RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Is Obama’s auto czar using blackmail on Perella-Weinberg/Xerion?

Editor’s Note: Stay tuned for the next story up by Larry Doyle, “Hedge Fund Manager Responds to Barack’s Bullying.”

Just three days ago, No Quarter, a handful of blogs and a thimbleful of major media caught on to the Chrysler holdout firms’ attorney, Tom Lauria, and his accusations that Obama’s auto czar, Steven Rattner, threated to destroy P-W’s reputation if they continued to oppose the government orchestrated sell out of Chrysler to Fiat SpA.

Perella-Weinberg has a stake in Chrysler via their Xerion [Capital] Fund. Chrysler, itself, is currently owned by Cerberus Capital Management LP. Try to keep all these names straight… these players are going to continue to reappear, along with some others you may not know about.

Per Law Shucks, and via Andrew Sorkin at the NYTs Dealbook, Lauria added more detail to that threat in a follow up interview with Jake Tapper.

In a follow-up interview with ABC News’s Jake Tapper, [Lauria] identified Mr. Rattner, the head of the auto task force, as having told a Perella Weinberg official that the White House “would embarrass the firm.”

It’s no surprise that the WH denied the event ever took place. And yesterday Perella-Weinberg issued their carefully parsed statement as well.

Suggestions have been made that the Perella Weinberg Partners Xerion Fund changed its stance on the Chrysler restructuring due to pressure from White House officials. This is incorrect. The decision to accept and support the proposed deal was made by the Xerion Fund after reflecting carefully on the statement of the President when announcing Chrysler’s bankruptcy filing. In considering the President’s words and exercising our best investment judgment, we concluded that the risks of potentially severe capital loss that could arise from fighting this in bankruptcy court far outweighed any realistic potential upside.

We have a very specific mandate from our investors, and that is to carefully weigh investment risks and rewards. It is not our investment mandate to pursue political or risky legal campaigns with our investors’ money. This was our assessment of investment risk and reward, nothing else.

While we did and still do believe that the lenders would be justified in pressing their objections under conventional bankruptcy law principles, we believe a settlement would now be in the best interests of all parties in the context of avoiding a drawn out contested bankruptcy litigation proceeding, and we encourage our colleagues in the loan syndicate to pursue this immediately.

Note very carefully, Perella-Weinberg spokespersons have not denied the charges of White House strong arming. Instead, in no uncertain terms, P-W has chosen to use the promise of heavy litigation costs …. with a questionable outcome… as their reason for a change of heart. Surely they would have known this before signing on to the lawsuit. Could they be this under-informed at the onset?

History… plus their choice of legal representation, belies this possibility. Lauria has been in this same spot for his clientele before with a previous decision in Adelphia Communications.

Here the bankruptcy judge refused requests by Lauria, representing first lien holders, to appoint a trustee to oversee disputes, and to disqualify a chief Adelphia bankruptcy counsel. The bench considered this a “nuclear war button” threatening obliteration of a crucial $17.6 billion deal, selling Adelphia’s assets to cable rivals, Time Warner and Comcast.

Key to the judge’s decision was that a failed sale due to delays could incur higher costs in penalties to Adelphi, and that the assets could be sold prior to the creditor challenges to the planned reorganization by using Section 363 of the US Bankruptcy Code under Chapter 11.

In the same vein, Obama’s orchestrating a forced asset sale to what will be a government and union owned company, [55% to UAW, 10% to government/secured lenders] known as Fiat SpA, prior to Lauria’s Chrysler claims being heard.

But there’s way too much crony’ism going on with Rattner as Obama’s auto czar. As the ever astute Missy pointed out at the end of March, Rattner’s conflicts of interest in oversight are tenacled.

