RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Follow the Money

Alright Obamatrons. And you too Obamedia. Now that we have the tax returns of Hillary Clinton and and Barack Obama in hand there is no doubt who cares more for ministering to the needs of the poor and sick in this world. Chalk a big one up for Hillary.

Here’s the score:

$10,256,741 donated by Hillary and Bill Clinton
$148,394 donated by Barack and Michelle Obama

Anyone can talk a good game.  And boy can Barack talk.  But talk is cheap.  Or, a more colorful expression:  money talks and bullshit walks.

Do the math for yourself.  Bill and Hillary gave almost 10% of their income to charity.  Barack “the Community Organizer for the Poor” and his wife donated less than 1%.  This is another stark difference between the character and substance of Barack and Hillary.  Hillary talks and does.  Barack just talks and barely does.

  • Donna Brazile

    Donna Brazile, who receives toxic ranting emails similar to the kind of trash that gets posted here, wrote back to one emailer:

    “Do you know how many undeclared supers are now just turned off by people like you? Do you understand you’re hurting her and not promoting Hillary? Perhaps that explains why a candidate like Obama has raised $40 million in one month. You don’t have to e-mail me again.”

    I don’t think Larry Johnson and the rest of you realize just how much you turn people away from Hillary. The art of persuasion doesn’t typically include insults, browbeating and haranguing.

    FROM LARRY JOHNSON: This is some clown posing as Donna. Here’s the email address and IP they used–abc@cbs.nbc.com | IP: 63.126.183.110. If you think I am turning people away, just check out the sitemeter. Look at the stats. Folks are flocking here for a respite from the Hillary bashing that people like Donna Brazil enable.

    • JoeySky

      Are you the real Donna Brazile?

      And I don’t think you realize how much you turn Hillary supporters away from Democratic party.

      I heard Dean comment that “some influential individuals within the DNC Black Caucas such as Donna Brazile opposed the plan [to add gays to the party's affirmative action guidelines for selecting convention delegates] because it was seen as ‘an affront to the civil rights movement.”

      Apparently you don’t think that GLBT right is a civil right issue. Civil right applies to all minority. I found your view disappointing. Democratic Party suppose to stand for equal right for all not for some.

    • Sam

      Riiiighhhtt…Hillary supporters are the only angry ones. What about the Barack supporters that booed Sheila Jackson Lee? Or threatened John Lewis? Or Congressman Cleaver? What about those supporters? You think they are good representatives for their candidate? Not exactly like Ms. Brazille is a neutral party here…

      • kenoshaMarge

        Or sat in the audience and laughed and cheered when a piece of trash like Randi Rhodes called Senator Hillary Clinton and Geraldine Ferraro “fu*king whores”. Oh yeah, Hillary supporters are turning people away all right. Because we all know that in the Obamanation every damn thing that is wrong in the world is either Bill or Hillary Clinton’s fault. Kinda the same talking points as those big bad Republicans the left use to hate more than the former DEMOCRATIC President of the United States and the former DEMOCRATIC First Lady who is now a DEMOCRATIC Senator from New York.

    • Patrick Henry

      The Art of Persuasion Includes telling the Truth..
      examining the Facts..and saying what you really believe in Your Heart is Right..Like Hillary Clinton did today…Not because someone payed you to do it…Not because you Take sides out of Favortism..or because you base your Opinions on skin Color…alone…or because you are trying to suck up someone or something..because there is something in it for you..

      Larry Johnson started this Blog By Standing up to the Bush Administration ane exposing thier Means..methods and damaging Policys..

      That Concern for TruthContinues Now..with Susan
      ( A Very caring Humanitarian &Great Editor)Larry and other great Writers and bloggers who have a Right to Debate the Issues in America..

      This Not NOT Toxic Trash..It is EXPOSING TOXIC TRASH..Political..Social..Domestic &Foreign..

      Your Predjustic is showing Donna..Think about it..
      I think you may have been exposed to RADIATION..

    • bbln

      This is not Donna Brazile – this is someone who read it off Politico – little Ben Smith peeping into Donna’s blackberry or Donna just leaking the contents of her blackberry, or Ben Smith peeping into Hillaryis44.

      Regardless…Geraldine Ferraro and the disgustings emails and voicemails she’s getting from Obama supporters, and the “f*cking whore” comment from Randi Rhodes, and the “monster” comment from Obama’s advisor Samantha Powers. I guess these don’t turn SD’s off – because you can’t say anything about race, but you can treat a woman any way you want.

    • blobert

      Wha?

    • blobert

      Hey, Donna. Want to count the number of RECOMMENDED Hit Diaries against Clinton on Daily Kos since summer?
      Not to mention smear articles by Kos himself?
      You’ve never made so much as a peep about that.

    • Andy

      Donna Brazile (hope you are the real one!)

      Here LOL at you; you are a joke.

      I invite you to collect every single post in the
      “other” bloggs ( you know which ones) and those here and bring them ALL to the public to compare who is really spewing hate and vile. And please include all the MSM in there as well.

      As for Obama’s $40; I want to see the documents showing the internet donations really came from US ctizens (at an average of $96 per donation?…umh..).

      I’m waiting for November to wish you: Good riddance!!

      • Andy

        PS: And add also all the shamful messages left in Mayor Nutter’s office by the BOmaniacs: UGH!

    • TeakWoodKite

      11 19 ms 20 ms 19 ms 0.so-5-0-0.XL1.SJC7.ALTER.NET [152.63.48.250]
      12 37 ms 35 ms 39 ms 0.so-7-0-0.XL1.SEA4.ALTER.NET [152.63.104.194]
      13 37 ms 36 ms 36 ms POS4-0.XR1.SEA4.ALTER.NET [152.63.107.233]
      14 37 ms 35 ms 35 ms 195.ATM6-0.GW3.SEA4.ALTER.NET [152.63.105.185]
      15 47 ms 47 ms 51 ms arenanet-sea-gw.customer.alter.net [157.130.176.
      246]

      Dies after that.

