<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Brits Tortured Too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/23226/the-brits-tortured-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/23226/the-brits-tortured-too/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 06:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcmediagirl</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/23226/the-brits-tortured-too/#comment-1200367</link>
		<dc:creator>dcmediagirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 03:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=23226#comment-1200367</guid>
		<description>Andrew 191:  I still think that your talent is wasted here.  I don&#039;t get why you get so defensive when I suggest you sign up.  You&#039;re also in posession of such a clear, sharp mind and blessed with above average reasoning skills and understanding of foreign cultures.  But maybe it&#039;s just as well you&#039;ve carved out a niche for yourself here with your admirers Cindy, Viking and pm317.  You&#039;re all perfect for each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew 191:  I still think that your talent is wasted here.  I don&#8217;t get why you get so defensive when I suggest you sign up.  You&#8217;re also in posession of such a clear, sharp mind and blessed with above average reasoning skills and understanding of foreign cultures.  But maybe it&#8217;s just as well you&#8217;ve carved out a niche for yourself here with your admirers Cindy, Viking and pm317.  You&#8217;re all perfect for each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live Chat on Torture: Sunday at 9 p.m. : NO QUARTER</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/23226/the-brits-tortured-too/#comment-1199854</link>
		<dc:creator>Live Chat on Torture: Sunday at 9 p.m. : NO QUARTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 01:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=23226#comment-1199854</guid>
		<description>[...] Clemons&#8217; story, &#8220;The Brits Tortured Too,&#8221; created &#8212; shall we say? &#8212; a rather LIVELY discussion on torture, both pro and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clemons&#8217; story, &#8220;The Brits Tortured Too,&#8221; created &#8212; shall we say? &#8212; a rather LIVELY discussion on torture, both pro and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reason</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/23226/the-brits-tortured-too/#comment-1199477</link>
		<dc:creator>Reason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 01:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=23226#comment-1199477</guid>
		<description>Your statement is complete bullshit. 

What you are saying is the government is always right and they can do no wrong. And if they do wrong then it is all the people of the United States fault and therefore we should do nothing about it! What complete bullshit. Where are you living is some kind of facist super patriotic follow the leader like a bunch of sheep state. Go back to your FOX television.

If you condon illegal acts by the government then we should also put you in jail.

By the way I believe it is the Republicans who are weak on security. They have made this country a hell of a lot less safe by invading Iraq, who had nothing to do with 9-11. It has been the best recruiting tool for radical islam.

Frankly, you can make the case that Bush should be put in jail for the Iraq war and for lying about the justifications for the war. Torture is small fry compared to the 100,000s of deaths and misery the Bush adminstration caused in Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your statement is complete bullshit. </p>
<p>What you are saying is the government is always right and they can do no wrong. And if they do wrong then it is all the people of the United States fault and therefore we should do nothing about it! What complete bullshit. Where are you living is some kind of facist super patriotic follow the leader like a bunch of sheep state. Go back to your FOX television.</p>
<p>If you condon illegal acts by the government then we should also put you in jail.</p>
<p>By the way I believe it is the Republicans who are weak on security. They have made this country a hell of a lot less safe by invading Iraq, who had nothing to do with 9-11. It has been the best recruiting tool for radical islam.</p>
<p>Frankly, you can make the case that Bush should be put in jail for the Iraq war and for lying about the justifications for the war. Torture is small fry compared to the 100,000s of deaths and misery the Bush adminstration caused in Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reason</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/23226/the-brits-tortured-too/#comment-1199474</link>
		<dc:creator>Reason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 01:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=23226#comment-1199474</guid>
		<description>Steve,

Why are you so sure that the article by Tomasky&#039;s in the Guardian is accurate?

Andrew Sullivan gives just as credible argument in his latest piece on the Brits not having tortured during World War II. Why do you automatically assume that Tomasky information is more credible?

Just to assume that Tomasky has all the correct facts is a bit presumptious. Sullivan digs up statements from Colonel Robin “Tin Eye” Stephens who was the commander of the wartime spy prison and interrogation in Britian. He says they did not torture. That is also very credible.

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/04/churchill-vs-cheney.html 

You should actully say in your post that there is an opposing view that the Brits did torture and here it is instead of just trying to blame Obama for something that you really have no idea is true or not.

