RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Statement From Non-Tarp Lenders To Chrysler

In my April 2009 Market Review, I commented on how Uncle Sam is not a good business partner. Business Wire issued the following statement from Chrysler’s Non-TARP Lenders:

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–As of last night’s deadline, we were part of a group of approximately 20 relatively small organizations; we represent many of the country’s teachers unions, major pension and retirement plans and school endowments who have invested through us in senior secured loans to Chrysler. Combined, these loans total about $1 billion. None of us have taken a dime in TARP money.

As much as anyone, we want to see Chrysler emerge from its current situation as a viable American company, and we are committed to doing what we can to help. Indeed, we have made significant concessions toward this end – although we have been systematically precluded from engaging in direct discussions or negotiations with the government; instead, we have been forced to communicate through an obviously conflicted intermediary: a group of banks that have received billions of TARP funds.

What created this much-publicized impasse? Under long recognized legal and business principles, junior creditors are ordinarily not entitled to anything until senior secured creditors like our investors are repaid in full. Nevertheless, to facilitate Chrysler’s rehabilitation, we offered to take a 40% haircut even though some groups lower down in the legal priority chain in Chrysler debt were being given recoveries of up to 50% or more and being allowed to take out billions of dollars. In contrast, over at General Motors, senior secured lenders are being left unimpaired with 100% recoveries, while even GM’s unsecured bondholders are receiving a far better recovery than we are as Chrysler’s first lien secured lenders.

Our offer has been flatly rejected or ignored. The fact is, in this process and in its earnest effort to ensure the survival of Chrysler and the well being of the company’s employees, the government has risked overturning the rule of law and practices that have governed our world-leading bankruptcy code for decades.

We have a fiduciary responsibility to all those teachers, pensioners, retirees and others who have entrusted their money to us. We are legally bound to protect their interests. Much as we empathize with Chrysler’s other stakeholders, the capital is just not ours to contribute to their cause by accepting a deal that is outside the well established legal framework and cannot be rationalized as being commercially reasonable.

We are continuing to discuss our position with the United States Treasury. We have made a proposal which we earnestly believe is fair and would appropriately recognize our legal position.

As President Obama implied yesterday, it is likely that Chrysler will have to file Chapter 11 whether or not all lenders agree to any particular proposal. Chapter 11 is often used to help implement an agreed deal and dispose of unwanted legacy liabilities. We are hopeful and optimistic that we will reach a positive resolution of our issues so that all stakeholders will move forward together to implement Chrysler’s “quick trip” restructuring in an un-contested proceeding. Our Group will never initiate a bankruptcy filing on Chrysler – that is a decision for the Company and the Administration to make.

As we all appreciate, laws are the foundation of our economy and society. Despite recent travails, our country remains the economic envy of the world and the United States remains a vital engine of global growth. The rule of law made it that way. We urge that people remember this and not succumb to unproductive and unwarranted finger pointing.

Sincerely,

The Committee of Chrysler Non-Tarp Lenders

This statement speaks for itself. My only comment is in regard to the creditors’ final assertion. Chipping away, if not crushing, the rule of law in our economy and society will come at a VERY HIGH price. I believe government representatives are misinformed and unappreciative of that price. I encourage investors and the public at large to remain vigilant and vociferous on this issue.

Please start by sharing your your thoughts and sentiments here.

LD

  • HARP

    So basically Obama wants to rob the pensions of one group to satisfy his supporters in the UAW even though the first group are secured and the UAW are unsecured. Sounds like spreading the wealth to me.

  • Docelder

    Yes, and with a double helping of pay to play to boot. But heck, anybody wealthy enough to have a pension plan doesn’t really need a pension plan to begin with… right? The very gall of those folks hoarding money at a time like this? But seriously, I would lean toward it looking just like a redistribution, except for the fact that the government has taken over Chrysler and the TARP banks. Redistribution would be a lot easier a pill to swallow than what this has the appearance of.

  • panjoe

    Are we a nation of laws or is it pay to play now? If it is pay to play, I will not be playing since I have no more money. Oh well…

  • shadow

    If you notice, Obama is systematically paying back all of his campaign supporters at everyone else’s expense.

  • Peggy Sue

    My sister falls into this group that’s being labeled “vultures” by various members of Congress. She was an Obama supporter, so I’m fairly confident she was shocked to find that “he did not side” with her point of view, which is that of an ordinary bond holder, heavily invested in Chrysler and GM because afterall, her financial advisor said: they’re the backbone of America.

    So, okay. We can say she should have been wiser, should have done her homework. But she was widowed at age 49 and trusted the financial advisor her husband had always used. She’s taken a sizeable hit in all her funds, just as I have, just as the rest of the public has. She’s now 56 with no way of making up her losses, and now she’s told along with thousands of others to get to the back of the line. Worse yet, she’s being told how greedy and unreasonable she is?

    Outrageous.

  • PamFlorida

    Greedy-I think not. People invest in bonds precisely because they are the most secure and are legally entitled to be repaid before any other creditor.
    The UAW members are victims of bad economic policy and poor management. They will suffer eventually.
    The government has no legal right to negotiate or determine the outcome of any bankruptcy proceeding.
    If I was a bond holder, I wouldn’t give them a dime.

  • Pennsylvania Red
  • Docelder

    People invest in bonds precisely because they are the most secure

    and traditionally the least risky. But all of that has changed. The fallout may be that people will not invest in bonds, and may withhold investment into these areas where we actually need it most and where it could do us the most good. More unintended consequences. Let us hope every business the government touches does not turn into some composite hybrid of the post office and a housing project.

  • I’m a Linda too

    THANK YOU for this post.

    Hmmm, Obama doesn’t want to be in the car industry, huh? indeed…NOT. Actually, he is correct, he doesn’t want to be in the car industry, but he DOES want to be the one calling the shots for the auto indusstry.

    He has a woody at the power he has claiimed and hanging over heads and exactly what he wants for the Banks.

    So, will Obama place his special interests further above the security and well being of our country and its citizens?

    …to be continued.

  • Objective Analysis

    Rule of law?

    Wow, i guess the lawless one (BHO) wants to have everyone not follow the rule of law.

    Is this a new revelation?

    I like how the shareholders at Bank of America ousted the CEO and didn’t let Fascist Obama and hi minions do the work that they can do themselves.

  • J.J. (The P.U.M.A.)

    I would like to challenge one, and only one, assertion by the non-TARP lenders. Secured creditors are entitled to all of the proceeds from secured assets before non-secured debt gets anything from those proceeds. But, to the extent secured debt does not pay off the secured debt, the remainder owed has no better right than the unsecured debt.

    Having said that, I am in total agreement with the non-TARP lenders. The people they represent have a legal right to a larger piece of the pie than what was offered, and they must protect that right. It is not their money to give away.

    The real reason for this impasse was that the President was trying to intimidate the non-TARP lenders into taking a big haircut so that the UAW would take little or none.

  • J.J. (The P.U.M.A.)

    One thing about the auto workers, with whom I have sympathy. They are being given the chance to become whole, or even better, through a huge equity position. If they make sacrifices going forward to make Chrysler successful, they will reap the rewards.

  • Portia Live-Free-or-Die Elizabeth

    Larry — I confess to being a total naif when it comes to all this juggling of corporations. Can you explain, based on TR’s management of trusts 100+ years ago, how he might’ve approached this mess?

  • DAB

    One of the commentators on CNBC was livid at Obama’s remarks regarding those who would not agree to his demands. He also implied that Obama never seemed able to admit that he is wrong or as he said it “take a hit”.

    I really don’t understand the details or implications of what is transpiring, but it was good to see someone who refused to tiptoe around That One.

    I notice that generally even when TV pundits disagree with what Obama does, they always add that it is nothing personal and that they “really, really like him” — as if that’s a given for everyone. Oh really???

  • nobody special

    GMAC bought Chrysler financial last night, isn’t that interesting. Some dealers are being forced to pay off all their inventories immediately…that’s gonna be hard for many of them.

  • jbjd

    My union – teachers – also supported BO. While people were reading why in the monthly newsletter, I was in the classroom, explaining to my students the difference between the Constitution’s requirement of “natural born citizen” and BO’s posted claims that he was a “native”; and the fact that no provision of any federal or state law requires any official to check whether he satisfied either status.

  • http://lenders.linkedz.info/2009/05/01/statement-from-non-tarp-lenders-to-chrysler-no-quarter/ Topics about Lenders » Statement From Non-Tarp Lenders To Chrysler : NO QUARTER

    [...] Larry Doyle put an intriguing blog post on Statement From Non-Tarp Lenders To Chrysler : NO QUARTERHere’s a quick excerptIn contrast, over at General Motors, senior secured lenders are being left unimpaired with 100% recoveries, while even GM’s unsecured bondholders are receiving a far better recovery than we are as Chrysler’s first lien secured lenders. … [...]