Rattner is co-founder and senior executive of the Quadrangle Group, under investigation for it’s alleged roll in a kickback scheme in concert with Henry “Hank” Morris, and former New York deputy comptroller, David Loglisci, and involving the New York State Common Retirement Fund. Both Morris and Loglisci were arrested in March of this year, charged with 123-count state criminal indictment that included money-laundering, enterprise-corruption and bribery charges.

So far, the most indepth round up of the doin’s between Rattner’s Quadrangle, and Rattner himself with documented meetings with Morris, and Loglisci comes from The New Republic’s Marty Peretz.

I’ll let you read thru the whole unsavory story itself, but it appears that Mr. Loglisci co-produced one loser of a flick called “Chooch” which lost about $700K after a brief run in three theatres. Rattner’s Quadrangle Group decided to do a quid pro quo, and avoided crucial reporting requirements by using a subsidiary to buy the DVD rights to this movie for $88K. Shortly thereafter, magically, Loglisci… in charge of managing some of the NY pension funds… slide $100K from the fund to Rattners Quadrangle Group for investment purposes.

AKA… pay to play.

Andrew Ross Sorkin’s article also adds more fodder to the story, saying Rattner turned to Morris for his specific placement services for the NY pension funds after meeting the then managing director of private markets for the New York City comptroller, Josh Wolf-Powers. Mr. Powers informed Rattner that “he could not think of any investment firm that had persuaded the city’s pension fund to invest without using a placement agent.” [Mata note: remember this statement...]

Thus the relationship between Rattner, and the now charged Morris, began.

As if the pay to play investigation weren’t enough on it’s own, there’s the incestuous relationship between Quadrangle Group and Cerberus – Chrysler owner. Again, back to Law Shucks brief summary on the situation, Quadrangle received a loan from Cerberus in which they are now technically in default.

Cerberus Capital Management LP, the current owner of Chrysler LLC, lent Rattner’s Quadrangle $125 million as part of the financing for the buyout of Maxim magazine and music publication Blender. As both titles limp through the drop in advertising revenue, Cerberus wants more capital invested to cover the debt levels, a request that Quadrangle has balked at. The two remain at loggerheads over the issue with Cerberus claiming the loans are technically in default.

As one source told the New York Post (NWS 9.85 ↑6.37%), “Cerberus is about to foreclose on the loan to Quadrangle, and now Steve Rattner is going to be the boss of Cerberus.”

Rattner is, of course, the “boss” of Cerberus via his Obama appointment as auto czar to Chrysler… aka Cerberus.

Simple translation? Rattner’s Quadrangle Group is one of Chrysler/Cerberus creditors in default… and he’s in charge of structuring their asset sell off.

Yeah. No conflict there…

Okay… I told you all the above so I could get to this moment. Just what is it the Obama admin (via his) auto czar have on P-W, aka Xerion Capital as the Chrysler first lien investor, to “embarrass” or “ruin their reputation”?

One’s first thoughts turn to Rahm’bo. And while there are, again, the tenacles of connection, that doesn’t pan out as planned. As Timothy Carney at the Washington Examiner reports today, Obama’s Chief of Staff and ballet-dancing tough guy has his own ties to Perella-Weinberg… taking in over $16 mil in his two-and-a-half years between the Clinton White House and Congress. Other publications, such as ProPublica.org and CNN actually put that figure at $18 million.

If one thinks that Rahm’bo was pulling strings with a former employer, I consider it unlikely. A quick look at Joseph Perella’s campaign contributions show he is anything but on Rahm’bo’s side of the political aisle. Records show Mr. Perella contributing a total of $29,600 to Obama’s rival, John McCain. But this would also explain why Rahm’bo also wouldn’t necessarily harbor any feelings to protect his former financial benefactor.

