RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

A Fraud By Any Other Name

A few loyal readers have graciously shared video clips of interviews with former banking regulator, William K. Black. These interviews address the fact that a tremendous amount of mortgage originations at the core of our current economic turmoil were fraudulently underwritten. The borrowers were never qualified only then to fall upon hard times. The loans were often NINJA (No income check, No job check or asset check) and the fraud was more often committed by the lender than the borrower.

Why and how did this happen? Let’s briefly revisit my writing from November 12th:

At the turn of the century, the Wall Street model was a pure “originate to distribute” model with little to no residual risk on behalf of the originators or underwriters. When there is no residual risk, those who “WIN” are the players that can purely process the most volume. Well, how does one get volume? Lower the credit standards, put fewer restrictions on borrowers, little to no covenants (NINA Loans … no income, no asset check). WOW!!! What were we thinking?? Well Wall St. felt, “let’s worry about it tomorrow or maybe not at all because we are making too much money today.”

That money SUPPOSEDLY being made left tremendous risks on the books of the banks. The pursuit of ever greater SUPPOSED profits incorporated the use of CDS (credit default swaps) as synthetic collateral for structured deals. These CDS allowed for an enormous increase in volume and SUPPOSED profits. Don’t forget, though, at the core of the process a large percentage of the underlying loans were fraudulently underwritten.

Our American banking industry has literally dragged our economy to depths not seen in a very long time and hopefully never again. The government bailouts, as Black highlights and I concur, are being used to cover up these fraudulent loans. Literally, the first paragraph I wrote as a financial blogger back in October addresses this point:

Much like that scene in the movie “Trading Places” when the wealthy tycoon says “turn those machines back on,” I view this bailout package as nothing more than the best of a litany of very bad alternatives. Without being overly pessimistic, though, if you want to reduce this package to layman’s terms, this package is the equivalent of a massive injection of capital/liquidity into a Ponzi scheme that was being played (whether they knew were playing it or not) by certain large financial institutions.

From that initial bailout package to every single one since then, the money truly is being used to backstop institutions filled with fraudulent loans.

Black provides a comprehensive review of the fraud in the underwriting, rating, and distribution process. Black maintains that the executives at these originators (such as Ameriquest, Long Beach, New Century, et al) were fully aware of the fraud but did not dissuade it. At every point in the food chain, an entity had its hand in the till.

Where were the regulators then and where are the authorities now? Why have no executives from the originators or banks been arrested and prosecuted? Where was the integrity then and where is it now?

A house with no foundation can not stand. In order to rebuild a foundation, the cracks and corrupt contractors need to be exposed. Utilizing a different analogy, while the authorities may go after some local thugs pushing dope onto schoolkids, the focus should truly be on the major drug kingpins bringing the dope into the country.

You may not enjoy the clips with Mr. Black, but I do think you will find them enlightening. I thank getfitnow and FiscalLiberal for providing them. The first clip is an interview of William Black on Bill Moyers Journal. Clicking on the screen below should bring you to the Bill Moyers page on PBS.org. Once there, just click on the video screen to begin playback of the video. The video clip runs for about 28 minutes, but well worth viewing.

bill-moyers-william-black

In addition to the Bill Moyers interview, I’ve also included a shorter, 6-minute clip of an interview of William Black from tech ticker:

tech-ticker

LD

  • Docelder

    At every point in the food chain, an entity had its hand in the till

    Yep, right on to Fannie Mae which ultimately was buying this paper. Were it not for that, the loans would not be made, because let’s be real here… if it weren’t for Fannie buying these as bundled assets… what bank in their right mind would write no income and no asset loans to begin with? It was a “land rush” to see who could write the most of these the fastest to up 100% loan value and to refinance anyone sometimes to 125% of value. Without the deep and willing pockets of Fannie Mae, none of this could have been possible.

  • oowawa

    The interview between Moyers & Black is particularly significant since they are (were?) both Obama supporters:

    BILL MOYERS: To hear you say this is unusual because you supported Barack Obama, during the campaign. But you’re seeming disillusioned now.

    WILLIAM K. BLACK: Well, certainly in the financial sphere, I am. I think, first, the policies are substantively bad. Second, I think they completely lack integrity. Third, they violate the rule of law. This is being done just like Secretary Paulson did it. In violation of the law. We adopted a law after the Savings and Loan crisis, called the Prompt Corrective Action Law. And it requires them to close these institutions. And they’re refusing to obey the law.

