RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Handwriting’s on the Wall … Err, the Questionnaire

I just love Fact Hub — it’s a great way to keep up with the campaign and they had fact checks up immediately, during the debate.  Take a look at something they caught regarding a bit of a flub-up of Obama’s during the debate last night:

Sen. Obama’s Handwriting Appears On Questionnaire Supporting Total Handgun Ban

During the debate, Sen. Obama flatly denied his handwriting appeared on a questionnaire where he expressed his support for a total gun ban:

Gibson: But do you still favor the registration of guns? Do still you favor the licensing of guns? And in 1996, you – your campaign issued a questionnaire. And your writing was on the questionnaire that said you favored a ban on handguns.

Obama: No, my writing was not on that particular questionnaire, Charlie. As I’ve said, I have never favored an all-out ban on hand handguns

That’s not the case, you can see his handwriting on the very questionnaire here:

The entire questionnaire is available here.

More on this story, including the Obama campaign’s initial denial he ever saw the questionnaire, here.

Oops!  He got another one wrong guys.  I suppose now he’s going to issue another one of his “what I meant to say was…” memos or deliver one of his famous speeches to undo the damange caused by getting caught out in this blunder, eh?

As for the debate, a friend just sent me the following email about how what they thought of Obama’s answers to some of the questions:

Ha! He didn’t fill out the questionnaire …

he was absent when Wright went wild …

it’s okay for him to hang out with Ayers because Clinton pardoned other people …

he only wears a flag pin when a veteran gives him one …

he’s for a windfall profits tax on oil companies but he voted for Cheney’s energy bill …

he doesn’t take money from federally registered lobbyists but he takes the money they bundle … etc.

:::::::::::::

Special thanks to Vet4Hill for the video. – SusanUnPC

  • Janicen

    Now just stop it. In the debate last night, Senator Obama told us that it’s wrong to “obsess” over things that he says. We’re supposed to focus on what his handlers say he “meant to say”. It’s a distinction that is so often missed by small town thinkers.

    • Catriley

      Perhaps they should just let Axelrod stand next to him. I mean, he doesn’t have the clout Bush had to wear a wire in the debate — but simply having Axelrove on the stage might cut down on those annoying “ummms”. Better yet, I still think that Obama’s fans should just write Axelrove’s name in on the ballot. He may not be as exciting a figure as Obama, but I’m thinking they could just cut out the middleman that way.

      • http://camoderate ca moderate

        Can you picture an Obama- McCain debate — Obama with Axelrove and a bullpen of other advisors on specific topics versus McCain with Lieberman and Graham to assist. That might actually be fun to watch.

    • Dawnelle

      Yes, Yes, we all must EMBRACE THE W.O.R.M. people!

      (for any Obamatron’s still out of the loop)

      What Obama Really Meant = WORM

      and your WORM people are sanctimonious and blindly projecting your OWN beliefs onto this empty suit!

      STOP IT!! You have become the lemmings you always protest against!! Can’t you even SEE it????

      good GAWD almighty!!

    • workingclass artist

      In the spirit of internet confession….I am Barack Obama….my…ummmm…er……mu…uh ha..hand was broken….That was not my …ummm…..wr…writing…er…( clear throat )….Actually that hand writing looks more like Hillary’s…..I have to run now…..Love Barry….

      • The Gringo’s Wife

        You forgot to pinch your pants obsessively. Liars do that yaknow?

    • Mary

      “Just words? Don’t tell me words don’t matter!”

      I think he stepped in the compost again.

  • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

    OT ANNOUNCEMENT / CRITICAL:

    Call ABC and tell them you were happy with their professional coverage and moderating of tonight’s debate.

    The number:

    1-818-560-1000

    We must get this message to them and support them now. Please help.
    They are being deluged with calls from Obama people.

    This is the kind of tactic we have seen throughout the campaign. If
    you care to help balance things out, please act now.