But then I ran across one of Tyler Durden’s (Zero Hedge) late February articles, examining just where the New York State Common Retirement System’s pension money was being invested. And among them are some very common names…

What is more curious is an often missed page in the Office Of The State Comptroller’s website (link here) in which the New York State Common Retirement Fund discloses its monthly indirect investment in other asset managers, be they private, public equity or real estate focused. Compiling the publicly available data from February 2007 yields some curious results. Turns out in 2007 the New York Common Fund invested over $5.9 billion directly into a plethora of other hedge and private equity funds, and a total of $7.3 billion net invested over the past 2 years. Some curious names that stand out:

Guggenheim, which received $100 million in May 2007 and a total of $500 million, and which has since shuttered;

Bear Stearns, which received $20 million in June 2007, after the blow up, only to see a the entire investment (including previous installments) of $490 redeemed in August, likely at a great loss;
The investment of $415 million in 24 assorted office properties in October 2007 (peak of the commercial real estate market) through a JV with Liberty Washington;

Apollo’s latest Investment Fund (VII), which received $350 million in August 2007, which somehow closed in late January with $15 billion in total commitments. Looks like New York ignored the stellar performance of the prior fund, in which most leveraged buyouts are currently bankrupt or on the verge;

BlackStone Real Estate Partners VI, in which the fund invested $800 million, and which closed in March 2008 with total commitments of $10.9 billion. Blackstone Real Estate became famous for its bidding war for the Equity Office Properties REIT which it won at the peak of the market with a final purchase price of $39 billion, and in which it invested almost $4 billion in equity, only to flip most of it to pay down the associated debt; they are likely stuck with the balance at a significantly underwater valuation.

Harbinger Capital Partners, which received a $71 million investment from the fund in 2007, and which is likely worth roughly 60 cents on the dollar;

Cerberus, which received $50 million in May 2007, and which might very well have been immediately funneled into such sterling investments as Chrysler and Aozora bank;

GoldenTree, which received $35 million in 2007, and is now running dutch auctions to offload all its illiquid holdings;

Xerion, which received $13 million in 2008, months after it was acquired by Perella Weinberg. As we have written, Joe Perella is probably the most important financial advisor in the country currently, advising the FDIC on its assorted activities (with very little information on how the process is compensated). If New York is invested in a fund which is run by a firm compensated by the FDIC, the potential conflict of interest here, absent further disclosure, could have massive proportions.

Is Rattner… who must be intimate to just what “placement agent” was used to gain access to NY pension funds… dragging Perella Weinberg via Xerion into the Henry Morris/David Loglisci investigation as a “threat”?

And then there’s the appearance of Cerberus on that same list…

Naturally, there can be instances where the NY Common Retirement Fund may indeed choose investments for their employees pension funds that are legitimate. But it does raise the question… are they tainted by the same contact? And is Rattner so absolutely sure of a common bond… ala running a possible P-W/Xerion pay to play scheme… that it would be an effective bully tactic to use as government blackmail?

Hopefully the really stellar guys at this… ala Naked Capitalism and Zero Hedge… will get to the bottom of it. But it’s food for thought.

Originally published at Flopping Aces.

  • I’m a Linda too

    Oh, no mistake. Rattner is dirty and involved in the pay for play schemes and under investigation in New York, so of course, he would use this tactic.

    Pension Fund Scandal Expands: Rattner’s Ties To Bill Richardson
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/22/pension-fund-scandal-expa_n_190347.html

    With Obama’s friends/administration, you don’t need a poster child of Blagojevich as the corrupt politician

  • I’m a Linda too

    PREZ AIDE TIED TO NY PENSION ‘GRAFT’

    By FREDRIC U. DICKER and BRENDAN SCOTT Post

    Last updated: 10:25 am
    April 17, 2009
    Posted: 1:45 am
    April 17, 2009

    ALBANY — President Obama’s point man in the auto-industry rescue was linked by the feds yesterday to New York state’s massive pay-to-play pension scandal.

