RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

A Democrat Warns More Trouble Ahead

(Bumped up from last night . See Larry’s commentary below the fold.)

Roger Altman, Bill Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of the Treasury, presented a sobering and troubling warning about our economic future in the op-ed pages of Monday’s Financial Times. Altman writes (subscription required):

The rare nature of this recession precludes a cyclically normal US recovery. Instead, we are consigned to a slow, painful climb-out, as are nations such as Japan and Mexico that depend on US demand. The implications for US policy include a likely second round of stimulus, much more federal capital for the banking system and stunning budget deficits that will slow key initiatives for President Barack Obama, such as healthcare and energy reform.

What is unusual is that this is a balance-sheet driven recession, centred on the damaged financial condition of both households and banks. These weaknesses mandate sub-normal levels of consumer spending and overall lending for about three years. . . .

In contrast, most postwar recessions had a different sequence – rising inflationary pressures, a monetary tightening to counter them and, then, a slowdown in response to higher interest rates. . . .

None of that happened here. Instead, we saw a housing and credit market collapse that caused enormous losses among households and banks. The result was a steep drop in discretionary consumer spending and a halt to lending. . . . With reduced incomes, only cutting discretionary spending can produce higher savings. This explains why personal consumption expenditures fell at record rates at the end of 2008.

Consumer spending, however, has approximated 70 per cent of US gross domestic product for the past decade and dominates our economy. But household balance sheets will not be rebuilt soon. Home values will keep falling through mid-2010 and there is no precedent for equity markets, still down 45 per cent from their peak, to make those losses up in just two years. It is illogical, therefore, to expect a full snap-back in the consumer sector in 2010 or 2011. This alone mandates a drawn-out, weak recovery.

The second key sector is the financial one. According to the International Monetary Fund, western financial institutions, mostly in the US, have realised $1,000bn of losses on US-originated assets since the crisis began. . . . These losses are eating into banks’ capital and shrinking their capacity to add assets. Funds from the Troubled Asset Relief Program are only replacing lost capital, not increasing it. When might they end? With key categories of toxic assets still losing value, the answer is: not soon. The scale of lending needed to support a normal cyclical recovery will not materialise.

A third constraint on recovery may involve the federal balance sheet. The fiscal and monetary engines are currently on full throttle. But, within two years, concerns over budget deficits and inflation may revive, compelling the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates and Congress to adopt deficit reduction steps. These actions, contractionary by definition, could occur before a full recovery has asserted itself. On that basis, the federal balance sheet would also limit a full recovery.

It also is important to understand that the rapturous European welcome for Barack Obama was at best an empty gesture. Obama did not get a single thing he genuinely needed from what we might charitably characterize as European leaders:

The G20 failed to agree on Obama’s request for stronger fiscal expansion.

NATO members rebuffed Obama’s request for a significant increase in European combat forces.

But hey, why worry about real results when we can focus on meaningless feel good moments, grab-ass photo ops and air kisses with hot models.

  • ghshaeha

    A British, Malthusian Swindle: A NEW WORLD CURRENCY AS FRAUD

    http://www.larouchepac.com/lpactv?nid=9862

  • standard

    Krugman is pretty unhappy as well.
    But here’s good news from Hillary Clinton!
    She’s pushing for limits on tourism in Antarctica.
    http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/science/04/06/clinton.antarctica.tourism/index.html

  • http://deleted Buzz Latte

    So true on the G20 failures of Obama. So now he hops a few countries and the press makes it look like he’s the messiah – Or* EWWW -Emperor of the Whole Wide World. *Whomever said that on another thread please take full credit!!

    Meanwhile nothing much is going to happen for a few years in the domestic economic scene.

    It’s looking brighter for GOP and Independents in 2010.

    But instead of a partisan thing how about electing the best persons for the jobs. Please America, learn to do the right thing!

  • I’mFedUp

    America has never been more humiliated than this loser piece of crap going on the America Sucks World Tour and telling people he doesn’t speak Austrian. Never mind that he just sold our country out to the EU like the red headed bastard stepchild. We might never recover from Obama. Thanks to the 60 Million brain dead morons who subjected us to this crap.

  • I’mFedUp

    PS. Now that we all agree that he’s Muslim, whatever, that he lied, that he’s a danger to America, etc. Now that we all know that America got conned and he’s on a path to destroy us. Yeah, we get it. I just want to say…I hope that everyone (including me) is doing everything they can to expose and stop this Fraud from further destruction. It’s great to blog about how right we are that’s he is an Anti-American liar and moron. We get it. But everyone here should take action before it’s too late. Write your senators, reps, get involved in the protests, grass roots movements, marches, tea parties, lawsuits,etc. Do something. Because it’s getting too late to save even one remnant of our Constitution.

  • elise

    There have been some odd reactions on FOX to the economy recently. At times, it almost seems euphoric. Well the DOW is up slightly, but still 48% under what it was a few months ago and it’s still bouncing around some. The real estate market did better last month, but that could be because some of the bad assets are being auctioned off and are they included in home sales if they are foreclosures bought at auction? The unemployment continues to grow and those numbers don’t include those who are no longer eligible for coverage and the workers not being given full time hours. I know I’m rambling a little here, but like everyone else I know, I’m trying to make some sense of all the economic news. If a president or candidate says the world as we know it will come to an end if he doesn’t get his spending bill passed, gets his spending bill passed do the celestial choirs sing and all right with the world until he needs his next bill passed? We’ve had a feeling of impending economic disaster for over two years now only partly because we have lost some money in the market. But I gotta tell you Larry, it’s hard to believe anyone now because we feel like we are being programmed to react a certain way like Pavlov’s dogs. It’s no different than the terror bell. My husband is having some doubts about the crisis, but I have a very strong feeling this is real and there is a delicate balance where even the slightest movement can cause the entire thing to come crashing down. If we knew the truth, it would set us free.

  • John Smith

    Reality has a way of straightening everything out. It just takes time.

  • cynic

    Want to know my take on the situation? Probably not, but here it is anyway.

    At some point, the burgeoning national debt is likely going to run over us like a steamroller. Republican or democratic administrations will make little real difference, because either will face the same demographic problems and be locked into varying degrees of increasing deficit spending. At some point interest on the debt will begin sucking us dry.

    If Obama’s plan is moderately successful, that will happen later.

    If Obama’s plan is a failure, it will happen far sooner.

    The only hope I see for a serious turn around is moderate success, coupled with something that would prove to be a game-changer.

    A major breakthrough in energy technology could do it quickly–if, for example, we suddenly found the means for controlled atomic fusion. Smaller breakthroughs could do it more slowly–say, a large-scale solar energy program, paired up with a switch-over to electric vehicles and an efficient energy storage and distribution infrastructure.

    Cheap and abundant energy could theoretically result in rapid reindustrialization and a new manufacturing economy that would boost the GNP into unknown territory. That would allow us to run in the black and begin paying down the national debt, while still meeting the program commitments of Social Security, health care, etc.

    Otherwise it’s the steamroller, sooner or later. I don’t believe going back to the way things used to be is possible. Too many limiting factors were built into that equation–growing global energy demands concurrent with diminishing global supplies being the biggest.

  • John Smith

    If you would read a few articles on nuclear power you would know that breeder reactors are already available today and could provide power for the USA for 1000s of years. They emit no CO2 if that is your thing these days and use up almost all of the fuel that you put in to them. So they create very little by product that needs to be disposed off.

    Why are we not building these environmentally friendly reactors you might ask. That is because it would make the need for solar,wind,coal,gas power thing of the past and that we can’t have.

  • elise

    cynic why would you think I’m not interested in your opinion? We obviously have some differences, but that doesn’t mean I would ignore what you say. First of all, atomic fusion is at least ten years away and maybe longer. It is my understanding the tech for fusion is already available, but the problem is in the tubes for conducting. They have been trying some type of porcelain which cracks eventually and allow leakage. The tech for electric cars already exists and GM had one a few years ago and killed it, The oil lobby is really strong and a complete conversion at one time would impact the industry. Thoughts about alternative energy have been around for a long time and as a long term goal it makes a lot of sense if it’s integrated into the economy slowly. There is no hope of paying down the debt as long as spending keeps increasing. The real worry would be arriving at a place where we can no longer pay the interest on the debts. That’s when we start printing money and have to worry about inflation. In principle, I support many of the programs set out by Obama. Practically, I believe the spending needs to be controlled now. What I have worried about for several years is the congress and White House seeing the crisis as an opportunity to gain political points without realizing what the effect will be. Several months ago, Hillary gave a speech on the economy and she said the crisis began with the housing market and that’s where it has to be fixed. Bailing out the banks, lending money to hedge funds and derivative funds which help create the situation and allowing the money lent to them to be used to buy the assets makes no sense unless the object is to protect them and not the taxpayers. It’s like losing a home, receiving a loan to buy back the home at a lower price and suffering no penalty if you don’t pay back the loan. It makes me very uncomfortable for the the public/private partnership to allow the government to intervene directly in the operations of private companies. I don’t believe the crisis is manufactured, but I believe it is being used by Obama’s administration to restructure the economy and that may be fine for you because you trust him. I do not. I think I am the cynic, not you, because I believe the only way to survive is to have a healthy mistrust of Washington. I listened to a speech once by Norm Chomsky and he said very simply, “Governments lie”. All of them. And when confusion can be created to the extent the people cannot understand what is happening, it is dangerous.

  • elise

    John the co2 problem may not be a problem at all, but it could increase growth of plants and we don’t know what the long term effect would be. There is still a problem with fusion and that is the pipes used to conduct the cooling water. They haven’t been able to find a material which will work without the risk of splitting and cracking. It is probably the best solution for the long term, but it won’t be ready for several years. We can’t rely on one source the way we do with fossil fuels. Their is research going on in several areas, but the problem, especially now, is grant money. There is a little town in Texas which was supposed to be the site of a super conductor, but the funds were cut off before they could begin the work and now, other countries are moving ahead of us in these experiments. Soon we will have no choice but to look for research to solve energy problems. The opportunities are enormous and they’re waiting for us, but right now we can do nothing because of the debt.

  • John Smith

    That is why I said “if that is your thing these days”.

    I was not talking about fusion. Breeder reactors have been around since the late 1940s.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breeder_reactor

    We have uranium in the USA plus it can be extracted from sea water. Further more breeder reactors can burn thorium. It is a crime that we have abandoned this type of power generation because of some unfounded fear that people have of nuclear power. After all every aircraft carrier runs on it.

  • WMCB

    OT, but the supposed “knife assassination attempt” in Turkey was hoax, a Turkish official is saying. The man was well-known to them, and disturbed, but no danger to anyone and was released.

    What is interesting is that the “tip” came not from inside Turkey, but from an email address in the United States, who knew the man’s name and address.

  • Mercedes

    I wonder what Al Gore is up to these days. If anybody knows what’s what in the world of energy and high technology, he probably does. I remember him saying last year something about new energy technology that is going to change the face of civilization…or maybe I was dreaming. Not being a linear, logical thinker that image keeps coming back to me together images of frozen face Nancy Pelosi chastising an impudent reporter, “We’re trying to save the world.”

    What a charade, what a sham this whole political scene is.

    And please Jimmy Carter, stay out of the White House…stay away from Obama. You caused enough problems during your own term of office….which isn’t to say there should not be justice for the Palestinians…but bowing and scraping to the Royal Saudis is a nauseating obscenity…quite on par with idolizing the Chicago Fraud.

  • tony

    “It’s great to blog about how right we are that’s he is an Anti-American liar and moron. We get it. But everyone here should take action before it’s too late.”

    exactly.

    i honestly thought that either the treasury’s unprecedented moves into the private sector or the census being moved to the white house (thus under direct manipulation of the administration) would be the breaking point.

    i think the problem though is that the very people who would be outraged by these things are too busy trying to survive. i would love to go to rallies and do what i could to help, but my life is literally scripted from the minute i wake up to the moment i lay down. when i’m not working or sleeping, i’m trying to spend a minuscule time with my kids. i feel all i can do is beat my hands on my desk in frustration.

