of this country and our troops? He’ll try to achieve both of course, being a two faced POS, but in the end, he’ll sacrifice everything this country stands for in persuit of Universal adulation.

 
 

Comment by rw | 2009-09-22 22:04:35

Don’t know what the correct course of action is, I defer to the experts. But one repeated comment I am sick of hearing is: Afghanistan is where empires go to die. It is just a simpleton comment stated with little thought or analysis and repeated by even the dumbest and most uninformed in history and politics people I meet.

In that comment the cause and effect is that a power’s incursion in Afghanistan results not just in defeat but in a collapse in the power’s global strength.

So the assumption is that all other influences are the same now as they were…in the 1800’s, in the 1980’s…No consideration is given to a globalized world, to 21st century technology in weaponry and communication (civil and military),nor to factors with the population on the ground, factors of the differences of who the “enemy” is, factors of differences in strategy, factors that Afghanistan is not a balance of power campaign/an isolated incursion but the main incursion of a larger and multi-pronged campaign against a multi-national stateless foe. The moment I hear the Afghanistan war meme, I stop listening. We need 21st century analysis that include 21st century factors in the equation.

Comment by hokma | 2009-09-22 22:20:51

The USSR amde the mistake of trying to takeover the country. The U.S. is trying to keep out one element of the country – and unwanted element – which is the Taliban.

However, this is an insurgency like in Iraq and we have learned how to effectively deal with insurgencies.

Obama has a parallel problem which is no one is scared of him. He is the most ineffective U.S. leader and every country in the world knows he caves in like a cheap suit. They also know he does not support his allies and concedes to opponents.

I am afraid even with the troops McChrystal wants the enemy knows we have a weak CiC and it would be only a matter of time when they can break his will.

Obama was an enormous mistake. As Larry said, this country elected an amateur.

 

Comment by Ferd Berfle | 2009-09-23 19:03:43

Afghanistan is where empires go to die. It is just a simpleton comment stated with little thought or analysis and repeated by even the dumbest and most uninformed in history and politics people I meet.

You are spot on, rw. We may be a tad bogged down but that is correctable. Were this country to actually want to lay waste to that country, it would have been a large parking lot already. So that silly anecdote of which you comment falls apart. We beat a much tougher enemy in Japan and Germany–because we put our mind and will (and boots on the ground) to it. I’m sure we could do the same in Afghanistan.

 
 

Comment by ces | 2009-09-22 22:09:27

Sorry for the snarky nature of this comment, but I think we might have just found a reason to keep ACORN around…just.a.bit.longer….

Comment by Peggy Sue | 2009-09-22 22:57:15

What Ces? Send them in as troops?? I’d vote for that :0). They could join the Obamatrons: the army of hope and change.

Perfecto!

 
 

Comment by carolhaka | 2009-09-22 22:28:42

Why are people surprised that someone who has spent their entire political career voting “present” hasn’t the capacity for leading?

He belongs on the Late Show – as a water boy. Oh gosh, did I say “boy”? I must be a rac*st. I’m pretty sure I received a memo about that …………………

CAROL HAKA :evil:

 

Comment by Smart-Jazz-Just Me | 2009-09-22 22:29:42

I agree that we need to move forward in Afghanistan. BUT! Not without a proper strategy and COIN is not it. I prefer to wait until the Obama Administration has completed its Afghanistan review before we pumps billions into a corrupt and deep dark hole…..

Comment by HARP | 2009-09-22 22:49:10

I would offer you a complimentary ice cream cone….but I fear most of it would end up on your forehead.

Comment by olivia1998 | 2009-09-22 22:51:30

 

Comment by Smart-Jazz-Just Me | 2009-09-22 23:01:55

So rather than insult, tell me what the Afghan Strategy is? And while your at it tell me how well COIN really worked in Iraq?

So rather than talk the talk, walk the walk..Or are ya gutless?

Comment by ~~JustMe~~ | 2009-09-22 23:23:36

Obama said he had a strategy, did you listen to the second video?

From the primaries : He said he was ready to lead. He said he was ready on day one to hit the ground running
How’s that for hope and change?

 

Comment by carolhaka | 2009-09-22 23:52:48

The Afghan strategy was for Obama and his cheerleading squad to pretend during the election cycle that he had a strategy! And, look how good a job he did!

“Mission Accomplished”

Too bad about those 3 to 5 American Soldiers dying daily.

Oh well, Obama and his family have had a great time flying in the big jet!

CAROL HAKA :evil:

 

Comment by TeakWoodKite aka It's not just me. | 2009-09-23 01:02:41

Smart-Jazz-Just Me, but the cone looks like it belongs there…

“completed its Afghanistan review” WTH? BO told the top brass to keep it where the sun don’t shine 3 weeks ago. Or were you in the dark as well?

Look I have nothing against the living conditions of mushrooms, but BO SAID he knew the score.

 

Comment by Karma | 2009-09-23 01:07:49

How can a COIN strategy work if there is no coordination?

Obama stole that point about the lack of coordination under NATO in the debates from McCain. A point McCain had been making for quite some time no less.

And now he is still talking about it instead of doing it all these months later. Maybe it is because he was looking at someone else’s platform is why it is taking him so long to ‘review’ what to do.

Can’t steal from McCain or Hillary when they aren’t on stage next to him so he can say…’Me too!’

 

Comment by an observer | 2009-09-23 06:38:22

Fire bomb all the dope fields including those in British held areas.
No money, no weapons.
No money, no local support.
Mission accomplished with no ground troops.

 

Comment by Katmoon | 2009-09-23 07:10:26

Are you serving?

 

Comment by armymom | 2009-09-23 12:20:08

Well, I’m about as pissed as anyone as I have skin in the game. My son has served 3 tours in Iraq and up until the POS Obama took over, they were doing just fine. The “COIN” as you put it Just me, worked fine, but since you have probably never served, or never plan on it unless it’s the O’s civilian army, you wouldn’t know what the hell you were talking about. Now as far as Afghanistan, he’s getting our guys killed over there, and without even a sweat or a tear, he doesn’t give a shit. Obama lied, our troops died. Get it? My son just came home about 2 weeks ago from his tour over in the “stan” and they need more troops, NOW, not later, after the POS does his narcissistic TV shows. NOW, not later.

 
 
 

Comment by fif | 2009-09-22 23:01:02

As Larry pointed out: then that should have been his statement initially. Instead, he made a definitive statement about our commitment, and now looks weak. As JFK stated, and learned the hard way, foreign policy is 75% appearance. There was a very cutting piece in The Guardian today that made this argument very clearly: Obama looks more and more incompetent.

Comment by Smart-Jazz-Just Me | 2009-09-22 23:07:44

I am not worried about his talk and lack of experience when talking. Christmas “W” was no Reagan noe was he like his Father. I am more worries about his actions or lack thereof. I will wait and see how he acts. I trust Gates and Jones they are old pros and so is Hillary..

Comment by Tammy | 2009-09-22 23:46:14

Not so Smart Jazz:
Would you like the military to give you the plan in writing? THAT sounds like a good idea.
Obviously you don’t know anything about how the military works.
They don’t hand out business plans.
Or did you want a point by point “to do” list?

And what’s with the fake name, Just Me?
Who the hell is this poster?

Comment by ~~JustMe~~ | 2009-09-22 23:47:46

It’s not me !!!

 

Comment by ~~JustMe~~ | 2009-09-22 23:49:29

someone who came in couple of weeks ago using a similar name to me!

Comment by Thinker | 2009-09-23 11:08:40

I know. Someone took my name as well. It’s annoying.

Comment by ~~JustMe~~ | 2009-09-23 13:03:53

You know did I see that yesterday a thinker with a lower case “t”

You know there was another Just Me here we spoke about it months ago that’s why I added the ~~JustMe~~ in fact I think they posted last week and it was never an issue but this hack above does not feel like same person he/she is 100% different than us on their views etc.

Smart-Jazz-Just Me I suggest you make yourself Smart Jazz and stop taking names over. If you’re the other Just Me it’s very odd the times your posting compared with the other one. However my gut tells me your a name grabber.

 
 
 
 

Comment by TeakWoodKite aka It's not just me. | 2009-09-23 01:18:23

I will wait and see how he acts.

? and then what?? ain’t you seen ENOUGH???

 
 

Comment by Tammy | 2009-09-22 23:31:48

fif:

LOOKS incompetent?
He IS incompetent?

Why weren’t you Dems here hammering the media during the primaries? Why? Because you were outsmarted by the insidious ACORN/SEIU/George Soros.

I actually thank GOD for crazy guys like Glenn Beck and Andrew Breitbart who are finally telling the TRUTH.

Journalism is DEAD in the MSM.
And I hope they all die.

Comment by Smart-Jazz-Just Me | 2009-09-22 23:38:47

Glen Beck wouldn’t know the truth if he stood in front of Christ himself..

