RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

[Update] Hillary Reassures Iraqis & U.S. Personnel In Iraq

The L.A. Times’s “In Baghdad visit, Clinton reassures Iraqis” points out:

Reporting from Baghdad — During an unannounced visit to Baghdad on Saturday, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton sought to reassure anxious Iraqis that the U.S. would not abandon them despite plans to start withdrawing U.S. troops soon.

Her visit coincided with a sudden surge of violence that had claimed the lives of nearly 160 people in the previous two days. But Clinton said she was confident that the bloodshed did not mean recent gains in security were being eroded.

The UPDATE is just below the fold:

UPDATE: Via Swoop.net, a most fascinating Web site that — in case Swoop is new to you — is “a multi-lingual source of intelligence about US international policy: political, military, financial and commercial” that “is produced by the Washington Assessment and Analysis Service (WAAS). WAAS brings together seasoned practitioners – American and European – who enjoy insider access to the centers of power in Washington DC. Having occupied positions that afford them intimate knowledge of how US policies are formulated and how outcomes are determined, Swoop’s writers have established expertise in interpreting US positions to global audiences.” (I subscribe to its weekly newsletter which comes out on Sunday mornings.)

As the US military begins to shift its focus to a new war in Afghanistan, a recent spike in violence in Iraq has some military commanders worried that their Afghan strategy could falter.

Even though President Obama has repeated his commitment to have US combat forces withdraw from Iraq over the next 19 months, potential cracks in the timeline have emerged. US Gen. Raymond Odierno, the top commander in Iraq, stated earlier this month that he has the “flexibility to change” the withdrawal schedule should events on the ground warrant it. Although changes in the proposed timeline would require Iraqi approval, some US officials worry that a series of unresolved political disputes may call for further US attention.

Chief among the internal challenges is violence targeting Sunni Awakening groups, the so-called Sons of Iraq, as well as a widening rift between Kurdish and Arab communities. Months of paralysis at the national level have also stalled legislative reforms, including the passage of a hydrocarbon law which, coupled with declines in oil revenues, will deepen the country’s economic crisis.

As Iraq’s competing factions work to secure their positions ahead of the American withdrawal, multinational companies also remain cautious about entering the Iraqi market. Concerned about the country’s stability and long-time climate, only few multinationals have engaged in exploratory projects. In Baghdad and Washington, military commanders and politicians are quietly fretting that unresolved governance issues and mounting sectarian tensions will test Washington’s exit strategy.

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

BELOW is more from the Los Angeles Times article, an excellent report. First, here’s the photo up at the State Department Web site:

Shortly after arriving in Baghdad, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton received a briefing by Commanding General Ray Odierno. To her left, in the seated photo, is newly arrived U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Christopher R. Hill. Photo: Eric W. Brooks, U.S .Embassy Baghdad

Shortly after arriving in Baghdad, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton received a briefing by Commanding General Ray Odierno. To her left, in the seated photo, is newly arrived U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Christopher R. Hill. Photo: Eric W. Brooks, U.S .Embassy Baghdad


From the State Department page, “Secretary Clinton: Travel to Iraq and Kuwait, April 25-26, 2009“:

Secretary Clinton has arrived in Baghdad, Iraq, April 25. The trip to Iraq is her first as Secretary of State. Secretary Clinton will depart later today for Kuwait.

While in Baghdad, Secretary Clinton will meet with Prime Minister al-Maliki, President Talibani, Deputy President al-Hashimi, Foreign Minister Zebari, and other senior leaders in the Government of Iraq. They will discuss issues of common concern including security, stability operations and assistance.

Secretary Clinton will also meet with Ambassador Christopher Hill and Multinational Force-Iraq Commander Odierno to discuss the Administration’s new direction and change of mission for U.S. forces in Iraq and hold a roundtable with Iraqi women.

And the Secretary will participate in a townhalll with Iraqi citizens who work day in and day out with Provincial Reconstruction Teams, to hear from and discuss with them what they are achieving as well as issues facing the Iraqi people.

Remarks
- 04/25/09 Remarks at the Town Hall Meeting with PRT Leaders and Iraqi Partners

The situation in Iraq is a far more complex matter than at first glance, what with half of those killed recently being Iranian pilgrims and the Iranian government accusing the U.S. of being behind the attacks along with growing resentment by Iraqis of Iranian interference in their country.

Then there’s that Iraqis are worried that the U.S. may be pulling out too soon.

“These are tragic, terrible events, but they don’t reflect any diversion from the security progress that has been made,” [Secretary Clinton] told reporters at a news briefing with Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari.

Clinton’s first visit to Iraq as secretary of State came the day after two suicide bombers killed 71 people at a Shiite Muslim shrine. The previous day, 88 people died in two other bombings, stirring fear that the insurgency is recovering its strength as U.S. forces are preparing to leave.

Nearly half the victims were Iranian pilgrims who were visiting Iraqi shrines. On Saturday, Iran’s supreme leader accused the United States of carrying out the attacks.

“The main suspects in this crime and crimes similar to that are American security and military forces who ruthlessly occupied the Muslim country under the umbrella of the ‘war on terrorism,’ ” Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said. …

Many Iraqis, regardless of religious or ethnic group, appear to resent the increased role Iran has played in their country since the fall of Saddam Hussein. The U.S. military alleges that some Shiite insurgent groups receive arms and training from Iran.

Khamenei’s accusation may be taken by such militants as a signal to step up attacks on U.S. forces.

Clinton said the ayatollah’s statement was disappointing, and blamed the attacks instead on remnants of the militant group Al Qaeda …

She said Iraq could continue to count on U.S. support, albeit in different forms.

“The end of the United States combat presence in Iraq by 2011 will mark the beginning of a new phase of our countries’ relationship. As we draw down militarily, we will deepen our civilian cooperation,” she said. ….

[...]

many Iraqis are concerned that the U.S. is pulling out too soon. At the heavily fortified U.S. Embassy, Clinton held one of the town hall meetings that have become a hallmark of her diplomacy so far, and some members of the invited audience of about 100 Iraqis expressed their anxieties.

“Frankly, some people are afraid and concerned,” one Iraqi stood up and told her. “There are so many people who don’t trust the Iraqi security forces.”

Clinton responded that Iraqis needed to set aside their sectarian differences so they could learn to trust their security forces. “The more united Iraq is, the more you will trust the security forces,” she said.

Another member of the audience asked whether the U.S. was engaged in a “kind of retreat” from Iraq. Clinton replied that America remains “very committed” to the country. …

This is a fascinating report: “In Baghdad visit, Clinton reassures Iraqis.”

  • arran Madison

    I’m dumbfounded. Last I heard they hated US occupation and wanted us to leave tout suite. Now with the recent upswing in terrorist insurgence they trust us to protect them more than their own security forces?

    Learned helplessness? We must leave tout suite (preferably, May, 2010).

  • Ferd Berfle

    Unlike That One, I was *really* against the Iraq invasion and occupation. It was a dumbass move that is going to cause a lot more trouble in the coming years. The law of unintended consequences is once again taking charge.

  • arran Madison

    I’m not surprised at what SoD said to eastern NC Marines on torture and deployment:

    “Defense Secretary Gates Visits Camp Lejune (sic), Talks Torture, Deployment”:

    http://www.witn.com/military/headlines/43592022.html

    * It’s spelled “Lejeune”, people!

  • Docelder

    Wait until we quit policing the world for free for real. I am almost looking forward to watching E.U. members snivel to us to help them militarily. It is easy to look down upon us with their fine wines and free health care systems when you don’t have to support a benevolent world police force. Next time we help these guys, it needs to be for compensation. We don’t need to be repaid… we need to make protection a business and we need to profit from our expertise in this area. Just as members of the E.U. profit from their own fine wines and beautifully engineered cars. If we ever have to fight a war to restore oil wells to their rightful owners, then it needs to be for half the mineral interest in them. Being nice has brought us nothing but heartaches. No more Mr. Niceguy.

  • Ferd Berfle

    Now there’s an idea, Docelder. I concur.

  • arran Madison

    Docelder–And no more damn apologies and humiliations with world leaders(warning: you’ve hit one of my hot buttons!). We have p.l.e.n.t.y to be proud of. Without a Defense budget of $613B, all totaled $1TR, we could have universal health care, a green economy, excellent schools, re-tooled infrastructure, Mercedes in every drive way, liver pate and top wines every night, and all the women could afford haute couture!

