http://www.queerty.com/more-preacher-probs-for-obama-20080324/

see other articles at:

hillaryisourchoice.com

But I am every day proud of the character, tenacity and will that this senator and woman has shown during ‘the storm’, (qualities, strong mind) she is too smart, audacious and astute for this half man and half brain and a too bad actor, even the title Sen Jr. Barack does not fit ‘that empty suit’. And he better stops saying that if he is the candidate, all democrats will come together, and support, oh no way, my vote will be only for Sen Rodham, if the Democrat Party goes to destruction, it was not because of her. I am not loyal to a party that have treated Sen Rodham with such disdain! She will be the ‘commander in chief’! Let’s see if the Do..Do..Dah..Dah. Sen Barack can win without us, the ones loyal to Sen Clinton not to him, not to any party!

How come, he is in the senate, when a person with those ‘friends and marxist brain wash’ could have been a ‘rejection letter’ to him, if he had applied to be an FBI agent, after a tough background check…now again, how come, he is in politics? Umm…

For those asking where all that money to support this do…do…da…da..dah… read the following:

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/feb2008/obam-f14.shtml

The two faces of Barack Obama

OBAMA’S MILLIONAIRES ENDORSERS

“To the extent that Obama’s rhetoric arouses popular expectations—and there are indications that it does—these will inevitably be dashed. In all probability, this will happen once the primary season is over and Obama is confronted by the Republican right as well as elements within the Democratic Party itself with the demand that he clarify his program. Should he capture the White House in November, he will head an administration committed to defending the interests of the American oligarchy both at home and abroad.

“Obama sat down at his computer to exchange emails with Robert Wolf, CEO of UBS America, one of his major Wall Street “bundlers,” responsible for bringing in millions in donations from fellow multi-millionaires to finance what Obama refers to as his “movement.”

“According to estimates made by the Center for Responsive Politics, 80 percent of the money raised by the Obama campaign last year came from donors affiliated with business, with Wall Street leading the pack. More than half of the money came in the form of donations totaling $2,300 or more.”

“Perhaps most significant was last month’s little reported endorsement of Obama by Paul Volcker, who was appointed Federal Reserve Board chairman by Democratic President Jimmy Carter in 1979 and remained in charge of the US central bank for nearly seven years under the right-wing Republican administration of Ronald Reagan.

Volcker was responsible for inaugurating a high-interest-rate regime demanded by the dominant sections of finance capital in the name of the battle against inflation. His monetary policy was inextricably linked to the offensive against the working class begun with the firing of the air traffic controllers and the breaking of the PATCO strike and continued with the shutdown of large sections of basic industry and the unleashing of the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression of the 1930s. The ultimate effect of these policies was a vast transfer of wealth from the mass of working people to a narrow financial elite, a process that has continued to this day.

In a statement announcing his backing for Obama, Volcker noted that he had previously avoided involvement in partisan politics. He said that he was moved to intervene now not “by the current turmoil in markets,” but because of “the breadth and depth of challenges that face our nation at home and abroad.” He added, “Those challenges demand a new leadership and a fresh approach.” Obama’s leadership, he concluded, would be able to “restore needed confidence in our vision, our strength and our purposes right around the world.”

Larry Kudlow, the right-wing pundit and former Reagan administration economic advisor, commented on the endorsement earlier this month, noting that he had once worked as a speechwriter for Volcker and describing him as “a great American… a classic conservative… a man of fiscal and monetary rectitude.”

Volcker, Kudlow wrote, “would not have made this endorsement on a whim. Believe me. He never gets involved in these kinds of political decisions.” He concluded by asking: “Is Volcker the new Robert Rubin [the Wall Street insider who directed the Clinton administration’s economic policy]? Is it possible that Mr. Volcker is somehow tutoring Obama? Is it possible that Obama is more financially conservative than originally believed?”

These are the real relations that are being forged behind the scenes as Obama delivers left phrases from the podium. Those like Volcker see the Illinois senator as a useful vehicle for effecting major changes aimed not at ameliorating the conditions of life for masses of working people, but rather at securing the global interests of American finance capital.”

In addition to Wolf, Obama stays in regular touch with Warren Buffett, the second-wealthiest individual in America, with a net worth of some $52 billion. Among his leading economic advisors is Austan Goolsbee, a University of Chicago professor and prominent advocate of free market policies.”

Well said(I have been writing the same thing over at my blog). Obama is NO friend to the LGBT community. Just today, I got a call from HRC asking for a donation. I asked which candidate they were endorsing, and the woman said they hadn’t decided yet. Had I not been in a big hurry, I would have asked her just what was there to decide!! There is only ONE person running who even comes close to deserving that endorsement, and it is Hillary. She has CONSISTENTLY stood with the LGBT community. And she will do what she says she will do, unlike Mr. Whatever Hillary Says I’ll Say Even Though I Don’t Really Believe It (but it is politically expedient for me to say it)!

I, too, am extremely disturbed that ANY prominent LGBT people would support Obama. Talk abt voting against your own self interests!

Thanks again for the great post!

I all I can add is that apparently Obama has no prominent gay supporters in has campaign. And no known gay staffers. His circle seems even more queer free than Bush’s.

Gee, that’s mighty big of Rev. Wright. And here I assumed you would only be able to come up with planned protests, pressure placed on Illinois legislators for passive of a Civil Unions bill, lame shit like that. But a SPEECH supporting gays- wow, that’s really something. You got me there.

Because we all know that words speak more loudly than actions. At least I think it goes something like that.

According to Lynsen, “He [Dean] acknowledged a proposal by gay DNC member Garry Shay of California to add gays to the party’s affirmative action guidelines for selecting convention delegates triggered a contentious internal debate. Dean said some influential individuals within the DNC Black Caucus such as Donna Brazile opposed the plan because it was seen as ‘an affront to the civil rights movement.’”

LGBT human rights are not civil rights?