RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

The Walk on Water?

I came across this interesting bit in my morning perusal of the Foreign Policy site. Ivan Krastev who is the chair of the Center for Liberal Strategies in Sofia, Bulgaria was asked to grade Obama’s 100 days and while giving him a B+, he says the following:

In my view, a recent joke best summarizes his achievements. In the wake of the G-20 meeting, Obama, Sarkozy, and Putin were walking around a beautiful lake. In the middle of the lake, there was an island. “Let’s go there,” Obama suggested, and started walking on water to it. Sarkozy followed him. Medvedev also followed, but started sinking.

“Should we tell him where the stones are?” Sarkozy whispered to Obama.

“What stones?” Obama replied.

This is a perfect metaphor for the then candidate and now president Obama.

While there is no question he makes certain gullible people think that he walks on water, what may be happening is more the invisible stones as the joke above illustrates that have carried him so far — the unbelievable sums of campaign money that nobody knows or asks where it came from, the fraudulent primary campaign that nobody questioned about, and perhaps, the most opportunistic of all, the economic, man caused disaster that fell on America in September of 2008 that nobody had anticipated (the timing of which still makes some not so gullible people suspicious and prone to conspiracy), all of which got the millions of gullible people to vote for him.

What makes the little allegory even more telling is the fact that the vainglorious Obama is reluctant to recognize what brought him to this point in history — he really thinks he can walk on water! The puppet is unaware of the invisible hands as it were. At what point does he buy his own PR completely and does something so foolish that even his best handlers will not be able to fix? ‘What stones?’ indeed.

Only time will tell.

On the other hand, it is entirely possible that the presidency of the United States is overrated if a 47 year old American Idol with no real accomplishments and a paper thin resume can seemingly pull it off. He will bumble and bungle his way through just like his predecessor and may be even win a second term for lack of a better choice just like his predecessor (at least he will have 4 years of experience being president!) and leave a different mess in the end for the next guy.

  • Docelder

    it is entirely possible that the presidency of the United States is overrated

    But, that would leave even more troubling questions unanswered. If the President of the U.S. can be so trivialized… well the world remains just as complex a place. Who then is running the show? That is more bothersome a prospect than the thought that anybody with a personality can do this job.

    • pm317

      Well, my cynical view is life goes on.. He and whomever he is listening to will make their choices and it will either hit or miss and they hand it off to the next guy. 4 years is a lot of time to take misguided decisions but not enough to correct course and in some cases even 8 years may not be enough as we have seen.

      • Zut alors

        Today Arlen Specter, the GOP Sen for PA, announced he’s switching to the Dems. He stated the GOP he joined in the 1960s is too right wing. Leads to some interesting Senate math – a smash-proof 60!

        • pm317

          Very interesting!

  • DaddysDarlin

    Obama doesnt have personality, nor is he doing his job, unless it’s apologizing to the rest of the world for Americas mistakes.
    Why isn’t anyone asking the hard questions, I mean why cant we get Fox to do a report about all the campaign money? Where did the rest of it go? What Muslim countries contributed to Obama’s campaign?
    I saw video online of Muslims contributing to Obama’s campaign, all I had to do was turn on my computer, so where is the investigative reporting, we want to know and I am sure millions more want answers as well.
    Unless and until the MSM start doing their jobs and actually doing investigative reporting, we will be stuck with this fraudulent ass for four long years!
    I doubt Obama would ever win another election, he threw too many people who supported him under his bus. There is no way he would be re-elected, besides they might actually look into his past this time.
    Obama has failed as a president and a leader, Hillary is the true leader of this country, if we didnt have her helping us out we would be in a lot more trouble.
    I will support Hillary in 2012, Obama wont even make the cut, he can try to run but he will have no support, he has already failed those he made promises to and there is nowhere for him to go but down now.

    • Docelder

      I would disagree that he won’t win another election. He most certainly will unless somebody else steps up who can compete with the cult of personality which surrounds him. Right now, I don’t see anybody republican doing this. Our best chance is probably a populist third party candidate. It won’t be Hillary. That ship has sailed. 2004 was her best chance to run as a Democrat. 2008 was her best chance to run as an Independent. This is just my opinion, but chances like that are few and far between.

      • Touchet

        I agree. I don’t see the american people becomming any wiser. All he needs to do is raise enough money to pay off the press and Voila, he can sell the dream again.

