RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Bush Administration’s Dark Side: Torturing a Clerk

american torture.jpg

Joseph Margulies in the Los Angeles Times offers anyone who wants to defend the Bush administration’s embrace of torture a chilling retort.

His bottom line: the administration sold out the values Americans cherish most to torture not a kingpin in the al Qaeda network, but a clerk.

Margulies writes:

First, they beat him. As authorized by the Justice Department and confirmed by the Red Cross, they wrapped a collar around his neck and smashed him over and over against a wall. They forced his body into a tiny, pitch-dark box and left him for hours. They stripped him naked and suspended him from hooks in the ceiling. They kept him awake for days.

And they strapped him to an inverted board and poured water over his covered nose and mouth to “produce the sensation of suffocation and incipient panic.” Eighty-three times. I leave it to others to debate whether we should call this torture. I am content with the self-evident truth that it was wrong.

Second, his treatment was motivated by the bane of our post-9/11 world: rotten intel. The beat him because they believed he was evil. Not long after his arrest, President Bush described him as “one of the top three leaders” in Al Qaeda and “Al Qaeda’s chief of operations.” In fact, the CIA brass at Langley, Va., ordered his interrogators to keep at it long after the latter warned that he had been wrung dry.

But Abu Zubaydah, we now understand, was nothing like what the president believed. He was never Al Qaeda. The journalist Ron Suskind was the first to ask the right questions. In his 2006 book, “The One Percent Doctrine,” he described Abu Zubaydah as a minor logistics man, a travel agent.

Later and more detailed reporting in the Washington Post, quoting Justice Department officials, said he provided “above-ground support. … To make him the mastermind of anything is ridiculous.” More recently, the New York Times, relying on current and former intelligence officers, said the initial assessment was “highly inflated” and reflected “a profound misunderstanding” of Abu Zubaydah. Far from a leader, he was “a personnel clerk.”

– Steve Clemons

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

EDITOR’S NOTE: See also our LIVE CHAT and VIDEOS on the torture question.

  • HARP

    Why would anyone read the LAT and believe it is journalism?

  • benny

    LAT and NYT. yeah, they are open and honest (snark). poor Abu Zabaydah. he was a clerk/logistics man/travel agent. yeah right.

    Please prove it, and with more credible sources.

  • Cindy

    I’d just like to say that the Democrats, with Pelosi’s help, chose NOT to impeach Bush when they had the chance. And one reason the Dems in Congress were elected/re-elected in 2006 was because of their promise that they WOULD punish Bush. Not only did they NOT impeach him, they REWARDED him by continuing to fund the war.
    It’s time to move on and stop belly-aching about what Bush did. It’s too easy now to divert our attention from what Obama’s screw-ups are, by talking about that mean ol’ Bush administration.

  • Peggy Sue

    This is so-o-o disturbing. I know opinions are all over the place on this question. I also remember quite well the sense of shock we all felt on 9/11. A friend of mine, a native New Yorker, said for residents of the city and outlying areas, you could not get away from it for weeks, months. The devastation, the real fear of another attack was in your face–day-in, day-out.

    But this and other reports, years after the fact, makes me feel downright queasy. I think the idea of waterboarding is abhorrent. I think abusing prisoners is not who we say we are, who we imagine ourselves to be. But despite that, I was willing to say: let’s make sure it stops and move forward.

    Until I read a phrase in Larry’s Memo from the VIPS. Three words: Rape by instrumentality. It literally made my skin crawl.

    So, I did some research and found out that there is credible testimony that repeated body cavity searches were done to humiliate and inflict pain and that these searches were often done with absolute disregard to anything approaching decent behavior.

    That’s when I decided that “moving on” was equivalent to putting a bandaid on a gangrened limb.

    It cannot stand. Not if we as Americans, as a country at large, expect to come through this whole sad chapter in our history whole without irreparable damage. I don’t want show trials. I don’t want a political circus. I do want our justice system, the one that has served us in the past to serve us now.

    This cannot stand. For any reason.

    Btw, I also read the testimony of a MP at Guantanamo, Neeley I think the name is. One of our guys, a young guy who joined the military in 2000 and was completely unprepared to handle these detainees.

    He thought he was going to see the biggest, baddest terrorists in the world. For the most part, these prisoners were malnourished, wounded and incredibly weak. We even held a schizophrenic for several years. He wasn’t a terrorist, just another young guy who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. But the guys who turned him in collected a $2500 bounty.

    This is “not” a proud moment for this country. We need to fess up, so we can truly go on.

  • TeakWoodKite

    If one is against torture does “terrorist” man station matter?

    My thoughts are if we find the bad man (rotten human) and it resists capture, then 6 feet under it will go. If we capture these individuals, it is our humanity which directs us to NOT torture. Nevermind the law and Constitution.