    • http://www.despair.com/changewinds.html Smilin’ Jim

      04/05/08 14:51:55 IP block 63.126.183.110
      Trying 63.126.183.110 at ARIN
      Trying 63.126.183 at ARIN

      OrgName: MCI Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Business
      OrgID: MCICS
      Address: 22001 Loudoun County Pkwy
      City: Ashburn
      StateProv: VA
      PostalCode: 20147
      Country: US

      NetRange: 63.64.0.0 – 63.127.255.255
      CIDR: 63.64.0.0/10
      NetName: UUNET63
      NetHandle: NET-63-64-0-0-1
      Parent: NET-63-0-0-0-0
      NetType: Direct Allocation
      NameServer: AUTH03.NS.UU.NET
      NameServer: AUTH00.NS.UU.NET
      Comment: ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE
      RegDate: 1999-01-22
      Updated: 2006-12-14

      RTechHandle: OA12-ARIN
      RTechName: UUnet Technologies, Inc., Technologies
      RTechPhone: +1-800-900-0241
      RTechEmail: help4u@verizonbusiness.com

      OrgAbuseHandle: ABUSE3-ARIN
      OrgAbuseName: abuse
      OrgAbusePhone: +1-800-900-0241
      OrgAbuseEmail: abuse-mail@verizonbusiness.com

      OrgNOCHandle: OA12-ARIN
      OrgNOCName: UUnet Technologies, Inc., Technologies
      OrgNOCPhone: +1-800-900-0241
      OrgNOCEmail: help4u@verizonbusiness.com

      OrgTechHandle: SWIPP-ARIN
      OrgTechName: swipper
      OrgTechPhone: +1-800-900-0241
      OrgTechEmail: swipper@mci.com

      # ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2008-04-04 19:10
      # Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN’s WHOIS database.

      Johnson:

      This is a UUnet account.
      If you want to send them a nastygram, send it to abuse-mail@verizonbusiness.com

      • http://www.despair.com/changewinds.html Smilin’ Jim

        This is too long. How do you add the scrollbar?

  • truthteller2007

    I am not surprised by any of this. The Clintons have always been engaged in philanthropy, while the Obamas are the recipients of philanthropy. And Michelle needs her housekeepers, gardeners, fashion designers, piano teachers and camp counselors. She also needed the Rezko mansion she could not afford. And yes, she needed the mink coat discussed in the New Yorker profile of Michelle.

    The Clintons actually care about people, while the Obamas believe people should care for them.

    Michelle Obama: “Give Us Something Here.”

    http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/17/michelle-obama-give-us-something-here/

    • Catriley

      I’m amazed that the animal lovers that populate our Party haven’t said shit about that mink coat.. well, the ones that support Obama sure haven’t uttered a peep. I find it thoroughly tacky and disgusting for her to own a coat made of the fur of cage and abused little animals who are bred only to die, so that she looks fab on the social scene.

      • Mary

        Not to mention that she has had an Hispanic nanny caring for her girls while she pursued her own career……and she only PAYS that nanny $6,000 a year.

        THAT speaks volumes about her own stinginess.

        • lifelong dem leaving party

          we sure know what the msm would do with the info about paying the nanny only $6000 a year if it was hillary.

          i bet the hispanic voters won’t be told about this, since obama’s stupidly thinking he can win them over.

  • Ruth Kaplan

    Hey Donna,

    Why don’t you take your so-called neutrality and stick it!

  • lookforward

    UGH..All the bitchin the media did for the last month about the tax returns…now they got them a week early..and all they can bitch about now is that they were released on a Friday. Gee..get a life MSNBO..would you prefer them on a silver platter and on a bright and cheerfull Monday morning instead? Would that make you STFU?

    • bert

      Released tax returns on a Friday like Obama did interviews about Wright on a Friday afternoon, and talked honestly about his relationship with Rezko with the Tribune on a Friday afternoon? That sort of release on a Friday? MSNBO REALLY bitched about that? Geeezzz !!!!!

    • Andy

      Like Obama’s earmarks and Obama’s Rezko “interviews” with the Chicago papers…

  • Kevin

    So Larry, you don’t think the Clintons have more money to begin with? I imagine you give more to charity than I do, and we know Warren Buffett has us both beat.

    Since when does the amount of money one gives to charity have to do with how much you care and work for your fellow man?

    There’s more than enough real things to talk about, this is just silly.

    • truthteller2007

      Not only did Barack and Michelle “Give Us Something Here” Obama donate an inconsequential amount of their income to charity; a large sum of that money was donated to Trinity in order to bankroll the jeremiads of Reverend Wright. They exercise poor judgment, and they lack a commitment to social justice. But at least Michelle has her housekeeper and her mink coat.

      • http://hyper-educated-uppity-woman.blogspot.com Uppity

        …and her Rezko plot of land!

        • truthteller2007

          and let us not forget the position on the board of WAL-MART ally Tree House Foods or the $200,000 per annum salary increase she received after her husband was elected to the US Senate. But Michelle still refuses to love her county, even though that country has handed her everything she believes she deserves.

          • http://hyper-educated-uppity-woman.blogspot.com Uppity

            Oh yeah that Tree House foods thing, I have been meaning to look into that.

            • truthteller2007

              What do you desire to know? I have written about this since July.

              • http://hyper-educated-uppity-woman.blogspot.com Uppity

                I would like to know anything you will share with me. With great interest.

                • truthteller2007

                  the administrators of this website are in possession of my email address. perhaps you should write them.

    • http://hyper-educated-uppity-woman.blogspot.com Uppity

      Kevin I guess the Clinton’s time and efforts are just worth more.

      Then there’s the Audacity of Mendacity. Obama’s next book.

    • Hope

      Kevin
      Tell it to the networks honey.

    • PMS

      Kevin, it’s 1% vs 10%.

      From my time working with United Way, the norm is those with more money give a lower percentage than those with less. With Clinton and Obama, it’s just the opposite.

      Further proof your guy thinks only about himself.

  • http://hyper-educated-uppity-woman.blogspot.com Uppity

    Hahahaha I knew that return would turn out to be “in your face”.

    Oh and anyone thinks we are hurting “Hillary” they don’t know hurt yet. If this election gets fixed, there will be a world of hurt in November.

    And Hillary has already proved in Ohio and Texas that Barack’s spending of 2 to 1 on campaign ads doesn’t really work very well. I do hope however, if this election gets fixed that Barack Obama can help the DNC or any other org that stars with “D” because they sure aren’t going to get any help from fifty percent of the Democrats.

    • truthteller2007

      Nor will they receive any help from Michelle “Give Us Something Here” Obama.

  • residentcynic

    My love letter to Donna Brazile and Randi Rhodes:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gKCmKE7AP4g&feature=related

    • Dawnelle

      ROFLMAO!!

  • Patrick Henry

    Kevin..

    Larry has a point..everyone in the media is doing the same thing..I think the Clintons paid 33 MILLION Smackeroooos…in Taxs too..

    Ah…10% vs….Ah 1%…Big difference..
    What did you pay Charity Kevin..being kind of Petty..funny coming from you since I kinow how much you really admire Larry..You can even have a conversion experience..I would be proud of You..

    This is the best TEAM of bloggers on the Net and you Know it..Join Up..

    Pays lousy but the Company is Great..

    • truthteller2007

      The Obama campaign pays 150 bloggers to write favorable comments about Obama online.

      • http://hyper-educated-uppity-woman.blogspot.com Uppity

        Do they get extra for swearing at women and calling them names?

        • kenoshaMarge

          Don’t need to pay sexists to be sexists, Uppity, they’d do it for free.

      • blobert

        How much do you think Obama paid Kos to destroy his own blog?

        • truthteller2007

          At least $25,000.

      • grtphoto

        How do you know this?

        • truthteller2007

          It has been widely discussed, and someone noted this at a blog.

          • grtphoto

            I’m not criticizing you, I would just love to know for a fact. Do you anyone in particular?

            • truthteller2007

              I know you are not. someone mentioned this at mydd, and it makes complete sense, for they all repeat the same bankrupt notions. and we cannot ignore the manner whereby they have brided bloggers with advertising revenue. and i do know that the obama campaign has sent opposition research to a couple of my friends who are bloggers. and i know one of the main bloggers at mydd receives directives from the obama campaign.

              • grtphoto

                this fascinates me, call me naive. i understand propaganda and believe that they would do this, explains a lot. specifically your friend; he/she does do it? are they a true BO supporter?

                • truthteller2007

                  yes, s/he did do it, and they are an obama supporter. i was very disappointed.

                  • grtphoto

                    well that is sad. psy ops running campaigns. i don’t want to lose to a cheater. has this motivated you to any new way of thinking? Have you by chance, mentioned this to anyone who would listen at the HRC campaign? I guess they know all of these tactics occur.

              • bert

                I wondered. I figured soemthing like that was going on. The other night I was on a different site reading and posting and I saw that someone had mentioned something negative about Clinton. Another Clinton smear – something about being fired from some job. I swear within 15 minutes the very same item showed up 2 more times on a different thread but same site. And the source/link for all 3 of the posts was different, but the article was exactly the same, word for word.

              • Fleaflicker

                That would have to be Jonathan Singer.

                • truthteller2007

                  yes, the unimaginative jonathan singer, who copies and pastes obama opposition research. he does, however, occasionally insert the phrases “that said” and “what’s more” in order to dupe his readers into believing that he engages in original research. i do not know who jonathan is, but he is the definition of a venal blogger. by the way, jonathan should lose a few pounds. FINGER DOWN THE THROAT TIME, big boy.

              • http://speaktruth speaktruth

                I was thinking that could be the reason for MyDD banning linfar and other Clinton supporters there.
                I also noticed that very big picture of Obama on the site, with ad for Chris Mathews. Advertising money could equal pressure and censorship.
                This bribe – pressure money is the only thing that makes sense to me to explain total personality change of so many, such as Olbermann, Maddow and other Air America people, even Kos, explaining their total intransigence, nastiness, and aggressiveness, their lack of nuance and flexibility. These are not just Obama supporters, they are cultists. They were not like this before this campaign; hence the surreal quality so many of us have written about.
                Money would explain it all. But I would have thought Kos would expect more than $25,000 to sell out that way – and also to destroy his web site.

                • truthteller2007

                  you are correct, for blogging is kos’s only source of revenue.

                  • http://hyper-educated-uppity-woman.blogspot.com Uppity

                    Oh Really? That’s interesting.

                  • Nellie

                    Truth,

                    Do you have any links – any kind of documentation?

                    Would you be willing to put something together to post here?

                    My God – everything Obama touches gets corrupted and poisoned!

    • yellowdogdemocrat

      I bet Kevin is a paid Obama blogger. Someone search his IP address.

      • Fleaflicker

        Kevin isn’t good enough to be a paid blogger.

        • yellowdogdemocrat

          then what is his excuse?

          • http://www.despair.com/changewinds.html Smilin’ Jim

            He has too much time on his hands.

    • TeakWoodKite

      Pays lousy but the Company is Great..

      No Sh** :)

  • grtphoto

    These Obamadroids never denounce our correct criticism, they just use the boring sophmoric retort: “she did it too”. Defend his policy stance on anything! Give me tangibles and then we can debate the candidates. I’m so sick of these people telling us we’re hateful. In his own words (TM has this posted)BO remarked that he is taking advantage of his race.
    I find it so amazing that they find it OK to call her names but if we report the facts we’re mean spirited and don’t have all the info. or that we are distorting.

    • lifelong dem leaving party

      one of their more common responses – to any comment on any subject – has been where are the tax returns. i guess now they’ll have to receive direction on what’s the next non sequitur to post.

  • art3
    • Andy

      Thanks for the article art3; it’s a good account indeed. It makes my blood boil…

      • TeakWoodKite

        insane isn’t, whacky Mob rules!

    • sjc-tx

      Gee… this is basically what happened at my district convention (SD17) in Texas too. We had several 100 folks there and not several thousand, as in SD 13, but same flim-flam occured and objections have been sent via proper procedures. The whole caucus system is flawed this way as it is so very easy to cheat… for *those* so inclined to do so… It was/is maddening.

      • Andy

        Do you remember Obama’s “great idea”(cyn.) form forcing the health insurance companies to lower their costs ? It was broadcast the hearings on C-Span…. Someone should ask Obama , hey, what do you think of broadcasting caucuses in C-Span; after all the vote is not secret ballot anyway.
        These mob-crowds in the caucuses behave like pigs b/c they know they can get away with it…

      • Andy

        Do you remember Obama’s “great idea”(cyn.) for forcing the health insurance companies to lower their costs ? It was broadcast the hearings on C-Span…. Someone should ask Obama , hey, what do you think of broadcasting caucuses in C-Span; after all the vote is not secret ballot anyway.
        These mob-crowds in the caucuses behave like pigs b/c they know they can get away with it…

        • TeakwoodKite

          How I wish they had…even on the series “Road to the White House”…It would make a great Frontline piece.

  • eurogirl70

    Has anyone ever noticed that Donna Brazile has one canned answer and that is “do you know how much you are turning people away from Hillary? Do you know you are only hurting her?”