        This will happen will every president from now on until the economy collapses or there is a revolution. If they didn’t get it in 8 they won’t get it in 12. You can’t tell a dumb ass how to be smart.

        • SN in MN

          The press is not paid off. It is owned by the same people that own TBP Odrama. They own us all, but they allow us to pretend otherwise.

        • silverfox

          he doesn’t have to “pay off the press”

          “the press” runs the show.

          who owns the press…follow the big money…if you can.

    • Portia Elizabeth Crockett

      DD– oh how I wish your words would be true! But like others have said, there are too many people who are still enraptured with his persona to see beyond the hype. I expect he’ll run in 2012 by saying that of course the crimes of Bush can’t be corrected in only 4 years, so he’ll need the next 4 to actually perform all those miracles he promised. And once he gets re-elected he’ll be able to gleefully say FU very much and throw everybody under the bus.

    • Larry

      Much as I dislike Obama, don’t for one minute think that he won’t run and win a second term. Obamots are obsessive compulsive and have found no wrong with what he is doing in office. These oc’s own our media, run our schools and are working to control our lives worse that Repubs. Hang on for the ride … brown shirts to follow.

    • http://noquarter foxyladi14

      oh.i pray you are right.

  • Cindy

    Your comments are right on target. Obama is probably one of the few politicians who will, ultimately, make us appreciate Geo. Bush ( I already do!)
    But right now, the Democrats are giddy, and are so proud that they screwed Hillary and propelled their Bubble Boy to the presidency.

    • http://www.dcmediagirl.com DCMediagirl

      Obama is probably one of the few politicians who will, ultimately, make us appreciate Geo. Bush ( I already do!)

      Good for you. It would be fascinating to know what you “appreciate” about George W. Bush. As for me, the only way I would “appreciate” him (and that’s really stretching the word to the breaking point) is if Dick Cheney became president.

      And I hope none of you cop out and resort to calling me a bot. I’m asking a simple question.

      • Touchet

        Alot of people on here don’t like Bush or Obama. Neither of them are for us.

        • http://www.dcmediagirl.com DCMediagirl

          Cindy wrote that she appreciates George W. Bush. I’d like specifics.

          • Cindy

            One thing I appreciate about Bush (now) is that he is NOT afraid of strong women. He has never shown ANY indication that he is a sexist pig. He’s alot of things, but NOT a sexist. It took the Democratic Party Obama’s blatant misogyny to help me appreciate the fact that at least Bush was not a sexist. And right now, that is the most important issue, ever!!! It’s a matter of life and death for women everywhere, like it or not! Screw all of the other issues. Sexism KILLS women! Period!

      • Portia Elizabeth Crockett

        I can’t speak for Cindy, but for myself, I appreciate Bush for never apologizing for America or being ashamed to be a citizen of this country. And he never denigrated our troops.

        • politicalidentitycrisis

          I agree. He kept us safe and would not want Americans harmed for any reason. Obama? He cares not for America nor Americans. The fact that someone with so much hate for a country is now it’s leader is absolutely beyond logic!

          • Cindy

            politicalidentity-
            I whole-heartedly agree with you and Portia.

            • Senneth

              Cindy, Portia, PoliticalIdentify, never thought I’d say those words either because for 8 long years I couldn’t stand The Shrub. Now, with this misogynist pig crowing his “I won” tune, I’m appreciating the Village Idiot from Texas a whole lot more. Bush was never a misogynist, never said anything sexist that I’m aware of. Never apologized for our country or being an American. Still don’t like the man, don’t like what he did to this country, which allowed That One to get elected, but there are indeed worse things than Bush, and I think we’re seeing one now called That One. A truly sad scenario, and now this Arlen Specter idiocy, I keep asking myself, why don’t the rest of Americans wake up and smell what stole the White House – another coup this one with a D all over it.

  • Tricia Spiegel

    I worry we will get a string of these kinds of Presidents, elected on the PR ability of their handlers (per the likes of Rove and Axelrod)rather than wisdom and expertise. Bye, bye American Pie….

    • pm317

      Me too! That is the most disappointing thing for me as a fairly new citizen. I was euphoric when I came here first looking at how well politics worked (instead of the corruption, thuggery, and rowdyism I saw back home). Now after 2000 (a guy you can have beer with) and 2008 (a messiah who can walk on water) elections, I am very disenchanted and even wonder why I gave up my citizenship for this (there was a lot of sentimental pain in giving up my other citizenship). I am especially disappointed at the media. What has become of them?

