RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Brainstorming Appeasement

beerhall-putsch.jpg

Obama Administration Struggles With Language.  

610x.jpg

The long argument against the Tehran regime will have successes.   Not now.  M. Ahmadinejad’s provocative visit last week to the Isfahan nuclear energy facility was not a good day for the United States.  The Tehran boast that it has up to seven thousand centrifuges in operation is well past any redline identified over the years by the UN watchdog the IAEA.  The day of reckoning was last week.  In a surprising response from Washington, there is a fresh gossipy policy  report in the NYT that the Obama team is “brainstorming” new diplomatic words and definitions in order to find a way not to confront Tehran over its nuke weapons programs.   The word “appeasement” is unattractive.    More useful is the word “accommodation.”

A review of Iran policy that Mr. Obama ordered after taking office is still under way, and aides say it is not clear how long he would be willing to allow Iran to continue its fuel production, and at what pace. But European officials said that in talks with Mr. Obama and his aides during his trip to Europe, there was agreement that Iran would not accept the kind of immediate shutdown of its facilities that the Bush administration had demanded….

“Our goal remains exactly what it has been in the U.N. resolutions: suspension,” one senior administration official said. Another official cautioned that “we are still at the brainstorming level” and said the terms of an opening proposal to Iran were still being debated.

What Happens Next.

putsch.png

Tehran is a predator and a sneak.  When the Americans advance, Tehran plays victim.  When the Americans retreat, Tehran boasts and provokes.  What will follow from the Obama team opening with concessions is that Tehran will grow aggressive and cocky.  We have seen this before.  The Devils in November, 1934 were craven and cock-sure.  Chancellor Adolf Hitler celebrated his 1923 so-called Beer Hall Putsch with much vain publicity in the foreign newspapers.  Hitler spoke on the same spot where he had called for a new Reich eleven years before, and he boasted to the reporters that it was not true that he had ducked for cover under the gunfire of the police, rather he had fallen while trying to help an invalid nearby.  Hitler also announced the distribution of half a million Reichmarks to the widows and children of deceased Nazi party fellows.  Applause.  On the same page, there was a preliminary announcement of an alliance between Hitler’s Nazi dominated government in Germany and Mussolini’s Fascist dominated government in Italy.   Few were fooled other than the appeasers in the Stanley Baldwin government at London and the FDR government in Washington.  The NYT of 1934 was hesitant.   Side by side with Hitler’s self-promotion and hints of the Mussolini cunning was a lengthy piece about the “Non-Sectarian Anti-Nazi League.”   The League believed it was necessary to emphasize that it was not only made up of Jews.  Everyone knew the threat, the League announced.  Everyone understood that Hitler was not going to behave.   The League called for boycotts of and sanctions on Germany.  The League pleaded for the democracies to confront Hitler’s villainy.  The Nazi abuse against the Jews and invalids and gypsies and communists and dissenters in Germany was constant and merciless.  The threats and plots against Germany’s neighbors were obvious, most especially Austria, Czechoslovakia, France.  Hitler claimed that he was righting the wrongs of the Versailles Treaty.  London, Paris and Washington maintained that if they could satisfy Hitler’s demands, then the peace would hold.  No one had stomach for war.  The public would not permit belligerent words in the parliaments.  The horror of the First War was still fresh.   London, Paris and Washington had to find a peaceful way.   The worldwide economy was in collapse.  There had to be a reasonable settlement.  London, Paris and Washington were still brainstorming.   The word “appeasement” was unattractive.  More useful was the word “accommodation.”  It was 1934.  Diplomacy bought two more years.  

boycott.png

  • politicalidentitycrisis

    Well, the lefties did like words, just words. The world will get just words, and so will America.

  • SHV

    IMO, Iranian nuclear program is a distraction from the real threat of the Pakistani nuclear program. Pakistan has produced enough weapons grade Uranium for an estimated 75 bombs and they also have Plutonium bombs that are small enough to be delivered by missiles. The Pakistan govt has approved Sharia law for a part of their country. Pakistan is a coup away from a radical govt with many nuclear weapons and I don’t think anyone has a clue about what to do if that happens.

  • http://Godhelpusall lee M

    Sharia law is a very insidious thing that is fast making its way through the West via Islamic Financing. “jihad with money”. Insight analytical has a post up today exposing the U.S.Treasury Dept.’s move to enable Sharia financing to invade this country.

