I’m not the one splitting hairs here. Trak-a-Crat is. She’s wrong. You’re wrong.

It is as simple as that.

Nada.

Track-a-Crat is the one splitting hairs here. Not me. What Napoliano said was true. It’s true in fact and it’s true in tone. Illegal immigration ISN’T a crime per se.

Period.

There is only one definition of “crime.” I’m a lawyer and crimes are defined by statute.

Being in this county unlawfully is not among them.

Ironically, the one getting “testy” after being informed of the “facts” is apparently you.

None of what you said makes anything that I said wrong. Not in the slightest. How could you possibly think that your argument made anything that I said “wrong?” I don’t understand your point in the slightest.

There are thousands upon thousands of illegal immigrants who are in this country illegally, yet they committed no crime. Therefore, “illegal immigration is not a crime per se.”

There is no argument against this.

Again, for the slow: being here unlawfully is not a crime. Like parking in a handicap spot (when you are not handicapped) is not a crime. It’s unlawful. You can get a fine or other administrative punishment for doing it, but you are not committing a crime and thus, you cannot be punished criminally.

My point remains unblemished – that Track-a-’Crat was wrong to call Napolitano “stupid” for saying (absolutely correctly) that “illegal immigration is not a crime per se.”

Napolitano was right. As I am right. As you and Track’ are wrong. I suggest you stop digging on this one.

I guess you owe me an apology in addition to the apology Track’ owes to Napolitano.

And another thing. I’m not going to call Track-a-’Crat “stuipid” for writing what she did. But she did write something stupid. There it is up there. Still flat wrong for all the world to see.

We are seriously starting to look at other countries. If only we could get the children to follow.

http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2009_04_23_archive.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/24/us/24flu.html?ref=us

The Center for Disease Control though has noted that Mexico had a strange and rather late season influenza outbreak. This information now coupled with “a new Swine Flu” having infected 7 Americans on the Mexican border regions should set off the alarm bells, when the said virus is a combination of swine, bird and human viruses from Europe, Asia and North America.
The Americans recovered from this virus and samples are being looked at by the CDC, but this situation needs to be explained in an al Qaeda context from the international Marxists in protocols in how one spreads a virus or gauges transmission.
The reality is this:

If one desires to attack the United States with a bioweapon, one uses Chinese shipping and PLA intelligence as a transshipping point for some communist group of Muslim Marxists etc… to drop a concentrated load of germs into a Mexican port.
The vials would be pocket aerosol size, like a can of spray on cooking oil.

Distribution would be simply going through Mexican markets and inoculating items from clothing, tissues to food.
If one desires to join the big leagues, one can distribute a drop shipment of personal items like deodorant with an advanced absorption agent via the skin to seat the germ into the human host.

No one would suspect your deodorant was making you sick with influenza.

Once one has that fire started, the Obama trend of any border buster is good for his 2012 vote, spreads these human carriers now all through America on their spring migration to the human traffic points across America.
There is a massive one operating in Iowa which is designed to spread slave labor to all the rural communities in “dairy” and “poultry” operations.

This is how “al Qaeda” would spread an engineered human, bird and swine virus into America with immune hosts from Mexico.

I’ve never read the phrase “stupid, stupid, stupido” before – I thought I was being slightly original, but it would seem not…

I was only emphasizing her incredible lack of intelligence – “stupido”, in my use, is not an amalgamation of “stupid” and “bimbo.”

But I have a problem with this phrase in the article,
You stupid, stupid, stupido.

Now when was the last time an article written to criticize Obama or any of the male members of his staff, had the writer blatantly calling the men stupid, stupid, stupido. They were criticized harshly (rightfully of course) and by all means criticie Janet that way as well. But why use words like stupid and bimbo, terms we only use to criticize women. I am not referring to the those making comments here, I am referring to the writer of this article, I have seen so many articles here criticizing Obama and his male staff (rightfully so) but never do the writers call out the men as stupid, stupid, stupido. Male politicians are just criticized on facts, with women politicians we not only criticize her on facts (and sometimes without that in the case of Bill Maher), but we call them stupid or bimbo something male politicans are never called by writers or journalist in their articles and then we also mock the looks of female politicans.

In all the criticisms I have heard of dick cheney, never once did anyone make fun of his looks, but I see that here with Janet and with Garafolo.

By all means criticize Janet and garafolo, but criticize them they way you would criticize a man. It just seems that women politicians are critized harder and with double standard, maybe if we hold male politicans to that standard we would have less shit in this country right now.

I guess I expect better from No Quarter.

This reminds me of the time Bill Maher called Sarah Palin a bimbo on his show for not being able to name any newspapers she reads, when was Obama called dumbo for not knowing how many states the US has, hell they did not even call George Bush when he was campaigning in 2000, and it was clear his general knowledge was pathetic as well. They made it seem like Sarah Palin was dumb beyond belief,I am pretty sure there are just as many dumb male politicans in Washington right now, except that we don’t call them dumb or bimbo, we just criticize them when they crew up based on facts and jokes are made based on facts as well. Did anyone even call Governer Jindal stupid or dumb because all he had to complain about the budget was the volcano research funding when there was so many useless funding on the budget. Also Paul Krugman called the republican party not Jindal specifically beavis and butthead of course, MSNBC twisted his words and made it sound as if Krugman called Jindal Beavis and Butthead. This is the only time I have heard the dumb anology being used on a male politican. Sure the commedians were always making jokes about what they thought was George Bush’s lack of intellect, but have never called him stupid or bimbo directly