      • Touchet

        Where did you come from?

      • Peggy Sue

        Unfortunately, pm, you certainly did not walk through the door at a good time. The last 8+ years have been a disaster, worse than any I remember. Or maybe, I’m simply paying more attention.

        But it is disheartening for many of us. As for the media? They’ve completely sold their souls. It’s embarrassing to watch the lapdog mentality. I think they’ve become too enamoured by power, money and privledge. I remember watching one of the network’s WH press corp guys talking about his Prada boots last winter, how his three-year old son thought they were so “kool” and thought: that says it all.

        Depressing!

        • pm317

          I have been here for quite a number of years and started paying attention to politics during the Clinton admin. I thought 2000 was an anomaly but as Tricia points out it has grown and become trendy to elect these media phenomena. It has got to stop. Media is like a version of Taliban in a way, right? They are undercutting your freedom of choice — Taliban does it with a AK47 and the media here does it with ink/bits&bytes. No entity should have such a hold on the populace in a democracy.

          • http://www.dcmediagirl.com DCMediagirl

            Media is like a version of Taliban in a way, right?

            No, the media are NOT a version of the Taliban, not in any way shape or form. No one from CNN has ever forced me to wear a burqa. MSNBC employees haven’t beheaded anyone. Fox News employees haven’t stormed towns with AK-47s and overthrown political systems. What a bizarre and inappropriate analogy.

            • pm317

              I have said enough there to explain the analogy before and after that sentence. If you want it to be literal, it does not work. Use your imagination.

              • http://www.dcmediagirl.com DCMediagirl

                I am using my imagination to figure out how anyone could compare the American media to the illiterate butchers of the Taliban but it’s not working for me. Not liking what Keith Olbermann or Sean Hannity have to say is not the same as having your head chopped off, your school blown up or not being allowed to venture out of your home unaccompanied by a male relative. And no, what you write before and after that sentence does not explain anything, sorry.

                • Docelder

                  I think the reference is more to the totalitarianism and control… in that totalitarianism on the part of the Taliban or the media is still totalitarianism. Smiley face totalitarianism maybe… but still.

                  • pm317

                    You got it. I could elaborate and say more but you do a good job in your comment below. Thanks.

                    Taliban is barbaric and controls the population with guns and violence. Our first world educated bastards in the media control it differently — they have helped steal elections twice now without giving the population their choice and still continue their charade of misinformation and propaganda. A free and unbiased media is essential for a healthy democracy.

                    • DCMediagirl

                      pm317: No one is suggesting that a free and unbiased media is an not essential element for a healthy democracy. That’s a given. But the media never issued edicts prohibiting women from being educated, or blew up women’s schools, or forced them to cover, or ruled that they not be allowed in public without a male escort, or flogged women publicly, or married young girls off to old men, or beheaded locals and left their bodies rotting on the roads to terrorize the village. Again, you have a choice to change the channel or get your news from the Internet if you don’t like the MSM. Women living under Taliban rule have no choice. This “metaphorical burqa” argument is drivel.

                    • pm317

                      I will say this one last time. Read my original comment and perhaps Docelder’s comments to see where I was going with it. If you don’t get it, you don’t get it. And don’t attribute that metaphorical burqa thing to me — I didn’t say it.

                      And stop harassing people on these threads and go get a life or something. Don’t you have some high powered career you need to babysit?

                    • dcmediagirl

                      Just to be clear, what you’re saying is you only want people who agree with you to post comments on your entries? If you don’t like the absurd and insulting “metaphorical burqa” observation perhaps you should scold the person who originally posted it. It’s interesting that when challenged a number of people on this thread resort to foot stamping, namecalling and misdirection instead of debate. How ironic that when your ideas are criticized you tell the person to shut up and go away. I thought you were upset about the lack of open and honest media?

                  • Pook

                    I think the reference is more to the totalitarianism and control… in that totalitarianism on the part of the Taliban or the media is still totalitarianism. Smiley face totalitarianism maybe… but still.

                    We have so many choices for media I wonder what makes people say the media has control? Seriously, I’ve tried every medium (blogs, cable news, dead-tree newspapers read offline on parchment, MSM newspapers read on the Internet, twitter) and in the end I get the most comprehensive and nuanced information from reading the dead-tree newspaper with no screen.

