RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

immelt’s defense of msnbc was met with lots of boos

The outrage over msnbc and NBC’s obvious liberal bias is growing, and the shareholders have had enough! You might say they are mad as hell, and aren’t going to take it anymore.


Click here if video won’t load.

“My biggest surprise was the open hostility to MSNBC,” said Tom Borelli of the Free Enterprise Action Fund and a four-year critic of Immelt. “It was noticeable and loud. I don’t remember any of this going on last year.”

“Any time MSNBC was mentioned, there was a rumbling in the crowd of 400 people,” he added. Borelli also asked a question pertaining to GE’s stock performance since Immelt took the helm.

Czajkowski said about 15 shareholders voiced criticism of NBC, MSNBC or CNBC, which was met with applause. When Immelt defended the networks, he was booed. “He didn’t have good answers,” Czajkowski said.

Paul Roeser, a shareholder since 1962 who had never been to a GE shareholder meeting until now, estimated that more than two dozen people expressed concern about GE’s television news division. “The biggest thing there was the put-down of NBC and MSNBC as slanted news media,” he said. “Of the people that got to make a remark, almost all of them mentioned it.” Roeser, a retired New York state trooper, also said that Immelt’s defense of MSNBC was met with “lots of boos,” some of which can be heard on the Borelli tape.

Jesse Watters, a producer on “The O’Reilly Factor” snuck into the meeting, and confronted Immelt, but his criticisms were cut short when his microphone was cut off, according to several people there. Also in this video, O’Reilly continues his investigation into the GE and Obama connection, and Cap and Trade and their abuse of power. The first video is here, from my post garofalo’s stench rises all the way to the top..


Click here if video won’t load.

Here is a second video with Laura Ingraham, who used to work for msnbc, discussing the liberal shift at msnbc, and the GE – Obama connection.


Click here if video won’t load.

It’s good to see shareholders express their outrage and realize their decline in profits stems from the bias of NBC networks. Nothing makes people sit up and take notice faster than when it hits them in their pocketbook.

Now, the interesting part will be to see what happens moving forward with GE and NBC and the Obama administration. Will NBC back off their liberal (hateful) bias, in hopes of improving their ratings? Or will they continue with the pro-Obama slant, using their power to influence politics, in hopes of getting more bailout money, and billions of dollars in cap and trade transactions?

  • Doc99

    The once proud Peacock is now Obama’s Lickspittle. Good Job, Immelt.

  • ziggy

    15 shareholders? OMG. A veritable tsunami of outrage.

    Had O’Reilly not reported on the true extent of this, we never would have suspected.

    • Ani

      Perhaps you were not reading this post properly — 15 people got to get up to the microphone to complain — when they MENTIONED MSNBC/NBC, MANY in the crowd booed. There were a lot more than 15 people expressing their displeasure. If you look at the fact that MSNBC’s rating are now consistently a helluva lot lower than FOX, and have been declining, period, that tells the story.

      • Paula Revere

        Yeah, uh, nice jab at O’Reilly Zippy the Pinhead, but you should check the ratings. Fox is number 1 by about double. Wonder why. Could it be that Americans are finally thinking journalism should have just a teeny tiny amount of TRUTH involved?

        • getfitnow

          Yes, and I believe that is almost, if not all Fox’s programming. Fox is ahead of CNN too.

      • catherine

        You don’t really expect reading comprehension skills from an 0bot, do you?!?! LOL

        This is the SAME generation who when asked to do a book report on The Scarlet Letter rent the movie version with Demi Moore and actually hand in a paper based on the film!

        0bots have the attention span of a gnat on meth.

    • WMCB

      For a shareholder’s meeting, that’s a sizable percentage. What, you think GE shareholder meetings are attended by thousands?

    • rw

      -“Any time MSNBC was mentioned, there was a rumbling in the crowd of 400 people,” he added. Borelli also asked a question pertaining to GE’s stock performance since Immelt took the helm.-

      hello….

  • http://noquarter foxyladi14

    that once proud peacock.ain’t so proud these days.

  • Docelder

    Just glad to see that O’Reilly is off the Koolaid. I think the fear of Beck taking his spot has shocked him into reality.

    • http://Godhelpusall lee M

      I think you’re right, but I also think Glenn Beck is going to knock him off his pedestal. O’Reilly needs a little comeuppance, he’s gotten too arrogant lately. I think the Kool-Aid did some permanent damage to his brain cells.

  • mountainaires

    I’m glad MSNBC is finally getting taken to task for their egregious, stunningly bad management, a management which has created a frat-house news division, where trashy “anchors” compete with each other for the most adolescent and juvenile sex jokes and fall all over each other trying to mock Americans engaged in their First Amendment right to political speech. These trashy gutter-crawlers think they’re the only ones entitled to First Amendment rights I guess.