    The Securities and Exchange Commission said an executive, identified by sources as Steven Rattner, used a politically connected middleman to steer a $150 million pension investment to the private equity firm he headed, Quadrangle Group LLC.

    http://www.nypost.com/seven/04172009/news/politics/prez_aide_tied_to_ny_pension_graft_164837.htm

  • politicalidentitycrisis

    Oh, dear. It looks like the MSM is going to have to get their sugar coat machine out again. If they’re smart, they just won’t ever put it away.

    Barack Hussein (insane) Obama, the most corrupt White House evah!

  • Docelder

    I think once the media turns, they will come at ObamaCo with a vengeance. They are still mad to this day at BushCo over WMD’s and the case made for war. ObamaCo has played the media for fools far beyond the level BushCo ever played them. Yes, there will be payback and scandal. ObamaCo loves crisis and the MediaCo loves scandal. These two deadly snakes are going to unwind from each other with their fangs out soon enough.

  • Tom Cat “wodie j” Jefferson Esq

    Cripes, the cockroaches are crawling out of the Obama/Dem machine……….yikes.

  • sanja1

    I just sent this comment to the Whitehouse.gov and of course did not ask for reply, as they never do!
    Well let me see if I understand the WH Chrsyler deal?! Rattner (your car czar) owns Quadrangle(sp) who owes Cerberius(sp) who owns Chrysler? This is how you get rid of his debt? Taking over the Chrysler company and awarding it to your political buddies (i.e., UAW). Now I really feel safe in knowing you are for the middle class people! Some day, I hope you will really sit down and take a look inside of your WH admin, and maybe understand that the American tax-paying citizens are feeling hoodwinked!

  • Cindy

    Thankyou, Mata H., for staying on top of this.
    And similar to Peter Pan’s pleading, let’s all keep clapping,and keep this story alive!

  • pacificisland

    No wonder Mr. Lauria was instructed by Perella-Weinberg/Xerion to make “no comment” today on Fox News about Rattner’s strong-arm threats. Mr. Lauria was able to say quite a bit, however, and it did not make the administration look good. This lawyers is not involved in the cesspool – he represents these and others in bankruptcy filings and has, by all accounts, a stellar reputation. He seemed to believe that the truth will come out and glad of it. I hope so.

  • pacificisland

    No wonder Mr. Lauria was instructed by Perella-Weinberg/Xerion to make “no comment” today on Fox News about Rattner’s strong-arm threats. Mr. Lauria was able to say quite a bit, however, and it did not make the administration look good. This lawyer’s is not involved in the cesspool – he represents these and others in bankruptcy filings and has, by all accounts, a stellar reputation. He seemed to believe that the truth will come out and glad of it. I hope so.

  • pacificisland

    No wonder Mr. Lauria was instructed by Perella-Weinberg/Xerion to make “no comment” today on Fox News about Rattner’s strong-arm threats. Mr. Lauria was able to say quite a bit, however, and it did not make the administration look good. This lawyer is not involved in the cesspool – he represents these and others in bankruptcy filings and has, by all accounts, a stellar reputation. He seemed to believe that the truth will come out and glad of it. I hope so.

  • pacificisland

    Sorry for the triple post!

  • Ornell

    Geez.

    Who to root for… I can’t stand Obama, but if there’s anyone/any group I like less, it’s hedge funds and these damned ’boutique firms’ like PW that have done more to destroy the foundation of our capitalist system than a million lifetimes of liberal entitlement programs could.

    Once upon a time, our securities markets were built on the idea of letting investors provide capital to companies who would then use it to grow, to innovate, and as such, to build the economy — more jobs, more products, more wealth earned through hard work by the recipients of that capital and the lenders of it.

    Firms like PW – and hedge funds like their Xerion – do not operate in that way. These are paper traders and paper pushers. Charlatans and leeches who use their place in the market not as investment vehicles in the pure sense and certainly not as seed capital for business — but to twist, to mutate, and to corrupt the market through a dizzying array of complex bundled securities, short selling, and other machinations that should make a true capitalist puke. The advent of CDOs? Look no further than your friendly hedge fund. The market manipulation by heavy hitting short sellers? Ditto.