  • Miss H

    Wake up America; $trillions to offshore bankers; Fiat tries to take over Chrysler. Arrest the bankers who have moved almost all USA money offshore. Now they will use this money to buy up our infrastructure. Audit the Federal Reserve; all of the money is gone; we are being ruled by corporatist, global IMF bankers who care nothing about the American people; their god is $$$$$!

  • http://noquarter foxyladi14

    but.he owes so many..we will be bamkrupt before he gets to the last ones…..

  • http://noquarter foxyladi14

    follow the money trail..to find the crooks..

  • Greg

    I can’t believe they let you teach people. Judging from your comments here, you’re a moron

  • http://wjr.com/Article.asp?id=1301727&spid=6552 Daisyjane

    It seems a whole lot worse than this, folks. One of the lawyers for the non-TARP lenders was interviewed by WJR, Detroit’s flagship superstation. This came on his way to the bankruptcy hearing. It seems that the White House THREATENED one of his clients. You can hear for yourself. The comments come about 2:20 minutes in but I urge everyone to listen to the whole thing. It’s only nine minutes long.

    I’m 48 years old (although since Jan. 20, I feel more like 108, honestly). This is one of the scariest things I’ve ever heard. Our POTUS is not willing to bring the full force of the U.S. gov’t on the head of terrorists or dictators or other bad actors. But he IS willing to do it on a private U.S. citizen.

    http://wjr.com/Article.asp?id=1301727&spid=6552

    If this doesn’t scare the crap out of you, nothing will.

    (I’m no computer whiz. Hope I did it right!)

  • http://wjr.com/Article.asp?id=1301727&spid=6552 Daisyjane

    I hit the “send” button too fast. Sorry…

    One more thing (which is why I recommend listening to the entire audio)…the “vultures” are those “dangerous” groups like:

    Teachers pensions, individual’s 401(k) accounts, college endowments. All of this is covered in the interview. I suspect that if I did a bit more research tonight, I’d find there are a lot more institutional investors.

    Hope this interview is bumped to the top in hours more normal than these. LOL

  • Jim S

    We know who the “Idiot” is, and it’s not jdbd.

    We have a president that in his first 100 days has violated more laws than Bush did in 8 years. If he was a businessman and not POTUS, he would be under investigation for violations of the RICO act. He should be on his way to jail.

    Come to think of it, why isn’t anyone complaining about Michelle’s $540 designer SNEAKERS? Lot’s of people complained about Palin’s $400 outfit. Where are they now?

  • http://www.senseoncents.com Larry Doyle

    Daisyjane,

    Wow. Very scary stuff. Did this really happen? Why would the lawyer be willing to go on the radio and put his practice at risk without it having occurred.

    This interview needs to be aired far and wide.

    I am going to do exactly that with commentary.

  • Lisa

    J.J.
    So, you’re saying many of the country’s teachers unions, major pension and retirement plans and school endowments etc….should suffer and not get their money but the UAW can get theirs? The bond holder put money into Chrysler, how much money did the workers of Chrysler put in?

  • http://wjr.com/Article.asp?id=1301727&spid=6552 Daisyjane

    Larry,

    I think since the decision was made to head to bankruptcy court, Mr. Laurie was in full “I don’t give a sh*t mode” figuring a bankruptcy judge would sort it all out. I found this an absolutely stunning incident.

    But yes, it did happen. I’m originally from Ohio and I used to listen to WJR (because I liked Ernie Harwell..lol). They are THE major radio station in Detroit.

    More people should hear that audio. Perhaps someone with more skills than I have (computer-wise) will give it it’s own post, if worthwhile enough.

    I think we’re in deep doo-doo for the next four years.

  • http://wjr.com/Article.asp?id=1301727&spid=6552 Daisyjane

    Larry, ignore what I just posted. I completely missed your post. What a putz. LOL

    I need more tea, I tell ya. :)

  • http://egoldmine.info/ egoldmine.info

    egoldmine.info…

    Golisano: Consolidate Governments, Lower Taxes by btp on January 31, 2009@ 4: 58 pm·…

  • http://www.irishtimes.com/money/pension-funds/ pension fund

    ery nice article. Thanks, Really, Pensions are an attractive component

    of employee compensation packages. The money that the employer withholds
    during the working life of the employee is not taxed, and the money in a
    pension fund can be increased through investments. I would also like if
    you put these type of more article in coming future…….      

blog comments powered by Disqus