    I couldn’t be more disgusted with MSNBC, so I’m glad to hear that shareholders are showering Immelt with “love.”

  • Paula Revere

    Did they REALLY think they weren’t going to get caught? LMAO. Losers.

  • ExDemInVA

    You reap what you sow! MSNBC is finally getting its due.

  • Eleven

    I guess people in MSNBC probably didn’t know tea-bagging rednecks hold GE stocks. I bought some at 20…getting burned here…Good thing is I shorted quite a lot of New York Times stock a year ago.

  • Fredster

    Are the vids working? They aren’t for me.

    • http://sarainitalyblog.blogspot.com/ American Girl in Italy

      not sure what is wrong with them. i reinstalled them, and still no workie. I added links to the videos, in case they aren’t working for anyone.

  • cathnealon

    Fox has the viewership and the power now to start going after GE and its propaganda machine. Maybe they couldn’t stop BO and his gang from taking over the WH but Axelrod and Emanuel should realize that a “crisis” works both ways–

  • Peggy Sue

    Sorry, ziggy. You need to listen to the tape. The “boos” are coming from more than 15 people. And why not boo? Not only has Immelt propped up a thoroughly discredited news outlet [come on, we're talking rah-rah cheerleaders here], he’s overseen the ruin of GE. But what happens? He’s rewarded with a spot on Obama’s business advisory panel.

    You’re not willing to entertain the connection between the political rah-rah, money transfer and the strange yet wondrous positioning of GE for the green “reset” economy? Here’s a quote:

    “Employees and executives gave $1.35 million to politicians in the past election while GE’s political action committee shelled out $1.55 million. About 64 percent of this $2.9 million went to Democrats, with Obama easily the top recipient of GE money.

    Obama’s budget includes the payoff, promising to start a multibillion-dollar greenhouse gas industry by 2012. In a letter this week, GE’S Immelt told shareholders that current events present an “opportunity of a lifetime,” because “capitalism will be ‘reset.’ ”

    Immelt wrote: “The interaction between government and business will change forever. In a reset economy, the government will be a regulator; and also an industry policy champion, a financier, and a key partner.” [Washington Examiner 3/3/09]

    Sounds like Utopia!

    Guess you believe in Santa Claus, too.

  • http://noquarterusa No-nonsense-Nancy

    I can’t get the videos to work, either.

  • http://noquarter foxyladi14

    me either..what do they say??

    • http://sarainitalyblog.blogspot.com/ American Girl in Italy

      I added links to the videos, you can view them by clicking on the link tht says, “Click here if video won’t load.”

      • FranSC

        Thanks, American Girl, for your post and putting these videos on. Nothing tells the story like hearing it with your own ears as it is spoken and responded to. I just hope Janeane Garofalo has access to all of this and is * h u m i l i a t e d! * I suppose she thought she was only being heard by the cult who would love her comments. I would imagine she is wondering how such redneck racists figured out how to get this all out there. Good job!

  • jangles

    It’s pretty amazing isn’t it. You see the hustle during the election months and you wonder why MSNBC is going so hard after Obama—now it is out in the open. Follow the money. When will we have a government where that mantra will not be the explanation of everything.

    • Peggy Sue

      “Follow the money. When will we have a government where that mantra will not be the explanation of everything.”

      That “is” the question, jangles. Obama campaigned on this idea of being independent of lobbyists and corporate influence. He claimed he would usher in a bi-partisan approach to governing.

      You see any of that happening? Or just the reverse. It’s hard to defend the indefensible.

      And now I understand that George Soros is pushing for the “torture memo” investigation to proceed, full-speed ahead. For the sake of the nation?

      I think not.

      We’re living the Big Lie. Part 2.

  • I’m a Linda too

    I could not believe how loud the boos were on Immelt and the applause was pointing out MSNBC’s hate and biased reporting from their own stockholders in the audience.

    If that doesn’t speak volumes and say loudly to boot Immelt and Zucker, nothing does.

  • catlady

    Since when is Obama a liberal? He’s a member of the party of Wall Street, hardly a liberal.

  • Cherry

    Big deal some right-wing nut shows up to a GE shareholder meeting and not surprising a few in the crowd clap, given you expect a few right-wingers at a shareholder meeting, but this is very far away from any kind of meaningful shareholder revolt.

    All the power to NBC to provide a counter the FOX and all the right-wing radio.

