POTUS Blinks, Day 7 on the Torture Memos
By John Batchelor on April 24, 2009 at 6:30 PM in Dept. of Justice (Obama), Obama Administration, Torture
White House Plans to Release More Documents — and Photographs, Too.

Congressional leaders met on Thursday with POTUS at the White House to discuss comity, yet what dominated the headlines afterward were the Torture Memos. House GOP Leader John Boehner asked POTUS to release the documents that explicate what intelligence the Bush administration actually obtained from the suspects under torture. The POTUS made no commitment.
According to Boehner, the president said further disclosures were being discussed by the administration. However, the White House official, who asked not be named, said the president made no explicit statement about a review.
The NYT put the new information, if that’s what it is, in a more deeply ambiguous fashion:
The president did not foreclose the release of more documents, officials briefed on the session said. But Mr. Obama suggested to Mr. Boehner that the additional information would not be definitive on the value of the information obtained from the detainees, they said.
More, Nancy Pelosi may have reiterated her notion of a Truth Commission. POTUS may have discouraged the Speaker. This may be half of a blink. Majority Leader Harry Reid cagily declared that any formal inquiry of the Torture Memos and attendant material would be “unhelpful.” At the same time news emerged that the White House, through its obedient agent the DoD, is planning to release 44 photographs of abused prisoners in four weeks, on May 28.
The photographs are said not to be as disturbing as the original Abu Ghraib snapshots. But then, these will be official photographs of suspected abuse.
The Obama administration is releasing the 44 photographs in response to legal pressure brought by the ACLU over a long period of time. The Bush administration fought until the end. Now, the Obama administration will compromise, sort of.
“This will constitute visual proof that, unlike the Bush administration’s claim, the abuse was not confined to Abu Ghraib and was not aberrational,” said Amrit Singh, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, which obtained the agreement as part of a long-running legal battle for documents related to Bush-era anti-terror policies
Meanwhile, AG Eric Holder (above at House hearings today) declared that he will not selectively release documents supporting or explicating the original four Torture Memos. No compromise, so far.
What of the CIA?
The new damage here is twofold. First, all hope of cease-fire is wrecked between the most partisan rightist Republicans and the most partisan leftist Democrats. Like the Barnburners and the Abolitionists before the civil war, the two strident camps, small in comparison to the electorate, now can dominate every conversation about the Torture Memos. The civil war of talk is launched; the two self-elected champions will insist upon center stage until 2012. The POTUS cannot stop this wrestling. The blinking today at the White House may have been the POTUS suddenly realizing that the grudge match does not need him to do other than stand by and hesitate.
Also, the always creative George Soros has announced that he will join the brick-throwing in demand for an investigation. The second damage is to the POTUS’s relationship to the spooks. The trip to Langley on Monday (right) was to seek to heal the rift caused by the original memo release.
This is Day 7. News of the 44 additional photographs to be released, suggestions of a Truth Commission, blogosphere bloviating of a war crimes tribunal and a 9/11 search and destroy investigation, all this will deepen the paranoia and alienation among the spooks, present, past and future.
The relations between Langley and POTUS may be compromised without possibility of repair. Too soon to be certain. One voice suggested it was too late already:
“My sense is the president was trying to please a lot of audiences at one time and that over the last [week] he has totally failed to put the mind of the intelligence community at ease,” said Mark Lowenthal, a former senior advisor to CIA Director George J. Tenet. “He is going to end up with a national clandestine service that will not be willing to do anything because they feel he will not be there for them when they need him.”

