All of this happened a very long time ago and it is not at all clear whether the British really did torture during WWII??

It is just as credible from what has been written that Obama is 100% right that the British did not torture. And in addition his larger point that moral nations don&#039;t torture is right.

Your &quot;gotcha&quot; bullshit is just bullshit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>Why are you so sure that the article by Tomasky&#8217;s in the Guardian is accurate?</p>
<p>Andrew Sullivan gives just as credible argument in his latest piece on the Brits not having tortured during World War II. Why do you automatically assume that Tomasky information is more credible?</p>
<p>Just to assume that Tomasky has all the correct facts is a bit presumptious. Sullivan digs up statements from Colonel Robin “Tin Eye” Stephens who was the commander of the wartime spy prison and interrogation in Britian. He says they did not torture. That is also very credible.</p>
<p><a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/04/churchill-vs-cheney.html" rel="nofollow">http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/04/churchill-vs-cheney.html</a> </p>
<p>You should actully say in your post that there is an opposing view that the Brits did torture and here it is instead of just trying to blame Obama for something that you really have no idea is true or not.</p>
<p>All of this happened a very long time ago and it is not at all clear whether the British really did torture during WWII??</p>
<p>It is just as credible from what has been written that Obama is 100% right that the British did not torture. And in addition his larger point that moral nations don&#8217;t torture is right.</p>
<p>Your &#8220;gotcha&#8221; bullshit is just bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ani</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/23226/the-brits-tortured-too/#comment-1199472</link>
		<dc:creator>Ani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 00:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=23226#comment-1199472</guid>
		<description>My experience of him thus far as that he employs whatever revisionist history required, or refocuses the real issue to whatever suits the particular aim or sound bite he is trying to achieve.  This may also be part and parcel of the work of Favreau, his frat boy speech writer, who figures people don&#039;t remember that far back, so what different does it make to fudge a few facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My experience of him thus far as that he employs whatever revisionist history required, or refocuses the real issue to whatever suits the particular aim or sound bite he is trying to achieve.  This may also be part and parcel of the work of Favreau, his frat boy speech writer, who figures people don&#8217;t remember that far back, so what different does it make to fudge a few facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCMediagirl</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/23226/the-brits-tortured-too/#comment-1199469</link>
		<dc:creator>DCMediagirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 00:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=23226#comment-1199469</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;For instance, where did I claim that Wahhabis and Sufis were anything but peaceful?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wahhabi Islam is what&#039;s practiced in Saudi Arabia. It is the extremist form of Islam that is taught in the radical madrassahs that encourage the types of practices that we all abhor.  Sufis are the mystics.  So there is a difference. That was my point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>For instance, where did I claim that Wahhabis and Sufis were anything but peaceful?</p></blockquote>
<p>Wahhabi Islam is what&#8217;s practiced in Saudi Arabia. It is the extremist form of Islam that is taught in the radical madrassahs that encourage the types of practices that we all abhor.  Sufis are the mystics.  So there is a difference. That was my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCMediagirl</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/23226/the-brits-tortured-too/#comment-1199465</link>
		<dc:creator>DCMediagirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 00:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=23226#comment-1199465</guid>
		<description>Viking:   I don&#039;t even know what that means. Just say what you mean and stop speaking in riddles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viking:   I don&#8217;t even know what that means. Just say what you mean and stop speaking in riddles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ulysses S. Moss</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/23226/the-brits-tortured-too/#comment-1199429</link>
		<dc:creator>Ulysses S. Moss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 22:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=23226#comment-1199429</guid>
		<description>What the revisionists fail to understand is that any investigation and prosecution into former officials of the United States also means 
Self Prosecution for all Americans including themselves. 
 You are allowing the world to have final verdict of guilt on the US which is forever. 
  
&lt;strong&gt;Self Prosecution!!! &lt;/strong&gt; 
So Ironic!...Isn&#039;t it!
 
I&#039;m, just totally surprised that you can&#039;t see this but, of course I have had to defend America in other countries and cultures so I have had practice. 
 
