Who’s Coming To Hang Out With Obama In Our White House?
By Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy on November 3, 2009 at 10:30 AM in ACORN, Bamboozling, Bush administration, California, Campaign promises, Chicago politics, Current Affairs, Dick Cheney, Energy Policy Act of 2005, Flip Flopping, General Election, George Bush, George Soros, Hillary Clinton, Hoodwinking, Lobbyists, MSNBC, Media Bias, MoveOn.org, Oprah, President Barack Obama, Richard Daley, Tax stimulus package, Ted Kennedy, Tom Daschle, Transparency, Unions, William Ayers, Women, World
You may recall that when Bush was president, it was like pulling teeth trying to find out just who had visited the White House. Let’s just say he dug in his heels a bit on releasing that information. Maybe it had something to do with Cheney’s “secret” Energy Meeting, who knows, but it was a battle.
I am sure you will be SHOCKED to learn that Obama is acting in much the same way. I know, I know - what a surprise. Ahem. Well, it seems some one has been doing a little investigative journalism, something in VERY short supply of late. But get this - I tell you, you better be sitting down - in this case, it was - WAIT FOR IT -
MSNBC. YES, the very network to which we routinely refer as “MSNBO”! Once I recovered from the shock of it all, I couldn’t wait to see just how transparent President Obama was compared to Bush. (I wonder if there is a way for us to do a pool on these kinds of things, like for NCAA basketball or something?)
This is what MSNBC uncovered in this report:
Obama Names 110 White House VisitorsThe White House on Friday released a small list of visitors to the White House since President Barack Obama took office in January, including lobbyists, business executives, activists and celebrities.
No previous administration has released such a list, though the information out so far is incomplete. Only about 110 names —and 481 visits —out of the hundreds of thousands who have visited the Obama White House were made public. Like the Bush administration before it, Obama is arguing that any release is voluntary, not required by law, despite two federal court rulings to the contrary.
The emphasis there is mine. This is a bit of a schizophrenic opening. On the one hand, they want to champion that Obama released 110 names - Woohoo!! On the other hand, they have to acknowledge that, once again, President Obama is using the SAME arguments as Bush. Moreover, this “Constitutional Scholar” is doing so in clear violation of not one, but TWO federal court rulings! Maybe the KoolAide was made improperly that day, I don’t know, but the report continues:
Under the Obama White House’s policy, most names of visitors from Inauguration Day in January through the end of September will never be released. The White House says it plans to release most of the names of visitors from October on, and that release is due near the end of the year. There are limitations there as well, including potential Supreme Court nominees, personal guests of the First Family, and certain security officials.The names released Friday include business leaders and lobbyists with a lot to gain or lose from Obama policies. They include Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates (whose foundation is pushing for changes in teacher pay), former AIG chairman Maurice Greenberg, Exxon Mobil CEO Rex Tillerson, Chevron CEO David O’Reilly, Citigroup’s Vikram Pandit, Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, JP Morgan’s James Dimon, Bank of America CEO Kenneth Lewis, John Stumpf of Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley’s John Mack, State Street bank’s Ron Logue, BNY Mellon’s Robert Kelly, labor leader Andrew Stern of the Service Employees International Union (22 visits)*, American Bankers Association CEO Ed Yingling, community bankers president Camden Fine, and lobbyists Heather and Anthony Podesta, whose brother John Podesta led Obama’s transition team.
Besides Gates, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer and General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt are also on the list. (Msnbc.com is a joint venture of Microsoft and NBC. One of NBC’s parents is GE.)
Advocates and nonprofit leaders include National Organization for Women President Kim Gandy, and Risa Lavizzo-Mourey, president of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, which is interested in health policy.
So, this is how Obama is paying these people and organizations back, by having them in the White House? I bet Kim Gandy was just all aflutter after she threw ALL women under the bus to endorse Obama over a life-long women’s advocate. There is more on her below.
I know many readers will be interested in this White House guest:
Democratic donor and businessman George Soros visited with White House aides twice.
Yes, indeedy, a major funder of Moveon.org has been to check up on his biggest investment - ahem - twice.
We’re just getting started:
Political figures include former Sen. Thomas Daschle, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich. Chicago Mayor Richard Daley, former Gov. Howard Dean, Sen. Al Franken, former Vice President Al Gore, former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, the late Sen. Edward Kennedy, and Democratic strategist Steve Elmendorf.Celebrities at the White House include Oprah Winfrey, actors Brad Pitt, George Clooney and Denzel Washington, and tennis star Serena Williams. Journalists include Paul Krugman, the New York Times columnist and Nobel Prize winner in economics.
Conservative religious leader Gary Bauer visited, as did liberal civil rights leaders Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.