    It is her one and only response…and just like George W. Bush with the tag line “faulty math” she brings it out as often as she can since she cannot argue with the fact that irrespective of what all parties agreed to back in the fall, the situation has changed and therefore the rules governing a completely unforeseen development, must change as well. Otherwise, we are no better than our Republican counterparts who start down a course and refuse to veer from it regardless of how the situation has changed or how ineffective their strategy has become.

    I have no doubt that Ms. Brazile has received some pretty heated emails. But, I must say that nothing I have written here or that I have seen posted here by regulars to this blog has been verbally abusive or sexist or racist or misogynistic. When so-called “progressive” blogs prevent the free discourse of alternate point of views, provided that they are factual and not threatening or abusive, then they are no better than propaganda tools. You can come here and again regurgitate your canned response without being called the kind of names Senator Clinton is called.

    I have never seen you, Ms. Brazile referenced on this website the way Senator Clinton has been referenced on Dkos or the Huffington Post. Ms. Brazile what is your response to the fact that on the night of Senator Obama’s win in Iowa, the song playing as he took the stage was Jay-Z’s song “I have alot of problems but a bitch ain’t one? How appropriate was that. Don’t you know that is only turning off people to Obama?

    • grtphoto

      well said, have you sent this note to her?

      • eurogirl70

        No I have not. I don’t think I will being that she has set her mind and there is absolutely no way to get her to see reason. This is what cost Al Gore the election in 2000. She told him, keep your distance from Clinton, it will only hurt you. Yeah, keep your distance from a soon-to-be ex-president who was impeached by the House, has a 70% approval rating and that a majority of American’s say that they would re-elect to a 3rd term in office if they could.

        Ms. Brazile refuses to take stock of the part she played in the debacle of 2000. Had Al Gore carried his home state of Tennessee and Clinton’s home state of Arkansas, the hanging chad fiasco of Florida would have done nothing to take a win away from Gore. That is why I do not care what Ms. Brazile thinks. I would only care if she had a record of winning anything for anyone.

        • Patrick Henry

          You Gals and Guys are so Cool..
          NQ Rocks..
          Hand Clapping dance scene from OKLAHOMA..

          • Fleaflicker

            I would rather see Steve Martin as Ruprect saying Oklahoma in Dirty Rotten Scoundrels.

            • Patrick Henry

              God ..Didn’t Steve do some funny Stuff…Remember the VooDoo One..
              My European vacation..

              “and..”I GOT A PURPOSE” Ha ha..Priceless..F

              Leaflicker…You Rock..

            • Patrick Henry

              Fleaflicker..

              Ah That Movie..directed by Frank Oz..

              I kinda remember it..1988 or so..Michael Caine is so great…done alot of really good movies too..you talking about the girl fromoklahoma..Meagan Fax…Now I gotta order the Movie again..

              • Fleaflicker

                That is exactly what I am referring too. Steve with the pots and pans. Too funny. The eye patch and the fork with a cork.

        • Salo

          shes a dunce.

          a ruthless dunce.

    • http://speaktruth speaktruth

      How about after one of the other caucus wins they played a song that was a Bush campaign song.

      Pointed out by an MSNBC commentator who seemed shocked.

      Dogwhistle, anyone?

    • mimi

      The email I sent to Brazile was not offensive. I merely pointed out the irony that an AA was causing the disenfranchisement of MI & FL. Something many here have pointed out.

      Her response:

      Thanks for the joyful email. Like most of the other pro Clinton emails, I have now put them in a special folder called ‘tales from the gutter.”

      Stay positive and remember if she wins, you will need Obama supporters and donors. So please stop throwing stones. Give her the support now and stop sending frivolous emails.

      I used to answer the emails and respond and write letters for the president of a non profit organization. In the course of doing such a job, you are going to get more than your fair share of unpleasant emails. I would never respond to an email like that. if I had, I would have been fired. You always take the high road. Not that I need reaffirmation of this after 2000 and Gore’s loss, but Donna’s not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

      For me, that response exemplifies why there is so much anger in the Party right now. It’s filled with thoughtless, unmindful, tactless, mean-spirited, self-serving, gutless, unprofessional people like Brazile. If ever there was a time for Party leadership to come forth with a concilliatory tone. Certainly, that’s what’s needed here. But no. They’d rather give attitude and act like Obama won’t need Hillary supporters as well.

      I thought about it all day and I decided that there’s a stronger possibility that Hillary could win without Obama’s supporters, than he could without hers. If Hillary gets the majority of latino voters, the working class voters that she’s getting now, women, Independents sick of Repubs, she could win. I wonder if the AA community really wants a democratic candidate to win without them?

      But here Brazile is, a Party official responding in this fashion when all she had to do was push the ‘Delete’ button if she didn’t like what I said.

      What a joke and how nice not to ever have to take her seriously again. It’s going to be a pelasure watching the amount of people Obama will be taking down with him in this election debacle.

      Pass the popcorn…

      And oh and read this:

      http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D02E5DC123DF932A15751C0A9659C8B63

      • Catriley

        Mimi- I’ve read and agreed with so much of what you’ve written on here, that I have no doubt you sent a decent yet direct email to Brazille.

        I completely agree with you at how shocking it is that she’d respond in such a personal (and snarky) fashion. Does she not realize that she is supposed to be a profressional? Or that she’s seen as a rep for the Party?

        I think she’s frightfully thin-skinned. Reading your account of her response, and what I’m sure you wrote, I have no doubt that she’s being a drama queen about the emails — there is NO way in hell that any Clinton supporter emails could rival the raw and vile anger that permeates the Obamcrats communications that have driven most of us away from progressive blogs recently.

        Does Brazille have no clue that the actions of Obama’s supporters have driven people away from not only HIM but the Party itself? She seems so frightfully out of touch…

      • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

        ATTENTION MIMI!

        I sent you an e-mail this morning. To the Yahoo account. Hope you see it. If not, e-mail me at susanunpc at gmail dot com

  • campskunk

    yeah, obama is poor. just ask michelle. she’s always whining, even with her magical 200% raise as soon as obama got into the senate.

  • ruhla

    Just watched Chgo. CBS News. Not one thing was said about the Clintons’ charitable donations, just how much they made since the White House. Does anybody notice that Hillary works really hard, while Barack coasts on everbody’s coattails? He reminds me so much of a former boss. I saw through him right away. Eventually, everyone else did. This is happening to Barack now. Have faith.

  • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

    OT NOTICE: Our spam filter has glitches that will be fixed soon, we are told. If you post a comment, and it does not appear, be sure to e-mail me at susanunpc at gmail dot com — along with the USERNAME that you posted the comment under. If i have your username, I can search the comments stuck in the spam filter, and restore your comments.