&lt;strong&gt;I will stand by my country again right now and do whatever it takes to prevent this national collapse.&lt;/strong&gt; 
Democrats have put themselves on the highest of pedestals. They are now boxed in a corner on National Security. 
If the slightest of events should happen out of the  perception of weakness, Democrats will suffer the largest collapse in political history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the revisionists fail to understand is that any investigation and prosecution into former officials of the United States also means<br />
Self Prosecution for all Americans including themselves.<br />
 You are allowing the world to have final verdict of guilt on the US which is forever. </p>
<p><strong>Self Prosecution!!! </strong><br />
So Ironic!&#8230;Isn&#8217;t it!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m, just totally surprised that you can&#8217;t see this but, of course I have had to defend America in other countries and cultures so I have had practice. </p>
<p><strong>I will stand by my country again right now and do whatever it takes to prevent this national collapse.</strong><br />
Democrats have put themselves on the highest of pedestals. They are now boxed in a corner on National Security.<br />
If the slightest of events should happen out of the  perception of weakness, Democrats will suffer the largest collapse in political history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viking</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/23226/the-brits-tortured-too/#comment-1199362</link>
		<dc:creator>viking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=23226#comment-1199362</guid>
		<description>Cindy and Andrew 191-

Thanks for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cindy and Andrew 191-</p>
<p>Thanks for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew 191</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/23226/the-brits-tortured-too/#comment-1199331</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew 191</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 19:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=23226#comment-1199331</guid>
		<description>Rapport building takes time, and time is not always a luxury that we have. 9/11 knocked us so far backward that we were completely in the dark regarding future attacks. It was not unreasonable to operate on an assumption that further attacks were on their way. In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, massive and extreme measures were needed to get our intelligence and defenses up to speed and to a complexity that put us back on top of the game. In the face of unknown attacks, there is no way to determine how much time you have to uncover them, so it seems reasonable to operate on the shortest timeline possible, and use the most extreme tactics allowable in our defense. I&#039;m sure it was possible to turn down the sense of urgency after we had more confidence in our intelligence network. Using more subtle methods now is appropriate. But the differences between then and now are quite different, and it is not fair to compare tactics used then to the tactics that may be used now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rapport building takes time, and time is not always a luxury that we have. 9/11 knocked us so far backward that we were completely in the dark regarding future attacks. It was not unreasonable to operate on an assumption that further attacks were on their way. In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, massive and extreme measures were needed to get our intelligence and defenses up to speed and to a complexity that put us back on top of the game. In the face of unknown attacks, there is no way to determine how much time you have to uncover them, so it seems reasonable to operate on the shortest timeline possible, and use the most extreme tactics allowable in our defense. I&#8217;m sure it was possible to turn down the sense of urgency after we had more confidence in our intelligence network. Using more subtle methods now is appropriate. But the differences between then and now are quite different, and it is not fair to compare tactics used then to the tactics that may be used now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pm317</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/23226/the-brits-tortured-too/#comment-1199326</link>
		<dc:creator>pm317</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 19:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=23226#comment-1199326</guid>
		<description>arran, we encourage participation to the fullest extent at NQ. Don&#039;t be deterred or hesitant to say what is on your mind. Some people will hijack the thread and make it unpleasant but we&#039;ll deal with it as and when it happens. Thank you for being a loyal NQ patron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>arran, we encourage participation to the fullest extent at NQ. Don&#8217;t be deterred or hesitant to say what is on your mind. Some people will hijack the thread and make it unpleasant but we&#8217;ll deal with it as and when it happens. Thank you for being a loyal NQ patron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arran</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/23226/the-brits-tortured-too/#comment-1199310</link>
		<dc:creator>arran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 19:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=23226#comment-1199310</guid>
		<description>pm317--I apologize for my memory loss and can&#039;t excuse not looking the analogy up because I had a late am appointment.  I will re-think the whole shebang.  

After the primary as a Hillary supporter, I despised the attacks.  I believe they merely polarize people and just work people up in an unnecessary rage. I will not be badgered in S(ing)TFU.

