Why Obama’s Bow Faux Pas Matters
By Larry Johnson on April 12, 2009 at 1:00 PM in Current Affairs
I had exchange last night over email with a person (let’s call this person Pene Verde or P.V. for short) over an article published by Richard Greene, an on-air talent for Air America. P.V. is an Obama disciple. This person makes followers of Jim Jones appear lackadaisical. I will warn you up front that I was rude and infuriated. But I think you will find this instructive.
Here’s some of the piece that kicked off the email melee:
WHY OBAMA BOWED By Richard Greene
I have to admit that I, too, was a bit taken aback by the very low bow of our President. I didn’t like the imagery and hated that he was cozying up to the same guy that President Bush almost French Kissed.
If President Obama bowed that low for the former leader of South Africa, Nelson Mandela, it would have been justified, but the Saudi King doesn’t deserve that treatment.
But the truth is that we are all missing the point and continuing to not understand the “high road” that IS Barack Obama.
He doesn’t play by the same old rules that we are used to seeing in Washington and in international diplomacy.
He gave his first interview to an Arab television network and used the word “respect” in almost every sentence.
He was the first President to look into a camera and speak directly to the Muslim world.
He is subtly leveraging his middle name and Muslim ancestry.
And his bow was, pure and simple, a continuation of that and his belief that the Muslim world, rightly or wrongly, feels dis-respected and not at all acknowledged by America.
You can not expect an adversary to be reasonable when they are pissed. People and countries are pissed when they are not acknowledged.
George Bush kissed the Saudis but he pissed off almost every other country in the Muslim world by his inability and unwillingness to listen and his hard nosed, imperialistic attitudes that were the opposite of acknowledgement. . . .
When I was a mediator it was the number one thing I required from each of the warring parties in front of me. Genuinely acknowledging the other party does not guarantee that they will agree to your demands but it opens the door to rational, rather than emotional, dialogue. It removes the “I’m pissed and I’m going to get back at you for hurting my feelings” elements of subconscious sabotage in all negotiations.
The bow was a very visible and very effective acknowledgement of an Arab leader. In his first meeting with international leaders abroad, President Barack Obama bowed low because President George Bush never bowed or bent at all when dealing with the rest of the Muslim world. It was overcompensating for the arrogance this nation has shown the world for eight years and it only communicates weakness to those who still believe that George Bush’s “Piss Off The World” strategy for making America safe is the right one.
Congratulations, President Obama, on having the courage to continue to take the highest of all possible roads to help repair the past. In our PTSD from the last eight years, we might still need a few more months to understand how this “respect” thing actually works.
Richard Greene is Host of “Hollywood CLOUT!” on Air America Radio
Responding to this article I sent the following note to a friend of mine who also is friends with P.V.:
From: Larry Johnson
Date: April 11, 2009 2:58:51 PM PDT
To: ww @earthlink.net
Subject: Re: WHY OBAMA BOWED
Greene is a fucking moron. Jesus Christ!! I have spoken with four different people who have served in Saudi Arabia with the US Embassy. One was an Ambassador, one a CIA Chief of Station, one worked at the CIA base, and one was a Defense Attache. To a person they all say this was an act of lunacy on Obama’s part. It demonstrates weakness and encourages them to think we are fools and low life belly scrapers.
My friend forwarded my comments to P.V. who decided to engage me:
From: PV@aol.com
Date: April 11, 2009 3:16:21 PM PDT
To: ww @earthlink.net
Subject: Re: WHY OBAMA BOWEDAs usual, I disagree with Larry.
He and everyone else is missing the point.
How far has the normal protocol that these career diplomats practice taken us in the Middle East. If they like stasis and statemate so they can protect their jobs, then go ahead with an old paradigm.
Blowing shit up is no longer an acceptable paradigm and Larry should know that.
Was what Obama did unconventional? Of course. But if the Muslims around the world are going to now fuck with the US because the Commander in Chief bowed, they are forgetting that this guy is asking Congress for over $80 Billion to continue two wars and would, in my opinion, have no problem blowing their fucking asses back into the sand that they grew out of. There is a level of strength here that is on a level that few understand. It’s what Gandhi called “Soul Force”.
Sorry that includes your friend Larry. (And you may pass this on to him).
PV
Oh, ouch!! Well, you know me. I couldn’t leave it alone. I sent the following note:
Your response is so incredibly stupid I don’t know where to begin. How does not bowing, which is not a cultural norm in the Arab world, equate with stasis and stalemate? I’m certainly not arguing for status quo. You obviously are not a dog person or familiar with dogs. There is an alpha dog phenomena. The beta dogs roll over on their backs to demonstrate their subservience to the dominate dog. Obama sent the clear message–he’s a servant. Servants bow, not leaders.
And because Obama is breaking his word with respect to Iraq and is going to keep combat forces in place you give him a pass but this is strength? And your opinion about what the U.S. is capable of doing militarily must be pulled completely out of your ass. Do some research to understand how grossly overstretched the U.S. military is now because of the idiocy of the Bush Administration, which was enabled by both Republicans and Democrats. Obama in the campaign promised initially to be out of Iraq in 9 months. Then he moved the bar to 16 months and now? Asking for more money.
Change you can believe in?
On Apr 11, 2009, at 6:59 PM, pv@aol.com wrote:
Your analogy to the consciousness of canines is exactly the point Larry. I too am upset about Iraq and want to understand that but we have to move beyond dogs Larry.
I returned PV’s volley as follows:
I take it you have not lived in a foreign country, particularly an Arab country. Your American mentality that gentleness or kindness are interpreted as such is naive beyond belief. There is a Spanish expression, “se confunde el bueno con el buenudo.”
I learned my lesson the hard way while living in the campo in Honduras back in 1978. I assumed that if we showed generosity, decency and humility that those values would be reciprocated and appreciated. I was shocked to discover that most of the folks I dealt with decided that I was a fool and someone they could take advantage of. That phenomena exists in the Middle East, especially Saudi Arabia, only stronger.
Now, this does not mean we should treat people like shit, but it does require we get rid of our romantic, childish notions that by bowing to a racist, Jew hating, sexist monarch we are somehow going to magically change his attitude.
If Obama believes like you do then that explains a lot.
Did that quiet PV? Nope. This next part is stunning:
Larry, please do not lecture me on this. I have lived abroad and given communication seminars in 26 countries including in Egypt, Kuwait and Israel.
I’m not talking about gentleness. I’m talking about a basic, primal human need called acknowledgement. Impossible to have peace without it. Respect is one form of acknowledgement.
Let me be clear.
I trust that Obama is decent, honest, shares my values. Until I see otherwise I will give him the benefit of every doubt. And, he is at a higher level of awareness and consciousness than any leader since Gandhi. That will inure to our benefit if we understand and allow it.
Are you shitting me? Obama is at a level of “awareness and consciousness” greater than any leader since Gandhi? My head exploded metaphorically at this point. And yes, at times, I acted like a complete juvenile:
Dude,
You have lost your mind. “Higher consciousness than Ghandi?” Are you doing drugs? Honestly, that is batshit crazy and despite your overseas lectures you have not learned a thing from your treks other than to be an airhead.
Ah yes!! The Larry Johnson Charm School offensive. I probably should have tried to craft a more diplomatic response but I didn’t. Not surprisingly PV response was curt:
Larry, please don’t email me again. I don’t appreciate the unrelenting ad hominim attacks. And your ability to read is obviously at the level of your ability to absorb new ideas. I did not say “higher than Ghandhi”. Pretty basic 6th grade reading comprehension. Read what I wrote, dude, and take a fuckin’ chill pill.
Wayne, please don’t encourage our communication in the future. I’ve lost all respect for him.
Thanks.
So, that was the end of it. Right? Wrong. This is a scab that needed picking. My response was really “mature” (ok, probably not):
In a message dated 4/11/2009 6:12:30 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, larry_johnson writes:
Well, the feeling is mutual Mr. Citizen of the Universe and Higher Consciousness.
Thankfully PV could not resist the bait and sent this:
One day you’ll appreciate, Larry, that there are other perspectives than yours.
And go take care of that anger. Once you get past it your extraordinary experience and talents will be very valuable.
Calling me a “fucking moron” is hardly the way to start a productive dialogue.
You’ve got issues, man.
Take care.
PV
A little more friendly now, so I pressed the matter:
What angers me is the notion that you see no problem bowing to a racist. By your standard the way to handle Hitler would have been for a world leader to bow to him. You know, if you just showed Hitler some respect he might not have unleashed the Holocaust. Surely you know that is nonsense. And yet, you’ll make excuses for an ingratiating gesture to a man who favors the destruction of Israel. I’m quite content with my issues. I know what is wrong and what is right. You don’t persuade men like Abdullah by pandering to them. And I challenge you to show me one time where Ghandi bowed to the British. Didn’t happen
PV ignored the challenge but appeared to backtrack a bit:
Obama was bowing to a Muslim far more than that pig. I would have preferred a different way of showing respect as well. My article was trying to help people understand a man who is very different than our typical President. Take care
Here was my final shot:
Not just a “muslim.” A muslim who stands at the head of the Wahabis. A muslim who declares Israel is a non-entity. A muslim who in fact disgraces what is the heart and soul of Islam. And there is nothing in Islam that dictates such a bow as the way to show “respect.” That you are comfortable with that nonsense is what disturbs and angers me. You’re better than that.
I think this matters and it matters a lot. I agree with the need to treat others with respect as long as they are not engaged in illegal or immoral activity that harms other people, especially children. But folks like King Abdullah do not merit a hearty hug and a back slap, much less a pandering bow. It reminds me of Neville Chamberlain’s failed effort to buy time with Adolf Hitler by treating him with respect. Hitler understood weakness and exploited it subsequently to the max.
If the Obama team had admitted it was simply a mistake in protocol guidance I would be less concerned. Instead of remembering that videotape is tough to erase the Obama folks tried to deny there ever was an instance of Obama bowing to Abdullah. That did not work and they then shifted to ridiculous explanations (e.g., Abdullah is vertically challenged and Obama had to bend over just to reach his midget-man hands). That has not worked.
We are left with the disturbing image of our nation’s leader bowing and scraping like a chambermaid. This sends the rest of the world a message and it is not good for us–we are weak and subservient.






















