RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Pakistan: In the Clutches of Pincers [Update on Nukes]

First, let me apologize for the disheveled organization of this post, since I have a lot of incongruent pincer-like situations on my mind, but — nevertheless — I have been trying to stay up on the latest news coming out of Pakistan because, dammit, it’s so important and because most media aren’t covering it in depth. Our Hillary, of course, is on top of everything in Pakistan, and has issued a special plea to all Americans to donate $5 — which I think would be a remarkable gesture of goodwill that will pay off far more than the amount of money sent. Hillary’s idea is one of many small steps we can all take to try to turn around the virulent anti-Americanism prevalent in Asia. Here’s the plan: “Using your cell phones, Americans can text the word “swat” — to the number 20222 and make a $5 contribution that will help the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees provide tents, clothing, food, and medicine to hundreds of thousands of affected people.” (See more about this program below.)

The two pincers putting the squeeze on Pakistan are 1) its mainstream majority population, and 2) its extremist, fundamentalist minority that is now getting armed to the teeth and swept up by the Taliban. In between is the Pakistani Army, which has no experience in counterinsurgency operations and is using conventional warfare to fight the well-armed Taliban, blowing up entire towns and dwellings, which has caused a massive refugee crisis — the largest of its kind since Rwanda — and for which Pakistan made NO advance preparations.

Here are some illuminating videos I’ve found that I’d like to share with you because they taught me so much. Included in the first two are Hillary Clinton’s statements.

From WorldFocus.org, an excellent backgrounder on the Swat Valley crisis, with these explanations to set up the video:

United Nations figures show that over 1.45 million people have been displaced by ongoing violence in Pakistan since May 2.

The immense strain of this humanitarian crisis is challenging the Pakistani government as it tries to avoid internal dissent against the consequences of its anti-Taliban military campaign.

The U.S. has pledged more than $100 million dollars in emergency assistance for Pakistan.

Ahmad Kamal, Pakistan’s former ambassador to the United Nations, joins Martin Savidge to discuss the situation in the refugee camps and how the military campaign is going.

*************************************

From Hillary Clinton’s statement, posted at the State Department’s Web site:

Humanitarian Aid to Pakistan

[...]

Americans can use technology to help, as well. Using your cell phones, Americans can text the word “swat” — to the number 20222 and make a $5 contribution that will help the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees provide tents, clothing, food, and medicine to hundreds of thousands of affected people. And before I came over here, we did that in the State Department. So we are making some of the first donations to this fund.

President Obama and I hope that individuals who have fled the conflict will be able to return home quickly, safely, and on a voluntary basis. Some have already gone back to their communities. And as they do, the United States stands ready to help Pakistan’s government support displaced persons as they rebuild their lives.

But as long as this crisis persists, our assistance will continue. We face a common threat, a common challenge, and now a common task. And we know that the work ahead is difficult, but we have seen an enormous amount of support and determination out of the Pakistani government, military, and people in the last weeks to tackle the extremist challenge. And we’re confident that with respect to the humanitarian challenge the people of Pakistan and their government, as well as the international community, can come together and forge not only the assistance that is needed, but stronger bonds for the years ahead.

*************************************

These two CNN videos are CRITICAL to view. The first gives you great background information on what’s going on in Pakistan, and the second discusses the disturbing developments in Pakistan’s nuclear weapons arsenal:

Crisis in Pakistan 2:25
CNN’s Ivan Watson reports on the first pictures from the battles between Pakistan’s army and the Taliban.

Is Pakistan adding nukes? 1:57
CNN’s Chris Lawrence looks at satellite photos that indicate Pakistan is building a nuclear reactor.

UPDATE: “Pakistan Is Rapidly Adding Nuclear Arms, U.S. Says

[...]

During a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee on Thursday, Senator Jim Webb, a Virginia Democrat, veered from the budget proposal under debate to ask Admiral Mullen about public reports “that Pakistan is, at the moment, increasing its nuclear program — that it may be actually adding on to weapons systems and warheads. Do you have any evidence of that?”

It was then that Admiral Mullen responded with his one-word confirmation. Mr. Webb said Pakistan’s decision was a matter of “enormous concern,” and he added, “Do we have any type of control factors that would be built in, in terms of where future American money would be going, as it addresses what I just asked about?”

Similar concerns about seeking guarantees that American military assistance to Pakistan would be focused on battling insurgents also were expressed by Senator Carl Levin of Michigan, the committee chairman.
“Unless Pakistan’s leaders commit, in deeds and words, their country’s armed forces and security personnel to eliminating the threat from militant extremists, and unless they make it clear that they are doing so, for the sake of their own future, then no amount of assistance will be effective,” Mr. Levin said.

[...]

  • SHV

    My audio doesn’t work…But if that is the reactor that has been under constuction since ’06, that will Pakistan’s third weapons reactor. They are or will shortly be able to produce enough Plutonium for 40-50 weapons per year. Pakistan’s weapons program has been Uranium based but now it looks as if they are switching over to Plutonium cores.

    • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

      THANK YOU! You reminded me to add a quote from the New York Times that I collected yesterday. I’m posting it as an UPDATE at the end of the story.

      Sen. Jim Webb, one of my favorites, is on it.

  • Diana

    Thank you Susan for the information. I will go and donate to help. I hope many more will do the same.

    • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

      Bless your heart! I think that the symbolic value of the donations vastly outweighs the monetary amount. Every thing we do — every gesture, large or small — will make a difference in how the peoples of the rest of the world view us. And I love Hillary’s idea of getting individual Americans involved in helping that to happen.

      • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

        May I also suggest that each of us who has a blog add Hillary’s request to their blog?

  • Diana L. C.

    Is there informtion for all of us who have refused to get cell phones about how to send the money?

  • TeakwoodKite

    Great read SusunPC, Senator Webb is a leader.

    Pakistan is going thru a process of liquification…similar to the way adobe behaves in an earthquake.

    There too many fault lines to present it tied up with a bow, but what of India? You think they are not worried about this development?

    We saw how the diversion of Pakistani troops made it easier for the Taliban to make inroads. I wonder if they are serious about committing to counter-insurgency when expending focus and man power on more nukes.

    Why? BO included Pakistan in his “national security” remarks today along with Afghanistan. This is headed in the wrong direction.

  • Lisa

    I donated over $1,000.00 to Hillary’s campaign because I wanted Hillary to be our president. At this time $5.00 is at least a cheap lunch for me. If I’m going to donate, it will be in my community, not in another country. Everybody wants donations now, it is too much. Lets take care of our own.