    Funny that FOX commentator confronts GE/NBC, when their network has been the worst promoter of right-wing ideology and Murdoch benefited (and lobbied) from media ownership change when the Republicans were in power while he towed the Republican party line.

    • Eleven

      It seems you bought the idea of change, but are not aware of actual change in the society. Such as Democratic Party used to be the racist party? or the great Abe Lincoln was a Republican?

      Yes, things change, heck, GE used to have Ronald Reagan as spokesman. But one thing remains absolute — that’s power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. So I will always pay more attention to the media outlets that are more critical to the powerful.

      • JozefAL

        Abe Lincoln was also a big hypocrite. He didn’t really give a rat’s ass about slaves. If he could’ve kept the Southern States from withdrawing (something they’d already announced months before Lincoln’s election), he wouldn’t have hesitated to keep slavery as it was.
        In fact, read his great “Emancipation Proclamation” and read what areas were SPECIFICALLY exempt from the terms of the Proclamation. EVERY SINGLE SLAVE in Union-controlled territory as of Jan 1, 1863, would remain a slave (that included the states of Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland and Delaware, plus the Hampton Roads area of Virginia and the Delta area of Louisiana including New Orleans). Lincoln’s REAL motive with the Proclamation was as propaganda against Britain and France (the CSA’s two major trading partners). Yes, Lincoln made many speeches denouncing slavery, but many of his own private papers (and several of his speeches) showed his complete and total indifference to slaves.
        As to your final statement, how then do you explain how willing Fox News was to spread the Bush/Cheney agenda at every turn from 2001 to 2006? There really weren’t many media outlets that criticized the GOPers in charge from 9/11 until well into Dubya’s second term. (Ironically, the ones which did are now being criticized for their Obama-love.) MSNBC and CNN were willing participants in the Dubya News Show until around 2005 and Fox News was a virtual mouthpiece for the Dubya/Cheney cabal until well into 2007 (with many of the talking heads keeping their mouths firmly attached to Dubya’s and Cheney’s asses until they left office). Fox News remained very connected to the Bush/Cheney 25%ers (usually tempering their criticism of Dubya by putting equal blame on Congressional Democrats). Did you pay attention to the anti-Dubya media, or is this “I will always pay more attention to the media that are more critical to the powerful” attitude just a recent development? For some reason, I’m thinking (like Patti LaBelle), you got a “new attitude”.

    • I’m a Linda too

      Oh, so sad. But at least you didn’t claim to be knowledgable. And you show you don’t believe in Democracy or honest reporting. It’s ok if they are opposite FOX? OY!

      Nothing like showing you don’t pay attention to the real world. And surely not a very good cheerleader as your example shows. You might try a different tact if you think comparing promoting ideals by Fox is a put down vs the lack of ideals and only attacking, lying and name calling that NBC does.

      You just make a great case for FOX.

      • Cherry

        You have to make a distinction with regard to news shows and shows that are about opinion. Nothing wrong with opinion shows. The problem with Fox is they claim to be fair and balanced all the time. O’Reilly claims he is fair and balanced. Olbermann and Maddow don’t try and deceive the viewer they readily admit which view point they support. And there is absolutely zero comparison between Fox and NBC. Almost every person on every show on Fox falls in line with the Republicans and their talking points. Fox is not a news organization, they are a propaganda organization.

        Promoting ideals on Fox. Is that what a news organization is suppose to do?

        Why don’t you give us some examples of attacking, lying, and name calling on NBC? Why don’t you give me just one example please?

        • FranSC

          There are MANY examples of lying and name-calling on MSNBC. Keith Olbermann did that constantly with his “Worst Person in the World” nightly rant.

          The night KO made the biggest deal imagineable about what Hillary said on Robert Kennedy’s assassination! Olbermann had the “BREAKING NEWS” flashing for an hour like a patrol car. He was trying to make that the end of Hillary’s campaign. His intimation was that she had suggested someone assassinate Barack Obama!

          That was the night I almost completely lost it, calling MSNBC and screaming into the phone that Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews better get body guards because they were going to need them.

          • FranSC

            I meant to say, “attacking, lying, and name-calling” all three!

  • Diana

    AGI I went to the new website O’Reilly said to go to. The Fox Nation. There you can hear a more indepth video with a couple questions that were asked.

    You have to hear the breakdown at the end and what GE stands to gain. What O’Reilly said about it all and Watergate.
    http://tinyurl.com/chafwd

  • DAB

    In my opinion the rock bottom lowest point in Broadcasting history so far was reached with David Schusters Teabagging rant:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaKAY99fahE

    I could not believe that anyone in the news business would allow this on air. Schuster and Immelt and anyone else responsible should be fired.

    A true disgrace.