    Funds like Xerion exist to destroy, to complicate, and to blaspheme the very foundation of our economic system. Their destruction would be a welcome step towards returning to the right fundamentals: If I have capital to invest, I invest it in a well-run company with good ideas. If that company performs well – offering a good product at a good price, we both profit.

    That’s how it should work… but that’s not how it works at most hedge funds (and I used to work at one). You’ll get laughed out of the room if you bother to examine the company itself – how well (or not well) it’s run, whether it’s got good product in the pipeline, whether it’s got a good strategy to sell that product, whether it’s a leading innovator in a field from Medical Devices to automobiles to flyswatters… you’re supposed to read the tea leaves of abstract capital flow, know the ins and outs of shady (motto: “immoral is not illegal unless it’s in the statutes”) dealing, and make sure your positioning has short term growth potential.

    How about if I root for the administration to succeed in destroying PW (and I could name several more firms I wish they’d take with them), then get impeached over illegal shenanigans in doing so?

    Best of both worlds.

  • olivia1998

    the truth will come out soon I hope. About all of them in this white house. Chicago thugs everyone of them

  • Peggy Sue

    Amazing story and complicated web of crossed purposes in all this. I guess this is a good example of “Chicago-style” business as usual.

    Thanks for the update. I think the WH made a big mistake with the “absolute denial” posturing. It will, no doubt, come back and bite them.

    Let’s hope so.

  • http://www.floppingaces.net/author/mataharley/ MataHarley

    You’re welcome, Cindy. And thanks, of course, goes to the original heads up on this from Susan and NQ to us.

    I suspect this is just “chapter two”…. I see the MSM is just beginning to pick up on the story. Better late than never.

  • J.J. (The PUMA)

    I think that the view expressed in the “Adelphia” link, that the secured creditors can “legally” have their security interests compromised through the bankruptcy provision that allows for the quick sale of assets is wrong. In the Adelphia case the attorney tried to delay the sale of assets until the claims of creditors were sorted out. That was denied because there was a reasonable offer on the table that could have been lost by delay.

    In the Chrysler case the attorney can directly challenge the sale on the grounds that it is not a reasonable offer.

    But all this assumes that the law will be followed. I think thre is a high risk to secured creditors that the bankruptcy judge will bend to the will of the administration.

  • http://www.floppingaces.net/author/mataharley/ MataHarley

    INRE the view on Adelphia, JJ… Naked Capitalism echoed the same opinion as U of Chicago’s law professor, Douglas Baird. Baird specializes in the instruction of corporate reorganizations and contract law.

    Whether his interpretation is correct on Section 363 of the bankruptcy code, and your thought that one offer was “reasonable” and the other not? All that would be up to a judge, ruling on a specific case. There are no absolutes, eh?

  • http://noquarter foxyladi14

    but they will call them love bugs,or at worse water bugs.eeeeeeek..

  • http://! stodgie

    i think back to the bush years sometimes. i remember telling people that tax cuts won’t work especially with peddle to the metal spending. i told them iraq was a tragic mistake. of course i was attacked for my “errors” as it were. now here we are. the arrogance and false bravado are gone. ok, with the bush people it is gone. we have the same arrogance false bravado with the dims. and in the end we’ll see the same bull. the media will turn on obama one of these days and try to pretend just like they did with bush. go down memory lane and remember the new york times enthusiam for the march to war. the cable whiners all thought bush was “it”. now they are liberals? i think not! they are suckups who don’t to work just take occasional dictation.

    obambi may think he is pushing people around now, but they’ll be pushing back. the only question is when.

  • http://lighthousepatriotjournal.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/nancy-pelosi-are-you-serious/ Nancy Pelosi: “Are You Serious”? « Lighthouse Patriot Journal

    [...] and using federal funding to blackmail state governments and private industry to tow the line of the Obama Nation Administration or be cut [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus