So if someboby IS mongering, it is Clinton (and Obama) and goon-hearted liberal Americans command ME to stop. Why do you NOT command Bush, Clinton and Obama to stop?

Another difference between me and you is that I have actually spent time in Iran and once upon a time could more or less get by in the language.

Yet another difference is that I have first-hand experience and actual knowledge of the Middle East and Islam.

And finally, I understand that it is not Iran that is the enemy of the United States, it is the United States that has decided to be the enemy of Iran.

I don’t romanticize anyone or anything. I don’t have to. More to the point, unlike you I do not demonize, which is, after all, just the flip side of the romanticization coin, isn’t it?

I, for one, think this would be a good thing for humanity, including American humanity. Being the world’s biggest bully doesn’t benefit Americans any more than it benefits the rest of the world.

Fred C. Dobbs, Remember when the King of Saudi Arabia summoned Cheney? What’s your best guess on what that was all about?

Ah, WHAT a set up line, all I can see is Cheney bending over, his big behind being paddle spanked by the King…

And I think both men are connected to each other through corruption.

I have no illusions about the the mullahs, bottom line, money talks.

More Rev Wright, than Jesse, Sr…

So tell me Shirin, what do you think?

Don’t romanticize those fools, those who hang gay men for the crime of being gay are not to feared.

And if you believe the micro, you are misguided, they just are not that good, you are not seeing your enemy.

Well, I still enjoy your posts…

Iran will be a victim of it’s own ideology like Bush, and the neocon nancys.

And don’t always be so quick to blame the US, look at what other countries, do, too, in the name of global economies.

Period.

There’s a new dance in town, there’s always a new dance in town, best to stay current.

NO, we’re not, we’re telling a bunch of mediocre jealous hearts if they get out of line, they’ll be held accountable. And the people of Iran? I would hope Clinton would help to free them, while maintaining US strategic position. This sometimes takes years, like the cold war it is a long term goal.

No way could Clinton take that issue off the table, nuclear bombing, at this point, given what the doofus Cheney and the porn star rockets have done to the middle east and the perception of American power there. They have undermined it through the overuse of stupid threats, and actual violence, in the form of ropeadope strategy, and the use of torture, and white phosphorus.

Clinton would have looked like an Obama amateur if she had said nukes were off the table. No one under any circumstances thinks nukes are acceptable, but really, once dumbo Cheney and Bush are gone, which government now has the mantle of king kookoo butt?

Why, those handsome men of Iran.

Each situation is unique, any foreign policy toward Iran has to be considered within a greater context, Clinton understands this, it is simply out of the lil bama’s league, and I have yet to hear what McCain’s lobbyists think.

There are no absolutes, you really have ot broaden your thinking, violence is the LST thing anyone wants, it can and is easily defeated, even an aerial bombing really accomplishes nothing, when in the hands of a donut like Cheney, and his lil buddy, Addington.

Iran really may face a bigger enemy in Russia than the US, anyway, it should watch it’s back, friends aren’t always friends, esp where oil is concerned…

Clinton has to clean it up.

So many factors have to be considered, for her to answer any other way at this point would have been ill advised.

Obama will not be elected President, but his staff would be worse than Bush’s, a bunch of fifth rate advisers, with NO experience, or really understanding of strategy, at all.

And since he can’t lead, like Bush, where’s it going to come from the geniuses who have run his disaster of a campaign?

He’s laughable.