  • http://noquarterusa No-nonsense-Nancy

    BO has been in office for over 2 months now and they still don’t have a policy on Iran? What have they been doing? Oh yes, that’s right. Campaining for 2012 and king of the world and partying and living high on the hog. Does he even know what the inside of the oval office looks like? Except that the temp is so high he can grow orchids.
    I think he and his “advisors” are so inept at this governing thing that they have no clue as to what to do. We are in so much trouble!! We could have had HILLARY!

  • http://Godhelpusall lee M

    Sharia law is an invasive, insidious evil that is permeating the West as we speak. With the help of our own Treasury Dept. Islamic-Compliant Finance is being introduced into our banking and investment system by way of seminars given at the Treasury Dept.

    Insight Analytical – Watching our World has a post up today on this very thing. I tried to leave a link, but it didn’t take.

    InsightAnalytical – Watching our World is on the blogroll for this site. Go to the link and see what is in store for us if it isn’t stopped.

  • Seattle Moss

    Iran has always been the real enemy. They intend to blackmail the united states in order to gain hegemony over the region.
    Obama is naive to think that playing nice with the retard with the Members Only jacket will lead to any dismantling of their Nuclear terror program.

    Iran needs to experience the full force of western power….Hurry up Israel!!

  • Betty

    and he boasted to the reporters that it was not true that he had ducked for cover under the gunfire of the police, rather he had fallen while trying to help an invalid nearby.

    And Obama didn’t bow either.

  • viking

    Krauthammer was saying recently that Iran would agree to negotiations for the sole purpose of buying time to get its nuclear program completed. Once they’re armed, all the talking is of no consequence. Makes sense.

  • CamdenRave

    the Obama team is “brainstorming” new diplomatic words and definitions in order to find a way not to confront Tehran over its nuke weapons programs.

    Sorry, Mr. Batchelor you fail at reading comprehension. I believe this is the quote from the NYT you’re referring to?

    Matthew Bunn, a nuclear expert at the Belfer Center at Harvard University, said in a interview on Monday that the Obama administration had some latitude in defining what constitutes “suspension” of nuclear work.

    One possibility, he said, was “what you call warm shutdown,” in which the centrifuges keep spinning, but not producing new enriched uranium, akin to leaving a car running, but in park.

    That would allow both sides to claim victory: the Iranians could claim they had resisted American efforts to shut down the program, while the Americans and Europeans could declare that they had halted the stockpiling of material that could be used to produce weapons.

    Do you see any differences between what the actual article says and how you described it?

  • http://www.thecjpoliticalreport.com Halli Casser-Jayne

    The President fears Iran more than North Korea and China. And he fears the Saudi’s who are holding him hostage to their economic war, their weapon oil. Clearly, POTUS has no fear of the Israeli’s who he feels safe to destroy. Here are my views, too long to post here but please read at:
    http://www.thecjpoliticalreport.com/a_bow_made_in_fear.html

  • bayareavoter

    Hey, Seattle Moss, I love reading your comments and I hate to appear too pc but may I ask you, just like I ask my teenager, to please refrain from using retard as a pejorative.

  • James Guglielmino

    What an absurd assertion. The American position regarding Israel will be little changed under Obama from what it was under Bush. You do remember that Bush, for a change, taking the advice of a non-neocon, did not allow Israel to attack Iran. This week’s Nation Magazine discusses Dennis Ross, the man in State who has assumed the place as “the man” regarding Iran. He is strongly pro-Israel and known to have said that attacking Iran is inevitable. Go to Nation on line and read the piece. It is no real surprise to me. The facts of this matter are that Israel fully intended to ethnically cleanse Palestine of Arabs since before there was an Israel. Don’t believe me? Ask Larry and I haven’t even asked him what he understands. The statement is well validated in many sources from David ben Gurion’s diary to numerous written statements. See “The Ethnic Cleansing Of Palestine.” I am, in no way, anti-Semitic, to put the record straight. The Zionists came to understand that the only way Jews could ever be safe was to have their own country. How could they possibly have had “their own country” in a region where they were the minority?
    At the same time, I do not defend what the Israelis have done to the Palestinians. (nor do I defend the attacks with missiles by Hammas on Israeli cities, of course)

  • http://trackacrat.com/2009/04/15/death-to-the-alphabet/ Death To The Alphabet « Track-A-’Crat: The Roll Call of Democratic Delinquency

    [...] at No Quarter, John Batchelor writes about Team Obama’s “brainstorming new diplomatic words and [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus