RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

That’s Where the Money Is

On the heels of the fraud known as Enron, Congress passed legislation requiring CEOs to validate the integrity of their financial reporting. This legislation, Sarbanes-Oxley, and its effectiveness are still hotly contested. Is it universally accepted? Does it truly promote best practices within companies and across industries? Does it produce results? Well, the fact of the matter is that it is the law of the land. However, what good is a law if it isn’t applied? I can count on one hand, without need of my thumb, claims by law enforcement authorities of companies’ violating Sarbanes-Oxley.

Will Sarbanes-Oxley be dusted off and put to use now? The Financial Times reports that it will not be for lack of opportunity that Sarbanes-Oxley is not used. In regard to bank earnings, TARP investigator Neil Barofsky offers:

“I hope we don’t find a single bank that’s cooked their books to try to get money but I don’t think that’s going to be the case,” said Mr Barofsky, who has been dubbed the “Tarp cop”.

If this is in fact the case, what about some perp walks? Is white collar crime still an activity tolerated by the system? Who is providing the cover? Are the perpetrators in bed with the legislators? Don’t tell me that cooking the books is a victimless crime. Every taxpayer is being victimized in terms of lessened credit, higher taxes, a growing deficit, and outrageous fees. Victimless? I don’t think so.

If bank executives’ “cooking the books” is the ultimate inside job, is the TALF (Term Asset-Backed Lending Facility) the equivalent of having the tellers throw on a smile while the banks’ back doors are wide open? To wit, Barofsky shares:

Mr Barofsky also said the Treasury’s expanded term asset-backed securities loan facility (Talf) was ripe for fraud.

The former New York prosecutor said the decision to expand the Talf to encourage investors to buy distressed, or “legacy”, assets from banks could put public money behind investments that were backed by fraudulent mortgages.

“One of our strongest recommendations of the last report was do not expand the Talf to buying legacy assets. If its structure is not changed considerably it’s very, very dangerous,” he said.

The full FT report, TARP Investigator Seeks Evidence of Book Fiddling, is a simple blueprint for building a case against bank executives. However, are certain of these bank executives nothing more than modern day versions of Willie Sutton?

Who is Willie Sutton, you may ask? From the files of the Federal Bureau of Investigation:

Willie Sutton acquired two nicknames, “The Actor” and “Slick Willie,” for his ingenuity in executing robberies in various disguises. Fond of expensive clothes, Sutton was described as being an immaculate dresser. Although he was a bank robber, Sutton had the reputation of a gentleman; in fact, people present at his robberies stated he was quite polite. One victim said witnessing one of Sutton’s robberies was like being at the movies, except the usher had a gun. When asked why he robbed banks, Sutton simply replied, “Because that’s where the money is.”

LD

  • http://Godhelpusall lee M

    We have a plethora of Willie Suttons in this mess. Let’s start with Henry Paulson, IMO the ring leader of the bunch. Throw in Ben Bernanke, Neel Kashkari, Timothy Geithner,etc., the list goes on and on. When Ben Bernanke, the Federal Reserve chairman gave the first bail-out to AIG from the Federal Reserve, he opened the flood gates to Bush and Paulson, who then transferred it to Obama and Geithner. Add the heads of all the banks and investment companies who made a killing at the taxpayer’s expense.

    Jesse James and the Dalton Brothers had nothing on this bunch of theives. The only difference being that this bunch were able to steal us blind under a facade of legality. I fervently hope that Mr. Barofsky is able to bring at least some of them to task for what they have done to this country.

  • Snoopy

    American Legion to Napolitano: Apologize

    Of all the smears listed in the new DHS warning about “right-wing extremism,” none are more dastardly and despicable than the insinuation that returning military veterans represent a security threat to the nation they willingly served. The Commander of the American Legion has sent the following letter to DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano explaining to her that military veterans are not the enemy:

    David K. Rehbein
    National Commander
    The American Legion

    http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/14/american-legion-to-napolitano-apologize/

  • Peggy Sue

    We are being so-o-o snookered. I’m so glad you used the term “cooking the books,” Larry, and that I’ve started to see the term used in on-going economic/treasury analyses. Because that’s all it is. That’s all creative accounting ever was.

    Several months ago, I watched a PBS presentation of how we got here, starting with the Bush/Paulson bailouts and remember feeling somewhat “sympathetic” towards Paulson, how shocked and overwhelmed he appeared.

    What a miserable joke! Fooled me once. But not again.

    We have Elizabeth Warren, presumably the TARP overseer, who cannot get a cup of coffee from these people. In her own words a couple of weeks ago, she said that she and her panel were obviously not a “priority” for Treasury.

    I guess not! Willie Sutton wouldn’t be too keen on having the cops watching the front and back doors.

    I’m astonished there’s not a louder outcry from all directions, Left, Right and Center as the nation’s coffers have been repeatedly raided.

    It’s mind-boggling!

  • i2d

    My posts never seem to appear but here goes.

    I’ve said for weeks that the people MUST demand hearings in Congress with everyone testifying being sworn in under oath, NOW! Why isn’t the public demanding hearings? All I read throughout the blogosphere and hear from people on the street are folks venting their frustrations about Treasury, the Secretary and TARP.

    Tea Party’s are great, BUT it’s time for accountability and transparency in all things related to our money and how it’s been dished out, to whom and why.

  • Mary

    Larry,

    Any idea why Fannie/Freddie were explicitly exempt from any Sarbanes-Oxley regulations after the Enron mess?

    I never could figure that out, really.

  • http://www.googlemoneytree.me/ Mary

    Larry,

    Any idea why Fannie/Freddie were explicitly exempt from any Sarbanes-Oxley regulations after the Enron mess?

    I never could figure that out, really.
    OH! You’re my new favorite blogger fyi

  • http://www.senseoncents.com LD

    Great question. Not sure. Perhaps the powers that be knew that the Freddie and Fannie were Dead Men Walking.

blog comments powered by Disqus