    With a Defense budget of $59B (UK), $54B (FR), $38B (GER), $33B Italy, whom are they going to call on if it were to really get rough? Canada with a $15B budget counts on our largess.

    It’s push-back time. And no more Mr. Nice Guy!

  • Ferd Berfle

    You’ve hit on something here. You know, instead of torturing terrorists, we should go to the source-Saudi Arabia and make them an offer they can’t refuse. They sell us oil at $10.00 a barrel and we promise not to set their oil fields ablaze. Oh, and by the way, we want bin Laden and his henchmen post haste. Oh, and by the way, we *really* dislike their treatment of women.

    Tell them the clock is ticking. If the world wants a policeman, let’s be the toughest cop on the beat. No torture, just punishment.

  • arran Madison

    Well, see, Bush screwed up (a lot of things!) things with the Iraqi War where no country on my list was threatened by Sadam. Our military expenditures and our people need to be compensated from now on.

    I have a soft spot for Israel while also desiring a two-state solution. I’ll look up their US foreign aid.

  • jbjd

    We signed peace treaties with both Germany and Japan at the end of WWII that limited their ability to maintain standing armies. So, instead, they spent their money investing in such social endeavors as research and technology. Now, they make cars the world wants to buy; and we have so many unspent and unusable armaments, we cannot maintain adequate garbage sites to safely contain them.

  • Ferd Berfle

    Yep. And we’re spending billions cleaning up after ourselves. Hanford in Souteastern Washington State is a cesspool containing 53 million gallons of highly radioactive and toxic waste that, if not treated within the next 10-15 years, will kill the Columbia River. This stuff is so hot, the treatment facility is anticipated to cost upwards of 15 billion (and that was the last estimate I was aware of) because of design concerns and the need for remote handling of the waste. Oak Ridge, TN is also a bloody mess.

  • Ferd Berfle

    Well, see, Bush screwed up (a lot of things!) things with the Iraqi War where no country on my list was threatened by Sadam. Our military expenditures and our people need to be compensated from now on.

    I agree. We’ve made a bed of nails for ourselves.

  • PainkillerJayne

    You know I watched Hillary get off that plane……………she didn’t have a I am holier than tho my nose in the air walk……………..she greeted each and everyone who met her with dignity and grace…………..there is the real POTUS. Not some jackass who struts.

    Hill was the one

  • PainkillerJayne

    Wait until we quit policing the world for free for real. I am almost looking forward to watching E.U. members snivel to us to help them militarily. It is easy to look down upon us with their fine wines and free health care systems when you don’t have to support a benevolent world police force. Next time we help these guys, it needs to be for compensation. We don’t need to be repaid… we need to make protection a business and we need to profit from our expertise in this area. Just as members of the E.U. profit from their own fine wines and beautifully engineered cars. If we ever have to fight a war to restore oil wells to their rightful owners, then it needs to be for half the mineral interest in them. Being nice has brought us nothing but heartaches. No more Mr. Niceguy.

    I wish you were President.

  • arran

    Since 2002, the US has given Pakistan $11B which neither improved their security nor won over Pakistani people. (I say if you don’t like us then we’ll stop the money-love.)

    Here’s a link that stole Docelder’s and my idea:

    “Reassessing Foreign Assistance to Pakistan”, by Lawrence J. Korb

    http://www.realclearworld.com/articles/2009/04/reassessing_foreign_assistance.html

    Btw, Israel’s 2009 military budget is $13.33B. It gets jet fuel from us, but they need all they can get, in my biased opinion.

  • Ani

    Amen.

  • imustprotest

    She IS my president, I don’t care what empty suit sits in the WH.

  • http://yoviral61.freehostdeal.0lx.net/?p=1047 Hillary Reassures Iraqis & U.S. Personnel In Iraq : NO QUARTER « MY WP

    [...] Go here to read the rest: Hillary Reassures Iraqis & U.S. Personnel In Iraq : NO QUARTER [...]

  • Hot Librarian

    That report is a State dept hack job.

    It states that iraquis are resenting Iran’s influence – reality check…..Iran has no troops there.