Comment by ~~JustMe~~ | 2009-09-22 23:45:52

Well he’s not doing too bad when you line him up with CNN, MSNBC, NBC, and the others.

Comment by Smart-Jazz-Just Me | 2009-09-22 23:53:44

I never said the others were any better.. Besides truth has little to do with any of these guys. Its all about money power and ratings.

Truth is the loser here…

Comment by ~~JustMe~~ | 2009-09-22 23:59:15

I am not sure what truth your looking for but I see truth written all over those videos Beck has shown over the past few weeks.

Comment by Smart-Jazz-Just Me | 2009-09-23 00:13:06

The Truth has yet to be determined… Yet to be determined. I gibe anyone who holds the office of President the benefit of doubt, until he proves otherwise.

Besides Mr. Beck better be careful how he judges others, otherwise he will be judged the same one day, as the Good Book says. Oh that is right! He does not believe in the Bible but the Book Of Mormon..I forgot…

Comment by ~~JustMe~~ | 2009-09-23 00:20:45

Is it a concern on Becks beliefs?
What is wrong with him being a Mormon?

 

Comment by TeakWoodKite aka It's not just me. | 2009-09-23 01:22:31

The Truth has yet to be determined.

No, but the lies have.

 
 
 
 
 

Comment by Tammy | 2009-09-22 23:50:02

Who the fuck are you, man? Did you steal Just Me’s name?
Why is this allowed on this site?

Glenn Beck is the truth teller of this country, and he was calling out George Bush almost two years ago. You just never heard of him then.

Smart Jazz: People who play jazz think they are smart, but most of them are too moronic to pay their own rent.
I’m guessing that you are one of them.
How’s mommma’s basement working out for you?

Comment by Smart-Jazz-Just Me | 2009-09-23 00:03:28

Tammy dear your mouth is so dirty I hope you don’t eat with it. And I was Just Me loooong before the other just me showed up….

I see you don’t believe in reality… When did they let you out of Bellevue?

 

Comment by TeakWoodKite aka It's not just me. | 2009-09-23 01:36:46

but most of them are too moronic to pay their own rent.

When you make idiotic statements about musicians, as a whole, you let the music die Tammy. From a musician who’s made 3k a minute, but has a family that comes first and (I DO pay my rent), I would rather play for change on Market St if meant that it would save a life or my music reached another human heart.

A Love Supreme John Coltrane

Comment by Katmoon | 2009-09-23 16:13:06

Quite tasty, Coltrane. Thanks Teakwood. I love how the music just swallows the listener.

 
 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2009-09-23 01:46:45

My comment to you Tammy was Spammed.

Time to loose the aka now.

 
 

Comment by Tammy | 2009-09-23 00:08:19

once again, I am asking,

WHY ISN”T THIS GUY BANNED FOR STEALING JUST ME’S NAME?

He is deliberately trying to confuse readers.

Hmmm?

Comment by Smart-Jazz-Just Me | 2009-09-23 00:15:27

Just kicks! I am trying to confuse readers? LOL! This coming from a Beck groupie? LOL!

 
 
 

Comment by Margaret | 2009-09-23 10:07:46

Tammy,
Clearly you were not on this site during the primaries, when we were all over the media like a cheap suit.

Comment by Thinker | 2009-09-23 11:11:40

I know right?

The unassimilated on this site went after the media non-stop.

I guessing she never read NoQuarter back then.

:lol:

 
 
 
 

Comment by Tammy | 2009-09-22 23:25:59

You’re so right.
The Obama administration is so good at “proper strategy” that maybe we should give him another chance to show his leadership.

I mean, his record as Commander is SOOOOO extensive, and his love of the military that defends this country is SOOO well known.

Huh?
It isn’t?
You mean hope and changey-tood won’t bring world peace?
I am STUNNED.

 

Comment by Ellen D | 2009-09-23 02:52:18

before we pumps billions into a corrupt and deep dark hole…..

Why should we devote more research on this than we did with the last hole – the banks?

 
 

Comment by yttik | 2009-09-22 22:49:45

I’m a strong antiwar advocate and even I believe we need to act now. We need to get resources and troops in there to finish the job because waffling around is costing lives.

Comment by rw | 2009-09-23 00:55:36

Yes, antiwar, but I keep my opinions quiet for the sake of the soldiers deployed. Though I do think of how horrible it must be for the civilians caught in the middle, but also how horrible it must have been for women during the Taliban rule, as well as for the men who did not agree with their cavemen like mentality. Total devolution. The destruction of the giant Buddhas proved that there is no room for diversity in their dark and primitive world.