                    But today I noticed a CNN screen in an elevator and it felt so intrusive – is that what makes you compare the media to the Taliban? Cuz just wait until newspapers and the free press are gone. Then we’ll have the Taliban. You think it’s bad now? Just wait.

                    • dcmediagirl

                      Pook: pm317′s comparison of the American media to the Taliban is ludicrous. As you can see, the commenters who agree with her are growing increasingly more hysterical and appear to have run out of rational points to make, if they ever had any in the first place. I wouldn’t waste too much time thinking about it if I were you.

            • Cindy

              DCMedia— Cnn IS making you wear a burqa, metaphorically. They bombard you constantly with images and ideas of what they expect of women in this society. Pay attention and you’ll see what I mean.

              • DCMediagirl

                Your views are, simply put, insane. Just because you disagree with the media’s coverage (as I often do) or find it shallow, inaccurate, false or irresponsible (again, as I often do) does not mean that the media are in any way comparable to the Taliban, metaphorically or otherwise. Obviously none of you who agree with the comparison have lived in a totalitarian society or had to live under the tyranny of religious extremists. If you openly disagree with something broadcast on CNN, Wolf Blitzer doesn’t come to your house and behead you. If you don’t like what’s on CNN you can turn to Fox, the BBC, Al Jazeera, MSNBC, Univision, etc. etc. etc. If you disagree with what the Taliban wants they intimidate you into silence or kill you. I was under the impression that the women who post on this blog were feminists. Trivializing the suffering of women who live under the boot of religious fundamentalism and violence is diametrically opposed to what Hillary Clinton campaigned for in 2008.

                • Cindy

                  DCmedia—more fiber in your diet. That’s what you need.

                  • DCMediagirl

                    Cindy: Thank you for the dietary tip. I think that what you and those who agree with your POV re the American media and the Taliban need is a bracing educational trip to Kabul with a swing through the tribal areas of Pakistan, where you will be forced (not asked) to don a burqa of the non-metaphorical variety and will come face to face with actual totalitarianism. I’d be glad to resume this thread following your fact-finding mission.

                    • Cindy

                      DCMedia—Since you’re “media GIRL” and not “media WOMAN”, I think I’ll wait til you’re a little older to consider your advice.

                    • DCMediagirl

                      I’m flattered by this comment, since a) I’m middle aged, and b) you completely changed the subject which means you have no argument.

                    • Docelder

                      I like parables when making points. I see where pm was going above. How about this one then? Thousands of Tea Party participants voices were negated by the media when the media refused to acknowledge that the Tea Party participants had legitimate concerns. Trivializing the concerns, ridiculing those who protested and refusing to cover the event except to mock it entirely is almost the same as denying the protesters the very right to have their own individual opinions in the first place. In this scenario, is not the media in effect just some smiley-faced Taliban of sorts? In that they want to control ideology of public opinion and even the perceived message of the protesters?

                    • Cindy

                      DCMediaMuffin—You are so pious that’s it’s actually scary. Funny, I used to live and work in D.C., but I, unlike you, came out of it OK.

                    • Cindy

                      Docelder—you make a compelling and intelligent argument. Subtle and systematic, incremental demonizing of a certain segment of society is just as dangerous as in your face violence. That’s how the Nazis eventually exterminated 6 million Jews.

                    • Elizabeth

                      Gee, it was my understanding CNN was tanking in the ratings. Now you’re talking about a one party media state with plans to take the univerisites and put all conservatives in concentration camp ?

                      Hitler’s first step in establishing a Nazi dictatorship was the burning of Parliment. From there, he very quickly proceeded to eliminate labor unions and end a multiparty system by systematically destroying their sources of power. Martial law was declared and all legislative and executive power was concentrated in the hands of the National Socialists. The ruling party then proceeded against the press and infiltrated universities. Anti-Semitic policies began to be applied within the first 2 years.

                      And CNN does what ? Sends out a reporter, Roesgen, to grill a tea party protestor who calls Obama a “fascist.” Yeah, I get the comparison, now…

                    • Cindy

                      Elizabeth—You totally distorted what i was saying, but that’s you’re right, I guess. I think it’s women like you and DCmediagirl who have helped to keep American women in their place, second place, that is. We should all just shut up and put up with one of the most sexist societies on earth because we are not under Taliban rule, right?
                      The patriarchy is safe, thanks to people like you. Battered and murdered American women have enablers like you and DCMedia to thank for your complicity. Hope you sleep well tonight. I won’t.