Okay, the last two, along with Oprah, are NOT a surprise. Gary Bauer? Just a tad surprising.
For anyone who wants to see more:
Msnbc.com has put the full list in a handy PDF file, and also in an Excel file for those who like to sort.
One guest is mighty interesting:
Not that Bill AyersThe White House warns that many names that may appear familiar — and controversial — do not in fact refer to the most famous people to carry those names. Jeremiah Wright is on the list, but it’s not the president’s former pastor. This Michael Jordan is not the basketball player. This Michael Moore is not a filmmaker. The William Ayers who took a group tour of the White House isn’t the former radical from Chicago who figured so prominently in the 2008 campaign. And the Angela Davis on the list has a different middle initial than the activist and former fugitive.
The White House could have avoided some of that sort of confusion by providing more information on the visitors, such as an employer name and the city they hail from. For example, is the Shawn Carter who attended a poetry reading the same one who goes by Jay-Z and had campaigned for Obama?
“This unprecedented level of transparency can sometimes be confusing rather than providing clear information,” a White House special counsel, Norm Eisen, wrote on the White House blog.
If you spot a name on the list that bears investigating, please drop us a note.
Of COURSE we will just trust Obama and his spokes-minions when they assure us that this Bill Ayers could not POSSIBLY be domestic terrorist - Capitol Building and Pentagon bomber - long time friend and mentor Bill Ayers! He is just some guy who wanted to visit the White House Gift Shop and pick up a couple of Marine One helicopter models for his boys. I am sure of it. Sheesh. Really? They expect us to believe this crap? Evidently - they got plenty of other people to believe that kind of crap and more, so why stop now?
Okay - if you are consuming any liquids right this minute, I suggest you put it down when you read this:
Limited releaseDespite the accompanying White House claim of “transparency like you’ve never seen before,” the Obama White House continues to take the same legal position as the Bush White House, arguing that the records are not public records subject to the Freedom of Information Act. Only limited “voluntary releases” are being made to settle a lawsuit filed by an advocacy group, though a federal judge has twice ruled that all the visitor logs are public. (Again, emphasis is mine.)
Yet there are severe limitations to the transparency:
Most of the visitors from Inauguration Day to September will never be released by the White House under this voluntary disclosure — unless the public can guess their names. The White House policy doesn’t allow members of the public or press to ask for “everyone who visited health czar Nancy-Ann DeParle,” or everyone who visited on May 4, or everyone from the American Medical Association. Only individual names can be checked.
I know, right? Didn’t this sound just a little pissy?? From someone at MSNBC?? The bigger picture is that the Obama Administration is BREAKING THE LAW. Hell to the YES, that information falls under FOIA - this is OUR White House, not the Obamas. We most definitely DO get to know every single John Smith and Jane Doe who cross the threshold of the White House. You better believe we do.
This is just the tip of the iceberg, but it is a start:
The list released at 4:30 p.m. Friday includes just about 110 names with 481 visits. Those names were among those requested by members of the public so far, for visits during the period from Inauguration Day through July. (That’s why we know of visits by the wrong Bill Ayers, the wrong Angela Davis, etc., but we don’t know of visits by countless unnamed lobbyists.) Members of the public who used the White House online form to check names did not receive a personal reply indicating whether or not the request was received, or whether the name appeared on the list, so the system provides no feedback. Does the absence of Bill Clinton’s name on the list mean that he has not been to the White House, or that the request wasn’t received by the White House online system?A request for the complete records of all visitors from the first months of the administration, filed by msnbc.com, was rejected by the White House, and an appeal is pending. The news organization requested the names of all visitors to the Obama White House beginning with Inauguration Day. Msnbc.com has filed an administrative appeal with the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the Secret Service.
Say whaa?? The White House rejected a request from their lapdog “news” source?? Huh. There’s a shocker. Welcome to the “Under The Bus” club, MSNBC!
The Wall Street Journal focused on the most frequent visitor to the White House. He was mentioned in the list above, but without the acknowledgment of the frequency:
SEIU’s Stern Tops White House Visitor ListPromising “transparency like you’ve never seen before,” The White House released its visitor log this evening under a new voluntary disclosure policy.
The log chronicles 481 visits to the White House from individuals ranging from Jay-Z to Bill Gates from January through July.
The list includes William Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, Michael Moore, Robert Kelly (R. Kelly), Malik Shabazz, and Michael Jordan.
But the White House said those aren’t the guys you’re thinking of. Nor is the log complete.