 
 

Comment by Craig Della Penna | 2009-09-22 23:18:14

See if any of these strike a chord…

Profile of the Sociopath

* Glibness and Superficial Charm

* Manipulative and Conning
They never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behaviors as permissible. They appear to be charming, yet are covertly hostile and domineering.

* Grandiose Sense of Self
Feels entitled to certain things as “their right.”

* Pathological Lying
Has no problem lying coolly and easily and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis. Can create, and get caught up in, a complex belief about their own powers and abilities. Extremely convincing and even able to pass lie detector tests.

* Lack of Remorse, Shame or Guilt
A deep seated rage, which is split off and repressed, is at their core. Does not see others around them as people, but only as targets and opportunities. Instead of friends, they have victims and accomplices who end up as victims. The end always justifies the means and they let nothing stand in their way.

* Shallow Emotions
When they show what seems to be warmth, joy, love and compassion it is more feigned than experienced and serves an ulterior motive. Outraged by insignificant matters, yet remaining unmoved and cold by what would upset a normal person. Since they are not genuine, neither are their promises.

* Incapacity for Love

* Callousness/Lack of Empathy
Unable to empathize with the pain of their victims, having only contempt for others’ feelings of distress and readily taking advantage of them.

* Poor Behavioral Controls/Impulsive Nature
Believe they are all-powerful, all-knowing, entitled to every wish, no sense of personal boundaries, no concern for their impact on others.

* Early Behavior Problems/Juvenile Delinquency
Usually has a history of behavioral and academic difficulties, yet “gets by” by conning others. Problems in making and keeping friends.

* Irresponsibility/Unreliability
Not concerned about wrecking others’ lives and dreams. Oblivious or indifferent to the devastation they cause. Does not accept blame themselves, but blames others, even for acts they obviously committed.

* Lack of Realistic Life Plan/Parasitic Lifestyle
Tends to move around a lot or makes all encompassing promises for the future, poor work ethic but exploits others effectively.

* Criminal or Entrepreneurial Versatility
Changes their image as needed to avoid prosecution. Changes life story readily.

Comment by Tammy | 2009-09-22 23:51:53

Comment by Onofre's arm | 2009-09-23 00:25:32

Tammy, while I can appreciate your passion, posting a flip response like “Duh” to a very accurate and informative description like the one Craig has given, does not contribute to a mature debate on a very important issue. Obama is most certainly a pathological Narcissist, but few people really know what that means. Posting the traits of such an individual is educational and necessary for an accurate assessment of our deeply disturbed POTUS. It was the lack of such information that led to his election. Now that he is where he is, it is even MORE important for America to understand the psychopathy of the man/child dictating from the Oval office.

Thanks for the info Craig!

 

Comment by pm317 | 2009-09-23 10:39:50

How old are you?

 
 
 

Comment by yttik | 2009-09-22 23:19:36

Oh, according to this article, Obama is considering Biden’s advice. It looks like Hillary may be opposed to that.

“President Obama is exploring alternatives to a major troop increase in Afghanistan, including a plan advocated by Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. to scale back American forces…………Mrs. Clinton, who opposed Mr. Biden in March, appeared to refer to this debate in an interview on Monday night on PBS. “Some people say, ‘Well, Al Qaeda’s no longer in Afghanistan,’ ” she said. “If Afghanistan were taken over by the Taliban, I can’t tell you how fast Al Qaeda would be back in Afghanistan.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/23/world/asia/23policy.html

 

Comment by TeakWoodKite aka It's not just me. | 2009-09-22 23:38:23

For three years, our commanders have been clear about the resources they need for training.

.

So about the time BO was the chair of a certain subcommittee that had the oversight duty for Afghanistan, he admits knowing that the Afghan effort was suffering from a lack of resources.

How is that possible he ever learned this, when BO not once held a hearing to aquire the facts on the record?
Mr. Johnson, I can’t thank you enough for making a point of BO’s in-experience in spite of being given the opportunity to learn his bonifides, and make the correct command decisions required of the POTUS.

I can visualize (ala Pat) a gaggle of Military brass or thier runners cruising the halls of congress three years ago, looking for BO, because he was the point man in the Senate for Afghanistan and finding him missing from his post.

Chaps my string to no end to see BO make a fool of himself and frag the rest of us.

Mr. Johnson can we now put to rest the “well intentioned” part of it?

