A Speech I Want To Hear, And The Voice On The Other End Of The Phone Line

It’s very clear that I wrote “LIBERALS adore celebrities….”, and I did so intentionally. Don’t misquote me, or distort my meaning and then expect me to defend YOUR distortion.

Just this morning I heard Woopie G. trying to excuse Polanski, and the uber liberal Hoolywood croud is generally supportive of the child rapist. Have you ever heard liberals clammering for justice in the Polanski issue? In the last 30 years, I’ve not heard a peep out of them, and silence for such a disgusting criminal act is as good as approval. However, it appears that RRR Amy is going to post her take on the issue, so I’ll reserve further thoughts for her thread. But if you can’t recognize it, it might just be that you’re so invested with the lopsided duplicity of treatment given to liberals vs. conservatives, that you’re unable to perceive the forrest through the trees.

You’ve got to be kidding. This post is considered acceptable discourse in this community?

Maybe he has finally seen the light or needs to make money off of her again and he sees it slip slip sliding away ……….

CAROL HAKA

Or, maybe he really is getting scared of the crazies ………

He is a political prostitute.
And just who sent him to Kenya to help Odinga run for office…?

Yeah, yeah — any single human injustice that happens while Obama is president is by definition his responsibility. As if the Clintons accomplished anything along those lines while they were in the White House?

“She would have never allowed this bullsh*t to go on.” Yeah, sure — HRC, if she were in the White House, wouldn’t be focused on the economy, health care, Afghanistan, and everything else — she would be focused on solving all international injustices. And yeah, she wouldn’t be diplomatic and respectful when visiting Saudi Arabia, upon whose oil business the entire global economy still relies; she would have created a massive international crisis by insisting that they immediately transform the treatment of women within their borders.

You’re a fool, Carol. A deranged fool, at that. And anyone who actually believes this sort of hagiographic nonsense is similarly a fool. I won’t even attempt to characterize what one must be, and how one must think, to ascribe such utterly evil intentions to our current president on the basis of such flimsy evidence.

I like the way you selectively debate; however, points will have to be deducted for deviating from the main talking points. You didn’t explain why your glorious leader who, until he stole the election, headed a subcommittee on Afghanistan and who also hammered away at why Afghanistan was of supreme importance. That said, why does he feel the fierce urgency of now regarding Olympic games 7 years from now, but cannot manage to meet with the general in command of our fighting forces in Afghanistan? (You know, the ones over there fighting and dying for our country?)

You seem like a reasonably intelligent Obot. Why do you not see the hypocrisy in this shallow, self-serving sham of a man?

Oh yes, let’s forget about McCain, Hillary and Bush and all the others that have warned for years that Bill’s bill and the thieving Dodd, Franks, and the rest of them paid millions to ACORN and others to f*ck us all raw!

I wish you would just shut up you stupid little pr*ck!

CAROL HAKA

Republicans play no relevant or productive role in American political discourse these days.

Fallacy of false generalization. Demonstrate to all of us that you are correct in every instance. You can’t and your argument, therefore fall apart at the seams. Besides, if they weren’t relevant, you wouldn’t be here parading around your newest PowerPoint presentation from Obamatron Camp. Nice going, kid, another gold star for you.

They had nothing relevant to say about the fiscal meltdown — nothing, nada, zilch, they would have just let the entire global economy collapse — and similarly, they have nothing relevant or productive to say about health care reform.

Fallacy of the unknown fact. They may have had many relevant things to say and indeed more than likely said them. You, on the other hand, cannot prove this silly little assertion any more than you can prove you’re so much more than a 12-year old, chubby-cheeked, basement dwelling, beanie wearing, cheetoh-eating obamabot. You have your assertions and I have my own, troll.

Republicans and a few “conservative” Democrats are basically now putting all their energy into promoting an insane bill that literally was written by health insurance industry lobbyists.

Equivocation on the word insane. It could very well be you who is insane and projecting those voices echoing about your empty skull on the rest of us.

And this site, of course, will support those “ideas” while condemning the genuinely progressive ideas like a public option which Hillary has spent many years fighting for. You’ll condemn them, because Obama supports them. Nice going.

Several equivocations in one statement. You misuse the term progressive. Unless you can demonstrate using the actual definition of progressive that your belief structure represents that, then you are mistaken. So give us the definition as you use it, troll, and then WE’LL decide if your argument holds anything more that empty blather.

What is condemned here is the manner in which these proposals are presented and the lack of transparency, which was promised by you bots and your master a long time ago. It is US who will decide what is transparent and what isn’t and not you shills who have a vested interest in secrecy. You whining bots railed for 8 years about Shrub and his chicanery but when you do what amounts to the same thing, you cry foul. Too bad, little snip.

Lastly, you insufferable, boorish moron–have a little tact and go somewhere else to expose yourself. We don’t much care for your verbal nudity. The transparency and sophomoric nature of your belief structure rather tends to blind us all with its patent stupidity.

In other words==shut the f u c k up.