Ahahahahahahaha!!! I just cannot get enough of this one - sure, they aren’t the same people. Yeah, okay, we believe you. NOT. And because it is just so much fun to see them squirm, I am keeping in the part that is repetitive of the article above, especially the quotes from Eisen. Oh, what a funny guy:
“A lot of people visit the White House, up to 100,000 each month, with many of those folks coming to tour the buildings. Given this large amount of data, the records we are publishing today include a few ‘false positives’ – names that make you think of a well-known person, but are actually someone else,” Norm Eisen, a special counsel to the president, writes on the White House blog. “The well-known individuals with those names never actually came to the White House. Nevertheless, we were asked for those names and so we have included records for those individuals who were here and share the same names.”Adds Eisen: “This unprecedented level of transparency can sometimes be confusing rather than providing clear information.”
Uh, ya know, I think we are all smart enough to not get all confused by this incredible level of “transparency.” Beginning with, we actually know the definition of “transparency,” something Eisen and Obama apparently do not.
And then there is this:
One thing is clear: *Service Employees International Union President Andrew Stern holds sway at the White House, where he’s listed for 22 visits—the top number on the logs. Visitors in the top 10 also include former Clinton White House Chief of Staff John Podesta, former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, National Organization for Women President Kim Gandy, and NARAL Pro-Choice America President Nancy Keenan.
So THAT’S what Gandy and Keenan got for stabbing Hillary Clinton and, well, WOMEN, int he back - visits to the White House. I guess there is something gained by selling your soul, though, personally, I don’t think it is worth it. But that’s just me.
Anywho - yes, the President of the SEIU, again, the union co-founded by the founder of ACORN, Wade Rathke, is the TOP visitor at the White House. The SEIU has been in the news quite a bit, especially for holding California hostage - threatening that their good buddy, Obama, would not give the state any federal stimulus funds if it had the audacity to expect the union to cut wages like everyone else so the state wouldn’t go bankrupt. NOW we know how the union was able to do that. All those visits to the White House apparently paid off - for the union, not California, the state with one of the largest budgets around (as in 5th in the world). What makes this more egregious is that California pays a lot into the federal tax system and receives little comparatively speaking. And this union is allowed - by the White House - to hold it over a barrel. Yep, all those meetings seemed to do the trick!
Aren’t you just so heartened by all of this “transparency”? And by seeing who Obama is welcoming into our White House? Yeah, me, too. As long as the Obama Administration continues to thumb its nose at Federal Law, I reckon we should be “thankful” for this (no, not really - it’s BS that they are still sitting on so much information).
Oh, but if you can just GUESS who might else have been there and submit that form asking them, maybe you can confirm some other folks who have been there, too. Lemme know what you find out, okay? I am sure we would all just love to know…









































So most of the visitors are Obama supporters, why is that a big surprise or even news worthy? Did you expect Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin to be on the guest list? The WH is President Obama’s crib now, he can invite whomever he wants.
Oh and the list is just a fraction…and carefully chosen from the entire year so far.
It’s not even like he claimed this is the list from the first so many months.
He’ selected whose names he would disclose.
You will not see the list of Coal Execs…Big Pharma…Insurance…..shhh, don’t tell the kool aid drinkers. Like one my sister mentioned in Atl, he thinks we don’t have anymore wars with Obama.
I’m surprised he listed Ayers. Actually, I’m really, really surprised the guy even visited. Obama doesn’t know him, he’s just a guy from the neighborhood.
Of course, they CLAIM it is not THAT Bill Ayers, without providing ANY information as to how it isn’t the same one (like employer, for instance). You know, we’re supposed to just trust them.
A WhitePages search for “Bill Ayers” brings up hundreds of different Bill Ayerses scattered all across the country–possibly an indication of a widespread Bill Ayers terrorist network.
Or, troll, it really could be Bill Ayers and That One is lying. That regulars here have to use Occam’s
razorchainsaw with you and your stupid comments each and every time you post is getting mighty old. Just dry up, shill.It’s amazing that he invited so many people with the same name as other people we have heard about. Hmmm - maybe there was a reason. Using Ayers as an example, maybe the “fake” (non-notorious) Ayers was invited once to cover for the “real” one going the other times. Then they could use the excuse about the “fake” one….. I wouldn’t put it past Axelrod.
Correction: It is not Obama’s crib, although a baby’s crib may just be the thing for Obama.
The White House doesn’t exist for the pleasure of Obama or MicHELLe or any of Obama’s pals.
What you fail to grasp is that Obama works for the country not the other way around. If Obama can’t figure that out and his minions can’t figure that out, what will it take to get the message across to him and you, FF?
Obama is a temporary guest in the White House, just as any other president has been.
