The Right is using the term Show Trial. I seem to remember one of these, led by some dimwits with hares in their trousers and a nasty little piece of work named Starr.

Us that the sort of SHow Trial of which they speak?

Americans would do those jobs. Contrary to what the media says.

I suspect there are many voters who would take exception to this. It was precisely the arrogance of the Bush administration that allowed many people to vote for a man of dubious competence to replace Bush. They deluded themselves into believing they were “fixing” what Georgw W. Bush broke.

None of the Bush administration officials will ever face charges. Like almost everything else Barack Obama says, this is just window-dressing; a chance to grab another headline and delude the voters a little more.

If you live in L.A. and didn’t die in a terrorist attack, you may owe it to the CIA’s use of the “enhanced interrogation techniques” that are currently under fire from Obama and his left-wing constituents.

In a compelling Op-Ed in Tuesday’s Washington Post, Marc A. Thiessen disproves Barack Obama’s hollow claim that such techniques “did not make us safer.” Rather than following the MSM lead and merely parroting the Obots talking points after the release of previously-classified memos this week, Thiessen actually examined the documents.

Thiessen concludes that Obama’s contention is “patently false. The proof is in the memos Obama made public — in sections that have gone virtually unreported in the media.”

“…that have gone virtually unreported in the media.” No surprise there. The legacy media has proved to be singularly un-inquisitive when it comes to facts that get in the way of Obama talking points.

Thiessen specifically refers to a May, 2005 memo regarding two top al Qaeda operatives, Khalid Sheik Mohammed and Abu Zubaydah:

“the CIA believes ‘the intelligence acquired from these interrogations has been a key reason why al Qaeda has failed to launch a spectacular attack in the West since 11 September 2001.’ . . . In particular, the CIA believes that it would have been unable to obtain critical information from numerous detainees, including Khalid Sheik Mohammed (KSM) and Abu Zubaydah, without these enhanced techniques… Before the CIA used enhanced techniques … KSM resisted giving any answers to questions about future attacks, simply noting, ‘Soon you will find out.’”

But once the enhanced techniques were used, “interrogations have led to specific, actionable intelligence, as well as a general increase in the amount of intelligence regarding al Qaeda and its affiliates.”

In other words, the techniques worked when previous interrogation methods had failed.

http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm

Former Cuban President Fidel Castro said President Obama misinterpreted remarks by his brother and successor, Raul, and bristled at the suggestion that the island should free political prisoners or cut taxes on remittances from abroad as a goodwill gesture to the U.S.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fgw-castro-obama23-2009apr23,0,2952733.story

Obama has extended the illegal wiretapping, rendition, and one can only assume that in afghanistan (where the renditions are taking place) things are/will happen that the Obama administration can be prosecuted for.

And perhaps he can face prosecution for robbery! haha

Also, he better be willing to prosecute Dems, and maybe even Clinton administration. Didn’t some of these things actually begin under CLinton after the Cole and WTC bombings?

I think he was wrong to release the memos. Post 9/11 we were not ourselves.