  • Park Slope Pubby

    I think we have to get small business to hire again. That, and that alone, will bring down unemployment.

    I own a small business, and I’m laying off.

    A game-changer is needed. Maybe stop FICA taxes for six months. Maybe some genuine health care reform.

    Small business owners need to feel that the government is on their side. And Obama has no idea that small business even exists. He will never take pro-small-business steps. So I can’t see things getting better.

  • Docelder

    “We’re trying to save the world.”

    That brings to mind this quote from Vietnam

    “It became necessary to destroy the village in order to save it.”

    Sometimes, I seriously wonder if that isn’t a viable option for these extreme leftists in control now. That they would rather destroy our economy and nation and rebuild it into what they think it should have been to begin with rather than to let things go on as they naturally would. Sometimes, I more than wonder… sometimes, I am fairly certain about it to be honest.

  • Diana L. C.

    I hate to sound sexist; but, hey, the MSM doesn’t mind, so why should I worry. Hillary reminds me of all the very busy, hard-working wonderful women in my family–12 aunts, my mother, my grandmothers, my great aunts. They couldn’t get things the way they really wanted them while living in a male-dominated culture, so they went about quietly making things better wherever thay could.

    Hillary did this after her health care proposals were laughed away when she was First Lady. She just quietly went on doing what she could to improve healthcare for children and women anyway. She’s doing that now. She could have done a much better job as POTUS, but since she couldn’t get that done, she is now going about trying to make our world better wherever she can.

  • penguin

    I love Antarctica. And I’m glad I saw it before the tourism limits will possibily be place. It is the most spectacular place on earth. From what I have read, scientists cause more harm to its environment that tourists, who only have a brief hour onshore. That’s if they are even able to go ashore. Of course there are all those ships. It is truly a treasure which the world shares.

  • penguin

    Couldn’t have said it better!

  • cynic

    There was a good/evil polarity about the atom in the days of my childhood: On the one hand, the possibility of total nuclear annihilation seemed like an entirely real, any-day-now possibility; on the other hand, every science fiction-reading kid knew that one day nuclear energy would power a technological future that was wonderful beyond imagining. That polarity was deeply embedded. Time passed. Somehow we managed not to incinerate the planet; a nuclear powered aircraft carrier appeared, a nuclear sub crossed under the frozen ice at the North Pole, and nuclear generating stations began to pop up like mushrooms. (Instead of the blinding flashes and mushrooms we’d grown up fearing.)

    Then something happened: Three Mile Island and Chernobyl. We came horrifyingly close to an unthinkable disaster out east, and actually saw one unfold somewhere else. It scared the crap out of us. The dark side of the nuclear polarity psychology kicked in with a vengence.

    We were also beginning to suspect about that time that corporate America couldn’t be trusted. The nuclear industry became a particular focus of the generalized suspicion. The human factor was as much of a concern as the technology itself.

    I agree that it’s high time we got over the irrational component of our fears. There were very important lessons to be learned, but the need for permanent abandonment of so promising a technology shouldn’t have been one of them.

  • http://noquarter foxyladi14

    i agree with you..get the small business to grow.into big ones.
    it.s the American way..

  • elise

    Sorry John, I should have read your comment more carefully. But there is a lot of radioactive waste from breeders which will have to be disposed of someway. Fusion, on the other hand emits mainly gamma rays which pass right through flesh without damage. I read the French and Japanese are working on fusion reactors and there are still some problems, but there will be enormous advantages.

  • Buck O’Fama

    Y, and thanks to the stupid brain-dead MSM who helped ensure the best person got elected. They have the nerve to tell us we’re gonna miss them when they’re gone. Can’t wait to find out.

  • http://www.callitsocialism.com TopDog

    TopDog…

    I am So Lucky That I found your blog and great articles. I will come to your blog often for finding new great articles from your blog.I am adding your rss feed in my reader Thank you…

blog comments powered by Disqus