    In fact Iran is perfectly entitled to billions in compensation from Iraq’s attack.

    I think Iran has been amazingly benevolent.

  • Jim S

    and up to this point, Øbama has sharpened them.

  • Brodie

    Right on! I noticed that, too. I also saw that the other leaders looked genuinely pleased to see her and that she immediately put them at ease. Now that’s a leader, folks! Damn, why’d those fools foist this stupid ass O on us. Makes me want to cry when I think what might have been. Bloody hell.

  • Brodie

    troll alert?

  • lilytoo

    Hill goes where ever folks need to be assured someone is on the job . It wasn’t by accident her first trip was to Asia to those who lend us money. She indeed, was the one….and still is

  • maddie

    Yep. She’s my President, without a doubt!

  • I’m a Linda too

    well said.

  • Peggy Sue

    An Iranian apologist?!

    Go hug a terrorist, Hot Librarian. I’m sure it will cool you down.

  • http://! stodgie

    hot? do you have a geiger counter librarian? i didn’t think so. by the way, others decide if you are really “hot” not you. keep that in mind. smile!

  • mary

    arran Madison

    “Learned helplessness”! Really? Did anyone invite a foreign force to invade their admittedly fascist dictatorship in Iraq? Bush SR. had the good sense and knowledge and appreciation of foreign affairs NOT to go into to Iraq Cowboy=fashion and start an ending war that brought millions of homeless Iraqis IN THEIR OWN LAND. Do you know what the current occupation of a quarter million of Iraqi Women and Girls now is? And not by choice. But by orders of the Bush Jr.’s administration?

    Well, for your info., they are employed in Syria and Jordan as PROSTITUTES. These young women are surviving as best they can entertaining the fat princes of Kuwait traveling to Jordan and Syria for “Entertainment”!

    So you better think again about these Women’s “learned helplessness” and push your rep. to IMPEACH BUSH and his blood-thirsty cronies who started this mess. It’s because of Bush’s Arrogance, Stupidity and Cluelessness about Other Countries that we now enjoy the sight of the equally CLUELESS OBAMA!

    People voted to get rid of Bush and his disastrous domestic and foreign (he didn’t even have a bloody passport and stayed in the U.S. all his life never visiting or trying to understand other countries’ causes of disconent!The Cowboy of the Plush Life wanted to start a MACHO WAR in Iraq. So you mean the poor people there are learning to be helpless!
    Thanks to that Moron Bush Dubya, we now behold an equally clueless, equally bloodthirsty moron named Barack Hussein. And this little piggy already sent 20,000 troops to Afganistan claiming he wants “Development and Diplomacy and NOT Military Solutions”! Gimme a break!

  • mary

    Must read to get why the troops cannot leave Iraq any time soon. The mess started by Bush must be cleaned up. It’s owed to them. Nobody invited the “ABEER” kind of fun to their demolished homes, schools and hospitals. Their women are no longer teachers, lawyers, doctors. Nope. They’re “entertainment dancers” (prostitutes) in Jordan, Syria…offering fun to fat Kuwait princes and other goddam perverts–to support their families…

    Read:

    ‘CONFESSIONS OF AN ECONOMIC HITMAN’

    By John PERKINS — retired former IMF/cia, etc.

  • http://noquarter foxyladi14

    sharp ones too.

  • http://noquarter foxyladi14

    i.d vote for you..

  • http://noquarter foxyladi14

    mine too..

  • Hot Librarian

    Over 100 Iranian pilgrims have been murdered in Iraq.

    As visitors these people are entitled to protection -or do you somehow think they are sub human?

    not just in 1980 but from this attack on their citizens -iran has been very forgiving to Iraq.

    Maybe they are just biding their time till 2011.

  • http://rose4hillary.blogspot.com/ Still4Hill

    She is my Stealth POTUS. I call her the SPOTUS. Yes, she IS the one who goes where people need to be reassured. She IS the one actually working (all the time!).

    And, yes when she greets people and speaks publicly she is direct, makes steady eye contact, speaks honestly. She is warm and never fails, even with someone who opposes her, to acknowledge that person’s accomplishments and worth (as in her remarks to Chris Smith and Ron Paul this week.

    She is my President, and I LOVE her!

blog comments powered by Disqus