                    • dcmediagirl

                      Cindy: In lieu of making a sensible point you a) completely distorted what I wrote, b) resorted to childish ad hominem attacks, and c) completely changed the subject, which is a pretty clear indication that you’ve run out of “sensible” points to make. Pathetic.

                • Elizabeth

                  And not just any old police state. I haven’t seen a regime to rival the Taliban in severity or barbarism since the Khmer Rouge came to power in Cambodia 25 years ago.

                  Even if CNN forbid and suppressed all criticism about Obama from their reporting, which they don’t, they wouldn’t be considered fascist or totalitarian under any dictionary.

                  Like DCMediagirl responded, enaging in vacuous insults only trivializes political discourse whole doing a tremendous injustice to victims of real political violence where lives really do hang in the balance.

                  • DCMediagirl

                    Elizabeth: Thanks for the comment. I didn’t realize that defending the rights of women living under the Taliban is considered “pious”. Now we’re on to paranoid ramblings about Nazis, Jews and camps. Now we have women belittling the plight of women who are brutalized on a daily basis? I’ve officially gone through the looking glass.

                    • Docelder

                      Now we’re on to paranoid ramblings about Nazis, Jews and camps.

                      I missed that somewhere. The only thing I might add is there is really no difference in oppression through the use of force and oppression by way of power abuse. Both can equally oppress. The Taliban uses force and the media uses power. Are they the same thing… not hardly. Can they both be oppressive and totalitarian? I think so. We have seen it. But maybe if the Tea Party people were all women, this wouldn’t be such an issue?

                    • Cindy

                      DCMedia—this is for you, too:
                      ” Elizabeth—– You totally distorted what i was saying, but that’s you’re right, I guess. I think it’s women like you and DCmediagirl who have helped to keep American women in their place, second place, that is. We should all just shut up and put up with one of the most sexist societies on earth because we are not under Taliban rule, right?
                      The patriarchy is safe, thanks to people like you. Battered and murdered American women have enablers like you and DCMedia to thank for your complicity. Hope you sleep well tonight. I won’t.”

  • Touchet

    Obama is nothing more than a cronie, just like Bush. Our politicans are nothing more than an extention of Corporate America. Totally corrupt and greedy. The press is their propaganda outlet.

    Yesterday, while the press had everyone running scared about a flu virus, the congress passed another half billion dollar bill to “investigate” the housing market fraud. On the surface it looks like a good thing, but the finer print tells a different story.

    In 2010 and 2011, the Inspector General of Housing and Urban Developement, along with the Inspector General for the United States Postal Service with recieve a cool 30 million dollars a year in compensation. Both of these positions, mind you, are appointed by the President of the United States.

    Now, currently, there are Bush appointments in those positions. Something tells me that is going to change, right before the election. I wonder what deal or whom Obama will put in those positions and what political favor they will do for him. Whom will be the next 60 million dollar men.

    • pm317

      30 million dollars a year in compensation, that does not sound right.

    • http://www.dcmediagirl.com DCMediagirl

      In 2010 and 2011, the Inspector General of Housing and Urban Developement, along with the Inspector General for the United States Postal Service with recieve a cool 30 million dollars a year in compensation. Both of these positions, mind you, are appointed by the President of the United States.

      Where in the world did you get this information? This figure is so laughable I need to see the source.

      • Pook

        It’s scary how people brag about not reading the newspaper and blame “the media” for everything.

        Great – let’s not have a media. You wouldn’t know about swine flu or the Iraq war. I am so sick of the media bashing. People are ignorant.

        • Elizabeth

          Exactly. Media control and censorship has actually been enforceable in the past, during the First World War for example, only because the number of outlets was so few and the space they operated in so narrow. When the only real mass media were newspapers and movies, even the STATE, here in America, not the Taliban or whatever, came just this side of censorship by implementing “voluntary guidelines” for the news media to restrict coverage. It was as sophisticated and comprehensive a propaganda dissemination as any modern advertising agency that the proliferation of viewing options has put utterly out of the question.

          Maybe it is the propaganda model in eduction that is making everyone so gullible ? Pick up an official student newspaper on most campuses and you’ll find it a much worse offender of liberal bias than any mainstream commercial press.