    (Apologies to Alegre for interrupting, but the entire Kool-Aid blogosphere is going nuts over the debate last night, and we need to provide our perspectives. SEE ALSO, Larry’s post below asking us to write to Charles Gibson.)

    • blobert

      Watching ABC World News Tonight is always good. Boosts the ratings.

  • Catriley

    The fact that Ayers was asked not to attend a conference for “progressive educators” in 2006 because of his radical past, tells you a lot about the people that Obama chooses to associate with.

    Wonder how many other people Obama associates with that are so out of the mainstream that they have to be hidden away like that? So far we have Wright, Rezko, Ayers, the list grows….. Once the media wakes up and starts looking into and reporting on Penny Pritzker’s role in the subprime mess and the failed Superior Bank, and Obama’s bff from Broadway Bank, his closet is going to look like the storeroom for a haunted house.

    Obama is becoming radioactive for the Democrats. Why does the party keep insisting on shoving these candidates down our throats, instead of supporting the ones that can seal the deal (i.e. Edwards, Clinton, Gore)? Yeah, they gave us Gore, but they handled and sanitized him in that DLC way until there was no “Al” left. If they had let him be himself, he could have won enough to render their vote tampering moot.

    • it’snotme

      I think by the time June rolls around Kennedy, Kerry, Casey, McCaskill, Richardson, Pelosi, Reid and their ilk will be BEGGING Hillary to stay in the race. I have a feeling we have seen only the tip of Mr. Hope’s iceberg of questionable friends/acquaintances. SURELY the Super Delegate’s eyes are WIDE OPEN now.

      • MessyMarcy

        Has Reid done anything to help Obama? I thought he had pretty much stayed neutral. I saw the 68-year-old Pelosi on CBS the other day sneering at Bill Clinton for having what she termed a “senior moment.” Wonder what she thinks of Obama’s serial misstatements of the past week or so? Admittedly he’s almost fifty years old, but that’s a little early to be having age-based lapses. Maybe he’s just not experienced enough for a tough presidential campaign.

        I don’t think Pelosi or any of the others you named will care enough about the party to admit they were wrong to back Obama. It is to be hoped voters in the remaining contests and uncommitted automatic delegates will go strongly for Hillary and save us from our idiot party leaders.

        • The Gringo’s Wife

          There is a growing campaign to make sure Pelosi is not re-elected. Not sure if Cindy Sheehan is still planning on running against her.

          We need to clean the Senate. It is obvious that with Obama, we will keep the status quo. Ironic isn’t it? Mr. change won’t change a thing. He will already in the bag to Pelosi and the gang.

          Bill and Hillary are amazingly the same people they were ten years ago; outsiders. I remember an Obamabot saying that Hillary was losing all of the Clinton administration people to Obama because they hated her. Later I learned that many these were passed over by Hillary.

          I am certain that Hillary thinks of “La Pelusa” what the rest of the country does, she is ineffective. I swear I was proud of Pelusa but at the same time, I have constant second hand embarrassment when I watch her.

          I believe a time lapse slow speed camera would catch Pelusa eyeballing herself every two seconds while making believe she means what she says. Maybe it is me but she comes across shifty and superficial.

          Just as Reid was not the personality we needed to fight the GOP. Imagine if Murtha had been in charge.

          Let’s make it so Number One! (aka Larry Johnson)

    • beebop

      Thank you Donna Brazile … or Typhoid Mary to her Democratic candidate friends.

  • http://hyper-educated-uppity-woman.blogspot.com Uppity

    you….you…you mean he lied? NO! Say it can’t be!

  • Ren Vs Stimpy

    BREAKING NEWS

    According to a 2007 Time interview Obama was in prep school while mom was getting her Phd and collecting food stamps. Of course you know that at that time he would be living with the (well off) grandparents not mom.

    SEE: Paragraph 9 Last two sentences: (Cut and paste)

    LINK: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1546302,00.html

    FURTHERMORE: Foodstamps were not available in Hawaii at the times Barry lived with his mom. Which was infrequent.

    • workingclass artist

      Question…..Did she get food stamps in Indonesia…..Trying to understand.

      • Ren Vs Stimpy

        Foodstamps are not sent overseas to anyone’s knowledge. What this amounts to is an embellishment to the degree of reducing the “Bosnia lie” to gibberish.

        • TeakwoodKite

          I am robbed even of the certainty of uncertainty—for sometimes absolute truths may well be absolute.”

          Barak Obama

          from Ren Vs Stimpy’s link…HuH?

    • http://hyper-educated-uppity-woman.blogspot.com Uppity

      God, I am just rolling my eyes here. is there ANYTHING about this guy that’s real?

    • http://hyper-educated-uppity-woman.blogspot.com Uppity

      Send that to ABC

    • scott

      It keeps getting better.

    • beebop

      You know? I find his resume inflating to bring his message to the “folk” becoming more than a little tiresome. Every time I hear another snippet of it, it diminshes my gag reflex.

  • Fleaflicker

    Liar Liar pants on fire Obama does it again. Thanks so much for finding the handwriting. Just too good!

  • JoeySky

    I don’t know why Obama keep insisting that his handwriting was not on that paper. The same he keeps saying that he doesn’t take oil money and lobbyists money. Anyone who do their own research will know that it’s a outright lie.

    Why does he think he will get away with it? With this kind of behavior, he will be very dangerous if he gets to the White House. He will distort the truth and lie to the public. He would not be much different from Bush.

  • Jason

    This actually has to do with the gun debate, but was missed, and I’m trying to make sure more people hear this… last night, during the debate (and other times in the past year), Barack Obama referred to people as “Mentally Deranged.” Please see here for the video and more information:

    Obama: Keep guns away from the “Mentally Deranged” | flishfun.com

    As you know, there is a huge stigma that comes with being diagnosed with a mental disorder, and we feel that Obama apparently doesn’t see the issue. We see this usage of the term as a blanket phrase for “mental illness” in the way he is using it. If that’s not what he meant, then where does “illness” end and “deranged begin? This is a horrible phrase to use to describe Mental Illness… and here we have someone running for President using them without a thought. My wife suffers with Bipolar and she is quite offended by his statement and wants to know what he was thinking.

    Amazingly he told NAMI that he strongly supports all aspects of help for the sufferers of “Mental Illness”, and never once in *their* questionnaire refers to these “mentally deranged” people. NAMI also publicly denounces the phrase “deranged,” so what does Obama really think here? We want answers.

    Please pass this message and link on to everyone you know so that he is called to explain himself. No matter your stance on politics, I feel this is inexcusable.

    • http://hyper-educated-uppity-woman.blogspot.com Uppity

      He needs to check on some of his mentally deranged friends and take their guns away.

    • Fleaflicker

      Barack Obama referred to people as “Mentally Deranged.”

      No I think it was cool. He was only talking about his wife.

    • The Gringo’s Wife

      ::::sigh::::

      I keep saying, Mr. Obama is mentally deranged. Most psychopaths are highly intelligent and effective liars. The type of lying Mr. Obama is perpetuating is of the more complex kind, the pathological.

      And true to form, he is also projecting this on others as he probably has done all of his life. Whatever is “not right” in his life, he blames on others. This is why Jeremiah Wright was such a hit with the young Barry. Finally, someone who spoke his language. And Wright did not disappoint. As you can see by their close relationship (Barry was willing to lose the election rather than denounce Wright and his church), Barry must have been his teacher’s pet.

      I also want to point out what I have not seen mentioned anywhere else, Rev. Wright is light skinned. Can you jump the Rob Schneider (RIP handsome) shark here? Why is Wright so angry against white people when it appears he has to have some white background?

      You following me …?

      Obama accuses the Clintons of racism, only to get caught with a “White America” Hating mentor and 20 year spiritual adviser.

      Obama accuses the Clintons of lying about so many thing, but he continuously lies.

      What should WORRY everyone, is Barry’s “affect.” If you watch closely you will see that what he says doesn’t always match how is is acting. In particular, look at the eyes. A real smile will cause “crinkles” around the eyes. His eyes are about as animated as day old fish.

      And this may explain why they have been able to get as many menacing (downright scary) facial expressions. For an affable guy full of hope and with nothing to fear but the truth itself, this is incongruent at best.

      Personally, the guy gives me the creeps. There is something very wrong going on inside Barry.

  • http://www.sugarnspice.typepad.com Sugar

    Such a liar he is!!!!

    • http://hyper-educated-uppity-woman.blogspot.com Uppity

      I keep TELLING you he’s Leland Gaunt!

      • http://www.sugarnspice.typepad.com Sugar

        Either Leland Gaunt or the anti-Christ.

        • scott

          Is there a difference?

      • beebop

        Calling Sheriff Alan Pangborn!

      • MessyMarcy

        NO. He’s George W. Bush.

  • http://www.sugarnspice.typepad.com Sugar

    I just called. It took forever for them to pick up, but a lady did and I told her that I wanted to let them know that I thought Charlie Gibson did a wonderful job moderating the debate last night.

  • Dawnelle

    LOL @ Shrimp on the Obambi!

    Another Great one Sugar :-)

  • Vnd

    I’ve taken to checking out the blogs at National Review because they (as Rendell said about Fox) hate both Democrats equally — and because of that, they seem to be more objective. Jim Geraghty has some great comments about the debate last night, some “nice” words for Hillary, and a new post about Obama “misspeaking” about the flag pin issue (he said he wouldn’t wear one) at:

    http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/

    Even though he’s generally rough on Clinton as well, I recommend reading it because I appreciate anyone, Democrat or Republican, who tries to be objective (we’ll have to see what happens if Clinton gets the nomination).

  • JoeySky

    OT: youtube Hillary fan video “God Bless The USA”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9K0rjUvqfU

    • jwrjr

      If either Obama or McCain they will need to change that title to “God Help the USA”.

  • http://www.myspace.com/rokski Paul F. Villarreal AKA “Universal” AKA “RokSki”

    Obama lied, period.

    In a debate where Clinton said she was sorry for fibbing about Bosnia, Obama not only doesn’t apologize for his poor judgment and mendaciousness, he lies AGAIN.

    That’s what you (and the SD’s) need to know.

    :)

  • beebop

    With a national audience watching, he scolded Charles Gibson and lied. What is the sense in that? How many days will it take NOW for him to spin this and how many times will he NOW claim that this is “silly season?” Facts are not his friends.

    • workingclass artist

      Would’nt it be great if Helen Thomas moderated his ass…

  • http://Q Dawnelle

    I will commend ABC George and Charley for FINALLY being allowed or choosing to do their JOBS! DoH!

    I won’t go beyond that because they SHOULD have been doing it all along!

    Not much in a mood for praising a human for something a DOG would have got right the 2nd or 3rd time they were chastised for pissing on the rug!

    Former MOS 71Q & 71R we were always pro military but always ACCURATE. I had no problem with that because that was the COUNTRY CLUB I Joined!

  • Terry

    What do you think Donna Brazile is going to say to George Steph on Sunday morning? It might get ugly.

    • beebop

      She won’t say a word. It’s the only paying gig she’s got.

      • TeakwoodKite

        Oh maybe something like “Don’t hurt yourself”…

        Maybe they willow sound like hot marshmellow mouth. WA WAWA WA…(Charlie Browns’ off camera adults sound effect.)

  • john b

    The questionnaire is a veritable cornucopia of lies.
    “I didn’t read it.”
    “An aide filled it out by mistake”
    “I scribbled on it during the meeting.”
    “It’s not my handwriting.”
    “I’ve never supported a ban on handguns.”

    • http://camoderate ca moderate

      you forgot “I was brought up by a single mother.”