    Thank you.

  • KnowVox

    Thank you for posting this information! Obama’s paulty charitable giving has been the RAMPANT whisper campaign circulating the Midwest for weeks, ever since Obama released his returns. Evangelical conservatives are using this as an argument that he’s “not really a Christian” with such a low percentage of his income going to the church. In addition, Obama’s contributions increased only AFTER he started contemplating a Presidential bid. The percentage in earlier years was MUCH lower, as I recall.

    • lifelong dem leaving party

      yes, he gave almost nothing until the year before he started his presidential run.

      and what part of his giving went to that anti-american church of his?

      plus when he did give more, the year before his run, a good size chunk of it went to the congressional black caucus, and was deducted (per article i read on abc). but that would be an illegal deduction. and he certainly would know that, since they’re both attorneys. wonder if the irs will notice?

  • Dora Ratquila

    The silent majority won’t be that silent for long. They have had enough of the BS that Team BO is heaping on them/us at almost every given turn. If this is a preview of a BO presidency, then his adopted uncle and spiritual pastor’s famous words may prove prophetic if everyone keeps drinking his toxic Kool-Aid lemonade. Fortunately, that’s not going to happen.

  • justsomeone

    I’m too tired to figure “X” the unknown & my algebra skills were never really worth a damn anyway. Please, include debt, assets & net worth. BTW, have you ever donated 148K annually? I know I haven’t. Alot of people take a standard charitable deduction & donate a mere fraction of what they claim, ergo they got no room to talk. Besides fat cats usually have their tax preparer advise them on how much to give to charity & upon many a closer look it’s not usually hard to imagine how the charity benefits the giver in some manner. I luvs it when fat cats want to pay mo’ taxes…Tell us a little more about the tax deferred Dubai venture..I’m tired of the filthy rich deciding how much of my money they want to distribute to obtain votes from the teaming masses to keep themselves & their heirs on the throne into perpetuity.

    • KnowVox

      If your premise is true, ie “fat cats usually have their tax preparer advise them on how much to give to charity,” what happened to Obama’s advisors?

      • Northwest rain

        Mrs Obama wanted a new fur coat and more shoes — had to cut back somewhere.

      • Mary

        Obama’s “tax advisors” tried to deduct a $13,000 donation to the Congressional Black Caucus as a “charitable contribution,” (which is against the law), and Barak and Michelle SIGNED that tax return.

        When the IRS balked and said “I don’t think so,” the Obamas had to file an amended tax return in 2006.

        A presidential candidate who is too stupid to know that political donations ARE NOT ALLOWED as charitable contributions, or who doesn’t even take the time to read his own return before signing, is NOT qualified to sit in the Oval Office.

        When I told my CPA/tax man husband that Obama story, he was absolutely STUNNED that the Obamas didn’t know that rule.

        Sheesh

        • lifelong dem leaving party

          i’d be willing to bet they did know it was illegal – they just thought they could get away with it.

          if they didn’t know it was illegal, they sure didn’t earn their j.d.’s.

    • allimom99

      The 148k is NOT annually, it’s for the whole period. Look at the PERCENTAGE, genius.

  • rjj

    Brazile is Bob Shrum with bigger breasts.

    • kenoshaMarge

      That conjures up a picture I will have to try and scrub from my mind all day. yuck. How about Bob Shrum with better and more hair?

  • http://hyper-educated-uppity-woman.blogspot.com Uppity

    They can say what they want, but I have to think this site received scores of thousands of hits. On the night my first post went up here, my little blog got more than a thousand hits from here in a few hours. I have to figure if I got those hits from here, the actually NQ daily hit/read number has to be many times that.

    When they start talking about this site like they are, you know it’s getting around. It’s a David and Goliath thing.

    So Donna, whose face I watched morph after they strong armed her from Hillary, can just kiss our feminist asses and copy and paste her email all she wants. She would have us just shut up and let CNN and MSNBC rigged Obama’s election for him. And much as I hate to link to this place, it’s necessary. When you get the mail from the party asking for donations, staple a copy of a filthy message you got from an Obama person to it and tell them to go get their money from him.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/07/dnc-lags-behind-gop-in-fu_n_90389.html

  • Patrick Henry

    WOO HOO..!!

    God I Love Uppity Women when they are right..

    Staple the Comments…That is so Cool..

    You Rock Uppity..

    • http://hyper-educated-uppity-woman.blogspot.com Uppity

      I plan to post on that sometime soon. If you have any comments that are fresh in your minds from sites, let me know at my blog and I will contact you. Not that I don’t already have a few myself.

      I would love to have us collect up all those filthy comments and post them all. We all have seen them. We know where they are.

      • truthteller2007

        yes, there are plenty at mydd. when do you plan on publishing these comments?

      • CognitiveDissonance

        Uppity, you should talk to Taylor Marsh. She gets tons of hate email from Obamabots every day.

  • http://hyper-educated-uppity-woman.blogspot.com Uppity

    truthteller, as soon as I have a nifty collection.

    cognitive, thanks. I don’t really know her though.

  • http://www.sugarnspice.typepad.com Sugar

    I’m surprised BHO and that silly wife of his even gave that much. They don’t seem like the giving type. I’m also certain she carries his balls around in a little jar in her Coach bag and hands them to him when she thinks he deserves to wear them for the day.

    • lifelong dem leaving party

      only when she thinks he needs to pretend to have some to collect a few votes. like bowling a 37 and not even realizing that your average 5 year old girl could do better than that. otherwise, she plans to keep them.

    • B-Rob

      The intelligent level of discourse among her followers explains why Hillary is doing SO WELL in this election . . . .

      Hillary fans absolutely SLAY me. 90% of your commentary revolves around what rotten scum Obama is. Well, son, I have news for you: not even hardcore Republicans think he is dishonest or untrustworthy. Hillary, on the other hand . . . .

      Have you folks ever stopped and wondered why Al Gore, who has known her close to 20 years, has NOT ENDORSED HER? Or why Bill Richardson endorsed a guy he barely knew over her? Or why Obama leads in endorsements among the senators they BOTH serve with?

      It should be simple: the more you know her, the less likely you are to think she would be a good president.

  • Douglas

    I’d hope they give more to charity. They’re currently earning and have been since 2001 almost 30 times the amount of money the Obama’s have.

    Neatly avoiding the fact that as the Obama’s income has increased in the last couple of years so has the percentage of their income given to charity. And for fucks sake…since when are the amount of charitable donations given a benchmark for being president?!

    I can’t wait for the “I can’t say for sure but Obama probably eats puppies!” post.

    • PMS

      I can’t wait for the “I can’t say for sure but Obama probably eats puppies!” post.

      Well, he did participate in some ethnic Kenyan rituals, but I haven’t seen the menus. You may be on to something.

  • Dan

    Forget Billary, the new nickname for Hill Bill is Clinton Inc. $109 million in less then 8 years from speeches to donors and ghost written books… What a far cry from when they were leaving the White House, robbing furniture as they went and offering pardons for cash. Read the NY Times this morning. The 10 percent figure Larry is so fond of pointing out is interesting. Almost all of the charitable giving by the Clintons has been to their Foundation. And most of the donations have come since Hill’s declaration for the presidency, and most of the funds had not yet been paid out to charitable causes. Some charity? Also look at the prime benefactors of Clinton Inc. Mr Buckle and Mr Gupta to name a few who have shared their vast rewards very generously with Clinton Inc for all the valuable services rendered on their behalf. If anyone had any doubts as to where Clinton Inc’s loyalties lie, they are clearly with the almighty billion dollar cash generators, and not with the average joe. This ought to play well in the steel towns of PA. Say what you want about Obambi, but he’s out raising money, more then her, from small donors ($96 per head).

    Face it, Clinton Inc’s political ambitions this year are finished… Its over. This should have a fair impact on Clinton Inc’s finances in the years to come, at least until Chelsea gets her political feet wet and takes on the electability role within Clinton Inc.

    • DisenfranchisedVoter

      At least whatever donations they give to charity or their own foundation does more things for society than giving money to Rev. Wright’s hate church which is what most of Obama’s charitable donations went to. The only thing Rev. Wright is using Obama’s money for is to build his millions dollar retirement home in Chicago.

    • PMS

      So Dan, how long have you hated America?

      In the last eight years, the Clinton’s have earned $108 million, given $10 million to charities, and paid $30 million in taxes, more or less. More power to them, I say.

      As for your final comment… if you believed the Clinton’s were “finished”, you wouldn’t be wasting bandwidth here.

      • Dan

        Now we are supposed to give Clinton Inc. a boner for paying their due taxes! The same taxes that they expect all of us to pay more of eventually to fund her health insurance bonanza giveaway. And then she has the gall to tell us that she never wanted the tax breaks Bush gave her but yet she took them!! Hey Hill, here’s a little advice… Next time you feel this pang of conscience, get your checkbook out and put your little John Hancock on one of those little blue safety checks and make it payable to the IRS. They accept donations and gifts from taxpayers who feel their tax burden is too light.

        At least when the Republicans rob you, they do it right to your face, but with Clinton Inc. and her pseudo liberal friends they get you from behind which hurts a lot more!!!

        Mark my words PMS, she will lose… This is only another nail in the coffin. What with her habitual lies about her role as stateswoman, being named after Sir Edmund Hillary, four years before he ever ascended Mt Everest, the Bosnia trip bullshit she tried to pedal, and her denial denial when comments were attributed to her telling delegates Obambi can’t win. I for one will frame her withdrawal speech as a permanent reminder of the pain this country has avoided. Are all of you true believers in the employ of the Clinton foundation or worse Buckle or Gupta?

        Yes, PMS, I love my country, and that is why I want to make sure that the closest Clinton Inc. ever gets to the White House again will be through the visitor’s entrance. She offers nothing but a return to the politics of deceit. At least Obambi offers something new.

    • Cee Hussein

      Almost all of the charitable giving by the Clintons has been to their Foundation

      Dan,

      This reminds me of Barbara Bush giving her son Neil funds that she called charity.

    • Kathy

      They never took furniture from the WH. Bush and his wife were on s talk show after his election and someone asked him if it was true the Clintons took things from the WH. They laughed and both said no. No, you got that, no.

  • http://makethemaccountable.com Carolyn Kay

    The Clinton tax returns don’t even show the vast amounts of money they have both raised for various charities over the years, that don’t show up in their tax returns.

    I’ll try to see what I can find out about that and write it up, but it may be difficult, since the Clintons don’t advertise their good works.

    Of course, Bill has raised many millions, if not billions, through his foundation, but one of the most telling ones is the money that Hillary raised on behalf of one of David Axelrod’s children. You wrote about it here.
    http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/03/27/smears-and-tears-how-obamas-national-security-week-turned-into-the-mendacity-of-hype/

    Carolyn Kay
    MakeThemAccountable.com

  • anna shane

    obama has made a big deal out of Hillary’s tax returns starting when she loaned her campaign money. I has more than inferred she had something to hide. Want to bet he won’t correct his smears? He encourages Donna and the others, sets the ‘tone’ for his campaign all by himself. The media is supposed to fact check and correct, and fortunately we have noquarter which is doing the job far better.

  • Braised Cod

    Yeah Larry, I really am “tired of spin.” You know it’s a lot easier to give 10% of your income to charity when you average over 15 million a year. You can only water ski behind one yacht at a time. You know how corporate America buys off the Clintons? They buy truck loads of Clinton’s books and donate them to libraries (charity). They give $120K to a college to have a speaking event for Bill where he makes 100K and the college keeps 20K and the corp gets a 120K charity write off. Not all charities feed the poor, some are flat out money laundering. Please wake up and ask yourself why Bill Clinton is so cozy with Bush 41. Or why Mark Penn is so cozy with the McCain campaign. Or why Hillary takes more money from the defense industry than McCain. It doesn’t matter who wins when both teams are owned by the same people. It’s a rigged game. The reason that Obama out raises Hillary 2 to 1 is that ordinary people want to “own” a candidate for a change, someone that will change this hopelessly corrupt system that has become a corporate plutocracy. The Clinton’s won’t change it because it works for them to the tune of $109M big ones.

    • rjj

      The reason that Obama out raises Hillary 2 to 1 is that ordinary people want to “own” a candidate for a change, someone that will change this hopelessly corrupt system that has become a corporate plutocracy.

      You imagine Dennis Hastert pulled Jack Ryan and the Pubs ran Alan Colmes against “The People’s Candidate”?

      • B-Rob

        You ignorance is showing! Obama was in third place in the Illinois polls before he won the nomination (and it was a real upset, beating a guy who spent $40 million of his own money and a former state senate majority leader). When he got the nomination, he was looking at facing a multi-millionaire investment banker turned inner city school teacher! Jack Ryan was a good looking, wealthy, connected Catholic and Obama was taking him on for a GOP seat. Yeah, SURE it was a cake walk in the end after Ryan imploded. But who knew he would implode? Certainly no one gave him a shot three weeks before the primary, though.