    What is it about self preservation that invokes primal behavior?

    I am NOT picking a bone with anyone else here that may think the ends justify the means. At the same time I would not apologize for what was done in my name. Just fix it and hold accountable those who broke our laws.

  • http://noquarter foxyladi14

    this kind of abuse must never happen again.

  • Animal Control

    This cannot stand. For any reason.

    Ditto that! We’re either a country of Laws or we’re not!

  • Ladydawnelle

    GOD

    FORGIVE THEM

    FORGIVE US

    WE WILL NEVER FORGET

    NOT THEN

    NOT NOW

    NOT EVER!!!!

    ARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

    GGGGROWWWWWWWWWLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!

    PUMA 4 EVER

  • Diana L. C.

    In a large quarrel between countries or in a small quarrel between two people, when one combatant pulls the other to the low road, the other has the hardest job in remaining in the right as far as the country or the person is concerned: get back to the high road. We didn’t even try.

    I don’t care who the man is, torture is WRONG and it DOESN’T WORK, EXCEPT TO BRING SCORN TO THE PEOPLE WHO TORTURE.

  • Shainzona

    Want to make your blood boil? The MSM is reporting that there will be no prosecution for the “torture memos”.

    So they have now labeled this whole mess as relating to MEMOS – without the admission that those MEMOS led to actual torture.

    I am ashamed for my country right now.

  • http://noliinsipientiuminiuriaspati.blogspot.com/ adagioforstrings

    “They stripped him naked and suspended him from hooks in the ceiling.”

    This would be the only accusation that I would consider to be real torture. As for the rest, I had to put up with similar treatment growing up with four older brothers & minimal adult supervision.

    I’m skeptical as the accuracy of the so-called journalism & the veracity of the source, since Al Qaeda members are instructed in their training manual to always accuse their enemies of torture.

    I also find it highly disingenuous that a photo from Abu Grahib was linked to this story, since the actions at AG were not sanctioned by the US government & the perpetrators were court martialled.

    Roman numral I is that non-uniformed combatants are not covered by the Geneva Convention. The are viewed as spies & saboteurs. Unless you think that the CIA should be protected by the Geneva COnvention, there is no way on earth that Al Qaeda terrorists should receive the privilege.

  • lightacandle

    “adagioforstrings”:

    The United Nations INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS, in Article 7 says: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.”
    http://www.hrweb.org/legal/cpr.html

    “no one” means no one, war or no war.

    - – - – -

    The United Nations UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, of which Eleanor Roosevelt was the chairperson at its creation, says in Article Five: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”
    http://www.hrweb.org/legal/udhr.html

    That means NO ONE, war or no war.

    - – - – -

    We, as a nation have signed these treaties and, according to our Constitution, treaties are “the supreme Law of the Land”: “…and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land” http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html

  • NomNomNom

    apparently, that would be “not”.
    :mad:

  • NomNomNom

    except that the same people run BHO as ran Bush: “defense” contractors and the financial sector. Investigation of either will lead to the same sources. Imo, we should attempt to punish all corruption, previous, current, and future.

  • Retired

    Setting aside the question of torture, “just a personnel clerk” is an incredibly naive statement vis a vis the value of an interrogation subject. How would you like to get your hands on the “personnel clerk” who knows the identities and locations of all CIA NOC officers? Al Qaeda’s “personnel clerk” seems like a pretty good find to me.
    Which makes the torture of him all the more idiotic. What if we could persuade an Al Qaeda “personnel clerk” who knew the identities and locations of AQ operatives worldwide that he had been misled by bin Laden as to the Holy sanction of his cause and methodology and in so doing to cooperate with us willingly and tell us everyone and everything that he knew in order to save them from also being misled? Think that this can’t be done? Guess again. U.S. intelligence has turned incredible hard cases to our side. It isn’t easy. But when it happens, the information that you get is high quality and sometimes even plentiful because the intent is positive instead of the avoidance of pain.

  • BARB

    Of course there will be no prosecution…..Afterall, they would have to include Pelosi, Rockefeller and all the other Dems who knew of and approved of the torture..and they might as well include Hillary and Obama and all those who voted for the funding of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan over and over, which included funding for what was happening at GITMO. Did any of the Presidential candidates speak out against the torture…other than Kucinch and Nader? What a bunch of hypocrites.

  • gonzotx

    Let’s see…Waterboarding or beheading? Hmmmm

  • http://www.callitsocialism.com BigMIke

    BigMIke…

    I am So Lucky That I found your blog and great articles. I will come to your blog often for finding new great articles from your blog.I am adding your rss feed in my reader Thank you…

  • NomNomNom

    Yes, Mckinney, & probably more times than all the rest of them combined

blog comments powered by Disqus