I would like to take a moment and thank the staff and fabulous writers at NQ.

Mr. Johnson, any chance you or one of your piers is looking at the BO’s energy policy and National security?

Comment by Nellie | 2009-09-23 18:20:18

Teak,

WOW! Good memory and excellent point. When it comes to National Security, are there any laws, penalties for Dereliction of Duty?

Pragmatically, there is little hope of impeaching him until after the 2010 elections. Can we at least start talking/shouting about it now?

Lord, I want that man in Leavenworth so badly.

 
 

Comment by Hank | 2009-09-22 23:52:50

Hey Harp, someone wants an Ice Cream Cone special. LOL!

 

Comment by DaddysDarlin | 2009-09-23 00:05:13

This country cant wait while Obama practices his foreign policy, he is taking us down a dark and dangerous path.
Is there anyone on Capitol Hill who dares to voice an opposing view? Is there anyone left on Capitol Hill who will stick up for America and Americans?
Is there anyone left on Capitol Hill who has read the Constitution they have promised to protect?
I figure that we common folk who are on these blogs know more about the Constitution and our rights as Americans than our own representatives, we at least will do our damndest to protect it,and our rights.
Obama is playing with our lives, if he thinks for one minute that he has done anything to protect this country, he has another think coming. He lacks the experience to get any job done, and frankly those of us who voted against him knew it all along. His record or lack thereof spoke for itself and now we are all paying the price for Obama’s folly.
The sooner we get him out of the White House the better, but then who would support us in that?
I would hope by now that Obamas true colors are showing through loud and clear. I hope that those who praised this fraud for no apparent reason, now understand why we did not.
Watch out America, Obama is out to destroy all we have believed in, all we have worked for, prayed for, loved.
Each move he makes is calculated, in order to achieve his goal of destroying our country and its people.
Screw you Obama and all of you hacks on Capitol Hill, you will all burn in hell for what you are doing.

Comment by pm317 | 2009-09-23 10:41:55

Lose the bold font, will you? It hurts to look at it let alone read it.

 
 

Comment by babawankenobe | 2009-09-23 00:16:02

He talked the talk. but he fails to walk the walk. The leftists will not be happy until our Finest sons and daughters in the armed services are humiliated on the battlefield and brought home,heads hung low in defeat. This must not and will not stand!

 

Comment by wanderer | 2009-09-23 01:16:27

Excellent piece, Mr. Johnson, and I agree with your assessment. I’ll take it even farther and state my belief that most of the objections raised against the previous administration’s war policies by those who have hijacked the Democratic Party were purely, cynically political nature. They had no actual objection to even the most over-the-line policies of the previous administration and have even continued some of them–note the present administration’s sub rosa continuation of the previous administration’s policy of extraordinary rendition. What they saw was political opportunity, and they turned it into a political weapon.

The foremost of those politically-motivated objections was (and continued to be for some time) the concept that the war in Afghanistan was “necessary and justified” while the war in Iraq was neither. Note that there is now an increasing resistance on the part of committed Leftists against the “necessary war,” and the present administration is responding to it by dragging its feet in the prosecution of that war. Now that the “necessary war” has become a serious political problem for the administration, it is dithering. While it dithers, American soldiers die.

I’m anything but a Leftist, but I have come to the conclusion that the war in Afghanistan has degenerated into a massive waste of blood and treasure and an abuse of our soldiers’ patriotic sacrifice, and will remain such as long as the present administration holds office. The idiotic ROEs imposed by the administration on our troops are tantamount to murder–that has been demonstrated, time and again, on the battlefield. The idiotic cowtowing to the demands of the corrupt Afghan government’s make it impossible to actually prosecute the war against the Taliban–which was supposed to be the misson, not “nation-building.” Until we have an administration with CINC who is willing to stand up for his nation, we should withdraw, and every member of the U.S. military should refuse to re-enlist or should resign and come home ASAP.

 

Comment by helenk | 2009-09-23 02:39:25

the apartment houses in his district with no heat in a Chicago winter told me all I wanted to know about backtrack.
When I would ask any of his supporters ” if he did not stand up for those people and took money for his campaign from the owners who would make no repairs, what do you think he will do for you or the country?”
Naturally I was called racist and a closet republican.
But they really could not give a good answer.
I do not remember the exact words he used about standing up for Muslims when the wind went against them but I did not think he would go against American troops to do so.

WOMEN WITH INTELLIGENCE AND EXPERIENCE,MEN WHO SUPPORT THEM AND COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY ALWAYS

PUMAS,BUBBAS,EQUALISTS AND THOSE PEOPLE RULE

 

Comment by proud mobster | 2009-09-23 03:40:33

What bothers me most about all this is what Obama influence has done to the rest of the Democrats in Congress.

Hillary said the General in charge of the Afghan War didn’t know what he was talking about when he said he needed more troops or the mission would fail. Bill Clinton seemed to partially agree with Carter when he said the far right was racist although disagreement on Healthcare was not racist. Pelosi calls us Nazis and Harry calls us evil mongers for daring to disagree on Healthcare. So many more Dems have lashed out at the voters — I can’t understand why they would think this is a good strategy. Could it be Obama’s pressure that has made them so hostile to us?

Obama seems to be an angry petulant man who numbers among his enemies the rich, the military, seniors and this country itself. He seems determined to get what he wants even when he’s not sure what that might be. I wish he would withdraw this Healthcare bill and introduce one which Republicans would also support and before making a decision on Afghanistan that he would speak to experts. The reality is however, that Obama thinks only he knows all the answers.

 

Comment by elaine | 2009-09-23 04:31:25

wanderer, Thanks for your well thought out post. By any chance did you watch Fareed Zakaria’s GPS show on CNN Sunday? His web site/e mail is taking opinions on the “stay or leave” issue in Afghanistan, you may wish to transport your post in hopes of gaining a wider audience. Zakaria thinks it absurd to stay with the hope of eventually building an Afghan force capable of policing the vast countryside; he sites the country’s tiny GDP, driving home the fact it is one of the poorest countries in the world.

 

Comment by elaine | 2009-09-23 06:24:31

wanderer, just reread your post. I have a small suggestion: nix the part near the end wherein you suggest troops “resign” or “refuse to re-enlist”, it puts the onus on the troops & more importantly resignation is just NOT an option.

 

Comment by Katmoon | 2009-09-23 07:02:47

Thank you Larry, thank you. This statement may pis some people off, (warning)it is a generalization.

Unless a person has skin in the game, their interest is fleeting at best. I mean that with all due respect.
Most people here know both of my kids are soldiers; one will do a first tour, the other will do a fourth. The one doing the fourth, just welcomed his daughter into the world. He has already had to miss birthday one and two for his son, he will now miss birthday 3, and birthday one for new daughter. I am just plain pissed at this point.

I would love to see a draft, let’s have a vested interest in this war for a switch instead of literally killing families by constant deployment, they can’t be a family if they can’t spend more than 9 mos to a year at a time together. My son however doesn’t want to see a draft; he has concerns over the ability to soldier up from some of these young ones still living with their parents into their twenties, not going to college.

Obama (and you know I usually refer to him as “o”) is incompetent, period.

When the commander who you personally selected to lead the war in Afghanistan tells you he needs more troops you let the request sit in your damn inbox and you hop a flight to New York City to yuck it up with Dave Letterman.

I would further state again, that I see Obama as a coward; his inability to act proves he has more of an interest in his political outcomes, than anything related to the welfare of this country and our brave and faithful fighting men and women.
I cannot suffer a liar nor a coward, Obama is both.

If I could enlist, at 53 yo, (yep, I tried) I would; even as support here, anything I can do to help our troops. The care packages help their hearts, now maybe we need to raise our voices and raise some hell to help cover their backs.

Enough of my soapbox. Again thank you Larry, you have always given me some strength in your articles addressing our troops; you stand tall in my eyes in your support and understanding; it is noticed and much appreciated.

Comment by ~~JustMe~~ | 2009-09-23 10:38:24

Well said Katmoon!

Thank you to all our troops who serve to keep us safe here at home and abroard!

Comment by Katmoon | 2009-09-23 11:06:12

 

Comment by Katmoon | 2009-09-23 13:37:30

Thank you ~~JustMe~~

 
 

Comment by Nellie | 2009-09-23 18:53:59

Well Said Katmoon. I had tears in my eyes. You are so right.

 

Comment by TeakWoodKite | 2009-09-24 13:32:17

God Speed, Katmoon. Well said.

 
 

Comment by ImaLlindatoo | 2009-09-23 08:47:15

BREAKING NEWS, Obama considering Joe Biden plan for Afghanistan, increasing Drones. Woohooo, the dim bulb in the room gets a spotlight and makes you want them to cut the plug so it can never be plugged in again!

Oh yeah, lets just create more death and maming of innocents and put the few Eye Candy, current troops, at further risk.

This plan only serves to make the Corporate Special Interests wet with excitement, but does nothing to actually benefit any goal other that profiteering at the expense of military, taxpaers and innocent civilians in Afghan.

 

Comment by Sassy | 2009-09-23 10:00:02

I didn’t count the number of times Obama used “train, trainers, training” in the excerpt, but enough to signal his intentions!
He won’t wipe his feet on the military, for the Democratic Congress will do it for him!
I believe that Gen. Meyers, former Pentagon spokesman, says in his book that President Bush said “We won’t bomb sand again”!
Hell no, I did not vote for Bush, but he stood by the service men and women, once they were in the field!

 

Comment by sarainitaly | 2009-09-23 11:32:39

“I would be a poor commander in chief if I didn’t take facts on the ground into account.”

“I’ve always said I would listen to commanders on the ground.”

“I’m going to continue to gather information to find out whether those conditions still hold,” he said. “My guiding approach continues to be that we’ve got to make sure our troops are safe and Iraq is stable.”

As Obama spoke, two of his foreign policy advisors told reporters in a conference call the current U.S. strategy in Iraq was allowing the security situation in Afghanistan to worsen and must be changed.

“My job is to make sure that the strategic issues that we face … are all taken into account and dealt with in a way that enhances America’s national security interests over the long term,” Obama said.

http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN0319227720080703?pageNumber=2&virtualBrandChannel=0

Apparently he feels differently about Afghanistan…

Obama calls situation in Afghanistan ‘urgent’
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/20/obama.afghanistan/

Obama has made Afghanistan a key focus of his foreign policy, saying he would make it the central front in the “war on terror” if elected.

Words….just words.

Comment by Ellen D | 2009-09-23 11:39:05

I like Hillary’s words on PBS.

“Some people say, ‘Well, Al Qaeda’s no longer in Afghanistan,’ ” she said. “If Afghanistan were taken over by the Taliban, I can’t tell you how fast Al Qaeda would be back in Afghanistan.”

 
 

Comment by Outlawales | 2009-09-23 11:36:51

it’s almost like we voted in the mailroom guy on the job for 3 weeks to run our trillion dollar company,

oh wait, we did

Comment by Katmoon | 2009-09-23 13:39:30

No “we” didn’t, I had nothing to do with him holding office. :)

 
 

Comment by HEPT | 2009-09-23 11:50:23

No, it’s not that he means or does not mean what his words say. He reads them and says them but does not write them or agree with them.
Mr. Obama is not in charge he is just the figurehead and spokesman for the democratic party.
Who is in charge?
who the fok knows.

 

Comment by Greyhound | 2009-09-23 13:19:45

Hussein Obama should resign. If not, then he should be impeached after the 2010 congressional elections

Comment by b mathews | 2009-09-23 14:50:37

my thoughts exactly. if we can manage to get more republicans (i am not a republican but am no longer a democrat) into the house and senate, obamas power will be watered down. as the 2010 election approaches, we need to ask all repub. candidates, if elected would they consider impeachment. if they see enough people supporting this idea maybe we have a chance. it seems to be our only hope for the future of this country.

 
 

Comment by Katmoon | 2009-09-23 13:44:14

 

Comment by JayD | 2009-09-23 14:50:53

The only people that should be aghast at Obama’s lies, flipflops, and blatant manipulation of our nation are those that voted for him. Everyone else knew he was a nasty character and we were headed for trouble. Nothing he does is a shock or surprise to me — it is the citizens of this nation that put up with him, drool over him, make excuses for him who I find shocking.

Of those that voted for him who are not angry with his lies, either support him no matter what he does or they are so blind to anything other than Obama-love that they cannot see or hear anything else. Frankly, unless there is some grand awakening within this nation all is lost.

 

Comment by wanderer | 2009-09-23 15:02:20

Many thanks, Elaine, for your suggestions and good words. I’ll check out Zakaria.

I must stick by what I said at the last. When the CINC is incompetent, the onus is on the soldiers. Enlisted and lower-level officers can refuse to re-up, general officers (note what’s about to happen re Gen. McChrystal) may resign, and citizens may refuse to enlist in the armed forces until an incompetent CINC is replaced. This is not mutiny–I would not advocate that. This kind of resistance to an incompetent is the right and the duty of every soldier.

And speaking of rights and duty .. when the President is incompetent and the Legislative branch won’t do anything about it, the onus is on the citizen voter to replace that Legislative branch and eventually replace that incompetent President.

Katmoon’s children are soldiers, and as far as I’m concerned, they’re my children, too. Every American soldier is a member of my extended family–which has been an American military family since the Revolutionary War. My son was a Marine recruit, injured in training, never got to finish, still walks with a limp. His classmates and cousins are serving or have served in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere.

I “have skin in the game,” but so does every other American, and it’s about bloody time that they wake up and recognize that fact. Katmoon is right that many of those who don’t have a direct connection to the war tend to ignore it. What’s worse is that many of those who don’t have a direct connection to politics also ignore the civilian side.

In the end, it’s up to us, soldier and civilian, to determine what kind of leadership we have. What we have now is an empty suit incompetent who is surrounded by a cabal of unreconstructed sixties radicals, greedy corporate prostitutes, and cynical statists. Resigning, refusing to enlist or re-up, speaking out against, and voting against that is the duty of every American, soldier or civilian.

Comment by Katmoon | 2009-09-23 16:27:06

Wanderer, You rock! You know I was quite against the war; and recall being called unamerican and non-supportive of our troops; by many who did not have anyone serving or were of a specific political persuasion. Many made the foolish assumption my son enlisted because of 9/11-no he had enlisted 2 years previous. Particularly as the mother of soldiers. I explained it as such:

I love my soldiers, and that is why I hate war. Why on earth would I want to put them in harms way? If it must be, than those who hold that kind of power must be sure, not sorta, not kind of, not maybe, must be strong enough, smart enough and have the guts to do what needs to be done.

Bless you and yours for serving- I am the only family member who has not served, my husband (ferd), my brothers, my father, my nephews, all have served or are serving, besides my son and daughter.

In the end, it’s up to us, soldier and civilian, to determine what kind of leadership we have.

You have it so right here Wanderer. We have to work together, not only as civilians, or military families or military members,all of us together; the war impacts us all, it is only seen and felt later by civilians, but it does indeed have a huge impact. Simply; I don’t pull my own teeth, I am not a Dentist: neither is Obama, and he needs to get over himself long enough to hear and understand and apply the responsibilities of a CIC; not a community organizer. One would think he would take a trip to the front line if he is so concerned about what decisions to make. Get out from in front of the camera, or out of the safe cocoon of his paid lap dogs. What am I thinking, this isn’t an election year.

Thank You.

 
 

Comment by Miss H | 2009-09-23 16:26:39

As I have said before, BHO didn’t grow up here in the 57 states of the USA, playing Little League baseball, joining the Cub scouts, driving a Chevy down to the Dairy queen for a coke. He grew up in Indonesia doing god knows what. He has no feel or sympathy for America; he is narcissistic and only craves world adulation; heading up the UN is an even greater thrill for him. I wonder if he would throw the USA under the bus for his world dreams?

 

Comment by bill | 2009-09-23 19:30:16

He is the American Chavez.

Comment by Ferd Berfle | 2009-09-23 19:46:09

I beg to differ–he’s the 21st Century Timothy Leary with his very own collection of groupiebots: Sign In, Drink up, pass out.

 
 

Comment by Katmoon | 2009-09-23 20:02:27

I guess he is too busy making sure defense funds are spent elsewhere: I see by today’s printing of the federal register,(although the dates show this was in play a week ago) a Presidential Administrative order to:

Economic Community of Central African States; Eligibility to Receive Defense Articles and Services (Presidential Determination)
No. 2009–26 of September 7, 2009 ,
48363 [E9–23086] [TEXT] [PDF]
Maldives; Eligibility to Receive Defense Articles and Services (Presidential Determination)
No. 2009–25 of September 7, 2009 ,
48361 [E9–23084]

 

Comment by Katmoon | 2009-09-23 20:15:37

What I want to know is where the fu*k is there any military surplus right now? Hell our soldiers can’t get the things they need half the time in country.

 

Comment by Katmoon | 2009-09-23 20:50:37

I don’t understand why this is more important than getting his act together deciding what is going to be done regarding troops in Afghanistan.

 

Comment by stodgie | 2009-09-23 21:03:44

ok i can’t quote the source as i read it in a tranlated iraqi news source. and the ole memory is just good enough to remember american sources. however the iraqi politicans are saying biben was a dismal failure in his last visit. so anything biden says do the opposite.

 

Pingback by Obama Throws Afghanistan and America Under the Bus : NO QUARTER | 2009-09-23 23:16:19

[...] up from Tuesday evening. Check out the comments in the original posting on September 22, [...]

 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)