        • lifelong dem leaving party

          oh please. obama caused the implosion by ensuring that the sealed divorce records got released.

          and, btw, millions of ordinary people tithe. that means 10%, for those who don’t know about things like churches. but obama and michelle need those $600 shoes and mink coats.

    • PMS

      Braised Cod,

      Never heard of Obama’s “bundling” of contributions, have you? There’s a lot of Astroturf in his grass-roots fund raising.

      Former Speaker Jim Wright has shown you can’t buy your own books and give them to charity as a tax deduction.

      • B-Rob

        Bundling is not Astro-turf. And if it is, I bet Hillary wishes she had some! I know her unpaid creditors do!

        I have an acquaintance who sent me an e-mail. He had set up a web page and he was trying to raise a few hundred dollars for Obama. That is the difference between Obama and HC. He relied on millions of small donations and a 50 state strategy. She thought she could get by on big donations and running only in big states, ignoreing the “fly over” states — a bad strategy that has NOT worked and, further, would bode ill for her in the fall if she somehow Shanghais the nomination.

      • Braised Cod

        Yeah yeah, I know the drill. Don’t answer the question, just throw another accusation at Obama. Don’t ask yourself why Hillary takes money from Rupert Murdock, or why Rush Limbaugh is her “get out the vote” edge or why she is courting Richard Mellon Schaife. Don’t ask yourself why Universal Heath Care didn’t get done, but NAFTA and the Communications Act of 1996 did. The DLC is for socially liberal Republicans. It’s a re-branded Republican party, same product, different label. They are called DINOs (Democrats In Name Only). The only difference between them and Republicans is whether or not the Supreme Court will overturn Rove v. Wade. That’s it. Corporate Democrats are more threatened by Progressives taking control of the Democrat party than by McCain. That is precisely why Hillary is playing chicken with the nomination. If the DINOs can’t control the party, they would rather kill it and reshape it in four years. The Dem party is supposed to be the permanent out of power, feckless and scared opposition party to give the illusion that there is in fact a democracy here. I know you folks will have no interest in exactly how the Clinton’s averaged $15 million a year. They must have hit the lottery, yeah that’s the ticket. As to the books, Bill Clinton was not in office during the book revenue, so the Wright example doesn’t matter. Obama supporters know that he’s no saint or messiah. He’s just the only one left standing in the race that hasn’t been bought with a $109M price tag. What you don’t get is that whether McCain or Hillary wins, the Clintons will be just fine. You and me, on the other hand, will still be in the same boat.

        • B-Rob

          You are talking to the walls here, dude! They are like that last Japanese soldier on the desert island, still figting long after the war is over. You cannot talk rationally with these people. But it’s like I told my daughter last week, because of their emotions, people sometimes lose their minds when a loved on dies. In this case, the Clinton era is officially over.

          • Braised Cod

            Well said.

    • Cee Hussein

      Bill Clinton’s complex charities

      John R. Emshwiller and Jose De Cordoba | Wall Street Journal | 02.14.2008
      http://www.greenchange.org/article.php?id=1861

  • Catriley

    Weird. I just came to this thread and started reading from the bottom up and had to make sure I was on No Quarter — thought I’d wandered over to freeprepublic or the great orange satan for the minute there. Gosh.. are some people getting nervous or something? Seems to be mighty crowded in here lately…

    • B-Rob

      It’s funny . . . Obama has tried from the beginning to be positive and he is winning. You read some of the nasty comments and I am reminded of my first wife’s friend, who we called “Miss Negativa” — a negative person who was surprised that no one wanted to date her.

      When you focus on the negatives of others, as opposed to the positives of your own candidate, it smacks of insecurity. In this case, the Clinton backers realized they picked a loser. I mean . . . $100 million in income in the last few years and her campaign is so dysfunctional and disorganized it is not paying health insurance premiums and is stiffing vendors? And this crew wants to run the White House?

      Put yourself in the shoes of a HRC supporter and you HAVE to be questioning your own judgment in backing such a dysfunctional candidacy. But rather than explain why it remains a “good idea” to support their failing candidate, they have convinced themselves that the other guy is worse than their candidate. Sad . . . .

  • OxyCon

    You know, Obama and David Axelrove attacked President Clinton and labeled him a racist, and here we come to find out that the Clinton family has given well over 10 million dollars to charities that help the poor, the overwhelming majority of which are minorities.
    Barack Obama needs to get down on his knees in public and apologize to all three members of the Clinton family for attacking them as racists and he needs to thank them for all the work and finances they provide to poor African Americans. Then Obama needs to tape his apology and broadcast it during every commercial break across the country for a full month, like he is doing now here in Pennsylvania.

    • B-Rob

      “You know, Obama and David Axelrove attacked President Clinton and labeled him a racist”

      Please give me a cite to any speech, interview, web posting . . . anything where Obama said anything about BC being a racist. You made the allegation — now back it up.

      “and here we come to find out that the Clinton family has given well over 10 million dollars to charities that help the poor, the overwhelming majority of which are minorities.”

      This is a wonderful thing. But past good acts do not absolve either Bill or Hillary or their surrogates for their racially tinged commentary during this campaign. Their own conduct is the reason they lost the Black vote — Obama had nothing to do with that.

      “Barack Obama needs to get down on his knees in public and apologize to all three members of the Clinton family for attacking them as racists”

      Interesting you want to see the leading candidate, a Black man, in a supplicant position to the loser and her husband. But your “suggestion” gets at what I have contended all along: Clinton and her supporters REALLY have a problem with WHO is kicking their collective asses in this campaogn, as opposed to HOW he is beating them.

      And ss I said, Obama has never said anything about “the Clintons” being racists. So as far as I am concerned, the only people who need to be on their knees are the Clintons, begging for some absolution — like “OK, you are not a racist, Bill. Stop slobbering on my shoes!”

      “and he needs to thank them for all the work and finances they provide to poor African Americans.”

      “Thank you, great White father, for being SO NICE to us colored. After all, we didn’t do anything to deserve your beneficence . . . except MAKE YOU THE PRESIDENT TWO TIMES SO YOU COULD EARN $50 MILLION MAKING SPEECHES AS A FORMER PRESIDENT, STANDING BY YOUR SORRY ASS EVEN AFTER YOU WERE CAUGHT LYING ABOUT THAT SKANK YOU HAD BLOWING YOU WHILE PEOPLE DIED IN RWANDA!”