DCMediagirl:  I&#039;ve scanned your comment below.  It will be the very, very, rarest of moments if I ever reply to your comments again.  That decision will save me a lot of time for *civil discourse*.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pm317&#8211;I apologize for my memory loss and can&#8217;t excuse not looking the analogy up because I had a late am appointment.  I will re-think the whole shebang.  </p>
<p>After the primary as a Hillary supporter, I despised the attacks.  I believe they merely polarize people and just work people up in an unnecessary rage. I will not be badgered in S(ing)TFU.</p>
<p>DCMediagirl:  I&#8217;ve scanned your comment below.  It will be the very, very, rarest of moments if I ever reply to your comments again.  That decision will save me a lot of time for *civil discourse*.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew 191</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/23226/the-brits-tortured-too/#comment-1199301</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew 191</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 19:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=23226#comment-1199301</guid>
		<description>Wonderful point Viking, but it is probably wasted on Sabina and DC. It&#039;s a waste of time and reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful point Viking, but it is probably wasted on Sabina and DC. It&#8217;s a waste of time and reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/23226/the-brits-tortured-too/#comment-1199266</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 18:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=23226#comment-1199266</guid>
		<description>viking--- i think your comments are very well articulated and I whole-heartedly agree.  And you made me laugh out loud when you wrote  &quot;being a female....oh wait&quot;. 
You&#039;re alright in my book!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>viking&#8212; i think your comments are very well articulated and I whole-heartedly agree.  And you made me laugh out loud when you wrote  &#8220;being a female&#8230;.oh wait&#8221;.<br />
You&#8217;re alright in my book!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew 191</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/23226/the-brits-tortured-too/#comment-1199256</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew 191</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 17:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=23226#comment-1199256</guid>
		<description>If anyone is guilty of ad hominem attacks, childish foot stomping, patrinizing observations, and deliberate misreading of material, it&#039;s YOU!

While you are obviously so proud of your knowledge of all things Islam, and couldn&#039;t resist regaling us all with your mastery of the subject, your whole lesson appears to be a response to your intentional misreading or distortion of my post. I intentionally referred to the people I was describing as the &quot;enemy&quot;. The &quot;enemy&quot; are the type of monsters that strap bombs to their children, and fly plane loads of people into buildings. I never indicated that all of the Muslims in the world are the enemy, (that is YOUR disgusting distortion) but in the war on terrorism I think it is safe to say that the &quot;enemy&quot; are all muslims; bred, raised, and molded in the cultures that I ACCURATELY described. By far, most of the 9/11 terrorists came from Saudi Arabia where the brutality I wrote about is commonplace.

Be honest (if that&#039;s possible), your whole post is a bizarre response to points and arguments that I never made, and never would make. For instance, where did I claim that Wahhabis and Sufis were anything but peaceful? However, you clearly imply that I&#039;m ignorant for not understanding those sects, and you also imply that I don&#039;t understand the difference between Shia and Sunni. How do you know that I&#039;m not an expert on those subjects? How do you know that I&#039;m not a Suffi? Nothing I wrote indicates otherwise.  You quite often assume the ignorance of posters and your superior knowledge, without any evidence to back up your beliefs. What is in evidence though, and is revealed in your posts, is your stark prejudice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone is guilty of ad hominem attacks, childish foot stomping, patrinizing observations, and deliberate misreading of material, it&#8217;s YOU!</p>
<p>While you are obviously so proud of your knowledge of all things Islam, and couldn&#8217;t resist regaling us all with your mastery of the subject, your whole lesson appears to be a response to your intentional misreading or distortion of my post. I intentionally referred to the people I was describing as the &#8220;enemy&#8221;. The &#8220;enemy&#8221; are the type of monsters that strap bombs to their children, and fly plane loads of people into buildings. I never indicated that all of the Muslims in the world are the enemy, (that is YOUR disgusting distortion) but in the war on terrorism I think it is safe to say that the &#8220;enemy&#8221; are all muslims; bred, raised, and molded in the cultures that I ACCURATELY described. By far, most of the 9/11 terrorists came from Saudi Arabia where the brutality I wrote about is commonplace.</p>
<p>Be honest (if that&#8217;s possible), your whole post is a bizarre response to points and arguments that I never made, and never would make. For instance, where did I claim that Wahhabis and Sufis were anything but peaceful? However, you clearly imply that I&#8217;m ignorant for not understanding those sects, and you also imply that I don&#8217;t understand the difference between Shia and Sunni. How do you know that I&#8217;m not an expert on those subjects? How do you know that I&#8217;m not a Suffi? Nothing I wrote indicates otherwise.  You quite often assume the ignorance of posters and your superior knowledge, without any evidence to back up your beliefs. What is in evidence though, and is revealed in your posts, is your stark prejudice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

