Another Addition For Obama, The Blame Czar?
By Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy on November 5, 2009 at 8:25 AM in Afghanistan, Bamboozling, Campaign promises, Chicago politics, Current Affairs, Foreign Policy, George Bush, Health Care, Messiah, President Barack Obama, Stimulus Plan, Valerie Jarrett
(Bumped up from Tuesday.)
This is rich. We know about Obama’s many, many czars. Mark Steyn believes Obama has another one, someone of whom you have heard, but who isn’t on the usual list,
Obama Makes Bush His Blame Czar. You know, he has a point - we’ve been hearing for months now “He did it!” from Obama on all sorts of issues.
Steyn begins his piece writing about “Barack’s Rock,” Valerie Jarrett:
Valerie Jarrett announced the other day that “we’re going to speak truth to power.”Who’s Valerie Jarrett? She’s “Senior Adviser” to the president of the United States – i.e., the leader of the most powerful nation on the face of the Earth. You would think the most powerful man in the most powerful nation would find a hard job finding anyone on the planet to “speak truth to power” to. But I suppose if you’re as eager to do so as his Senior Adviser, there’s always somebody out there: The Supreme Leader of Iran. The Prime Minister of Belgium. The Deputy Tourism Minister of the Solomon Islands. But no. The Senior Adviser has selected targets closer to home: “I think that what the administration has said very clearly is that we’re going to speak truth to power. When we saw all of the distortions in the course of the summer, when people were coming down to town hall meetings and putting up signs that were scaring seniors to death.”
Ah, right. People “putting up signs.” Can’t have that, can we? The most powerful woman in the inner circle of the most powerful man on Earth has decided to speak truth to powerful people standing in the street with handwritten placards saying “THIS GRAN’MA ISN’T SHOVEL READY.” Was it only a week ago that I wrote about this administration’s peculiar need for domestic enemies?
The Senior Adviser seems to have forgotten that she is the power. Admittedly, this is a recurring lapse on the part of the administration. There was Barack Obama only the other day, blaming everything on the president – no, no, silly, not him, the other fellow, the Designated Fall Guy who stepped down as head of state in January to accept the new constitutional position of Blame Czar. Musing on problems in Afghanistan, Obama blamed the “long years of drift” under his predecessor. The new president – OK, newish president – has been Drifter-in-Chief for almost a year but he’s too busy speaking truth to the former power to get on top of the situation. It could be a while yet. In his more self-regarding moments, such as his speech to the United Nations, he gives the strong impression that the “long years of drift” began in 1776.
Indeed, Ms. Jarrett thinks throwing around phrases pulled from those who are actually in the trenches will give her some street cred. You don’t think anyone fell for that hooey, do you? Just in case you know anyone who did, you can tell them that she is a lawyer, married to a doctor, and was on the Chicago Stock Exchange. So, yeah, not exactly a career in the Peace Corps., or hell, even AmeriCorps. Just more posturing on the part of the Obama Administration.
Just like Obama’s blame shifting. Just more posturing to protect his carefully crafted image:
Rocco Landesman, head honcho at the National Endowment for the Arts, seems closer to the reality of the situation. In his keynote address to the 2009 “Grantmakers in the Arts” conference, Landesman hailed Obama as “the most powerful writer since Julius Caesar”. He didn’t mean a “powerful writer” as in a compelling voice, gripping narrative, vivid characterization, command of language, etc. He meant a “powerful writer” as in Caesar was king of the world, and now Obama is. He came, he saw, he stimulated: “If you accept the premise, and I do, that the United States is the most powerful country in the world, then Barack Obama is the most powerful writer since Julius Caesar. That has to be good for American artists.”I suppose so. He could invade somewhere and force the natives to accept degrading roles in NEA-funded performance art. He could take out the Iranian nuclear program by carpet-bombing it with unreadable literary novels. That is, if you “accept the premise” that the United States is the most powerful country in the world. Rocco Landesman may, but it’s not clear, from his actions (or inactions) in Eastern Europe, Iran, Afghanistan and elsewhere, that the president does. But, even so, it seems an odd pitch to “American artists.” Rocco Landesman, Speaking Goof to Power, isn’t the first Obama groupie to enjoy the kinky frisson of groveling obsequiousness, but he’s set an impressive new standard in public revelation thereof. Rocco’s aunt, Fran Landesman, is the great lyricist of “Spring Can Really Hang You Up The Most” as well as “The Ballad Of The Sad Young Men.” But surely there are few sadder middle-age men than her nephew, prostrating himself before his master as the most literate global colossus in two millennia.
Oh, I wouldn’t be so sure about that, but I take his point. Still, there are a whole bunch of sad “middle-age men” who would fit that bill. Chris Matthews springs immediately to mind.