      Your “suggestion” is one more example why Black people WILL NOT VOTE FOR HILLARY. The condescention, the contempt, and the entitlement mentality coming from your camp has turned many a Black professionals’ stomach. There are entire blogs discussing this, like The Root and Jack and Jill politics. BC and HRC have pissed in the well one time too many!

      “Then Obama needs to tape his apology and broadcast it during every commercial break across the country for a full month, like he is doing now here in Pennsylvania.”

      *yawn*

      When is lunch?

      • Andy

        B-Rob:

        What did you have for breakfast? Shouldn’t drink in the morning….

        Markos M. misses you; go back home; where the discourse is more at your level.

      • OxyCon

        Hey Bob, you ever read a fucking thing you write?
        Lol!

        R Bob: “Please give me a cite to any speech, interview, web posting . . . anything where Obama said anything about BC being a racist. You made the allegation — now back it up.

        This is a wonderful thing. But past good acts do not absolve either Bill or Hillary or their surrogates for their racially tinged commentary during this campaign.”

        Now you made accusations, so you go waste YOUR time Googling to back them up, while I claim ignorance.
        I know how to play your game.

        • Cee Hussein

          OxyCon,

          Answer the question.

          • http://www.despair.com/changewinds.html Smilin’ Jim

            Last night’s experiment with spelt spaghetti.

            I’ll stick with semolina.

  • OxyCon

    Looks like the DailyKooks aren’t having enough fun Clinton bashing over at their sandbox so they’ve come here.
    You know what’s really funny?
    On the one hand, these DailyKook assholes are attacking the Clintons because Rush Limpbaughs told his minions to vote for Hillary, on the other hand the assholes are using every attack Limpbaughs ever used to attack the Clintons with.
    They sound just like Limpbaughs!
    They’re using all of Limpbaugh’s attacks!
    They, themselves are just like Limpbaughs!

    • Braised Cod

      Actually, the reason I came by this site is I wanted to see what so called Democrats were gloating about getting Randi Rhodes suspended. If Rush Limbaugh said what she said, he would get a bonus. The difference is the person who suspended Rhodes from Air America is a Clinton / DLC shill. “[AAR Chairman] Kireker, a long-time Democratic party activist, has ties to the Clintons.” – 4/3/08 NY Daily News. Rhodes is AAR’s top earner. Anyone interested in holding the network together would not have suspended her. Those interested in silencing and intimidating the Progressive wing of the Dem party would act EXACTLY that way. IF YOU CAN’T CONTROL THE MESSAGE, DESTROY THE MESSENGER. The DLC should have Air America in a smoking ruin by the fall. Give yourselves a big pat on the back. By the way, the dictionary also defines whore as “debase oneself by doing something for unworthy motives, typically to make money.” What would you call taking money from Murdock and kissing Richard Mellon Scaife’s ass? I call it Hillary McSame.

  • Newport News Dem

    Yuppies are too self centered to be philanthropic. The Obamas are the epitmy of yuppies.

    Don’t forget, Michelle got a $200,000 raise when Obama was elected and magically the Hospital got a million dollar earmark.

  • OxyCon

    This just in:
    Obama is a closeted Nazi!
    I kid you not.
    Remember that “article” which popped up shortly after Rev Wright’s bigot eruptions where the author tried to imply that Hillary Clinton was tied up with a shadowy secret Nazi organization, because she attended a couple prayer meetings?
    Well, guess who else was going to the same prayer meetings?
    Barack Obama!
    This is too f’n rich.
    For weeks the rabid psychos at DailyKooks and Obama Talking Points Memo were frothing at the mouth over “Hillary’s Pastor Problem”, and now it turns out that Obama has gone there too.
    What will these Obamatons do now?
    I used to rib ignorant right wingers by telling them to put their helmets on because their heads were about to explode. I guess I should start doing the same to these Obamatons.

    ===============

    Like Clinton, Obama Attended “Shadowy” Group’s Prayer Meetings
    Email
    Print
    Share April 04, 2008 11:21 AM

    Justin Rood Reports:

    Stories on the “stealth” ministry of Douglas Coe have been cropping up recently on blogs and online publications, linking him unfavorably to Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y.

    Comparing Coe to Obama’s inflammatory pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Barbara Ehrenreich wrote at HuffingtonPost.com, “When it comes to unsavory religious affiliations, she’s a lot more vulnerable than Obama.”

    But the story may not be so simple. Indeed, as Sen. Barack Obama’s presidential campaign confirmed yesterday, he has also attended Coe’s prayer meetings.

  • Pingback: We have our own Soapblox « Donna Darko

  • http://www.despair.com/changewinds.html Smilin’ Jim

    This gives the Obama camp cause to rejoice.

    Despite Obama’s appearance as the Sheik of Bed, Bath and Beyond in those photos, this Scrooge approach to charity proves that he is not a Muslim.

    The Quran demands that everyone above the poverty line give at least 2.5%.

    The Shiites have extended this with the Khums which originally related to giving 1/5 of war booty to the poor. The amount they are now required to give involves a quasi-capital gains calculation. The Sunnis take a more parsimonious view.

    Thus through the Wonderland Mirror the Clintons are better Muslims than Obama, although they would never make the grade as Shiites.

  • Pingback: The Palins Give Far More to Charity Than the Bidens : NO QUARTER

  • Karen4McCain/Palin 08 Country first not terrorist buddieds!

    The thing is the chairty went to Rev J.Wrights church and now Rev J.Wrights has a 10 million dollar home that was completed this year over 5.ooo thounsand feet Hello-And RevJ.Wright and Obama calls us greddy white peole when they work and take from other people.

    McCain/Palin 08
    Country First

    TERRORIST Or those who handg with them-Obama…NEVER!

  • Karen4McCain/Palin 08 Country first not terrorist buddieds!

    Obama got alot of money from IRAN

    WAKE UP.

    AS OBAMA SAID HE WILL DE WEAPONIZED SPACE-HE WILL HAVE RUSSIA TAKE US POFF THE ALERT-HE IS FOR BANNING GUNS-HE WILL NOT FUND THE NUCULAR-he will cut funding -He will not fund our space program-Now Iran making nucular war weapons and Russia ?????????????Some thinks Obama is talking of things will be like peace–No talking more like setting americans and america in the way we can not defend ourselves.Hello wake up.
    NOOBAMA !!!!!!

    McCain/Palin 08