    The bluntness of the admission was surprising.

    • Peggy Sue

      The bluntness “was” surprising, oowawa, and was not lost on the Far Left, who started howling as soon as the interview aired. I managed to watch this over the weekend with a link mountainaire provided. A very sobering run down on the extent of the fraud and the continuing coverup. Then I checked on a few “progressive” sites and they were dumping on Moyers. How dare he ask these snarky questions???

      When this breaks open [as I think it will eventually] Geithner and the Obama administration will have people calling for public lynchings. The Obama people may think they’re standing between the banksters and pitchforks now. But as Larry so succiently stated: a house without a foundation cannot stand. Not even if you repeat: “yes we can” in fast forward.

      What a disastrous mess!

  • Objective Analysis

    Bill Black is trying to attack CEO of capitalism when he knows darn well the problem is Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 by Jimmy Carter who tried to mix SOCIALISM by creating the freakin Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae institutions as it relates to home purchases.

    Obama and all these socialist Democrats supported this crap knowing full well that you don’t have a right to own a home.

    You can either rent or buy a home. There are advantages and disadvantages to it.

    Black is an ass and wants to support Obama knowing full well that his socialist theory is behind this shit.

    It is like mixing Oil with Water. It does not work.

    • Ferd Berfle

      Since you claim to be objective, when did the shit hit the fan? Not during Carter’s administration nor during that of Reagan or Bush I or Clinton. As a matter of history, now, it started during your hero, Dubya’s Administration and That One is only following in his footsteps since he is apparently DubyaII. Nice try, neocon, but you’re no better than an Obamabot.

      Your objectivity is apparently clouded.

    • Docelder

      Fannie and Freddie could get government money to loan cheaper than anyone else. So, what did they do with this? Did they make loans more affordable to qualified borrowers… to anybody? No, they took their pricing advantage and became a lender’s lender. They created this crisis by buying these bundled assets of loans to begin with. People could get 100% financing for a home who could not otherwise qualify for a revolving credit card. How stupid was that? But, everybody was just following the government money. The government was complicit.

  • viking

    I’m a little suspicious of the idea that ALL these hands in the till were merely greedy. Each of these individuals is both experienced and well educated enough to see the scale of the damage to our and other countries’ economies which resulted.

    I mean, I guess its possible that they were all myopically blinded to the result by rabid, wild-eyed greed but, really? Consider:
    (1) adopting bailouts rather than established chapter 11 bankruptcy mechanisms and continuing them;
    (2) Treasury’s attempt to get control over the U.S. business decisions/personnel;
    (3) Geithner’s acknowledgment that ‘we’re open to evolving into a new global currency’; and,
    (4) Obama agreeing to an international regulation board of U.S. companies.
    I am starting to get very, very nervous.

  • TexasBuckeye

    Two narratives seem to be forming to describe the underlying causes of the financial crisis.

    One, as outlined in a New York Times front-page story on Sunday, December 21, is that President Bush excessively promoted growth in home ownership without sufficiently regulating the banks and other mortgage lenders that made the bad loans. The result was a banking system suffused with junk mortgages, the continuing losses on which are dragging down the banks and the economy.

    The other narrative is that government policy over many years–particularly the use of the Community Reinvestment Act and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to distort the housing credit system– underlies the current crisis.

    The stakes in the competing narratives are high. The diagnosis determines the prescription. If the Times diagnosis prevails, the prescription is more regulation of the financial system; if instead government policy is to blame, the prescription is to terminate those government policies that distort mortgage lending.

    Read the whole truth here: http://spectator.org/archives/2009/02/06/the-true-origins-of-this-finan

  • TexasBuckeye
    • viking

      TexasBuckeye-

      Thanks for the link and that piece is a good overview of how the crises was caused and who played what roles. However, the federal reserve and treasury’s actions taken since mid Sept. 2008 to the present are outrageous at best and seriously creepy at worst (yeah, technical terms, I know.)

      I watched ALL of Paulson and Bernanke up on the hill in Sept. 2008. Their request for the original $700 billion was stunning but their reasoning and argument for its necessity (and outward behavior) were NOT credible.

      We’ve been told its all too complex to go through chapter 11 bankruptcy and I happen to know that is simply untrue. Complexity is NOT the reason. I have a couple different theories as to why bankruptcy is being avoided at the cost of trillions (no exaggeration), some benign and some not. The ensuing statements and actions by the federal reserve and treasury however, are very, very troubling.

  • ghshaeha

    A British, Malthusian Swindle: A NEW WORLD CURRENCY AS FRAUD

    http://www.larouchepac.com/lpactv?nid=9862

    • viking

      WOW! I never expected my views to combine with those of the LaRouche types . . . but here we are. There’s no question given all of what we’ve seen, Obama is an internationalist whoops, a transnationalist. He does not see the USA as a unique nation in world history. He sees a nation that somehow cheated its way into #1 . I’m seriously grossed out.

  • I’m a Linda too

    Another great an informative post. I had this link open to find the time to watch it. Thank you.

    And we will only worsen and only Barry will have to answer for it. He is covering…talking about salaries, not fixing the problems. But I guess, how can he, if the peoople telling him what to do are the ones who created the problem and want it to continue.

    He can give empty words, but when the problems worsen, those words won’t help him.

  • FED-UP!

    And what we have is the perfect Fascist Model – Government co-ownership & corruption with business while the taxpayer is set up for covering any losses. And why “FANNIE & FREDDIE”? Because the US Treasury/Federal Reserve Cartel now holds “REAL” Estate (rather than the phoney money $%^%^ they call “currency”) to pay off bond holders when the dollar collapses. Look for mass-loads of Chinese & other foreign bond holders to begin record-ownership of real estate in America. These tyrannical bastards must be stopped: http://publiccentralbank.com

  • I’mFedUp

    I know some people think the LaRouche peeps are a little wacky, but I am friends with someone there. The things he has told me have scared me to death. There is no way, none, to survive Obama. It’s worse than we all think and talk about. It’s so big, so ugly and it’s the end of America if we don’t stop it. The only people who CAN stop it at this point are “We the People.” By the way, every single thing my friend who works with LaRouche has told me has been the truth. Everything. He tells me something, and then two days later it’s in the news but not the reality of it – the MSM spin on it. We’re in SERIOUS trouble folks. SERIOUS bad news trouble.

  • Lyn Marcus

    I’m fed up, Larouche runs a cult which uses the same formula to scare people who know no better for 4 decades now.

    Larouche is nothing but a convicted criminal and cult leader who was sent to prison in the 1980s for hijacking over 30 million dollars from people who thought that he was a legitimate person. In this regards, Larouche is more of a Bernie Madoff with his cult’s promissory note schemes and credit card fraud. Like Madoff, hardly anyone who lost a total of nearly 34 million dollars in this madmans delusions and fraud will ever see a dime.

    Larouche has been a socialist, communist, Christian, left/right winger, pro Russian, anti Russian and anything else you can imagine to sucker people to his delusions.For over 40 years he has been running a cult of endless economic collapse, New Dark Ages and Nuclear war to recruit enough naive colege kids to drop out of school and support him. His cult skips many labor laws as he has them called “volunteers” and has them running like hamsters 18 hours a day, 6 1/2 to 7 days a week with one crisis after another for about 20 to 40 dollars a week.

    This cult circus has been going on for over 40 years by Larouche who has to recruit new blood to replace the worn out and broken down cult members who are discarded or those who have figured out how this farce works. Several hundred people have left the cult and in the last dying days of the elderly Larouche, he needs a few naive people to keep him and his wife living that millionaire lifestyle.

    You can read about how this charade is run on sites like:

    http://laroucheplanet.info/

    http://lyndonlarouchewatch.org/

    http://www.factnet.org/ under discussions where there are over 6K posts from former members about this lunacy.

    If you give your name and phone number to the cult, they will be calling you endlessly to save humanity which seems to be only done by emptying your babk account with them. If you are in college, then the way to save humanity is for you to drop out of college, toil endlessly at their card table shrines or boiler rooms raising money for him. You bascialy work for free as most people in cults.

    Whatever is the current script is all just a mirage as it can change on a dime when Larouche needs yoo to raise money from another list of people. Last year, Obama was the devil incarnate, now, Obama is being advised by Larouche. Read up on how this cult operates so you do not get hoodwinked by them.