Speaking of the NEA:
Meanwhile, Larry David is now doing televised NEA exhibits on his HBO show “Curb Your Enthusiasm.” Christians are said to be “angry” at him because of an episode in which, after he accidentally sprays his urine on a picture of Jesus, his assistant mistakes the droplets for tears and calls in her mother to witness the miracle of Christ weeping. Ha-ha! Oh, those brave transgressive artists! Of course, Christians aren’t “angry” in the sense that two U.S. residents arrested last week are. The pair – one an American citizen, the other Canadian – were so “angry” about the Muhammad cartoons published in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten that they hatched a plot to kill the artist and his editor. As many commentators pointed out, Mr. David’s splashy stunt is a dreary provocation: It’s easy to be provocative with people who can’t be provoked. If he were to start urinating in a more Mecca-ly direction, he’d find an entirely more motivated crowd waiting for him at the stage door.But I liked the point made by the Anchoress, a writer at the magazine First Things: Putting Muhammad, et al aside, if Larry David had a yen to urinate hither and yon, wouldn’t it have been “braver” to have done it to the religious icon du jour? That’s to say, Barack Obama. And then maybe Ashton Kutcher could have marveled at how even Obama’s image was empathizing tearily with all 687 million Americans without health insurance. Or, alternatively, dribbling warm champagne from his Norwegian Nobel banquet toast. C’mon, Larry. Sure, you might not have a career afterward, but, unlike any Islamo-provocations, you’re not gonna get killed. Just fired, and probably damned as a racist. But at least you wouldn’t be a simpering suck-up to power like Rocco Landesman and the other creeps.
“Religious icon du jour” - priceless. I mean, c’mon, obviously he is - just check out that Chia commercial. And I wouldn’t hold my breath on the end of sucking-up, but that’s just me:
At some point the Caesar cult has to manifest itself in an achievement – I mean a real achievement, not merely some dud prize handed out by Norwegian Lefties. Afghanistan is his now: Notwithstanding “years of drift,” whether it winds up as victory or defeat is his call. It’s Obama’s war. It’s Obama’s economy. The stimulus bill is his stimulus, and for $787 billion it created 30,000 new jobs (according to the government) or (according to the Associated Press) 25,000. Either way, you do the math. It’s Obama’s unemployment rate, Obama’s dollar, Obama’s debt. Pace Valerie Jarrett, the truth is you are the power. And those on the receiving end of it are going to be speaking a lot louder in the months ahead.
Yep, it surely is all Obama’s now. And not for nothing, but it isn’t like the Democrats didn’t control both houses for two years before Obama got into the White House. There is a lot for which Bush is responsible, but at some point, Obama needs to stop making him the Blame Czar, and start doing his job.









































Blame Czar! I love it! What would we do without you Amy? Thanks for all your work and keeping us updated. You are a marvel. Blame Czar…that’s good!
Thanks so much, Lana! I wish I could take credit for the “Blame Czar,” but Steyn came up with it. Pretty accurate, though, isn’t it?
I get that, Amy, and I spend a lot of time online trying to educate myself about what’s going on in this country. It’s unbelievably time-consuming. You find these gems, pull them together, string them with your thoughts and put it out there for all of us. Just wanted you to know I appreciate that. I also appreciate the many members of the community on this site. It’s my ‘go-to’ place for a bit of sanity and actual thought when the other places are driving me crazy.
Whew - good - I was afraid I wasn’t clear. I should have known you got it, Lana - sorry!!
And thank you so much. It really means a lot that you feel that way.
I am grateful for this community, too; for such thoughtful, well educated people who are willing to look deeper, and not accept things on face value.
Thanks again, Lana!
[...] Go here to read the rest: Another Addition For Obama, The Blame Czar? [...]
Have to say, Bush started this. Especially his first term, EVERYTHING was Bill Clinton’s fault. The Republicans are still blaming Bill Clinton for every stupid thing Bush did.
Oh, I doubt Bush was the first one to blame a former president, though, yes, it used to bug the bejesus out of me when he blamed Clinton for things even after Bush’s first term. Ridiculous.
But Obama was actually in the Senate, and voted on a lot of the things he is now blaming on Bush, so that’s the (big) difference.
Absolutely, Amy! Huge difference. 0 should have been doing his job and working to defeat these oh-so-horrible Bush policies. But of course, he was too busy campaigning.
Really Tek? Try to provide some proof that Bush was constantly pointing backwards at Clinton. I don’t recall even a quip that Bush made in that respect. There were many in the media that did, and I’m sure the public in general were in a rolling debate along those lines, but I seriously don’t remember a constant drumbeat of blame issuing from the Bush administration, at least NOTHING similar to the ubiquitous excuses and blame shifting that is an intentional and planned tactic that Obama uses to replace actual acomplishments and constructive remedial policies. No need for Obama to ever pass in his homework as long as the teacher keeps believing that the dog ate it.
Agree Amy–
There was a Democratic Congress as of 2006, AND Obama knew what he was willing to take on (unless he is really stupid, which I don’t think he is).
Over at Cannonfire, I just read an article about Geithner’s new plan:
“Now, Treasury Secretary Geithner is talking about reforming the financial industry. The FDIC has a scheme of its own. Alas, as in the health care debate, the proposed reforms are worse than doing nothing”.
_______________________________________
http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/
One part of this is a perpetual list of institutions “too big to fail”.
Now who’s going to take the blame when these institutions need to be bailed out everytime they have milked the cow dry. Will it be Bush or Clinton?
Is it possible that a more accurate title could be “Scapegoat Czar”?
George W. Bush and Bill Clinton are going to square off and duke it out on February 2, 2010, at Madison Square Garden. The outcome of the match will determine once and for all Whose Fault it Really Is.
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local-beat/Its-On-Bill-Clinton-George-W-Bush-to-Face-Off-at-Radio-City–68937827.html
Why would Clinton want to debate Bush? Bush already is painted the fool by the media and the President’s machine. There is nothing to gain for Clinton. All that will happen is it will bring new life to the discussion of the Clinton closet.
Maybe they’ve both watched too many Rocky movies?
That meeting has been canceled now by both Clinton and Bush. They were not happy abt the way it was being promoted. Apparently, the publicity was supposed to be run by both of them, and it wasn’t. It wasn’t supposed to be a “debate,” as it turns out.
I admit, I am disappointed. I would have loved to see Bush square off against Bill Clinton!!
Blame Czar! In prison they call have a phrase for it. LOL Bush is BO’s ____.
(ala Brittney) Leave Bush alone!!!
Looks like BO took Yogi’s advise. Blame the bat.
Great Rev. Amy.
We’re headed for a nasty accident when Obama seems focused entirely on the rear view mirror and not on the road up ahead.
Valeria Jarrett is a crook from the Chicago crook cabal. The sooner she and her crook cabal, including bho the fraud, are out of OUR WH, the better.
Valerie. Even crooks deserve to have their names spelled right.
She can speak truth to power as much as she likes. Fewer and fewer are listening to her. She and Obama’s thugs have had their chance and they blew it. Greed and arrogance have a way of doing that to folks.
Obama and his 40 odd czars…Ali Baba and the 40 Thieves
In case you haven’t seen it:
Photo of the Day – Jon Corzine seen scraping “Yes We Can” bumper sticker off of NJ state SUV
LOL - good one!
That is the overwhelming tone to this man’s Presidency. He is the first U.S. President whose speeches could have been written by the speech writers of Chavez or Ajad. But wait, those guys probably write their own material. But heck, he is ever so elegant while he tours the world as an anti-American idol and beats us down for being born Americans. What did we ever do to deserve this? Ask the President. No, ask his speech writer. Our President is made of anarchist putty.
Great job! From Hope and Change to Dope and Spare Change in less than 12 months. Brilliant!
We are headed for a “couch money” economy it looks like. But onto the fun stuff… When is the next trip to Copenhagen? I wonder what the Obama’s will be wearing? Which celebrities will fly with Obama to the climate change summit? I nominate Bono, because he is not a rapper… you know diversity and all that. We don’t need no stinkin’ jobs. Jobs are for people who don’t have an entertaining President. Besides if everybody was working, who would watch the press conferences?
Good morning Amy!
The “Blame Czar” would have been perfect for Rev. Wright…too bad about the spat with BO!
The debate mentioned upthread between Bush and Clinton has been canceled by Bill.
It was supposed to be a respectful discussion, much like those of the past among former Presidents.
I’m also concerned that Clinton does not appear as vital and alert now. He looked rather vague at the appearance with Corzine.
Good point, Sassy - Rev. Wright was mighty good at blaming…
I wonder if it is taking a toll on Bill to have to pander for this guy. I mean, how could it not? It has to eat away at him…
The job numbers just came out and it was painted as improving because there were just 511K people becoming unemployed last week. 511K is about the population of Atlanta. But then on thinking about it… in Atlanta there aren’t 511K employed persons. A good part of the population is school kids, retired people etc. So, I am wondering what this number is really like? If 511K people lost their jobs last week… How big a city would that really effectively translate into? 1M, 1.5M… It is probably 2-3 times higher than the 511K figure. For how many weeks has this been going on while the Presidents men and women spend “stimulus” money on field mice type of projects. Something has to give, because this can’t go on much longer… can it?
Docelder,
I share your concerns. I saw a map a couple of days ago that had many states already at 10% and higher unemployment.
The biggest issue is that many of these jobs are gone forever.
Wherever we are going, we are moving fast!
well, and even the stated figures are not real figures: small businesses do not have to pay unemployment: all those people let go from small businesses that don’t pay unemployment aren’t included in these figures.
http://money.cnn.com/news/storysupplement/economy/gapmap/ the unemployment map
My state has pretty high unemployment - close to 12%. Hence the joy abt Boening coming here.
Docelder, I was thinking abt that this morning, too. Over HALF A MILLION new claims in one week is pretty significant.
And sad.