You are absolutely right, Buzz 0 it most definitely is NOT Obama’s “crib.” The White House belongs to the PEOPLE, not the resident.
That this fact eludes Obama’s supporters is indicative that they do not understand the most basic of of civics. Hence, the liberties they take with the Constitution and laws (like the federal ones Obama is breaking) sail past…
Thank you for this. Obama’s secrecy is far worse than anyone else. Namely, he campaigned againsst the secresy of others meetings. And he pledge openness on his. So his slap in the face is stinging.
And, I’m happy you brought this up. I had been wondering about Paul Krugman. Paul Krugman is a liberal, but always looked at honest facts. He never used to be a shill for the WH. I thought he took pride in being honest ad realistic to his beliefs.
But I noticed a change with him. He has become more, not just partisan, but Obama talking point partisan. Organizing 101, intimidate and demean.
All of the sudden weeks ago he started tweeting daily, with his blog posts. And I saw a different Krugman. Writing with a slant to promote the Democrats and their agenda. I saw derogatory referenes and it was troubling. He always made the argument that any “opposers had to be right wingers”. But “concerns from Progressives were legitmate” as the” bill is far from perfect”. Oh, but the opposers are right wingers? How can he tell the difference fro the right wingers or legitimate progressives? hmmmmm
Also the problem that his words have been political “not perfect”, “better than nothing”. Gee, what happened to Paul Krugman.
The capper for me was when he referred to the Tea Part protesters as “tea baggers” and then tried to use the Democrats talking point trickled out from the top advisers, trying to claim “now that Sarah Palin’s efforts have backfired”… Really? In what universe? But the point was, Krugman is using WH talking points in his writings.
He at that moment lost me and I unfollowed him.
And then the list. When I saw Krugman went to the WH, and his change, it became clear. Part of the NEA push…or just directed at select journalists with promises to bailout the newspapers?
Our previously respected voices are not learning, but in reality are worsening becoming whores for the WH.
sorry for my typos. Not awake enuf yet….ok more coffee.
Does anybody know if NOW lost membership after they endorsed Hillary? I sure hope so.
As far as I know, all the women’s groups supported the man (manchild). And I don’t believe that NOW can be judged that simply, as since the Selection they now have totally different leadership. The 3rd wavers got kicked out (thank goodness).
and wow, look at this.
“In Iowa, Second Thoughts on Obama
By JEFF ZELENY
Published: November 3, 2009
The president’s standing has fallen in the state that jump-started his campaign, especially among independents and Republicans.
…and that’s from the NYT
I used to have tremendous respect for Krugman, IALT, but you are right: he is changing.
It is really a shame. Such a bright man, but they have gotten to him. Not sure what he is getting out of this. During the campaign, he was firmly entrenched in Clinton’s camp, and highlighted why her health care plan was superior to Obama’s. I guess he forgot that, but I sure haven’t.
Thanks, too, for the piece from Iowa. That happened so early on, I don’t know how those caucuses were run, but if the others are representative, we can only assume ACORN was involved int hose as well. We know that Texas, glaringly, as well as Washington, had some major shenanigans occur with their caucuses, including people being bused in. So, yeah - what happened in Iowa from the get-go?
Thanks for the thoughtful comments - even before your coffee!
Thanks for writing this because if you just read the headlines or hear about it on the radio you’d think he IS being more transparent than BushCo. NOT.
The only satisfaction I get these days is that we didn’t vote for this fraud.
But it’s not much solace when you read about what the future holds in the USA with these jerks at the helm. I am really worried about the economy.
Perhaps the SEIU guests had something to do with planning this:
http://biggovernment.com/2009/11/01/will-corzine-allies-steal-the-election-in-new-jersey-acorn-dirty-tricks-and-absentee-ballot-fraud/#more-23882
http://biggovernment.com/
Thanks so much for this, Lana. I have been seeing some news about this recently. If NJ comes down to absentee ballots, they are going to look carefully at them. A number of the signatures on ones turned in do NOT match the signature of the person on record.
What a surprise. Not.
I just can’t believe they could let it come to this again. I keep hoping people are beginning to see the light, but then something like this pops up again and shows that That One, Inc. think they can still do whatever they want without repercussions. Which means they have reason to believe people will let them.
Obama’s skin ‘n bones skeletal figure will get worse since as a pathological liar he now has to lie continuously and repeatedly on a daily basis. Keeping track of all his lies keep him preoccupied, worried and his meals go to waste. Lesson: Pathological liars should not run for president of anything, let alone the U.S.A.
well said.
And not that I agree with the (ugh) “swooning” over the shallow one, they do say, “beauty is only skin deep” and he’s running out of that skin.