    • Touchet
  • TeakWoodKite

    Very Funny Pm317.

    The fly over is a great example of the WH chief of staff being out of the loop and in turn allows BO to walk on water.

  • Doc99

    What Obama does not want you to read.

    Hope …

  • oowawa

    O’s “walk on water” is kid of like Wile E. Coyote walking on air after he runs off the cliff. He does just fine until he looks down.

    • benny

      hehehehehehe. nice one, oowawa.

      • pm317

        Hey benny, where have you been?

    • oowawa

      Hmmmm–but now that I think about it . . . The One’s carrying a mirror and is so hypnotized by his own glorious image that he will never look down to notice the abyss under his feet . . .

      That’s what made Peter Pan so aerodynamic

      That and fairy dust

  • IndieDogg

    “and leave a different mess in the end for the next guy.”

    Or…. woman [??????]

    Right, I’m hallucinating. It’s the O-Brownies I ate this morning. Ummmmm, tasty, what’s in these things? Think I’ll go out today and spend three times my annual income, thereby cutting my debt in half. These brownies are amazing!!!

    Oh, yeah, and I’m thinking, a woman could maybe be President… no, wait, I know, that’s nuts. I mean every 30 days they’d attack a country or something, you know. And they’d probably re-paint the White House. There’s a Pink House Restaurant in Savannah and it looks weird, and that’s for a restaurant. We shouldn’t have a Pink House as the home of our POTUS, you know? Unless they just do it for Perez Hilton to visit and then paint it back. No, forget I even said that. Okay, gotta go now, the ceiling’s melting, it’s melting, melting, melting…..

    [Sarcasm intentional in case anyone's dense enough to not know that already.]

    • pm317

      haha.. seriously, no, I intentionally said the next guy. After watching this election, I don’t think we will get a woman president anytime soon and even if we do get, it will perhaps be someone not our choice.

      • IndieDogg

        Just having some fun (mixed with terror, frustration and depression), but yeah, I agree with you, not likely.

        I have visions of the horror movie where the swimmer strolls into the apparently tranquil pond for a swim, at which point the water turns to a full boil as the piranna attack…

        Cut To: A bare skeleton on the grassy bank. The former (female) Presidential Candidate.

      • JustMe~~

        We wont get a Woman as she will know what to do and the last thing that will happen is all these cronies now in power will never be able to line their own pockets…. after all that is what brought us to this point in time and YES life goes on ……

        but how many times can we continue to do the same old thing which results in the same old ways?

        The only “Change” we have here is what your left in your pocket…. Pocket Change ……

        The only way these in power would understand change is if voters wise up and make sure they vote them all out of power…

        CAN WE HAVE THIS CHANGE IN 2010 PLEASE????

  • Entwife

    George Soros is apparently proven to be behind the Dems push for “truth” commission and his iron hand on the current White House administration. The article linked below substantiates who is the real president of the United States. And, not surprisingly, it’s George Soros. That’s who told Obama to make his 24-hour 180 degree flip-flop about investigating harsh interrogation techniques, releasing selective Top Secret memos (is that sedition/treason?), and now dropping resistance to releasing photos designated for use in the US’s own prosecutions of those accused of criminal acts towards prisoners. This guy tracked down Soros as the owner of the web domain that is astroturfing the issue. Here’s the link:

    http://spectator.org/archives/2009/04/28/soros-show-trials

  • cassie
    • pm317

      Yeah, I saw that when I was looking for an image for this article.

  • I’m a Linda too

    Oh, you mean like their fairytales, making empty claims for whose ever ears are receptive, be damned honesty and facts.

    The other tales involve the First Occupants Wife. How many times do we have to hear the media tell us how much we are supposed to love or envy the angry shallow one? That we are supposed to admire her every move or dress, regardless of who instructed HER to put it on. lol

    Then we have, make over 3.0, because folks just can’t get over how angry she comes across. And her new look is displayed on their First trip overseas and returns home to holiday festivities for Easter with her new and improved look.

    Just in time for real life to capture her yet again applauding herself to try to get the audience to follow and procede to call her child a member of the “peanut gallery” because she dared interrupt the Angry man.

  • Hg

    “What stones?” The stones are the disciples of Obama that he steps on, and when he runs the second time there are other stones he will stack on top of the old ones. He has a huge cache of stones under his bus. Obama walks on s–*